XPS DRX
XPS DRX
XPS DRX
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In recent years, vanadate has attracted the attention of researchers for its application in electrode mate-
Received 12 November 2022 rials due to its high specific capacity and layered crystal structure. Herein, a typical manganese vanadium
Revised 21 December 2022
oxides (MnV2 O6 ) product is efficient synthesis via a simple one-step hydrothermal method at 200 °C for
Accepted 10 January 2023
16 h. The as-prepared MnV2 O6 sample is found to be the unique one-dimensional fan-like superstructure
Available online 13 January 2023
consist of several nanorods. From a microcosmic point of view, VO6 octahedra sheets are connected by
Keywords: sharing edges which provides highly-open framework for rapid the intercalation and deintercalation of
One-dimensional MnV2 O6 guest ions Therefore, stable MnV2 O6 was prepared and used as a cathode material in aqueous zinc ion
Fan-nanorod superstructure batteries, which displayed favorable specific discharge capacity, excellent coulombic efficiency and well
Aqueous Zn-ion batteries cycling performance.
Energy storage © 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia
Cathode material
Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
Given the growing concern over rapidly diminishing traditional In recent years, research has focused on one-dimensional (1D)
fuel reserves and the serious environmental problems, sustainable or quasi-1D nanostructures, such as nanowires, nanotubes and
energy resources such as solar and wind have come under global nanoribbons, whose shapes provide them unique physical and
spotlight, which triggering the search for reliable, safe and eco- chemical properties that greatly broaden their potential in energy
nomical electrochemical energy storage and conversion technolo- storage devices [19]. Compared to other structures the 1D nanos-
gies [1–5]. In this case, the development of energy storage systems tructure has a larger specific surface area and faster ion diffu-
is essential for providing more functional and stable energy sup- sion rate. This is very beneficial for its capacity, rate capacity and
ply, and it is necessary to seek energy storage devices with strong long-term cycling stability as electrode materials. However, a well-
adaptability and high efficiency [6–8]. The potential application of arranged array is more conducive to improving the stability of
waterborne zinc ion batteries (ZIBs) in large-scale energy storage 1D nanomaterials in application to accentuate the anisotropy and
devices has been widely recognized. Owing to its the theoreti- conforms to the equipment design scheme. Among them, man-
cal capacity, relatively low redox potential and stability in water ganese vanadium oxides (MnV2 O6 ) with brannerite structure as
due to a high overpotential for hydrogen evolution [9–13]. In re- classic representative of AB2 O6 compounds (A = Co, Mn, Mg, Zn,
cent years, as different aqueous ZIBs cathode materials have been Cu, and B = V+5 ) have received a great attention as an emerg-
studied and attempts have been made to improve them. How- ing electrode material due to their structural relationship with
ever, certain problems cannot be ignored, such as unstable layered γ -MnO2 and nonstoichiometric manganese dioxide for the bat-
structure and low electronic conductivity, which lead to poor cy- tery industry [20–22]. The MnV2 O6 compounds have been classi-
cle capacity and stability. To solve these issues, many optimization fied as monoclinic structure with a C2/m space group. It consists
strategies have been developed, such as adjusted pH to influence of VO6 octahedral chains interconnected to form two parallel an-
dendrite formation and constructed inorganic interface to suppress ion sheets, and Mn2+ are located between the oxygen sheets. In
water decomposition etc. [14–16]. However, it still faces numerous the event of chemical oxidation/reduction, the two metals can act
challenges of serious capacity degradation and inferior rate capa- as buffer substrates for each other, maintaining structural stabil-
bility [17,18]. Therefore, it is urgent to research into efficient aque- ity more effectively, which is suitable for Zn2+ insertion or extrac-
ous ZIB cathode materials. tion [23]. Recently, the successful synthesis of crystalline MnV2 O6
compounds has been reported, such as solid-state reaction [24],
∗
co-precipitation [25], polymer gelation [26] and autogenous hy-
Corresponding author.
