5 - NAS Questionnaire With Data Privacy
5 - NAS Questionnaire With Data Privacy
5 - NAS Questionnaire With Data Privacy
Capitol University
Cagayan de Oro City
National Service Training Program
Presented to:
Mrs. Andrea Roselle C. Mabao
Presented by:
Advincula, Bea P.
Alcantara, Riadel S.
Amora, Mary Queen C.
Avila, Joanna Rica
Ayuda, Saint Angel Mish C.
Locsin, Rex Heins
Lumamba, Ludilyn T.
Maboloc, Rhonalyn A.
Obsioma, Nizel Desiree L.
Rafols, Maria Yrrah
Tadlas, Jesselle V.
Zea, Aaron Reijan N.
CE 107
Page 2 of 25
Contents
I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 3
Background of the Study ....................................................................................................................... 3
II. COMMUNITY PROFILE.................................................................................................................... 4
Rationale of the Study ............................................................................................................................ 4
Cultural Profile .......................................................................................................................................... 5
Social Profile ............................................................................................................................................. 6
III. GEOGRAPHICAL AND POLITICAL PROFILE ........................................................................ 7
Land Area and the Location .................................................................................................................. 7
Political Structure .................................................................................................................................... 8
Map of the DDU Community .................................................................................................................. 9
IV. PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA ......................................................................... 10
Profile of the Respondents .................................................................................................................. 10
Needs and Program Assessment ...................................................................................................... 14
V. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................. 18
VI. RECOMMENDATION .................................................................................................................. 18
VII. APPENDIX .................................................................................................................................... 19
Documentation ....................................................................................................................................... 19
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Letter ...................................................................................... 20
Questionnaires ....................................................................................................................................... 21
COMMUNITY MAP .................................................................................................................................. 23
BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................................................................................................................................... 24
Page 3 of 25
I. INTRODUCTION
Historical Profile
Barangay Camaman-an in Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines, has a diverse and storied
historical background that stretches back centuries. Before Spanish colonization, the area
was inhabited by indigenous peoples, predominantly the Higaonon tribe, who lived off the
land and engaged in traditional agricultural practices. With the arrival of the Spanish in
the 16th century, Camaman-an likely became part of the Spanish hacienda system, where
large tracts of land were controlled by Spanish settlers or the Church. Throughout the
Spanish colonial period, Camaman-an would have been influenced by Spanish culture
and governance, though the indigenous way of life persisted to a significant extent. The
American colonial period in the early 20th century brought further changes, with the
introduction of modern infrastructure and administrative structures. The barangay system,
which is still in place today, was established during this time, with Camaman-an becoming
an integral part of local governance.
In the post-war period, Camaman-an experienced rapid urbanization and
development, fueled by migration from rural areas and economic opportunities in the
growing city. The barangay transformed from a predominantly agricultural area into a
bustling residential and commercial hub, with a mix of traditional and modern influences
shaping its identity. Today, Barangay Camaman-an continues to thrive as a vibrant
community, home to a diverse population engaged in various economic activities. Its rich
history and cultural heritage remain integral to its identity, with efforts to preserve and
celebrate its past while embracing the challenges and opportunities of the present and
future.
Cultural Profile
Barangay Camaman-an in Cagayan de Oro City, like many areas in the Philippines,
boasts a rich cultural tapestry shaped by the interplay of various ethnicities, traditions,
and lifestyles. This barangay serves as a home to indigenous peoples, notably the
Bukidnon and Higaonon communities. These indigenous groups infuse the barangay with
their distinct cultural practices, beliefs, and languages, deeply rooted in reverence for the
land, nature, and ancestral heritage. From intricate music and dance performances to
sacred rituals honoring their ancestors, the Bukidnon and Higaonon people weave a
tapestry of tradition and resilience, preserving their cultural identity amidst modernization
and change.
