VuHongNgoc - 21070361 - INS307001
VuHongNgoc - 21070361 - INS307001
VuHongNgoc - 21070361 - INS307001
1. By changing the way his group talks about IT investments, CIO Tim Schaefer is trying to
change the way the rest of the company sees IT. Why do you think this is necessary? What
would be the prevailing mindset about IT in his company, such that he needs to do something
about it? Provide some examples of how IT may be regarded in this organization.
It’s necessary for IT to be able to communicate effectively in the language or
languages used by the businesses they serve. In the case of Northwestern Mutual Life,
the business operates using terminology related to investments, returns, and risk.
Utilizing a shared language helps to break down communication barriers between IT
and the business unit. Previously, there was a perception that IT existed in its own
distinct reality, with its own specialized language and knowledge. Schaefer used
descriptors such as "separate," "distinct," "opaque," and "specialized knowledge" to
characterize how Northwestern Mutual Life viewed his organization. He aimed to shift
this perception towards viewing his organization in terms of assets with values, returns,
and risks, terms that were familiar to business managers.
2. Chip Gliedman of Forrester Research breaks down IT risks into implementation and impact
considerations. Why do you think these are so difficult to manage? What makes IT investments
different from investments in other areas of a company?
Regarding the challenges in management, IT projects present difficulties, with the
terms "implementation" and "impact" encompassing all aspects of the project lifecycle
except maintenance. Implementations in IT entail unique challenges due to the frequent
involvement of new and untested technologies. Additionally, managing the impact of IT
initiatives is notably challenging as it often necessitates cultural and personal
adjustments, which can be met with resistance. For instance, any alterations to
interfaces on platforms like Facebook™ prompt widespread complaints. Changes in
communication patterns, job expectations, and incentive structures elicit even more
significant reactions. It is this human factor that renders managing the impact
particularly demanding.
The key difference between a significant IT project and building a new
manufacturing plant is that while the latter typically involves minimal behavioral
changes, the former often requires substantial shifts in job roles, communication
methods, and compensation structures. Unlike the 1970s, when factory automation led
to increased productivity but also massive layoffs, the IT revolution similarly affects
mid-level management. However, mid-level managers now have the capacity to resist
unwelcome changes passively, posing a challenge that IT managers must actively
address.
3. Do you agree with the notion that IT investments can be treated in the same manner as
financial investments, and similarly quantified by putting a dollar value to them? Why or why
not? Would your answer change depending on the type of IT investment under consideration?
I disagree because when dealing with larger projects, business managers must take into
account not only the basic costs and risks of a new project but also factors such as the
competitive landscape, regulatory requirements, and the organization's strategic objectives.
Assessing these aspects can be challenging and often defies straightforward quantification.
I would change my answer since the size and complexity of a project should influence
the level of scrutiny applied by managers when assessing an IT investment proposal. Smaller,
high-value projects should require only a fraction of management's time and attention.