Module 3 in Prof Ed 73 1
Module 3 in Prof Ed 73 1
Module 3 in Prof Ed 73 1
The first part of each lesson will start with the “Let’s Explore” part. In this
part introduces the topic with surfacing of the prior knowledge of the learners.
The second part, the “Let’s Explain”, processes the prior knowledge of the
learners through thorough discussion with concrete examples.
Third is the “Let’s Deepen” part. It is where the learners are given various
exercises where they can apply the concepts in real life classroom scenarios.
“Let’s Wrap – up” is the part which learners summarizes the learning
transferred through reflections, reporting or advanced organizers.
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 2
The last, “Let’s Evaluate” measures how deep learning has taken place in
the lesson by the students. The traditional or alternative assessment may be used
as method.
At the end of this module, you are expected to HAVE DEMONSTRATED the
following standards:
1. Demonstrate understanding on the key concepts of assessment.
2. Explain the nature and roles of a good assessment, and its relevance to
learners, teachers, parents, and other stakeholders.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 3
Lesson Overview
This lesson familiarizes the learners on the guidelines in constructing
multiple choice type of test. The multiple choice of type of test can measure
knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation levels
of assessment.
Lesson Objectives
After the lesson, the students will be able to on their own:
1. Determine the guidelines in constructing the multiple choice tests.
2. Construct test items using the multiple choice type.
Directions: Here are some concrete samples of Multiple Choice Type (MCT) of
test. Determine which makes each item incorrect. Consult the
handouts on the rules for constructing MCT to find the errors.
Which of the following describes Who is our national hero?
Maria in the story? a. Bonifacio
A. Maria is described as a petite b. Jose Rizal
woman. c. Apolinario
B. Maria is described as a d. Aguinaldo, Emilio
responsible parent.
C. Maria is described as a good
woman.
D. Maria is described as a nice
woman.
What is one of the characteristics of All of these animals are herbivores
the sea? EXCEPT
1. Bland A. Pig
2. Wavy B. Goat
3. Hot C. Carabao
4. Blue D. All of the above
1. Make a test item that is practical or with real – world application to the
learners.
2. Use diagram or drawing when asking question about comprehension,
application, analysis or evaluation.
3. When ask to interpret or evaluate about quotations, present actual quotations
from secondary sources like published books or newspapers.
4. Use tables, figures, or charts, when asking questions to interpret.
5. Use pictures if possible when students are required to apply concepts and
principles.
6. List the choices/options vertically not horizontally.
7. Avoid trivial questions.
8. Use only one correct answer or best answer format.
9. Use four to five options to discourage guessing.
10. Be sure that distracters are plausible and effective.
11. Increase the similarity of the options to increase the difficulty of the item.
12. Do not use “none of the above’ options when asking for the best answer.
13. Avoid using “all of the above” options. It is usually the correct answer and
makes the item too easy for the examinee with partial knowledge.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 5
2. Distracters
These are options which are related to the correct answer which helps
learners apply their critical thinking skills in choosing the correct answer.
Directions: Get a copy of Multiple Choice of Test from a teacher. Critique the
items basing from the guidelines in constructing Multiple Choice
Test.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 6
Outstanding = 17 – 20 points
Very Satisfactory = 13 – 16 points
Satisfactory = 9 – 12 points
Fair = 5 – 8 points
Poor = 1 – 4
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 7
Lesson Overview
This lesson teaches you how to construct test items using the knowledge
levels. The knowledge level recognizes the students’ ability to use rote
memorization and recall certain facts. The test questions focus on identification
and recall information. Examples of behavioral terms under the knowledge level
are cite, define, identify, label, list, match, name, recognize, reproduce, select or
state.
Lesson Objectives
After the lesson, the students will be able to on their own:
1. Write simple who, what, where and when questions.
2. Construct test items on the knowledge level following the given examples.
3. Present the constructed test items for critiquing.
Directions: Construct questions which start with who, when, what, and where.
Who?
What?
Where?
When?
The following are examples of test items on knowledge. The questions use
the behavioral terms to name, identify, state, recall, define, give example, etc.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 8
C. However…..therefore
D. As soon as
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 10
2. To identify (2 items)
3. To recall (2 items)
4. To state (2 items)
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 11
5. To define (2 items)
Directions: Get a copy of the second quarter of any grade level of your area of
specialization. Basing from the competencies under the quarter,
construct a 10 – item test on the knowledge level. Be sure to use
varied behavioral terms appropriate to test the indicated
competencies.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 12
Lesson Overview
This lesson familiarizes you on test items which are on the comprehension
level. Comprehension questions involves students’ ability to read course content,
interpret important information and put other’s ideas into words.
