State of Kenya Population Report 2020
State of Kenya Population Report 2020
State of Kenya Population Report 2020
OF KENYA
POPULATION
2020
“Zero Harmful Practices –
Accelerating the Promise of
ICPD25”
JUNE 2020
GOVERMENT OF KENYA
NATIONAL COUNCIL
FOR POPULATION
AND DEVELOPMENT UNITED NATIONS POPULATION FUND
FOREWORD
Kenya, through the National Council for Population and Development (NCPD) publishes the State of Kenya Population
Report each year to domesticate the global theme of the State of World Population Report. The report affords readers
an overview of the Kenyan situation within the context of the annual global theme.
The State of Kenya Population Report, 2020focused on getting to zero harmful practices with a special focus on mar-
riage and motherhood in childhood; Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and son preference. During the Nairobi Summit
on ICPD25, Kenya made commitments towards accelerating the promise on zero harmful practices and committed to
eliminating, by 2030, all forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV), including child and forced marriages, by addressing
social and cultural norms that propagate the practice while providing support to women and girls who have been
affected.
Child marriage has negative outcomes for both boys and girls, but girls are more adversely affected by this practice
because in most cases they have to leave school and begin motherhood when they are not mentally and physically
ready for motherhood experience. Their lives may be threatened with disease and death resulting from pregnancy and
child birth. This harmful practice is therefore a threat to the development prospects because it prevents many girls
from achieving their full potential and participating in social and economic activities that can improve their wellbeing.
Son preference is a product of gender-biased systems that assign and reinforce higher social status to men and boys
and that favor male over female children. From a human rights perspective, gender-biased sex selection is a harmful
practice because it translates a preference for boys over girls into a deliberate prevention of female births.
Ending discrimination against women and girls is not only an inalienable human right but the key to the social progress
and economic development of Kenya. GBV and harmful practices such as FGM and child marriage are hindrances to
achieving gender equality. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially Goal 5 on Gender Equality, cannot
be realized if progress is not made in this area.
Clearly, the propagation of harmful practices stands to prevent Kenya from achieving a demographic dividend and the
noble goals set in the Kenya Vision 2030, Big 4 Agenda, Population Policy for National Development, and the ICPD25
Kenya country commitments among others. It is therefore imperative that harmful practices be publicized and ad-
dressed with a view of ending them.
Finally, the National Council for Population and Development hopes that this report will prove to be a useful resource
to all the actors in the population sector involved in efforts to end all harmful practices thereby putting the country on
track towards to achievement of her development goals and improve the quality of life for all citizenry.
June, 2020
The development of the State of Kenya Population Report (SKPR), 2020 was undertaken through the technical and
financial support of the Government of Kenya and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Technical staffs of the
National Council for Population and Development (NCPD) and UNFPA were involved in the development of this report.
The technical team, under the leadership and coordination of the NCPD Director Technical Services (DTS), Mr. Peter
A. Nyakwara played a critical role in the compilation of this document and coordination of the entire process. Special
thanks go to Ms. Lucy Kimondo; Mr. Nzomo Mulatya, Mr. Francis Kundu, Ms. Fidelis Ndung’u, Mr. Ken Lwaki, Ms. Irene
Muhunzu, Mr. Morris Gitonga, Mr. Ezekiel Ngure, and Ms. Loise Alix for their efforts in ensuring the production of this
timely and good quality report.
The Council renders special recognition to the internal and external reviewers of the report for the valuable profes-
sional support provided during the process. To all who contributed in one way or another to the development of the
SKPR, 2020, we say thank you. This report will serve as a key reference document for policy makers and programmes
across the country.
Table of Contents
Foreword i
Acknowledgement ii
Kenya’s population was enumerated at 47.6 million in 2019 with an inter-censual population growth rate of
2.3 percent. This was an increase of about nine million over the 38.6 million enumerated in 2009. From in-
dependence in 1963 up to 2019, the country’s population increased five (5) fold as shown in Figure 1.1. The
population is dominated by young people with those below age 15 making up for 39 percent of the popula-
tion. Compared to 2009, the proportion of this population decreased from 43 to 39 percent. From the 2019
census, Kenya’s labor force (15 – 64 years) accounts for 57 percent and youth constitute 29 percent of the
total population. The elderly (age 60 and above) are 6 percent of the total population.
According to the census, Kenya had 918,270 people aged 5 years and above living with a disability. More females than
males had disabilities. The common types of disability found in the country during the census were mobility (385,417)
and visual impairment (333,520). A total of 9,729 persons had some form of albinism.
Kenya’s 2019 population pyramid shown in Figure 1.2 is typical of a population that is dominated by young persons.
This pyramid shows that the population of those in the age cohort 0-4 and 5-9 years is less than that of those in the
10-14 years cohort. This is a clear signal of the country’s declining fertility over the years and hence a reduction in the
proportion of the population below 15 years when compared to previous censuses. In 2019 it was estimated that 75
Figure 1.3 indicates that Kenya experienced a decline in fertility from 5 children per woman in 2003 to 4 children in
2014. This can be attributed to the increase in contraceptive use whose prevalence rose from 39.3 percent of married
women in 2003 to 58 percent in 2014. The effect of increased contraceptive use and decline in fertility is the decline
in population growth rate from 2.9 percent to 2.2 percent between 2009 and 2019.
Positive trends have also been witnessed with other population dynamics indicators such as infant and under five
mortality rates which have declined substantially over the last two decades. This can partly be attributed to the in-
crease in health service deliveries which improved from 40 to 61 percent over the same period.
Overall, the positive performance of the above population dynamics indicators shows that the implementation of Ken-
ya’s Population Policy for National Development is on course and the country is moving towards the goal of matching
the population growth rate to the available resources for sustainable development.
There is a substantial variation in the size and spatial distribution of populations in the counties. The five Counties with
the highest population are Nairobi City (4,396,828), Kiambu (2,417,600), Nakuru (2,162,107), Kakamega (1,867,539)
and Bungoma (1,670535) while the five Counties with the least population Lamu (143,916), Isiolo (267,993), Samburu
(310,320), Tana River (315,941) and Taita Taveta (340,664). Some of the rural counties with high population densities
(number of persons per square kilometre) are Vihiga with 1,047, Kisii with 958, Nyamira with 675, and Kakamega with
618 respectively. Marsabit County has the lowest density in the country of 6 persons per square kilometer followed by
Tana River and Isiolo with 8 and 11 persons respectively. The patterns of the spatial distribution with regard to popula-
tion density show that they remained unchanged between 1999 and 2019.
Since the outbreak of COVID-19 on the world scene in December 2019, the first case in Kenya was reported in March
2020. By that time, thousands of people had fallen sick from the disease and some had died especially in China, Italy
and Spain. Between December 2019 and March 2020, Kenya took several measures in preparation to combat the dis-
ease. These measures included training health workers, creation of COVID-19 treatment and quarantine centers, and
educating the public on the disease. When the disease hit the country in March 2020 and the number of infections
continued to rise alarmingly in Europe and America, further measures were implemented including closing down of
learning institutions and certain types of businesses, restriction of movement across the country’s international bor-
ders and across the borders of certain counties, and introduction of daily curfew hours.
The above measures were taken to minimize the impact of COVID-19 on Kenya’s population in terms of number of
infections and deaths. As of 1stJuly 2020, the total number of reported infections and deaths stood at 6,673 and 149
respectively representing a 2.2 percent death rate of positively diagnosed cases. More infections and deaths had
been reported among men compared to women. At the beginning of July 2020, the global death rate from COVID-19
was about 4.6 percent while in some of the worst hit countries it was about 15.5, 14.4, 4.3, and 4.0 percent in United
Kingdom, Italy, United States of America, and Brazil respectively. Though still at risk, Kenya’s population has remained
relatively safe for now from COVID-19 deaths.
On the flip side, measures to contain the spread of COVID-19 appear to have had a negative effect women and chil-
dren, especially girls. From anecdotal sources, incidents of gender based violence are on the increase because many
people have been forced to stay home longer thereby creating a situation where perpetrators and victims of gender
based violence spend more time together. In addition to this, the closure of schools had led to an increase in pregnan-
cies among school girls as a result of defilement or engagement in sexual activities since some spend quite some time
From the above, COVID-19 poses a threat to the gains made in improving the demographic indicators and quality of life
of the population. More action is required to arrest the spread of this pandemic.