Alongside indigenous populations, Barangay Camaman-an is inhabited by Christian
Filipinos, predominantly adherents of Roman Catholicism. Catholic traditions form an
integral part of community life, with church fiestas and religious observances fostering a
sense of unity and camaraderie among residents. Family values, hospitality, and respect
for elders shape the fabric of everyday life, strengthening social bonds and community
solidarity. While smaller in number, Muslim Filipinos from Maranao and Maguindanao
ethnicities also contribute to the cultural diversity of Barangay Camaman-an. Islamic
traditions, including prayer rituals, dietary practices, and social customs, imbue the
Page 6 of 25
community with a unique flavor, reflecting the intricacies of religious and cultural pluralism
that defines the Philippines. Despite differences in religious observance, mutual respect
and coexistence prevail, fostering harmony and understanding among diverse cultural
groups.
The lifestyle and livelihoods of Barangay Camaman-an residents are as diverse as the
cultural intricacies that defines them. Agriculture, encompassing farming and fishing,
remains a cornerstone of livelihood for many, particularly in rural areas where agricultural
traditions are deeply ingrained. Small-scale entrepreneurship, trade, and service-oriented
businesses thrive in urban pockets, reflecting the dynamic economic landscape of the
barangay. Traditional practices such as bayanihan (communal labor) and barter trading
may still be observed, underscoring the resilience and adaptability of community life in
Barangay Camaman-an.
Social Profile
Barangay Camaman-an, situated within the bustling city of Cagayan de Oro in the
Philippines, is not just a geographical entity but a vibrant community teeming with
diverse social dynamics, interactions, and structures. At the heart of Barangay
Camaman-an's social profile lie different family structures that serve as the cornerstone
of community life. Traditional Filipino values of close-knit family ties, respect for elders,
and intergenerational support permeate the fabric of social relationships within the
barangay. Extended families living in close proximity often share resources,
responsibilities, and celebrations, fostering a sense of belonging and mutual assistance.
While nuclear families are common, variations in family arrangements exist, influenced
by factors such as migration, urbanization, and socio-economic status.
Barangay Camaman-an is home to a myriad of community organizations, grassroots
initiatives, and civil society groups that play a pivotal role in addressing local needs and
promoting social cohesion. Barangay councils, youth organizations, women's groups,
and cooperatives serve as platforms for civic engagement, advocacy, and community
development initiatives. Through collaborative efforts and partnerships with government
agencies, non-profit organizations, and private stakeholders, these institutions mobilize
resources, build social capital, and empower residents to participate actively in shaping
the future of their barangay.
In conclusion, Barangay Camaman-an in Cagayan de Oro City is characterized by a
complex and dynamic social profile shaped by diverse demographic compositions,
family structures, social networks, community organizations, and the challenges that
confront residents. By unpacking these social dynamics through research and analysis,
stakeholders can develop targeted interventions, policies, and programs that promote
social inclusion, strengthen community resilience, and foster a sense of belonging and
well-being for all residents of Barangay Camaman-an.
Page 7 of 25
Updated Population
This study aims to determine the population of Barangay Camaman-an. Based on the
historical population, we may predict Camaman-an's population in 2024 by estimating
the population growth rate between 2015 and 2020 censuses. Furthermore, the growth
rate during this time was 2.78%. Using this growth rate and the 2020 population of
35,238, we may project the population in 2024 to be around 36,252 resident (PSA,
2024). The Barangay Camaman-an's population provides useful information for the
municipality's planning and decision-making processes for their community. However, it
is crucial that continuous monitoring and updating of demographic data is required to
refine and validate population estimates over time.
Estimating the population of Barangay Camaman-an is essential to the efficient
development and planning of cities in Cagayan de Oro City. This study provides a
reliable estimate of 36,252 residents, with the goal of increasing the quality of life for
residents in the barangay. This figure represents a snapshot of the demographic
landscape within the barangay, capturing the number of residents as of a specific point
in time. The population of Barangay Camaman-an, like many urban barangays, is
subject to fluctuations influenced by factors such as migration, birth rates, mortality
rates, and socio-economic dynamics.
Political Structure
Barangay Camaman-an, as one of the smallest administrative units in the Philippines,
play a vital role in local governance, community development, and democracy.
Understanding the political structure of Barangay Camaman-an is essential for
comprehending the dynamics of governance at the grassroots level. The political
structure of a barangay is organized hierarchically, with roles and responsibilities
distributed among various officials and bodies.