drothermal methods [27]. Several experiments have demonstrated
E-mail address: huanpangchem@hotmail.com (H. Pang).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108143
1001-8417/© 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
S. Wang, Y. Ru, Y. Sun et al. Chinese Chemical Letters 34 (2023) 108143
2
S. Wang, Y. Ru, Y. Sun et al. Chinese Chemical Letters 34 (2023) 108143
3
S. Wang, Y. Ru, Y. Sun et al. Chinese Chemical Letters 34 (2023) 108143
Fig. 4. (a-d) Galvanostatic charge/discharge profile of MVO-16 for different cycles at different discharge current densities of 20, 30, 50 and 100 mA/g; (e-h) Cycling perfor-
mance at different discharge current densities of 20, 30, 50 and 100 mA/g.
Intercalation/deintercalation reaction: the range of 0.6–0.9, which also indicates these two forms of con-
tribution to controll the electrochemical reaction by coordination
Znx MnV2 O6 ↔ Znx-y MnV2 O6 + yZn2+ + ye− (3) [42]. The pseudocapacitance contribution rate of the intercalation
can be calculated by the following formula [43,44]:
According to previous, the electrochemical mechanism of VO2
i = k1 v + k2 v1/2 (8)
in MnV2 O6 //Zn batteries is proposed [40,41]:
Anode:
i/v1/2 = k1 v1/2 + k2 (9)
xZn ↔ xZn2+ + 2xe− (4)
where k1 v and k2 v1/2 respectively represent the contribution of ca-
Cathode: pacitance and diffusion control to the total current. Combined with
the formula, it is easy to fit the contribution of its capacitive cur-
xZn2+ + VO2 + 2xe− ↔ Znx VO2 (5) rent (k1 v) to the total current at different scanning rates. As shown
in Fig. 3d, the contributions from pseudocapacitive reactions are
Kinetics analysis is carried out to further explore the electro- 45.3%, 53.9%, 58.9%, 62.3% and 64.9% as the increasing the sweep
chemical performance of the MVO-16 electrode and the CV curve rate from 0.1 mV/s to 1.0 mV/s. This result indicates that the bat-
at 0.1–1 mV/s is investigated in Fig. 3c. The relationship between tery is mainly controlled by ionic diffusion and pseudocapacitance
the current i (mA) with the scan rate v (mV/s) is as follows: synchronously. The electrochemical process is mainly dominated
by pseudocapacitive behavior at high scan rates, which is bene-
i = avb (6) ficial for delivering excellent electrochemical properties [45]. Ac-
cordingly, as is depicted in Figs. S5e-h (Supporting information),
the capacitive contributions of MVO-X (X = 8, 48, 72) at various
log i = b log(v ) + log(a ) (7)
scan rates are obtained to be in the range of about 32%∼58% except
where a and b are constants obtained by fitting straight lines. If the MVO-32, which as well manifests the control of capacitive and dif-
b = 0.5, the electrochemical reaction generally indicates a diffusion- fusion synergistically during the reaction. Compared the capacitive
controlled intercalation, while b = 1.0 the electrochemical reaction contributions of MVO-16 to other samples obtained for other time,
suggests that the reaction is surface-limited. there is a little superiority of capacitive control for MVO-16, which
According to the equation, log(i) vs. log(v) curves for sweep may be beneficial to the fast ionic migration and demonstrating
rates ranging from 0.1 mV/s to 1 mV/s can be plotted respectively, better electrochemical performance [46].