Lesson Objectives
After the lesson, the students will be able to on their own:
1. Write possible questions from a given picture.
2. Construct test items on the comprehension level following the given examples.
3. Present the constructed test items for critiquing.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 13
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 14
100
98
96
94
92
90
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
Question: Which of the following best supports the data shown in the graph?
A. Monday is the warmest day.
B. Saturday is the coldest day.
C. The hottest day is Friday.
D. Tuesday is as warm as Wednesday.
4 meters
Question: Which of the following best describes the given data and figure.
A. The figure illustrates its perimeter.
B. The figure shows its area.
C. The figure indicates measurements of sides.
D. The figure shows the distances in meters.
Question: What does the meaning of the sentence: “The closets had to cleared,
the plants to be inspected, the unhealthy and the dying to be made
well again.’?
Question: Why do you think Justin’s mother did not take the earlier incidents
seriously?
A. She thought that her son was lying.
B. She probably could not be bothered about it.
C. She thought that her son probably deserved it.
D. She probably thought that it was minor incidents which the
teacher would handle.
From the horizon, I can see the beauty of the calm see
From below me, I can feel the waves caressing my cold feet.
From behind, I can hear the whispers of the coconut leaves.
Question: Where can the speaker in the poem be?
A. In a house
B. In a forest
C. In a beach
D. In a desert
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 16
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 17
Selections B Questions
2. To interpret the data given from a graph or chart (pictograph, bar, line, pie)
1 each kind with 3 items
Line Graph Questions
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 18
Pictograph Questions
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 19
Picture 2 Questions
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 20
Questions:
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 21
Graph 2:
ENROLMENT
AY 2017-2018
127 131
43 38
17 23 21
15
Questions:
Lesson Overview
This lesson teaches students to construct test items on the application level.
Application level carries out or uses a procedure in a given situation.
Lesson Objectives
After the lesson, the students will be able to on their own:
1. Identify questions which apply concepts.
2. Construct application questions.
15%
10%
5% 3%
0%
First Timers Repeaters Overall
Directions: From the given graph, write possible questions on the analysis level.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 23
EXAMPLES:
Objective: To solve for the area of the given dimensions.
Question: Find the area of the rectangle if its width is 5 units and its length is
6 units.
A. 20
B. 30
C. 40
D. 50
Question: Mrs. Crisanto is one of my teachers ______ not only with their studies
but also with their personal lives.
A. who help students
B. who helps students
C. which help students
D. which helps students
Question: “The moon was a ghostly galleon”. What kind of figure of speech was
used?
A. Simile
B. Metaphor
C. Personification
D. Synecdoche
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 24
Directions: Visit the CG last quarter of your area of specialization in any grade
level of your choice. Construct 10 test items which are in the
application level.
1. 2.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 25
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
9. 10.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 26
Directions: Get a copy of your teacher’s test material or from teachers of DepEd.
Make a critique on the application questions.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 27
Lesson Overview
This lesson helps students construct good and effective questions on the
analysis level. Analysis level uses data, rules, facts, information, and concepts.
This level enhances critical thinking skills by comparison and contrast.
Lesson Objectives
After the lesson, the students will be able to on their own:
1. Determine different types of analysis questions.
2. Construct questions on the analysis level.
Directions: Using the two questions provided below. Which of these enhances
the critical thinking skills of the learners on the analysis level? Give
your reasons.
To construct good and effective analysis questions, you can use the
following formats:
1. Single Word Approach
Example:
Below are pairs of words which are in one way on another related.
Determine the correct pair of the second group such that it is related to the
first group.
Cohesive : united : : efficient : ______________
A. cheap
B. faster
C. optimized
D. productive
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 28
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 29
1. A bar of chocolate
2. A bottle of face powder
Question: Give an example of a solid.
Directions: Get at least four competencies from the first quarter of your any grade
level of your choice (in your own area of specialization) and construct
1 analysis question of each type.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 30
Directions: Request a copy of the quarterly exam of any DepEd teacher. Make a
critique on the analysis level of the material. Copy the items and
make some suggestions to improve the questions.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 32
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 33
Lesson Overview
This lesson teaches the students to construct items on the synthesis and
evaluation levels. Synthesis is putting broken ideas or concepts into one whole
concept. On the other hand, evaluation questions lead learners to make decisions
or judgment.