Kenya has made several strides in an effort to achieve a demographic dividend from the large population of young
persons in the country. The decline in fertility levels over the years is a good indication that Kenya is on the right path in
creating conducive environment for a demographic dividend. To actualize this, a demographic dividend roadmap was
developed in 2017 to guide the country in making strategic investments in the health, education and training, econom-
ic, and governance sectors with the aim of harnessing the potential of young people and accelerate socio-economic
development that would ultimately lead to a better quality of life for the citizenry. In this regard, access to reproductive
health information and services as well as to education and training opportunities for young persons is being improved
countrywide. More employment opportunities are also being created and youth are continually being empowered to
participate in governance at all levels.
With the above measures in place, Kenya is projected to achieve a demographic dividend for a period of 40 years
starting from 2038. However, the advent of COVID-19 threatens to reverse the gains that have been made to harness
the youth potential. Further, some harmful practices also threaten to impede the progress being made to enhance the
role of women and girls in actualizing and benefiting from the anticipated demographic dividend. The State of Kenya
Population 2020 report therefore gives attention to three harmful practices that affect women and girls mostly; child
marriage, female genital mutilation/cutting, and son preference. These practices are highlighted with the aim of en-
couraging discussions and action to end these practices in harmony with Kenya’s commitment made at the Nairobi
Summit on ICPD25 to ensure “Zero Harmful Practices by 2030”.
The criteria for determining whether or not a practice is harmful was laid down in a Joint General Recommendation
issued by the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of
Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) Committees in 2014. The Committees described harmful practices as: per-
sistent practices and behaviors that are grounded in discrimination on the basis of, among other things, sex, gender,
age, in addition to multiple and/or intersecting forms of discrimination that often involve violence and cause physical
and/or psychological harm or suffering. The harm that these practices cause to the victims surpass the immediate
physical and mental consequences and often has the purpose or effect of impairing the recognition, enjoyment and
exercise of the human rights and fundamental freedoms of women and children. There is also a negative impact on
their dignity, physical, psychosocial and moral integrity and development, participation, health, educational, economic
and social status.
Child/forced marriage and teenage pregnancy, Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), and Sexual gender-based violence
(SGBV) and Son Preference are harmful practices determined by the CEDAW and CRC Committees that meet these
criteria and recognized as human rights violations. There are provisions under international, regional and national law
that prohibit harmful practices and oblige states to take measures to eliminate both harmful practices and their root
causes. However, these practices remain common in Kenya with prevalence rates of 23 percent for child marriage, 18
percent for teenage pregnancy, and 21 percent for FGM (KNBS, 2015).
Right to protection from abuse: Article 19 of the CRC imposes the obligation to protect children from: All forms of
physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation, including
sexual abuse, while in the care of parent (s), legal guardian(s) or any other person who has the care of the child.
Forced marriage or child marriage is regarded as a form of violence against the child while subjecting a child to the
rigors of motherhood before her body is ready for sexual activity and pregnancy.
Right to health: This is provided for in Article 24. State parties have the obligation to ‘diminish infant and child mor-
tality’. Article 24(3) obliges state parties to take ‘all effective and appropriate measures with a view to abolishing
traditional practices prejudicial to the health of children’. FGM, pregnancy, birth complications and medical conditions
such as fistula reinforce child marriages as a ‘traditional practice’ harmful to the health of children. Son preference is
a harmful practice that may lead to selective abortion or female infanticide. This practice denies the girl child good
health, education, recreation, economic opportunity and the right to choose her partner.
Right to education: The primary duty of state parties embodied in Article 28 of the CRC is to ensure provision of equal
education to children. Article 24(2)(a) of the CRC requires measures be taken to encourage regular attendance at
schools and the reduction of drop-out rates. Both elements above cannot be achieved where communities practice
child marriage because it is not feasible for a child to take care of family responsibilities and attend school at the same
time.
Freedom from all forms of exploitation: Article 36 of the CRC requires states to protect the child from all forms of
exploitation prejudicial to any aspects of the welfare of the child. This provision strengthens the argument that child
marriage is a form of exploitation and in this case, it is sexual exploitation.
Right to state support after exploitation: Article 39 provides as follows: States Parties shall take all appropriate mea-
sures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect,
exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. State parties
b. The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)
CEDAW entered into force in 1981 and is the premier binding instrument for the protection of women’s rights under
the UN human rights system. FGM is a violation of the principle of ‘equality between men and women’ administered on
women based on sex and gendered discrimination. Article 1, CEDAW defines discrimination as any distinction, exclu-
sion or restriction made on the basis of sex which has the effect or purpose of impairing or nullifying the recognition,
enjoyment or exercise by women.
FGM is also a violation of the right to health as enshrined in article 12 of CEDAW. The extreme physical and psycho-
logical pain which FGM victims endure violates their freedom from ‘degrading treatment’ in violation of article 7 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Child marriages violate article 16(2) of CEDAW, which states that
‘the betrothal and the marriage of a child shall have no legal effect …’ and that necessary action should be taken to
specify a minimum marriage age and to make the registration of marriages in an official registry compulsory.
CEDAW requires states parties to take all appropriate measures: to modify the social and cultural patterns of conduct
of men and women, with a view to achieving the elimination of prejudices and customary and all other practices which
are based on the idea of the inferiority or the superiority of either of the sexes or on stereotyped roles for men and
women.
The ICPD PoA on Gender Equality, Equity and Empowerment of Women focused on elimination all forms of discrimi-
nation against the girl child and the root causes of son preference, which results in harmful and unethical practices
regarding female infanticide and prenatal sex selection. Governments were urged to prohibit female genital mutilation
wherever it exists and to give vigorous support to efforts among non-governmental and community organizations and
religious institutions to eliminate such practices. The PoA explicitly recognizes female genital mutilation as a violation
of basic rights that must be prohibited. In commemoration of 25 years of ICPD in 2019, Countries re-affirmed commit-
ment to deliver on the ICPD PoA and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This includes striving to achieve zero
sexual and gender-based violence and harmful practices.
Gender equality (SDG 5) is an agreed goal under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which also explicitly
calls for ending all forms of discrimination, violence and harmful practices against all women and girls. Governments
are required to put in place various interventions to address child marriage through collaborative efforts to support
coordinated approaches to gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls, including through the UNF-
PA/UNICEF Global Programme to Accelerate Action to End Child Marriage.
e. Maputo Protocol
The Maputo Protocol starts off by defining harmful practices as ‘all behavior, attitudes and/or practices which nega-
tively affect the fundamental rights of women and girls, such as their right to life, health, dignity, education and physical
integrity’. Article 2(2) of the Protocol requires states to ‘modify the social and cultural patterns of conduct of women
Under both international and regional law, children are regarded as incapable of giving their full and free consent to
marriage and the marriage of children is therefore widely prohibited. Article 6(b) of the Maputo Protocol specifies that
the minimum age of marriage shall be 18 years of age. Universal Declaration of Human Rights stated that “men and
women of full age… have the right to marry and to found a family” and that “marriage shall be entered into only with
the free and full consent of the intending spouses”. Eighteen years later, that language was echoed in the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The right to marry free from coercion and force is also embodied in the Women’s
Convention. Similarly, Article 5 of the Maputo Protocol, which mandates the elimination of harmful practices, contains
an explicit reference to FGM in article 5(b).
State parties to the Maputo Protocol are required by article 25 to provide ‘appropriate remedies’ to women whose
rights have been violated. In providing appropriate remedies, states are required to establish institutions to ensure
that such ‘remedies are determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other
competent authority provided for by law.
f. The African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC)
FGM and child marriage have also been recognized as harmful practices under the African regional human rights sys-
tem. The African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC) is the regional initiative for the protection
of the rights of children in Africa. It came into force on 29 November 1999.Article 21 of the ACRWC provides States
Parties to take all appropriate measures to eliminate harmful social and cultural practices affecting the welfare, dignity,
normal growth and development of the child. Article 21 contains a specific reference to child marriage in article 21(2).