from which four redox peak b values are 0.88, 0.60, 0.89 and 0.67. The GCD was used to characterize the electrochemical perfor-
According to the b value, the charge/discharge process is controlled mance of as-prepared MnV2 O6 [47]. The GCD curves of MVO-16
by both ion diffusion and surface controlled reaction synergisti- sample for 1st , 2nd , 3rd ,10th , 20th and 50th cycles at 20 mA/g were
cally.The specific b values of other sapmles for different durations first performed in Fig. 4a [48]. Obviously, two discharge voltage
in Figs. S5a-d (Supporting information) were calcualted fitting in plateaus appear in 0.9 V and 0.65 V. which corresponds to the re-
4
S. Wang, Y. Ru, Y. Sun et al. Chinese Chemical Letters 34 (2023) 108143
sult of CV curve [49]. Compared with the first cycle, discharge ca- relative large impedance should still be a problem affects the bat-
pacity decreases markedly from the second cycle, but both dis- tery performance. Therefore, to further reduce the impedance the
charge and charge capacities decrease gradually afterwards and Zn//MnV2 O6 battery in the future research is still neccessary to be
the charge capacity became even close to the discharge capacity improved.
[50,51]. To investigate the rate properties, the GCD curves at dif- In conclusion, we successfully fabricated the 1D MnV2 O6
ferent scan rates from 20 mA/g, 30 mA/g, 50 mA/g and 100 mA/g nanorods via a facile hydrothermal reaction at a temperature of
are also conducted in Figs. 4a-d. With the charge/discharge cur- 200 °C for different duration and obtained MnV2 O6 nanorods
rent density increases, the initial discharge capacity of MVO-16 de- with uniform fan-like superstructure for 16 h. These products were
creases from 30, 27.5, 25 mAh/g to 13.5 mAh/g. This phenomenon used as the cathode material for aqueous MnV2 O6 //Zn batter-
might be due to the intrinsic characteristics of MnV2 O6 products ies in 3 mol/L Zn(CF3 SO3 )2 solution at a voltage range of 0.4–
with 1D nanorods structure, which reduced the diffusion distance 1.4 V. The MnV2 O6 structure is arranged in layer network while
of Zn2+ and electrons in the solid state [19]. Different discharge each layer consists of octahedral MnO6 chains and tetrahedral
capacities of 24.2, 20.1 and 19.6 mAh/g were achieved MOV-16 an- VO4 chains, which provides open and flexible channels for Zn2+
ode after 2, 20 and 50 cycles at 20 mA/g, respectively. At the same transfer. Taken advantage of such superstructure, the assembled
time, with the increase of the cycles number, the discharge capac- MnV2 O6 //Zn battery exhibited favorable specific discharge capac-
ity of the MOV-16 decays slowly, indicated that MOV-16 had well ity, excellent coulombic efficiency, and well cycling performance.
cycling performance. Based on this, the GCD properties of MVO- Therefore, this investigation proved the metal vanadate material
X (X = 8, 32, 48, 72) are measured at for 1st , 2nd , 3rd ,10th , 20th has great potential for ZIBs. Since the electrochemical performance
and 50th cycles at different current densities in Figs. S6a-d, S7a-d, of vanadate is highly dependent on interlayer cations, doping or
S8a-d and S9a-d (Supporting information). The initial discharge ca- substituting cations is a promising strategy to further improve the
pacities are displayed to be 40, 45, 58 and 18 mAh/g, respectively, electrochemical performance of ZIBs. This study provides a new
which indicates that the discharge capacities of MnV2 O6 //Zn bat- choice in the future for high-performance electrodes and has great
teries will become better the with the increase of the hydrother- potential for building the next generation energy storage devices.
mal time. However, the decrease of discharge capacity of the MVO-
72 may be result from the inherent influence of different material Declaration of competing interest
morphologies.
To further examine the cycling stability of MnV2 O6 products, The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-
the cyclic performance of MVO-16 at different current densities are cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to
depicted in Figs. 4e-h. As shown in Fig. 4e, the battery remained influence the work reported in this paper.
the 51.4% retention of initial discharge capacity after 140 cycles and
the coulombic efficiency is nearly 100% throughout the whole cy-
Acknowledgments
cling process. As the current density raised up, the capacity degra-
dation accordingly came to be larger, which is displayed in Figs.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foun-
4f-h. Compared to MVO-16, the cycling performance of other sam-
dation of China (No. U1904215), the Natural Science Foundation of
ples in Figs. S6e-h, S7e-h, S8e-h and S9e-h (Supporting informa-
Jiangsu Province (No. BK2020 0 044), and the Changjiang Scholars
tion) displays poorer charge/discharge reversibility and long lifes-
Program of the Ministry of Education (No. Q2018270).
