Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

What Does The Evidence Reveal About The Nature and Role of The Army in Persian Society During This Period

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

What does the evidence reveal about the nature and role of the army in

Persian society during this period? In your answer, refer to Source M, other
sources and your own knowledge. 15 marks

The Persian army played an integral role during the Achaemenid period due to the nature of
the army. It allowed the Persians to conquer land, letting them grow their substantial
number of nations in the empire. The army were also extremely useful in letting the Persians
defend against rebellion, and disparities between foreign forces. The sheer size of the army
followed by the smartness in its composition allowed for an effective and almost unbeatable
military force. There were many different contingents, including the immortals depicted in
Source M, which allowed for the army to be highly regarded.

The Persian army was made up of several different contingents, including namely the
immortals, which were the highest regarded. Source M depicts the group, whose ranks were
never to fall below 10,000. The Immortals were the best of the best of the Persian warriors,
1000 of which were recruited as the kings’ personal guard, accompanying him at all times
during battle. The Susa Bricks, display the respect the position commanded, the high esteem
at which they were held and the pride Darius held in his military. The rest of the army was
made up from military levy’s taken from Satrapies, meaning the army had a range of
different nations present. Xenophon provides a vague figure of 120,000 in the standard army
generally. Herodotus tells us that Xerxes took 1.7 million men into Greece to fight in the
Greco-Persian wars. Since it was such a large army, the king organised his troops into a
decimal system to ensure orders were properly administered. There would be myriads of
10,000 men led by a Hazarpatis, who were generally wealthy nobles, or family members of
the king. The military’s best strategy was to have archers at the back who would rain down
arrows to weaken the enemy troops, then they would use the cavalry to break the enemy
formation and have the rest of the ground troops wipe out the enemy.

The army was used for many different reasons, the main being external and internal issues.
The army would help the king, claim territory, as well as attack. They would come on
campaigns with the king, and the multinational nature of the army was helpful during these
escapades. Darius conquered the Saka tribe in Central Asia around 520BC for the sole reason
of incorporating and taking advantage of their native strategies and the equipment they
used. The army was used in all important wars, like the first and second Persian wars. The
army was useful in the sack of Sardis, which was a punishment to the Ionians for revolting.
The army was also used to defend against internal issues, such as suppressing revolts, like
the Ionian revolt, but also the numerous others, particularly at the start of Darius’ reign.
They would take care of administrative policing, ensuring the Satraps paid their tax and
military levy, and would also protect the citizens.

For these reasons, the Persian army played an integral role during the Achaemenid Empires
reign.

You might also like