Articles 16 and 27 of the ACRWC prohibit child abuse and sexual exploitation.
A number of national legislation and policy frameworks have been put in place in Kenya to address child/forced mar-
riage and teenage pregnancy, Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), and Sexual Gender-Based Violence (SGBV) and son
preference. These legislations and policies are:
a. Constitution of Kenya (2010) prevents any person from compelling another person to ‘perform, observe, or
undergo any cultural practice or rite.’ Children are also protected from ‘abuse’ and ‘harmful cultural practices’
under Article 53(1)(d) of the Constitution. This has seen enactment of legislations such as the Prohibition of
Female Genital Mutilation Act (2011) and revision of the Children Act (2016).
The constitution sets the minimum age of marriage and prohibits early marriage under the age of 18. The
Marriage act of 2014 consolidates existing marriage laws into a single Act that provides guidelines on types
of marriages in Kenya and minimum age for marriage. This helps to dissuade families and communities from
marrying off their daughters as children.
b. The Children Act (2016) Article 14focuses on protection of the child against FGM, early marriage and other
cultural rites. It Stipulates that “no person shall subject a child to female circumcision, early marriage or other
cultural rites, customs or traditional practices that are likely to negatively affect the child’s life, health, social
welfare, dignity or psychological development”. The Act aims at protection of children from retrospective
cultural practices. It criminalizes child marriage and FGM. The Act safeguards the rights and welfare of the
child against child abuse and sexual exploitation
d. The Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act (2011) criminalizes all forms of FGM, regardless of the
age or status of the girl or woman. It bans stigmatization of women who have not undergone FGM. It also
makes it illegal to aid someone in performing FGM, fail to report a case to the authorities or carry out FGM
on a Kenyan woman abroad.
e. The Marriage Act(2014)calls for registration of all marriages effectively granting women a legal basis for
land ownership claims.
f. The Matrimonial Property Act (2013) protects women’s rights to property acquired during marriage, and
the Land Registration Act defers to it. The Land Act provides spouses some protections from having their
home or land leased or sold without their knowledge.
g. The Law of Succession Act (2012) gives both male and female children the same inheritance rights.
h. The National Gender and Equality Commission Act (2011) seeks to promote gender equality and free-
dom from discrimination in accordance with Article 27 of the Constitution. It also provides a framework to
co-ordinate and facilitate mainstreaming of issues of gender, persons with disability and other marginalized
groups in national development.
i. Persons with Disability Act (2003) Has very progressive and responsive provisions to promote and pro-
tect the rights and freedoms of persons with disabilities both adults and children.
j. The Population Policy for National Development (2012) calls for tackling of harmful socio-cultural prac-
tices such as early marriages, FGM and nutritionally biased taboos that still exist in some communities by
proposing a raft of measures such as Implementation of the Sexual Offences Act of 2006 and the Children
Act, establishment of the Gender Based Violence (GBV) centers in public health facilities and development
of guidelines on the management of rape and sexual violence.
k. The National Policy for the Eradication of Female Genital Mutilation (2019) focuses on strategies for
the complete eradication of FGM in Kenya. These strategies include; strengthening multi-sectoral interven-
tions, coordination, networking, partnership and community participation; addressing emerging trends and
practices largely aimed at avoiding the enforcement of the law; addressing gender inequality by promoting
the empowerment of girls and women; strengthening research, data collection, information and knowledge
management on FGM.
l. The National Policy towards Prevention and Response to SGBV (2014): This policy puts in place a frame-
work to accelerate implementation of laws, policies and programmes for prevention and response to GBV by
state and non – state actors for the realization of a society where men, women, boys and girls are free from
all forms violence.
m. The National Guidelines on the Management of Sexual Violence (2014): provides a framework for the
provision of services to SGBV survivors.
n. County Government Policy on Sexual and Gender Based Violence (2017) The policy provided the frame-
work to be adapted by the counties in dealing with SGBV.
Human rights obligations are understood to require governments to respect, protect and fulfill the human rights of
their populations. Because harmful practices often involve violence against girls and women, governments have an
obligation to prevent, investigate and punish such acts, including when non-state actors, such as family members,
perpetrate the violence (UN CEDAW, 2017, 1992). In this regard the following recommendations are made;
• Though the policy and legal environment in Kenya has improved and is progressive, the existing policy and le-
gal framework ought to be embraced and implemented adequately by supporting enforcement programmes
focused on the implementation of policies and laws against FGM/C, Early Marriage and Son preference
• There is need to make some amendments to some of the legal and policy provisions to respond to emerging
challenges and gaps, and expand scope of acts to address some of the life-threatening conditions faced by
women and girls e.g. “medicalization” and cross-border nature of FGM.
• The implementation of the policies and laws calls for multi-sectoral and inter-linkages across the sectors of
health, education, social services, community leadership, law enforcement, private sector, civil society, legal
and forensic. It is imperative to have an implementation framework that brings all these sectors together.
It is rarely due to the absence of laws that women and girls have their genitals cut, get forced into marriage, are fed far
too much or too little, or are less desired as progeny. Effective measures to prevent and eliminate harmful practices
must be part of a “well defined, rights-based and locally relevant holistic strategy”, according to the treaty bodies that
monitor adherence to the Women’s Convention and the Child Rights Convention. The strategy should comprise laws,
policies and social interventions “combined with commensurate political commitment and accountability at all levels”.
Kenya’s Population Policy for National Development recognizes child marriage as a harmful practice perpetuated by
diverse cultural and religious beliefs. High levels of adolescent fertility in the country are partly attributed to child mar-
riage. Despite Government efforts and initiatives to curb this practice, it still exists in many communities in the country.
During the Nairobi Summit on ICPD25 held in November 2020, the Government of Kenya recommitted itself to end
child marriages and motherhood in childhood by 2030 using various strategies.
In many countries worldwide, child marriage is still practiced though prohibited by law. About 33,000 children are
affected by this practice every day throughout the year. It is estimated that over half a billion women living today were
married when they were still children. Child marriage is closely tied to low levels of education, poverty and rural resi-
dence. Girls with only a primary education are twice as likely to be married or in a union than those with a secondary
or higher education. Girls with no education are three times more likely to be married or in a union before age 18 than
those with a secondary or higher education (UNFPA, 2012a). Child marriage has been shown to increase during hu-
manitarian crises caused by natural disaster and conflict.
Prevalence of child marriage is measured by computing the percentage of women aged 20 to 24 who were married
or in an informal union before they attained the age of 18 years. In 2006, the global prevalence of child marriage was
about 25 percent. This prevalence declined to 21 percent in 2019. Regionally, the highest prevalence is in West and
Central Africa at 40 percent, followed by East and Southern Africa at 34 percent (UNICEF, 2019a). In Latin America
and the Caribbean, the prevalence of child marriage is about 25 per, while in the Middle East and North Africa it is 18
The prevalence of child marriage in Kenya is 23 percent according to the 2014 KDHS. This practice is more prevalent
in rural areas than in urban areas. The prevalence of child marriage in rural areas of Kenya is 29 percent while in urban
areas it is 17 percent as shown in Figure 3.1.
Table 3.1 shows the prevalence of child marriage in Kenya by county as established by the 2014 KDHS. The counties
with the highest prevalence of child marriage are Tana River, Turkana, Samburu, Wajir, Isiolo, Samburu, and Migori
where the prevalence is over 50 percent. Tana River county has the highest prevalence at 60 percent followed by
Turkana and Wajir counties at 57 and 53 percent respectively. Nineteen counties have prevalence rates of less than
20 percent. These include Nairobi and Mombasa cities whose prevalence rates are 15 and 14 percent respectively.
Makueni and Elgeyo Marakwet counties have the lowest prevalence rates in the country at 10 and 7 percent each.