pan than MVO-16 which may be because of the less stable struc-
ture framework and slower ionic diffusion. However, these samples
still exhibit excellent coulombic efficiency reaching almost 100%. Supplementary materials
These results indicate that the redox reaction still occurs when an
irreversible transformation of the crystal structure does not gener- Supplementary material associated with this article can be
ate [44]. found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108143.
In order to elucidate the resistance change of MVO-16 during
the cyclic process at 0.1 A/g, the electrochemical impedance spec- References
troscopy (EIS) test is performed in the frequency range of 100 kHz
[1] D. Kundu, B.D. Adams, V. Duffort, S.H. Vajargah, L.F. Nazar, Nat. Energy 1 (2016)
to 0.001 Hz in Figs. S10 and S11 (Supporting information). The 16119.
impedance spectrum is composed of a semicircle in the high fre- [2] X. Guo, H. Xu, W. Li, et al., Adv. Sci. (2022), doi:10.1002/advs.202206084.
quency region and an inclined straight line in the low frequency [3] T. Chen, F. Wang, S. Cao, et al., Adv. Mater. 34 (2022) 2201779.
[4] M. Du, P. Geng, C. Pei, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202209350.
region [17]. The semicircle in the high frequency region contains [5] Q. Zhang, J. Luan, Y. Tang, X. Ji, H. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020)
the charge transfer impedance between the electrode and elec- 13180–13191.
trolyte. The illustration in Fig. S10 is the fitting equivalent circuit [6] S. Liu, L. Kang, J.M. Kim, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 10 (2020) 20 0 0477.
[7] D. Chen, M. Lu, D. Cai, et al., J. Energy Chem. 54 (2021) 712–726.
model, where Rs is the electrolyte resistance and ohmic resistances [8] J. Gu, Y. Peng, T. Zhou, et al., Nano Res. Energy 1 (2022) e9120 0 09.
of the cell components. Rct is the sum of the resistance of the [9] W. Sun, F. Wang, B. Zhang, et al., Science 371 (2021) 46–51.
charge transfer resistance of the electrochemical reaction. CPE rep- [10] S. Zheng, Y. Sun, H. Xue, et al., Natl. Sci. Rev. 9 (2022) nwab197.
[11] L. Zeng, H. He, H. Chen, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 12 (2022) 2103708.
resents the constant-phase element and Zw represents diffusion-
[12] L. Zeng, J. He, C. Yang, et al., Energy Storage Mater 54 (2023) 469–477.
controlled Warburg impedance, respectively. The high-medium fre- [13] X. Guo, W. Li, Q. Zhang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 432 (2022) 134413.
quency region impedance is mainly composed of Rct applied on [14] Q. Yang, N. Jiang, Y. Shao, et al., Sci. China Chem. (2022), doi:10.1007/
s11426- 022- 1397- 2.
the electrolyte/active particle interface, while the impedance in the
[15] Q. Yang, L. Li, T. Hussain, D. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022)
low frequency region is composed of the corresponding diffusion e202206471.
barrier impedance and semi-infinite diffusion impedance [52]. The [16] Q. Yang, X. Qu, H. Cui, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202112304.
impedance of the Zn//MnV2 O6 battery became larger after 100 cy- [17] J. Hao, L. Yuan, B. Johannessen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 133 (2021)
25318–25325.
cles at 100 mA/g, which may be caused by the gradual insertion of [18] J. Hao, L. Yuan, Y. Zhu, M. Jaroniec, S. Qiao, Adv. Mater. 34 (2022) 2103708.
Zn2+ in the reaction process. By comparsion with Fig. S10, it can be [19] W. Huang, S. Gao, X. Ding, L. Jiang, M. Wei, J. Alloys Compd. 495 (2010)
found that the impedance of MVO-16 is much smaller than other 185–188.
