Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Marking Criteria For 60%

    Uploaded by

    xuanquangpham141098
    The document outlines the assessment tasks and marking rubrics for a course. It details two tasks - the first involves summarizing and critiquing articles, the second evaluates a teaching activity through a micro teaching assessment. Marking criteria are provided for both tasks.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Marking Criteria For 60%

    Uploaded by

    xuanquangpham141098
    6 views4 pages
    The document outlines the assessment tasks and marking rubrics for a course. It details two tasks - the first involves summarizing and critiquing articles, the second evaluates a teaching activity through a micro teaching assessment. Marking criteria are provided for both tasks.

    Original Title

    Marking criteria for 60%

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document outlines the assessment tasks and marking rubrics for a course. It details two tasks - the first involves summarizing and critiquing articles, the second evaluates a teaching activity through a micro teaching assessment. Marking criteria are provided for both tasks.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    6 views4 pages

    Marking Criteria For 60%

    Uploaded by

    xuanquangpham141098
    The document outlines the assessment tasks and marking rubrics for a course. It details two tasks - the first involves summarizing and critiquing articles, the second evaluates a teaching activity through a micro teaching assessment. Marking criteria are provided for both tasks.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    FINAL COURSE ASSESSMENT AND MARKING RUBRIC

    Instruction for assignments


    1. Task 1: Summarize and criticize 5 articles (10%)
    Summary: teaching context, methodology, results, discussions, critical response (how it could
    be applied in your context – any issues with research design or results)

    Marking rubric
    Name: Final Mark:

    Introduction gives a good overview of research in the field and /2


    refers to items in the bibliography
    Bibliography covers range of recent and relevant research. /4
    Demonstrates independent research skills. Annotations are
    succinct and well written. Items are placed in context of research
    in the field. Evidence of critical evaluation and reflection.
    Writing is of a postgraduate standard. /2
    Coherent logical flow of ideas; style is professional in tone and
    language use
    Document shows careful proofreading, few/if any grammatical
    errors
    Correct use of APA referencing /2
    Comment
    2. Task 2 – Evaluation of teaching activity

    Micro teaching and evaluation (50% of the course grade)


    This assignment requires you to select two of members of the class or which you have seen on
    video available to everyone in the class.
    Task: For each of the two teaching episodes,

    • write a full description and reasons why you chose the lesson (250-350 words)
    • write an analysis of the learning that (would have) happened (250-350 words)
    • write an analysis of teachers’ use of technology. (250-350 words)
    • suggest research-informed improvements and/or write a research-informed reflection (350-
    500 words)

    The questions below may be useful to stimulate reflection.

    • What was the focus of the lesson?


    • Who were the intended learners?
    • What resources were used? (describe or attach if appropriate)
    • What activities were included?
    • How was the pace of the lesson?
    • Were the instructions clear?
    • Were the resources appropriate?
    • How did teachers use technology?
    • Did the teacher employ the right technology for the lesson?
    • How did/would the activities facilitate new learning?
    • Did/would the intended learning take place, and how do you know?
    • What would you modify next time you taught this lesson? or
    • What suggestions would you make to the teacher of the lesson?

    Remember to write this in an academic style, and follow the APA referencing conventions.
    Your work will be checked against Turnitin's database (this may take several hours) the report
    and score will be made available to you to enable you to use it as formative feedback.

    Marking rubric
    Name: Mark:

    Video /10
    Introduction clearly sets out and prefaces content of essay /5

    Content of essay demonstrates an understanding of theories and /15


    research in using technology in language learning and teaching.
    Analyses and critiques literature and research in relation to essay /13
    question.

    Writing is of a postgraduate standard /7


    Coherent logical flow of ideas; style is professional in tone and
    language use
    Document shows careful proofreading, few/if any grammatical errors

    Comment

    You might also like