24 Meru 24.6%
Source: Kenya Demographic and Health Survey, 2014
Normally, marriage precedes motherhood but the converse is not uncommon. An analysis of women aged 20 – 49
years in Kenya who got married when they were children shows that about two-thirds commenced motherhood when
they were still children (KNBS, 2015). The proportion is the same for these women irrespective of their residence and
wealth status. Table 3.2 shows the proportion of women aged 20 – 49 years who got married and began childbearing
when they were still children by county.
The results in Table 3.2 show that over 70 percent of women aged 20 – 49 years who were married when they were
below the age of 18 years in Homa Bay, Migori, Meru, Tana River, Kwale, Siaya and Mombasa commenced motherhood
when they were still children. Homa Bay has the highest proportion of women (76%) who began motherhood in child-
hood. Wajir, Makueni, and West Pokot have the lowest proportion of women 20 – 49 years who were children when
they began motherhood.
The main consequence of child marriages is early pregnancies and child birth. Due to their tender age, girls are usually
not ready physically, emotionally, intellectually or financially for this motherhood experience which is closely linked to
the risk of death and injury of child mothers as well as low birth weight, and infant and child disease and death for their
newborns. Another consequence of child marriage is the fact that these girls are more likely to have more children in
Table 3.3 shows the distribution of women aged 20-24 years in Kenya by education attainment and age at first mar-
riage. The Table indicates that among the women who got married when they were still children, 14 percent had no
education and 68 percent had primary education as the highest education attainment. This implies that 82 percent of
these women never went beyond primary school and it compares poorly with the proportion of women who did not
go beyond primary school among those who got married when they were adults and those who have never married.
About 47 percent of the former and 25 percent of the latter never went beyond primary school in their education. The
proportion of women who have attained higher education is highest among women who have never married (26%)
followed by those who got married when they were already adults (10%) and those who got married when they were
still children (less than 1%). From these results it is evident that child marriage and motherhood in childhood deprives
women in Kenya from fully accessing their right to education and the benefits that come with secondary and higher
education attainment.
Table 3.3: Distribution of Women Aged 20-24 By Education Attainment and Age At First
Marriage
Age at first marriage/union
County Adult (18 years and
Child (Below 18 years) above) Never Married
No education 14.2% 3.7% 1.5%
Primary 67.7% 43.3% 23.7%
Secondary 17.5% 43.2% 48.5%
Higher 0.5% 9.8% 26.3%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Source: Kenya Demographic and Health Survey, 2014
Table 3.4 shows the distribution of women aged 20-24 years in Kenya by their wealth status and age at first marriage.
This Table shows that among women who got married while they were still children, over half (54%) are poor. As for
the women who got married for the first time when they were already adults and those who have never married, about
30 and 20 percent are poor respectively. At the same time, over half of the women who have never married (62%) and
those who got married when they were adults (54%) are rich wealth quintiles. Less than one-third (29%) of women
who got married when they were still children are in the rich wealth quintiles. These figures demonstrate the economic
disadvantage that women who get married when they are children face later in life.
Figure 3.2 shows the distribution of women aged 20 - 49 years by experience of gender based violence and age of first
marriage. The results indicate that women who get married when they are children had a higher chance of experienc-
ing gender based violence compared to their counterparts who get married for the first time when they were already
adults. About 37 percent of women who got married when they were children had experienced emotional violence
compared to 31 percent who got married later. Experience of less severe violence was more common compared to
severe violence in both groups of women. Among those who got married when they were adults, about 13 percent had
experienced sexual violence compared to 15 percent among those who were married in childhood.
When girls have a choice, they usually decide to marry later. For this reason, many programmes designed to end child
marriage choose to empower girls. The Sustainable Development Goals and the creation in 2016 of the UN Global
Programme to Accelerate Action to End Child Marriage provides countries and communities with an opportunity to
Kenya’s Population Policy for National Development targets to raise the age at first marriage to 23 by 2030 by enhanc-
ing Information Education and Communication on child marriage in communities that still practice early marriages.
This will complement efforts that are being made by stakeholders in the country to improve education attainment,
female labor force participation and enforce laws against child marriage.
• ensure that adolescents and youth attain the highest possible standard of health
• eliminate all forms of gender based violence, including child and forced marriages, by addressing social and
cultural norms that propagate the practice while providing support to women and girls who have been af-
fected.
Implementation of the above Kenya country commitments that were made at the Nairobi Summit on ICPD25 will help
the country to reduce and eliminate both child marriage and motherhood in childhood.
4.1 Introduction
The “medicalization” of this harmful practice by medical professionals is never justified. Even
when the procedure is performed in a sterile environment by a health-care provider, there is
the risk of health consequences immediately and later in life. Under any circumstances, FGM violates human rights. It
also violates medical ethics (WHO, 2016). Performing FGM in a doctor’s office serves to normalize the practice, under-
mining efforts to eliminate it altogether.
Global human rights instruments unequivocally condemn FGM, yet 4.1 million girls and women are at risk of being
subjected to it in 2020 alone. Some 200 million girls and women alive today have undergone some form of genital
mutilation. Furthermore, there are an estimated 3 million girls at risk of undergoing FGM every year. The majority of
girls are cut before they turn 15 years old. FGM has been documented in 30 countries, mainly in Africa, as well as in the
Middle East and Asia. Some forms of FGM have also been reported in other countries, including among certain ethnic
groups in South America. Moreover, growing migration has increased the number of girls and women living outside
their country of origin who have undergone FGM or who may be at risk of being subjected to the practice in Europe,
Australia and North America (WHO, 2020).
FGM qualification age in Africa vary from one state to another and from one community to another. From infancy in
Ethiopia, Eritrea and Mali to seven-month pregnant females in Nigeria. In Somali (at the horn of Africa) it was tradition-
ally performed on adolescents as an initiation right to womanhood. Somalia is the country with the highest prevalence
of FGM in Africa at about 98 percent of women.
A report by UNICEF, 2020 states that the type of FGM procedure performed varies mainly with ethnicity. Estimates
indicate that around 90% of female genital mutilation cases include Type 1, II and IV (See Annex 3). The United Na-
tions strives for the practice’s full eradication by 2030, under Sustainable Development Goal 5, which explicitly calls
for ending all forms of discrimination, violence and harmful practices against all women and girls everywhere thereby,
recognizing the positive effect this would have on the health, dignity, education and economic advancement of girls
FGM is grounded in beliefs that it improves fertility, enhances sexual pleasure for men, suppresses female sexuality,
leads to better hygiene, prevents infidelity, complies with the demands of religious institutions or results in acceptance
by the community (Kandala and others, 2019; Alhassan and others, 2016; Ashimi and others, 2015; Bogale and others,
2014). It is believed to uphold a girl’s purity, honor and cleanliness and it is used to control women’s sexuality as a way
to make girls and women more marriageable, conforming to social norms that have sustained the practice for centu-
ries (Mackie, 2009).
Empowering women—and men—to say no for their daughters would be transformational, but they need the agency
and information to make a different choice. In almost every context, parents believe that the practice is the right thing
to do for their daughters. In many cases, parents are aware of the physical and psychological risks but do it in the in-
terest of social acceptance (Eldin and others, 2018; Tamire and Molla, 2013). Mothers are often the ones who subject
daughters to FGM, perpetuating gender-unequal norms that drive the practice from one generation to the next.
FGM can result in severe physical and psychological harm. It can cause painful intercourse, infection, cysts and infer-
tility and can heighten the risk of HIV, obstetric fistula, complications giving birth and newborn mortality. It can also
trigger depression, nightmares, panic and trauma. Regardless of why it is done, a girl can be harmed for life. FGM is a
procedure with no health benefits, but immediate and long-term health consequences, ranging from infection to dis-
abilities that last a lifetime as shown in Annex 4 and 5.
FGM is practiced by some ethnic groups in Kenya as well as in other East African countries and is motivated by beliefs
about what is considered proper sexual behavior for women and what is necessary to prepare them for marriage
(WHO, 2014b). However, the practice is widely acknowledged as a violation of children and women’s rights, and it has
the potential to cause serious medical complications. In 2011, Kenya passed a law, the Prohibition of Female Genital
Mutilation Act (2011), that banned FGM nationwide. Under this law, it is illegal to practice FGC in Kenya or to take
someone abroad for FGC.