[20] J.I. Viegas, R.L. Moreira, A. Dias, Cryst. Growth Des. 19 (2019) 3233–3243.
samples, which indicates a faster ion diffusion and better interca- [21] W. Zhang, L. Shi, K. Tang, Z. Liu, Mater. Res. Bull. 47 (2012) 1725–1733.
lation and deintercalation of the Zn//MnV2 O6 battery. However, the [22] N. Khamaru, S. De, A. Das, et al., Magn. Mater. 497 (2020) 165995.
5
S. Wang, Y. Ru, Y. Sun et al. Chinese Chemical Letters 34 (2023) 108143
[23] R. Muruganantham, W.R. Liu, C.H. Lin, M. Rudysh, M. Piasecki, J. Energy Storage [38] S. Deng, H. Li, B. Chen, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 452 (2023) 139115.
26 (2019) 100915. [39] X. Liu, T. Cao, S. Li, et al., J. Power Sources 525 (2022) 321134.
[24] X. Wu, W. Wu, X. Cui, S. Liao, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 109 (2012) 163–169. [40] X. Zhang, X. Li, F. Jiang, et al., Dalt. Trans. 49 (2020) 1794–1802.
[25] S. Kim, H. lkuta, M. Wakihara, Solid State Ionics 139 (2001) 57–65. [41] Y. Liu, T. Lv, H. Wang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 417 (2021) 128408.
[26] T. Morishita, K. Nomura, T. Inamasu, M. Inagaki, Solid State Ionics 176 (2005) [42] T. Lv, G. Zhu, S. Dong, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2022) e202216089.
2235–2241. [43] B. Yan, X. Li, X. Fu, et al., Nano Energy 78 (2020) 105233.
[27] Y. Wu, Z. Zhu, Y. Li, et al., Small 17 (2021) 2008182. [44] Z. Pan, J. Yang, J. Yang, et al., ACS Nano 14 (2020) 842–853.
[28] P. Geng, L. Wang, M. Du, et al., Adv. Mater. 34 (2022) 2107836. [45] F. Wan, L. Zhang, X. Dai, et al., Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) 1656.
[29] Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, J. Du, W. Yu, Y. Qian, J. Cryst. Growth 291 (2006) 320–324. [46] H. Geng, M. Cheng, B. Wang, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 (2020) 1907684.
[30] F. Wan, S. Huang, H. Cao, et al., ACS Nano 14 (2020) 6752–6760. [47] C. Zhu, G. Fang, S. Liang, et al., Energy Storage Mater 24 (2020) 394–401.
[31] N. Wen, S. Chen, Q. Lu, et al., Nanoscale 14 (2022) 10428–10438. [48] S. Zhang, R. Hu, L. Liu, D. Wang, Mater. Lett. 124 (2014) 57–60.
[32] K.H. Kim, Y.H. Choi, S.H. Hong, Nanoscale 12 (2020) 16028–16033. [49] S. Huang, F. Wan, S. Bi, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 4313–4317.
[33] M. N, S. V, Chem. Phys. Lett. 737 (2019) 136832. [50] M. Inagaki, T. Morishita, M. Hirano, V. Gupta, Solid State Ionics 156 (2003)
[34] Z. Li, Y. Ren, L. Mo, et al., ACS Nano 14 (2020) 5581–5589. 275–282.
[35] C. Liu, Z. Neale, J. Zheng, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 12 (2019) 2273–2285. [51] S. Lei, K. Tang, Y. Jin, C. Chen, Nanotechnology 18 (2007) 175605.
[36] Y. Li, Z. Wang, Y. Cai, et al., Energy Environ. Mater. 5 (2022) 823–851. [52] X. Wang, F. Wang, L. Wang, et al., Adv. Mater. 28 (2016) 4904–4911.
[37] N. Zhang, F. Cheng, Y. Liu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 12894–12901.