Lesson Objectives
After the lesson, the students will be able to on their own:
1. Construct test items which are in the synthesis and evaluation levels
2. Make suggestions on constructing original items to a better synthesis or
evaluation type.
The synthesis level questions are items which help learners put together
parts or single ideas into a whole bigger idea.
Evaluation level questions usually start with situations and let learners
make decisions to solve the problem.
Examples:
Using the Logical Organization
The following are the steps in adding dissimilar fractions:
A. Divide the new common denominator with the denominators of the given
fractions.
B. Add the numerators.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 34
Questions:
1. Which is the third step?
2. Which come before step D?
Ana saw that one of her classmates opened her notes during the exam. What
should she do?
A. Do the same as her classmate
B. Tell it to her teacher
C. Tell it to her parents
D. Call the attention of her classmates
Your teacher discussed about the parts of a flower and asked which part do you
like most. Which of the parts would you choose? Why?
Jessa went to the market to buy 20 pieces of bread at P6.00 each. She only
received P100.00 from her mother. What would Jessa do?
Directions: Construct 2 items which are in the synthesis level and 2 items in the
evaluation level.
Synthesis Questions Evaluation Questions
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 35
Directions: Get one competency from the Curriculum Guide and construct one
synthesis question and one evaluation question.
Competency:
Synthesis Evaluation
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 36
Lesson Overview
This lesson focuses on the tests items on the True or False form. This is a
form of test where there is a 50 – 50 probability of the learners to get the answer
correctly.
Lesson Objectives
After the lesson, the students will be able to on their own:
1. Determine the guidelines in constructing True or False Type of test.
2. Construct test using the True or False type.
3. Evaluate the given True or False type and make a critique based from the
given guidelines.
Directions: Correct the given test items in True or False format using the
guidelines in constructing the test of this type.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 37
Examples:
Write your answer before the number in each item. Write T if the statement is
true and F is the statement is false.
Put a check mark before the correct statement and X – mark before the incorrect
statement.
Color the box Yellow if the statement if correct and RED if it is wrong.
Draw a HAPPY face if the statement is correct and SAD face if it is incorrect
Directions: Have a copy of True or False Test constructed by teachers and already
administered to students and write a critique about it based from the
guidelines.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 39
Directions: Craft 3 samples of TRUE or FALSE Test using the “Open the Safe”
format.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 40
Lesson Overview
This lesson shall be focused on constructing a good matching type of test.
Matching type of tests involves two columns. The first column are the set of
definitions while the second column are concepts.
Lesson Objectives
After the lesson, the students will be able to on their own:
1. Determine the guidelines in constructing the matching type of test.
2. Construct good matching type test.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 41
Advantages of MTT
1. It is simpler to construct than a multiple – choice type of test.
2. It reduces the effect of guessing compared to the multiple – choice and true or
false types of tests.
3. It is appropriate to assess the association between facts.
4. Provides easy, accurate, efficient, objective and reliable test scores.
5. More content can be covered in the given set of test.
Disadvantages of MTT
1. It measures only simple recall or memorization of information.
2. It is difficulty to construct dues to problems in selecting the descriptions and
options.
3. It assesses only low level of cognitive domain such as knowledge and
comprehension.
Directions: Have a copy of used matching type test and write a justifiable critique
about it based from the guidelines.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 42
Directions: Construct a 10-item or 15-item matching type test. Use the riddle
style.
Lesson Overview
This lesson shall present other methods of tests to be used as formative
assessment in the day to day class interaction.
Lesson Objectives
After the lesson, the students will be able to on their own:
1. Familiarize other formative assessment tools to be used in instruction.
2. Construct samples of these.
Directions: List some formative assessment tools which your teachers usually
used during instruction.
Other Formative Tools How to Answer
There are other formative assessment tools which teachers may use during
the teaching and learning process.
1. Supply Type or Subjective Type
This require students to create and supply their own answer or perform a
certain task to show master of knowledge or skills. This is also known as
the constructed response test. It requires the students to organize and
present an original answer and perform task to show master of learning or
supply a word, or phrase to answer a certain question (completion)
Guidelines
• The item should require a single word answer or brief and
definite statement. Do not use indefinite statement that allows
several answers.
• Be sure that the language used in the statement is precise and
accurate in relation to the subject matter being tested.
• Be sure to omit only key words; do not eliminate so many words
so that the meaning of the item statement will not change.
• Use direct question rather than incomplete statement. The
statement should pose the problem to the examinee.
• Be sure to indicate the units in which to be expressed when the
statement requires numerical answer.
• Be sure that the answer the student is require to produce is
factually correct.
• Avoid grammatical clues.