The Session Paper No. 3 of 2012 on the Population Policy for National Development notes that FGM is one of the
practices that fuels disparities in gender equality, equity and empowerment of women. The Policy proposes the fol-
lowing measures to be undertaken with regard to FGM and other harmful practices; Improve the policy environment
for mainstreaming gender and reproductive rights in population and reproductive health programmes; Advocate for
availability and access to quality treatment, care and rehabilitative services for victims or those affected by harmful
practices and/or violence.
Kenya is home to 4 million girls and women who have experienced FGM. However, according to the 2014 KDHS, 93
percent of women and 89 percent of men aged 15–49 believe that FGM should be stopped. Traditional practitioners
usually perform FGM on 7 out of every 10 girls in Kenya. Some medical personnel are also involved in perpetuating the
practice especially among the Kisii (UNICEF, 2019).
In 2019, at the Nairobi Summit on ICPD25 that was held to mark the twenty-fifth anniversary of the International Con-
ference on Population and Development (ICPD), participants reiterated their commitment to strive for zero harmful
practices. During this Conference, Kenya made the following commitments pertaining to prevalence in gender vio-
lence and harmful practices;
• Eliminate, by 2030, all forms of gender based violence, including child and forced marriages, by addressing
social and cultural norms that propagate the practice while providing support to women and girls who have
been affected (Commitment 14).
• End gender and other forms of discrimination by 2030 through enforcing the anti-discrimination laws and
providing adequate budgetary allocations to institutions mandated to promote gender equality, equity and
empowerment of women and girls (Commitment 15).
FGM or female circumcision is widely practiced in some Kenyan communities. It involves partial or total removal of the
external female genitalia or other injury to the female organs for cultural or other non-therapeutic reasons. The prac-
tice is widely condemned as harmful because it poses a potentially great risk to the health and well-being of the wom-
en and girls who are subjected to it. It is also generally recognized as a violation of children’s rights (KDHS, 2008/9).
According to the KDHS 2014, 21 percent of girls and women aged 15 to 49 years have undergone the FGM which has
had a gradual decline from 32 percent in 2003 as shown in Figure 4.1. Regional variations are notable varying from 98
percent in the North Eastern region to 1 percent in the Western region.
Figure 4.2 shows the trend in FGM by place of residence from 2003 to 2014. There is a remarkable decline in FGM over
the years both in urban and rural areas. Rural women are more likely than urban women to be circumcised.
Figure 4.4 shows the prevalence of FGM in Kenya by County. FGM in Mandera County among women 15-49 is univer-
sal (100 percent). In contrast, 1 percent or less of women in the Kilifi, Kakamega, Vihiga and Busia are circumcised.
Counties in the North Eastern region have high prevalence of FGM, while Counties largely in Western and Luo Nyan-
za have low prevalence. To note are Counties in the Central region of Kenya, where FGM is relatively high in Kirinyaga
and Murang’a Counties at 29 and 26 percent respectively. To reduce FGM and achieve the SDG target, a huge decline
in the practice is required in North Eastern region and parts of Rift Valley and Nyanza regions.
4.5 Recommendations
FGM is a harmful practices held in place by a mix of societal forces. Addressing this retrogressive practice requires
holistic multi-sectoral approaches that engage with households, community leaders, institutions and policymakers.
In Kenya, since the communities that practice FGM are known, there is need to design county specific FGM pro-
grammes if the fight against FGM is to be won.
Agencies and partners implementing activities in regions where FGM is practiced need to consider more closely the
reasons why the practice of FGM persists in these communities, and develop alternative messages and strategies.
More interventions are needed to help girls cope with the tremendous social pressure that forces them to submit to
the practice, for example through girl empowerment to help girls resist the social pressure to undergo FGM. These
can be as simple as clubs in schools to teach life-skills, and offer information and social skills training to resist family
pressure.
There is need to build upon the initiatives that have been identified as encouraging abandonment, such as encourag-
ing girls to stay in school, supporting teachers in discussing FGM with girls and boys, encouraging churches to actively
oppose FGM, implementing girl empowerment and Alternative Rite of Passage (ARP) programmes.
Increased community education is needed on the negative health and social effects of FGM and its illegality. Pro-
grammes should engage the whole community, including boys, men, local authority staff, teachers, community and
church leaders, and traditional circumcisers and health professionals.
Government and the local agencies need to strengthen public awareness around the existing laws in relation to FGM
and the process of reporting cases of FGM to the authorities. The government also needs to enforce the laws more
diligently at local and national levels. Stronger enforcement of the existing laws prohibiting FGM and promoting chil-
dren’s rights is needed.
Engage men and community leaders in initiatives to abandon FGM. Although the practice is seen as largely a women’s
affair, men can have a role to play as heads of households providing the resources needed for the ceremony. The com-
munity needs to be persuaded that cultures can and do change, and it is not therefore necessary to cling to a practice
whose purpose is upholding cultural tradition.
5.1 Overview
Son preference is a product of gender-biased systems that assign and reinforce higher
When Boys are valued
social status to men and boys and that favor male over female children. Son prefer- more highly than girls,
ence may also be expressed through gender-biased sex selection: the termination of a pressure to have a
pregnancy when the fetus is determined to be female, or pre-implantation sex determi- son is intense. The
preference for sons
nation and selection, or “sperm-sorting” for in-vitro fertilization. From a human rights
over daughters maybe
perspective, gender-biased sex selection is a harmful practice because it translates so pronounced in some
a preference for boys over girls into a deliberate prevention of female births. In some societies that couples
low-income countries of Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, for example, son preference is will go to great lengths
to avoid giving birth to a
widespread, but postnatal and gender-biased sex selection are uncommon.
girl or will fail to care for
the health and well-be-
Unlike son preference in general, the manifestation of it in gender-biased sex selec- ing of a daughter they
tion may be more directly measured through a country’s data on “sex ratio at birth” already have in favor of
(Guilmoto, 2015). The “natural” or normal, sex ratio at birth in most parts of the world their son.
is between 105 and 106 male births for every 100 female births (Chahnazarian, 1988).
Any deviation from this natural sex ratio at birth therefore reflects some degree of gen-
der-biased sex selection (Chao and others, 2019; Tafuro and Guilmoto, 2019). Litera-
ture indicates that in general, couples do not engage in gender-biased sex selection for their first child. However, they
may subsequently opt for sex-selective abortions if their first child was a girl. In 2001, measured census data revealed
that the sex ratio at birth among women who already had two girls increased to 223 (UNFPA, 2013).
The strongest son preferences are observed in countries with sex ratios exceeding 120: Mauritania, Senegal, Guinea,
Nepal, Azerrbaijan, Jordan, Mali, Armenia, Niger and Chad (John Bongarts,2013). Two countries—China and India—
together account for about 90 percent to 95 percent of the estimated 1.2 million to 1.5 million missing female births
annually worldwide due to gender-biased (prenatal) sex selection (Chao and others, 2019; Bongaarts and Guilmoto,
2015). In India, a deeply entrenched preference for male children continues, and some families still seek to abort
female fetuses, even though gender-biased sex selection has been banned, or neglect the nutrition and health of
daughters in favor of sons. In her review of the empirical evidence on gender preferences, Fuse (2008) concludes
that, although North Africa has not been subject to much research compared to East or South Asia, there is evidence
of strong gender bias against girls. She further writes that of all sub-regions in the world, it appears that the least is
known about Sub-Saharan Africa. Evidence from a comparative analysis by Rossiand Rouanet (2015) shows that pre-
dominance of son preference in North Africa (Morocco, Tunisia and Egypt) has increased over time. They concluded
that there is weak evidence of son preference in Mali, Senegal and in the Great Lakes region.
In most of the sub-Sahara African countries, more women have son preference than daughter preference (Kana,2008).
Sub-Saharan African countries that had substantial son preference as reported in DHS surveys from the early 1990s
(Arnold 1997) continued to have considerable son preference in the 2000s (i.e. Mali and Senegal). Son preference is
especially prominent in Burkina Faso and Senegal, where more than 30 percent of women have son preference than
daughter preference.
