Sy Evid Module-8
Sy Evid Module-8
Sy Evid Module-8
CRIMINOLOGY DEPARTMENT
EVIDENCE
ATTY. PRINCESS JANINE R. SY
I. OBJECTIVES
1. To discuss and explain Testimonial Evidence.
2. To determine the Qualifications of a Witness.
3. To discuss and explain Privilege Communications.
III. DISCUSSION
TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE
Who is a witness?
A witness refers to a person who testifies in a case or gives evidence before a judicial
tribunal (FRANCISCO, Basic Evidence, 2017, p.387).
QUALIFICATION OF A WITNESS
May a witness be disqualified on the ground of religious or political belief, or interest in the
outcome of the case, or convicted of a crime?
No. Religious or political belief, interest in the outcome of the case, or conviction of a
crime, unless otherwise provided by law, shall not be a ground for disqualification (RROE, Rule
130, Sec.21).
Note: The phrase "conviction of a crime unless otherwise provided by law" takes into account
Article 821 of the Civil Code which states that persons convicted of falsification of a document,
perjury or false testimony are disqualified from being witnesses to a will (People v. Umali, G.R.
No. 84450, February 4, 1991).
What are the disqualifications for witnesses under the Revised Rules on Evidence?
The following are the disqualifications under the Revised Rules on Evidence:
Note: The disqualification now includes a person reasonably believed by the client to be licensed
to engage in the practice of law (RROE, Rule 130, Sec. 24, par. (b)).
What are the exceptions to the attorney and client privilege? (FC-JAB)
1. Furtherance of crime or fraud - If the services or advice of the lawyer were sought
or obtained to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit what the client knew or
reasonably should have known to be a crime or fraud;
A public officer was charged with corruption. He consulted a lawyer and they
came up with the plan of forging a certificate of arraignment and dismissal purportedly
coming from the court in order to support their claim of double jeopardy. The
communications relating to this plan are not privileged. (People v. Sandiganbayan, 275
SCRA 505 [1997])
Illustration: A and B are brothers. Their father hired Atty L to draft the will. Father died.
B wants to show that their father intended Lot B to belong to B. Atty. L can testify that
the Father intended to devise Lot B to B as shown by the will
llustration: Where the client alleges that the lawyer’s fees were excessive, the lawyer
can disclose relevant communication to show that the case was complex and difficult
thus justifying higher fees.
Illustration: The lawyer was hired by lender and borrower to draft their loan and
mortgage agreement. A dispute arose between lender and borrower on whether applying
for government financial aid is an event of default. Lender can present lawyer to testify
that the parties’ intention was that such application is an event of default thus justifying
the lender into calling in the loan.
What are the requisites in order that the physician-patient privilege may be successfully
claimed?
Note: The privilege may also be claimed against persons, including members of the
patient's family, who have participated in the diagnosis or treatment of the patient under
the direction of the physician or psychotherapist.
3. Information was acquired for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment of the patient's
physical, mental or emotional condition, including alcohol or drug addiction (RROE.
Rule 130, Sec. 24).
Who is a psychotherapist?
A psychotherapist is:
1. A person licensed to practice medicine engaged in the diagnosis or treatment of a
mental or emotional condition, or
2. A person licensed as a psychologist by the government while similarly engaged
(RROE, Rule 130, Sec 24 c).
What are the requisites for the rule on privileged communication between priest and
penitent?
What are the requisites of the rule protecting communications made to public officers in
official confidence? (GOTI)
The requisites are the following:
1. The holder of the privilege is the Government, acting through a public officer;
2. The communication was given to the public Officer in confidence;
3. The communication was given during the Term of office of the public officer but the
privilege may be invoked not only during the term of office of the public officer but also
after; and
4. The court finds that the public Interest would suffer by the disclosure of the
communication (RROE, Rule 130. Sec. 24, par. (e)).
May privileged communication obtained by third persons remain privileged under the
Revised Rules on Evidence?
Yes. Such communication shall remain privileged, even in the hands of a third person
who may have obtained the information, provided that the original parties to the communication
took reasonable precaution to protect its confidentiality (RROE, Rule 130, Sec. 24).
Note: Under the Family Code, the exception as to when a person may be compelled to give
testimony is when such testimony is indispensable in a crime against the descendant or by one
Note: When disclosure is directed, the court shall take such protective measure as the interest of
the owner of the trade secret and of the parties and the furtherance of justice may require (RROE,
Rufe 130, Sec 26)