• Do not select textbook sentences.
Advantages:
• It covers a broad range of topic in a short span of time.
• It is easier to prepare and less time consuming compared to
multiple choice and matching type of test.
• It can assess effectively the lower level of Blooms Taxonomy. It
can assess recall of information rather than recognition.
• It reduces the possibility of guessing the correct answer
because it requires recall compared to true or false and multiple
choice items.
• It covers greater amount of content than matching type.
Disadvantages
• It is only appropriate for questions that can be answered with
short responses.
• There is a difficulty in scoring when the questions are not
prepared properly and clearly. The question should be clearly
stated so that the answer of the students is clear.
• It can assess only knowledge, comprehension and application
levels in Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive domain.
• It is not adaptable in measuring complex learning outcomes.
• Scoring is tedious and time consuming.
b. Essay Test
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 44
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 45
Direction: Prepare one sample for each of the creative tests discussed.
1. Creative Essay Test
2. Word Maze
3. Cross Word Puzzle
4. Solving a Riddle
5. Amazing Path
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 46
Lesson Overview
This lesson introduces about the grading system of the K+12 curriculum
prescribed by the Department of Education. The grading system is composed of
3 components which are written works, performance tasks, and quarterly
assessment. The weighted percentage of each component depends on the nature
of the subject area.
Lesson Objectives
After the lesson, the students will be able to on their own:
1. Classify the learning activity results as to written works, performance tasks,
or quarterly assessment.
2. Compute the hypothetical grade of the learners from a given set of raw
scores.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 47
2. Performance Task. This allows learners to show what they know and are
able to do in different ways. This may come through creating novel outputs
or produce genuine products.
The following gives the steps in computing the Final Grades of the learners.
1. Scores from all student works from each component are added up.
The table below shows the weight of the each component along different
subject areas:
Components Languages Science MAPEH
Aral Pan Math EPP/TLE
EsP
Written Work 30% 40% 20%
Performance
50% 40% 60%
Task
Quarterly
20% 20% 20%
Assessment
4. The sum of the Weighted Scores from each component is called the Initial
Grade.
5. The Grade for the quarter will be based from the transmutation table.
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 48
6. To obtain the final grade for the school year of each subject shall be taken
from the average of the four grades received from each quarter divided by
4.
7. To get the general average of the learners is to add up all final grades from
each subject divided by the number of subjects.
8. The remarks will have the following legend
Descriptor Grading Scale Remarks
Outstanding 90 – 100 Passed
Very Satisfactory 85 – 89 Passed
Satisfactory 80 – 84 Passed
Fairly Satisfactory 75 – 79 Passed
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 49
Directions: Let us try to compute the grades of 5 students for a certain quarter
following the steps.
QUARTERLY
No. WRITTEN WORKS PERFORMANCE TASKS
ASSESSMENT
IN QG
Total 10 10 15 20 T PS WP 20 50 30 T Ps Wp 50 Ps WS
1 8 6 12 14 15 28 22 34
2 7 4 15 11 10 34 20 45
3 9 9 8 8 16 38 25 40
4 5 4 14 18 13 40 28 30
5 4 3 7 9 10 20 11 20
Directions: Compute for the grades of the following students with their
corresponding scores. Use the weighted percentage of your own area.
Show your computations in a matrix.
Student Written Works
20 10 25 15 20
1 18 7 20 11 11
2 15 9 21 10 14
3 19 10 15 9 8
4 12 5 10 10 10
5 10 5 20 14 18
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 50
3 47
4 37
5 42
Reference:
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R.
E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, j., Wittrock, M. C. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning,
Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education
Objectives, New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon
Bixler, Brett (2007), Writing Educational Goals and Objectives, retrieved from
http://users.rowan.edu/~cone/curriculum/psychomotor.htm
Calmorin, Laurentina, 2011, Assessment of Student Learning 1, Rex Bookstore
Dave, R. H. (1970) In R. J. Armstrong et al., Developing and Writing Behavioral
Objectives, Tucson, AZ: Educational Innovators Press
De Guzman, Estefania and Adamos, Joel, (2015), Assessment of Learning 1,
Adriana Publishing Co., Inc.
DepEd Order No. 8, (2015) Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K
to 12 Basic Education Program, retrieved from
https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/04/01/do-8-s-2015-policy-guidelines-on-
classroom-assessment-for-the-k-to-12-basic-education-program/
MRBTalledo2020-2021
Modules in Prof Ed 73 (Assessment in Learning 1) 51
Culminating Activity
MRBTalledo2020-2021