Although it is well recognized that sons are strongly valued in traditional patrilineal societies in Great Lakes region, no
evidence has been found of sex ratios favoring boys at birth in Kenya. There is also no or very few studies that directly
link son preference to violation of human rights in the country. According to the census data, Kenya has a natural sex
ratio level of 103 which simply means that at birth there are 103 males per 100 females born since 1969.
From anlaysis of KDHS 2014 data, a large proportion of women and men (67% and 69% respectively) reported having
no sex preference. However, a higher proportion of men than women have preference for sons compared to daughters
as shown in Figure 5.1.
As shown in Figure 5.2, men prefer sons to duaghters regardless of whether they are in the urban or rural areas.It is
however worthy to note that,despite few cases of the son preference in both rural and urban areas, 7 out of 10 men
and women have no sex preference.
Analysis of KDHS 2014 also shows that daughter preference is clearly pronounced among men who don’t profess to
any religion and among the Muslims as compared to other religions. In over half of the Counties in Kenya, a higher
proportion of men have a preference for sons than for daughters. Figure 5.4 indicates that the proportion of men who
have son preference is highest in Turkana (53%), Wajir (52%), and Kwale (46%) Counties. There was no daughter
preference reported among men in Mandera County.
In 26 Counties of Kenya, a higher proportion of women have son preference over daughters. At the same time, a high-
er proportion of women prefer daughters over sons in the remaining 21 Counties. This is highest in Turkana (29%),
Kakamega (27%) and Vihiga (26%) Counties. Figure 5.5 shows that Wajir (41%), Laikipia (27%), Tana River (26%),
Garissa (26%) and Kericho (26%) counties have the highest proportion of women who prefer sons over daughters.
Preference for sons over daughters have a number of negative consequences which include the following;
• One notable consequence of the continued disproportionate importance given to boys is the huge
pressure put upon women to produce sons. This pressure can have particularly debilitating effects on
the mental and physical health of women.
• The pressures to engage in sex selection in a gender discriminatory environment not only directly affect
women’s reproductive decisions but also put women in a position where they must perpetuate the lower
status of girls through son preference.
• Women always bear the consequences of giving birth to an ‘unwanted girl’ child which include violence,
abandonment, divorce (or being forced to live with an additional wife) or even death (Ganatra, Hirve &
Rao, 2001; Li, 2007).
• Societal pressures may lead women to terminate pregnancies against their will. In some cases, a wom-
an who refuses to accede to societal expectations may endure physical violence, social exclusion and
divorce.
• Societal pressures on couples to have sons may also pressure women to have more pregnancies than
they desire, denying their right to freely and responsibly make their own decisions about the timing and
spacing of pregnancies.
Solutions to eradicate harmful practices against girls and women will vary across countries. Generally, these strate-
gies must encompass prevention, protection and care and they should aim at achieving gender equality and women’s
rights at the level of families as well as in institutions and across societies. Countries should endorse these strategies
as essential (and investment worthy) steps towards a more peaceful, fair world for everyone with an aim of getting to
zero harmful practices while ensuring no community is left behind on this fight. This implies a multi sectoral ap-
proach since these practices and the perpetrators are insidious and frequently occur beyond the reach of laws and
the data that might track their spread. This will accelerate the promise during the ICPD25 Nairobi Summit as well as
the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Kenya has made substantial gains in ending gender based violence, child gender preferences, elimination of all forms
of discrimination against women and harmful practices that negatively impact on girls and women future. During the
Nairobi Summit on ICPD25, held last year to mark the twenty-fifth anniversary of the ICPD, Kenya committed to end
the Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) by strengthening coordination in the area of legislation and policy framework,
communication and advocacy, evidence generation, and support cross border collaboration on elimination of form
by 2022; Elimination of all forms of gender based violence, including child and forced marriages as well as Ending
gender and other forms of discrimination by 2030. To achieve these goals, our programming should mainly focus
on laws and legislations, drivers of FGM, and SGBV, gender equality, teenage pregnancy child and forces marriages
among others.
Laws and legislations: Passing laws against harmful practices is not a panacea, but it is a powerful statement of
disapproval and is in line with State obligations under international human rights instruments. This speaks to Govern-
ment’s commitments under the 2030 Agenda, the ICPD25 commitments and the Beijing Platform for Action. In recent
years, countries in all regions of the world have made progress on legislation to combat violence against women
(Commission on the Status of Women, 2020).
As part of this process, and in line with the obligations of international human rights conventions and treaties, Kenya
should include explicit prohibitions on harmful practices with laws grounded on human rights and offer a compre-
hensive framework for prevention, protection and mitigation of harmful practices. These harmful practices which
hinders girls and women from achieving their dreams have persisted in Kenya simply due to weak implementation
and enforcement and other silent and endemic factors.
Mitigating risks of non-compliance: Since legislating against harmful practices can have the unintended effect of
driving them underground, measures may also be needed to mitigate these risks. Laws need to operate in tandem
with a clear understanding of the social and economic determinants of harmful practices, and their dynamics over
the years. Managing the risks of non-enforcement, community rejection and clandestine practice can build on the
meaningful participation of affected individuals and communities in developing and then regularly monitoring and
evaluating laws and associated policies and services (Gruskin and others, 2010). International human rights bodies
have underscored the need to back legislations, effective enforcement measures as well as monitoring to track im-
pacts in practice with appropriate budgets (OHCHR, n.d.). Also, since gender discrimination and the “permitting” of
harmful practices can appear at many points in legal systems for instance when a police officer sides with a perpe-
trator and refuses to process a complaint or processes it incorrectly. This calls for interventions that involves training
and sensitization among police and judicial officials.
According to UNFPA, 2018, health-care providers are increasingly involved in FGM and estimated 52 million women
and girls have undergone FGM performed by doctors, nurses or midwives. In view of this light, there is need to differ-
entiate penalties under the law to impose heavier sanctions on people who aid those harmful practices whereas they
are supposed to be on the frontline of prevention. These include and not limited to health-care providers participat-
ing in the medicalization of female genital mutilation, or “specializing” in sex-selective abortion for which there is no
medical justification as well as perpetrators of cross boarder FGM.
All-Inclusive and Innovative Community Engagement: Kenyan communities have heterogeneous beliefs, practices
and traditions. The voices, opinions and local knowledge of community members must be sought if efforts to address
FGM will bear fruits. Sustaining dialogue sessions with girls, women, boys and men to acknowledge the problem,
discuss solutions and recognize the challenges is an important step. This process should conclude with a community
action plan that encourages girls to undergo all culturally accepted rites of passage without having to endure FGM.
Resource allocation: There is need for government to upscale funding of the national programme to end FGM that is
underpinned by national laws and policy. This programme entails an oversight and coordination board, community
engagement, girls’ empowerment programmes, partnerships with religious leaders, outreach to both traditional prac-
titioners and medical personnel, and community services to report and respond to cases (UNICEF 2020b).
Regional Collaborations: There is need to collaborate with the neighboring countries where harmful practices cross
borders to create and fund regional action plans including a mechanism for regional monitoring and accountability.
Ammonized legislations and policies will stress the broad sanction of harmful practices, and limit the chances that
people will cross borders to carry out harmful practices in more permissive jurisdictions.
Faith-Based Partnerships: In the North Eastern Region, where practicing communities profess Islamic faith, and in
Nyanza, where the Kuria Community has a Seventh Day Adventist following, taking a religious approach to ending
FGM is crucial. Partnerships with faith-based agencies and associations foster anti-FGM messages in mosques
and churches, and help delink the practice from any religion. When highly respected religious scholars take part in
community dialogue sessions and other outreach programmes, they can exert a powerful influence in persuading
communities to abandon FGM.
Interventions Targeting Practitioners: Programmes aimed at both traditional excisors and medical professionals aim
to break the link between supply and demand. For traditional excisors, interventions focus on education around FGM
as a violation of human rights, and on opportunities for developing alternative skills. Among healthcare providers
and medical students, the emphasis is on existing codes of conduct and regulations that prohibit medicalized FGM.
Also, health-care providers can be enlisted in stopping the medicalization of female genital mutilation, and delivering
consistent messages to families and individual patients around the many negative health consequences of harmful
practices.