At the apex of the Barangay Camaman-an government is the Barangay Assembly,
composed of all registered voters in the barangay. The Barangay Assembly convenes
periodically to discuss local issues, propose resolutions, and participate in decision-
making processes. Directly elected by the Barangay Assembly is the Barangay Captain,
who serves as the highest-ranking official and chief executive of the barangay. Assisting
the Barangay Captain are the Barangay Councilors, elected representatives who form
the Sangguniang Barangay or Barangay Council. Together, they enact ordinances,
approve budgets, and oversee barangay affairs. The following names are the key
officials of Barangay Camaman-an;
Barangay Captain/Punong Barangay:
Hon. Carl Harrison “Kuya Bodie” D. Galarrita
Barangay Kagawads:
Hon. Alicia Y. Cabili:
Page 9 of 25
Bar Graph 1.0 shows that for the total of 30 respondents, 10 or thirty four
percent (34.00%) of the respondents were 26 to 35 years old, 8 or twenty seven
percent (27.00%) of the respondents were 36 to 45 years old, 7 or twenty three
percent (23.00%) of the respondents were 18 to 25 years old, 4 or thirteen percent
(13.00%) of the respondents were 46 to 56 years old while 1 or three percent
(3.00%) of the respondents were 57 to 67 years old and above.
Page 11 of 25
Bar Graph 1.1 shows the demographic profile of respondents with respect to their
gender.
Bar Graph 1.1
Profile of the Respondents According to Gender
Bar Graph 1.2 shows the demographic profile of respondents with respect to their
occupation.
Bar Graph 1.2
Profile of the Respondents According to Occupation
Page 12 of 25
Bar Graph 1.2 shows that residents in Barangay Camaman-an for the total of
30 respondents, 12 or forty percent (40.00%) among them were jobless, 9 or thirty
percent (30.00%) are self-employed, 6 or twenty percent (20.00%) of them were
private employee, and 3 or ten percent (10.00%) of them were entrepreneur.
Bar Graph 1.3 shows the demographic profile of respondents with respect to their
educational status.
Bar Graph 1.3
Profile of the Respondents According to Educational Status
Bar Graph 1.3 reveals the data that 9 or thirty percent (30.00%) of the
respondents are a high school graduate followed by 8 or twenty seven percent
(27.00%) of respondents who are in the college level. The data shows that 2 or
seven percent (7.00%) from elementary level, elementary graduate, and college
graduate got the lowest percentage.
Bar Graph 1.4 shows the demographic profile of respondents with respect to their
economic status.
Bar Graph 1.4
Profile of the Respondents According to Economic Status
Page 13 of 25
Bar Graph 1.4 shows the data that 5 or twenty one percent (21.00%) of the
respondents’ monthly income ranges from 2,000 to 4,000, 4,100 to 6,000 and
10,100 to 12,000. Others show 3 or thirteen percent (13.00%) of 8,100 to 10,000
monthly income and 2 or eight percent (8.00%) of 6,100 to 8,000 monthly income.
Bar Graph 1.5 shows the demographic profile of respondents with respect to their number
of children.
Bar Graph 1.5
Profile of the Respondents According to the Number of Children
Bar Graph 1.5 reveals the data that out of 30 respondents, 14 or forty seven
percent (47.00%) of them have 1 to 2 children. This is followed by 9 or thirty percent
(30.00%) of the respondents who have 3 to 5 children. Data shows that 6 or twenty
Page 14 of 25
percent (20.00%) of the respondents has no child and 1 or three percent (3.00%)
have 6 children and above.
The purpose of this study was to assess various aspects related to the needs of
Barangay Camaman-an population, community, organization, or target group. The
quantitative approach has applied particularly on the presentation of findings from the
responses. The survey questionnaires were also used to collect data and were
distributed to the respondents according to the categories of the different programs
assessment.
Graph 1.0 shows the results of the survey in Concern A.
Graph 1.0 Environmental Concerns
Based on the chart, the concern that needs priority is the Waste Management (4.2),
while the least is Tree/Mangrove Planting (3.0).
Based on the chart, the concern that needs priority is the Supplemental Feeding
Program and Medical and Dental Mission (4.3), while the least is the Information Drive
and Health Literacy (4.2).
