John Locke

John Locke
“Successful revolutions are stimulating to those who believe in them. Locke is the most fortunate of
all philosophers for, he completed his work in theoretical philosophy just at the moment when the
Government of his country fell into the hands of men who shared his political opinions. His political
doctrine is embedded in the American Constitution.” (Bertrand Russel)
John Locke was born at Wrington in north Somersetshire in 1632. His father was an attorney and land-
owner of modest means. He got his early education at home and later on he was admitted to
Westminster School. In 1652, he was sent to Oxford for higher education. At that time he was only
twenty-two and entered Christ Church College (Oxford). His university career was not very shining
because the narrow discipline of the place dulled his enthusiasm for formal studies. In 1660, he got the
degree of Master of Arts. After taking the M.A. degree, Locke was appointed as a tutor in Greek.
Locke did not like teaching profession and he started medicine. He was greatly influenced by Descartes
and became physician. Later on he became the confidential Secretary of Lord Shaftsbury, the founder of
the Whig Dynasty. He went over to the Parliamentary side and was later on made a field marshal in the
rebel forces. When Charles II became king, he was made Earl of Shaftsbury in 1672.
In 1682, Shaftsbury was charged with the crime of conspiracy. He was arrested and tried for treason. He
was, however, acquitted but was compelled to leave England. Locke also facing his persecution fled with
him to Holland and remained there until the bloodless Revolution. After the glorious revolution of 1688,
he came under the liberalizing influences that were beginning to be felt in England and he devoted his
entire intellectual faculties towards literary work and to numerous controversies arising out of his
works.
Sabine attributes John Locke in these words, “his sincerity, his profound moral convictions, his genuine
belief in liberty in human rights, and in the dignity of human nature united with his moderation and
good sense, made him the ideal spokesman of the middle-class revolution.”
Locke’s father, a renowned attorney of his time exerted a considerable influence in making him zealous
advocate of liberty, equality and democracy. Locke completely discarded the Hobbes’s conception of
man who depicted as utterly selfish, irrational, solitary and brutish. He portrayed his men in the state of
nature fully possessed a sense of sociability bringing all men in togetherness of mutual benefit and for
the progress of civil society. He advocated for the elimination of the coerciveness and intimidation over
the subject for peaceful progress of the state.
Bases of his Philosophy

Sensationalism:
Locke was of the view that all knowledge and beliefs come through our senses and experiences. There is
nothing in mind except what was first in the sense.
Utilitarianism:
He is one of the great pleader of utilitarianism. His conception is quite apparent from his contention that
“happiness and misery are the two great springs of human action.” He was of the view that morality is
pleasure and pleasure is only conformity to universal law.
Optimistic Conception of Human Nature:

Locke believes in the inherent goodness of human beings. He says that man is a rational, sensible and
social creature. He feels love, sympathy and tenderness towards his fellow-beings and is capable of
being actuated by altruistic motives. He wants to live in peace and harmony with others.
Rejection of Absolute Monarchy based on Divinity and Heredity:

Locke refuted emphatically the hereditary principle in kingship advocated most fervently by Filmer in his
Patriarcha and upheld by the Anglican Church. Filmer contended that political power is derived from the
authority of father over his children and that regal authority is subjection of children to parents, and
since the actual monarchs are the heirs of Adam, therefore they can demand from the citizens
unflinching loyalty. Locke points out the injustice of primogeniture (the principle by which property
descends to the eldest son) which is unavoidable if inheritance is to be the basis of monarchy. Further,
Adam can have only one heir, but no one knows who he is. And if the true heir could be discovered,
would all existing monarchs put their crowns at his feet. Moreover, in case of this discovery all kings
except, at most one, would be usurpers and would have no right to demand the obedience of their de
facto subjects.
Locke’s View on Natural Rights of Man
Locke appears to be a true democrat when he says that the establishment of a commonwealth stands
for the complete security of natural rights of men. Natural rights of citizens are:
1.Right to life
2.Right to property
3.Right to liberty
“Most distinctive contribution of Locke to political theory is the doctrine of natural rights.” (Dunning)
Locke was of the view that the right of property is a most important because all other natural rights are
analogous to the right of private property. He further maintained that the right to private property
existed in the state of nature under the operation of natural law. Locke thought of natural rights as
things which man brings with him from birth. Society exists to protect them; they can be regulated only
to the extent that is necessary to give them effective protection.
“The life, liberty and estate of one person can be limited only to make effective the equality valid
claims of another person to the same rights.” (Sabine)
According to Locke, “God, who has given the world to men in common, has also given reason to make
use of it to the best advantage of life and convenience. The earth and all that is therein, is given to
men for support and comfort of their being and all the fruits it naturally produces and beasts it feeds,
belongs to mankind in common, as they are produced by the spontaneous hand of nature, and
nobody has originally a private dominion, exclusive of the rest of mankind, in any of them, as they are
thus in their natural state. Whatsoever he removes out of the state that nature has provided and left
it in, he ahs mixed his labor with and joined to it something that is his own and thereby makes it his
own property.”
Locke’s Conception of Popular Sovereignty
Locke is regarded as the champion of people’s rights and a harbinger of their sacred and fundamental
liberties. His social contract did not create the irresponsible, cruel and absolutist “Leviathan” of Hobbes,
but reserved the sovereign rights to the final judge of all actions, the community. The ultimate supreme
power is not vested in the scepter of king; but it remains in the hands of the people.
Locke did not advance the idea of legal, absolute and indivisible sovereignty. The very idea of it was
discarded by him because Machiavellian and Hobbesian conception of sovereignty brings about a reign
of terror for the people who would loudly whisper for freedom and equality. He initiated the conception
of popular sovereignty, which has been firmly accepted, a best way of rule by the succeeding thinkers
and the whole world own him too much, because real and practical democracy was strongly enunciated.
Locke stood for a Government which should be subject to a number of limitations. It cannot rule with
coercion and intimidation and tax them without their will. A government which violated its limitations is
not worthy of obedience. The state is created for certain conveniences and it must justify itself by
creating those conveniences.
The basic rights of the individual life, liberty and property are to be protected rather than restricted by
the state. The king has neither the divine authority nor any moral justification to over load the subject.
All men are equal in the eye of Almighty God and their basic rights must not be violated under the civil
laws of the state.
Locke’s Government created by the unanimous consent of the majority should have freedom of speech,
of election and of religious worship and in order that it may be prevented from becoming too autocratic
and arbitrary. This democratic government should be run by a system of checks and balances. In other
words, the government should be divided into three main organs i-e, legislature, executive and judiciary.
And of these three, the legislature should be supreme, as is evidently available in the modern
constitutions.

John Locke

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

John Locke

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

John Locke

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

John Locke

Bases of his Philosophy

Optimistic Conception of Human Nature:

Rejection of Absolute Monarchy based on Divinity and Heredity:

Locke’s View on Natural Rights of Man

Locke’s Conception of Popular Sovereignty

You might also like