Leadership and Coordination: Progress towards ending FGM by 2022 depends on strong coordination at the nation-
al, county and sub-county levels. The Anti-FGM Board, a semi-autonomous government agency under the Ministry
of Public Service and Gender, coordinates an extensive network of stakeholders, provides leadership and holds
partners accountable. Given the short duration of eradicating FGM, proper coordinated targeted advocacy, public
education and community dialogues on FGM should be scaled-up moving forward.
Girls’ Empowerment Programmes: These include alternative rites of passage and mentorship programmes imparting
life skills. Mentorship involves training girls to reject FGM, and connecting them with local champions for the aban-
donment of FGM as well as with law enforcement. Both can serve as resources for girls in resisting the practice. This
can be facilitated by the media as a tool in the Anti – FGM campaign due to the influential role it plays. Supporting
the inclusion of Anti-FGM content in the curriculum of learning institutions and correctional centres should also be
prioritized.
Enhanced multi-Sectoral response and support services for GBV boost coordination of provision of legal aid services
for GBV survivors. Establishment and operationalization of recovery centers, Safe Houses/Rescue centers for GBV
survivors at the county level.
Education is viewed as one of the most successful drivers of transformation in the lives of girls and young women.
Cash transfers programmes have had success in keeping girls in school, but need to be accompanied by efforts to
counteract the gender discrimination that often derails future opportunities for girls to secure employment. Schools
should also be accessible, safe and have adequate facilities for girls and boys (World Bank, 2017).
There is need to intensify trainings and sensitization to prevention service providers and to communities and coun-
ties with high prevalence on the effects of these practices.Also, medical practitioners, law enforcement institutions
and legal linkages to improve on evidence management and ensure justice is served to the affected accordingly.
Lastly, there it is important to facilitate development a national action plan and county policies and laws on GBV to
address harmful cultural practices.
Towards gender equality and free from all forms of discrimination: Gender equality is an agreed global goal under the
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which also explicitly calls for ending all forms of discrimination, violence
and harmful practices against all women and girls everywhere. In 2020, the world marks the twenty-fifth anniversary
of the Fourth World Conference on Women, which built on the 1994 ICPD by elaborating far-reaching commitments
to women’s rights and gender equality in all areas of life. Disrupting root causes of inequality, including social rela-
tions as well as patterns of economic and political power that continue to favour men will go a long way in bridging
the gender equality gap (Heymann and others, 2019). Countries as diverse as Bangladesh and the Republic of Korea
have shown that when girls and women have better economic options, harmful practices such as child marriage and
son preference begin to decline, sometimes dramatically (Naved and others, 2001; UNFPA, n.d.).
In Kenya, implementation of Constitution of Kenya 2010 as well as other policy legislations have borne fruits. The
enactment of the two-third gender rule, establishment of Women Enterprise Fund and other women empowerment
avenues have mainstreamed women into leadership and business positions, accelerating gains in empowering wom-
en to bridge the gender parity in the country.
During the ICPD25 Nairobi Summit held in November last year, Kenya committed to end gender and other forms of
discrimination by 2030 through enforcing the anti-discrimination laws and providing adequate budgetary alloca-
tions to institutions mandated to promote gender equality, equity and empowerment of women and girls. To realize
this commitment among other national and international commitments such as the SDGs, policy legislation, robust
programming as well as adequate budgetary allocations are important.
Working with Volunteers: Partners working on this thematic area should be committed to training all volunteers on
key concepts of discrimination, inequality, justice and exclusion, and training them on how to identify and report
abuse as well as model inclusive, non-discriminatory behaviour. A relational volunteering model can contribute to
lasting positive change in communities by merging ‘outside’ expertise with ‘inside’ knowledge.
Making much more of National Women’s Institutions: Women need more positions of power, as a matter of justice
and to set new, transformative agenda centered on their equality and rights. Gender equality mechanisms have
proven effective in orienting national plans, policies, budgets and institutions around achieving gender equality and
the empowerment of women, including spearheading action plans and the removal of discriminatory legislation. They
could be well-positioned to lead a drive to eliminate harmful practices, given their explicit commitment to women
and women’s rights, and their existing work on the multiple and mutually reinforcing dimensions of gender equality.
The Government may also consider systematic gender assessments of laws as well as social and economic policies
that encourage the undervaluing of girls and women. Among many possibilities, insights gained from such a process
can guide reforms to end legal discrimination related to property rights, pension benefits, inheritance, marriage,
divorce, child custody, and sexual and reproductive health and rights. Together with other relevant institutions,
these mechanisms can mobilize the diverse array of people such as the religious leaders, teachers, youth peers, law
enforcement, healthcare providers, parents and policymakers and work towards reducing violations of the principle
of equality and freedom from discrimination for the Special Interest Groups.
Mobilizing Women’s Movements: National gender equality mechanisms often have close links with women’s move-
ments and groups, giving them unique insights into women’s concerns and priorities, and allowing a reach from the
national to the local level, and into populations facing multiple forms of marginalization and stigma. These groups
know many of the solutions to gender discrimination and harmful practices, based on a long record of research, ac-
tivism and lived experience. There is dire need to scale up investments in both national gender equality commission
and women lobby groups to enable them work systematically and drive service and policy changes at the community
level (Commission on the Status of Women, 2020).. In a time of pushback against advocacy for gender equality,
national gender equality mechanisms could open doors for women’s rights organizations to influence and monitor
implementation of national affirmative action policies and serve as avenues of promoting public awareness on prin-
ciples of equality and inclusion in the country.
To sustain the gains made and ensure progress on gender inclusivity, there is need to Review, facilitate and advise on
policy, laws, regulations, standards and guides to aid compliance with principles of equality and inclusion. It is also
imperative to ensure proper enforcement of laws and policies touching on SIGs as well as develop and operationalize
an automated complaints handling system to facilitate legal redress.
Data for Decision Making: As the Government seeks to combat teenage pregnancy, child marriages, and other harm-
ful practices such as FGM, reliable, timely and quality data on key indicators disaggregated by lowest administration
possible will be necessary for proper programming. A fully functioning digital harmonized database system that
integrates all child protection activities and accessible by stakeholders will enhance data quality, data processing
and analysis for quick decision making;
Leveraging on technology: Online violence against women is a growing concern, with younger women at particular
risk (Commission on the Status of Women, 2020). Internet technology is used in some cases to perpetrate harmful
practices, including the selling of child brides. Platforms with sexist content reinforce broader patterns of gender
discrimination that underpin harmful practices. Leveraging on technology such as mobile penetration in Kenya,
social media and others can go a long way in accelerating eradication of child marriages and other harmful practices
against girls and women.
Alhassan, Yussif Nagumse and others, 2016. “Belief Systems Enforcing Female Genital Mutilation in Europe.” Inter-
national Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare 9(1): 29–40.
Arnold, Fred. 1997. Gender Preferences for Children. Calverton, MD: Macro International Inc
Ashimi, Adewale O. and others, 2015. “Prevalence and Predictors of Female Genital Mutilation Among Infants in a
Semi Urban Community in Northern Nigeria.” Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 6(4): 243–248.
Bogale, Daniel and others, 2014. “Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation and Its Effect On Women’s Health in Bale
Zone, Ethiopia: A Cross-sectional Study.” BMC Public Health 14: 1076.
Chahnazarian, Anouch, 1988. “Determinants of the Sex Ratio at Birth: Review of Recent Literature.” Social Biology
35(3–4): 214–235.
Commission on the Status of Women, 2020. Review and Appraisal of the Implementation of the Beijing Declaration
and Platform for Action and the Outcomes of the Twenty-Third Special Session of the General Assembly. Report of
the Secretary-General. Website: undocs.org/E/ CN.6/2020/3, accessed 26 March 2020
Commission on the Status of Women, 2020. Review and Appraisal of the Implementation of the Beijing Declaration
and Platform for Action and the Outcomes of the Twenty-Third Special Session of the General Assembly. Report of
the Secretary-General. Website: undocs.org/E/ CN.6/2020/3, accessed 26 March 2020.