Based on the chart, the concern that needs priority is the Financial Literacy Program
(2.9), while the least is the Hairdressing (2.3).
Based on the chart, the concern that needs priority is the Stress Management/Mental
Seminar (3.9), while the least is the Dance and Aerobic Exercise (2.9).
Based on the chart, the concern that needs priority is the Firefighting and Storm,
Flood, and Thunder (4.4), while the least is the Earthquake (3.8)
Based on the chart, the concern that needs priority is the Basic Literacy and
Numeracy Program (4.4), while the least is the Computer Training and Leadership
Training for the Youths (3.9).
Graph 1.6 shows the overall results of the survey in Concern A, B, C, D, E, and F.
Graph 1.6 Overall Results
Based on the overall chart, the concern that needs priority is the concern B – Health
Concerns (4.32), followed by concern E - First Aid and Safety Measure during Disasters
and Calamities (4.20), concern F - Literacy and Educational Program (4.11), concern A -
Environmental Concerns (3.57), concern D - Recreation and Wellness Program (3.38),
and the least is concern C - Entrepreneurship and Livelihood (2.53).
Page 18 of 25
V. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the analysis of the survey data has provided comprehensive insights
into the needs and perspectives of our target respondents (Social Planning Council of
Winnipeg, 2012). Through the voices of the residents of Barangay Camaman-an,
researchers have gained a deeper understanding of the concerns and aspirations that
shape their collective well-being.
Through the careful examination of responses and statistical analysis, several key
findings have emerged. The survey revealed that the most pressing needs among
respondents are related to Waste Management (4.2), Supplemental Feeding Program
and Medical and Dental Mission (4.3), Financial Literacy Program (2.9), Stress
Management/Mental Seminar (3.9), Stress Management/Mental Seminar (3.9), and
Basic Literacy and Numeracy Program (4.4). The result of the overall graph shows that
Health Concerns (4.32) should be highly prioritized while the least concern is
Entrepreneurship and Livelihood (2.53).
Demographic analysis revealed variations in needs based on age, income level, and
geographic location (Census, 2019). Younger respondents expressed greater concerns
about education and career development, while older respondents prioritized access to
healthcare and environmental benefits. The findings from our community needs
assessment survey offer valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities facing
our community. Through the voices of our residents, we have gained a deeper
understanding of the needs, concerns, and aspirations that shape our collective well-
being.
VI. RECOMMENDATION
The current study can be interpreted as a first step on community extension. However,
the results of this study should be treated with caution due to the small sample size and
the lack of details regarding the participants’ characteristics.
Future researchers could further examine the factors that the past researchers did not
able to specify. They can employ a mixed-methods approach that combines quantitative
and qualitative data collection methods such as interviews, surveys, focus groups, and
observations to gather comprehensive insights to the community needs, assets, and
perspectives. When doing this, future researchers should Consider the accessibility and
preferences of diverse populations when designing surveys and conducting interviews.
Adhere to ethical principles and guidelines throughout the research process, including
informed consent, confidentiality, and respect for autonomy. Future researchers should
maintain transparency and open communication with stakeholders throughout the needs
assessment process. Share findings, progress updates, and next steps with the
community in accessible and understandable formats.
VII. APPENDIX
Documentation
Page 20 of 25
Questionnaires
Page 22 of 25
Page 23 of 25
COMMUNITY MAP
Page 24 of 25
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2003). Electronic Survey Methodology: A
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1602_04
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks.
Beel, J., Gipp, B., Langer, S., & Breitinger, C. (2015). Research-paper recommender
305–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-015-0156-0
Baldwin, C., & Van Bommel, S. (2023). Rural development for sustainable social-ecological
142–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206290630
Akintobi, T. H., Lockamy, E., Goodin, L., Hernandez, N., Slocumb, T., Blumenthal, D.
S., Braithwaite, R. L., Leeks, L., Rowland, M., Cotton, T., & Hoffman, L. (2018).
139–147. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2018.0029
Thompson, C. W., Roe, J., Aspinall, P., Mitchell, R., Clow, A., & Miller, D. (2012). More
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015