Eldin, Ahmed Gamal and others, 2018. FGM/C Decision-making Process and the Role of Gender Power Relations in
Sudan. Evidence to End FGM/C: Research to Help Women Thrive. New York: Population Council.
Ewelukwa, Uche U. 2002. “Post-Colonialism, Gender, Customary Injustice: Widows in African Societies.” Human
Rights Quarterly, Vol. 24, pp. 424–486.
Fapohunda, Eleanor R., and Michael P. Todaro. 1988. “Family Structure, Implicit Contracts, and the Demand for Chil-
dren in Southern Nigeria.” Population and Development Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 571–594
Feldmans-Jacobs, Charlotte, 2013. Ending Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Lessons from A Decade of Progress.
Washington, D.C.: Population Reference Bureau. Website: assets.prb.org/pdf14/progress-endingfgm.pdf, accessed
23 April 2020.
Fuse, K. (2008). Gender Preferences for Children: A multi country study. [Online] Available:http://etd.ohiolink.edu/
send-pdf.cgi/Fuse%20Kana.pdf (October, 10, 2013).
Ganatra B, Hirve S, Rao V (2001). Sex-selective abortion: evidence from a community based study in western In-
dia. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 16(2):109–124.Li S (2007). Imbalanced sex ratio at birth and comprehensive
intervention in China. Paper prepared for the 4th Asia and Pacific Conference on Sexual and Reproductive Health
and Rights, Hyderabad, India, October 2007. Available at: www.unfpa.org/gender/case_ studies.htm (accessed 24
June 2009).
Girls Not Brides, 2016. Fear of Female Sexuality: Addressing an Unspoken Driver of Child Marriage. London: Girls
Not Brides. Website: girlsnotbrides.org/fear-offemale-sexuality-unspoken-driver-childmarriage/, accessed 17
March 2020.
Gruskin, Sofia and others, 2010. “‘Rights-based Approaches’ to Health Policies and Programs: Articulations, Ambi-
guities, and Assessment.” Journal of Public Health Policy 31(2): 129–145
Guilmoto, Christophe Z., 2015. “The Masculinization of Births. Overview and Current Knowledge.” Population 70(2):
185–243.
Heise, Lori and Karima Manji, 2016. “Social Norms.” GSDRC Professional Development Reading Pack no. 31. Birming-
ham, UK: University of Birmingham. Website: gsdrc.org/professionaldev/social-norms/, accessed 23 April 2020.
Heymann, Jody and others, 2019. “Improving Health with Programmatic, Legal, and Policy Approaches to Reduce
Gender Inequality and Change Restrictive Gender Norms.” The Lancet 393(10190): P2522–2534
John Bongaarts,2013: The Implementation of Preferences for Male Offspring
The ICPD25 Kenya Country Commitments were presented at the Nairobi Summit on ICPD25 by His Excellency Uhuru
Kenyatta, President of the Republic of Kenya. Here below is the full text of the seventeen commitments made by
Kenya;
On the Essential Reproductive Health Package of Interventions and UHC, Kenya commits to;
1. Employ innovation and technology to ensure adolescents and youth attain the highest possible standard
of health. Efforts will be made to eliminate teenage pregnancies, new adolescent and youth HIV infections
and harmful practices such as child marriages while at the same time ensuring universal access to friendly
quality reproductive health services and information to the youth and adolescents by 2030.
2. Eliminate preventable maternal and newborn mortality, mother to child transmission of HIV and severe
morbidity such as obstetric fistula among women by 2030.
In Creating Financing Momentum for the outstanding promises in the PoA, the country commits to;
3. Progressively increase health sector financing to 15 percent of total budget, as per the Abuja declaration by
2030. This will enable the country to cover the cost of implementing Universal Health Coverage and gradu-
ally increase financing of family planning commodities from domestic resources.
4. Improve support to older persons, persons with disabilities, orphans, and vulnerable children by increasing
the core social protection investment from 0.8 percent of Gross Domestic Product to at least 2 percent
over the next 10 years.
5. Enhance integration of population, health and development programmes and projects into Medium Term
Plans (MTPs) and the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) to ensure budgetary allocations and
efficient implementation of programmes and projects by 2030.
Demographic Diversity and Sustainable Development are critical in addressing the country’s challenges and there-
fore Kenya commits to;
6. Enhance the capacity of relevant Government institutions to increase availability and accessibility to
high-quality, timely and reliable population and related data at national, county, and sub-county levels, dis-
aggregated by income, gender, age, ethnicity, migratory status, disability and geographic location by 2030.
7. Integrate population issues into the formulation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of all policies
and programmes relating to sustainable development at national, county and sub-county levels by 2030.
8. Harness the demographic dividend through investments in health and citizens wellbeing; education and
skills training; employment creation and entrepreneurship; and rights, governance and empowerment of
young people by 2022 as outlined in the Kenya’s Demographic Dividend Roadmap. This includes the estab-
lishment of a National Coordination Mechanism for Demographic Dividend by 2020.
9. Eliminate legal, policy and programmatic barriers that impede youth participation in decision making, plan-
ning and implementation of development activities at all levels by 2030.
10. Attain universal basic education by ensuring 100 percent transition of pupils, including those with special
needs and disabilities, from early learning to secondary education by 2022. Also raise the completion rate
for basic education to 100 percent by 2030.
12. Fully implement the Competence Based Curriculum (CBC) so that learners are equipped with relevant
competencies and skills from an early stage for sustainable development by 2030.
Prevalence of Gender Based Violence and Harmful Practices is of great concern to Kenya. To address this issue, the
country commits to;
13. End Female Genital Mutilation by strengthening coordination in the area of legislation and policy frame-
work, communication and advocacy, evidence generation and support cross border collaboration on
elimination of FGM by 2022.
14. Eliminate, by 2030, all forms of gender based violence, including child and forced marriages, by addressing
social and cultural norms that propagate the practice while providing support to women and girls who have
been affected.
15. End gender and other forms of discrimination by 2030 through enforcing the anti-discrimination laws and
providing adequate budgetary allocations to institutions mandated to promote gender equality, equity and
empowerment of women and girls.
In the spirit of leaving no one behind, provision of Reproductive Health Services and information in Humanitarian and
Fragile Contexts is critical. The country therefore committed to;
16. Ensure universal access to quality reproductive health services, including prevention and management of
GBV, in humanitarian and fragile contexts by 2030.
To ensure Kenya accelerates the promise of ICPD Programme of Action the country commits to;
17. Track and monitor the implementation of the ICPD25 Nairobi Summit commitments through the National
Council for Population and Development in the State Department of Planning.
They constitute a denial of the dignity and/or integrity of the individual and violate human rights and fundamental
freedoms of women and children as recognized under international law. Specifically;
• They constitute discrimination against women or children and are harmful because they result in violence,
negative physical, psychological, economic or social harm or limit the capacity of a woman or a child to
participate fully in society
• They are traditional, emerging or re-emerging practices that are kept in place through social norms that
perpetuate male dominance and the inequality of women and children based on their sex, gender, age and
other intersecting factors
• They are imposed on women and children by families, community members or society at large, regardless
of whether the victim provides or is able to provide full, free and informed consent
Child marriage is defined as any legal or customary union involving a person below the age of 18. This definition
draws from various conventions, treaties, and international agreements. The term child marriage is often used inter-
changeably with the terms forced marriage and early marriage.
Sexual Gender Based Violence (SGBV) is any act that is likely to or results in physical, sexual or psychological harm
or suffering to women (and men) including threats or acts of coercion, arbitrary deprivation of liberty, private or
public, in the family or community (UN Women 2012). SGBV is a serious, life-threatening protection issue, primarily
affecting women and girls more than men and boys.
Female Genital Mutilation violates a number of human rights protected by the national constitution, regional and
international instruments. In particular, it violates: the right to equality and non-discrimination; the right to life; the
right to bodily integrity; reproductive health rights; the right to dignity; freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment and punishment; and the right to health.
Sex Selection in Favor of Boys is a harmful practice of pervasive social, cultural, political and economic injustices
against women, and a manifest violation of women’s human rights. Sex selection favoring boys is one form of dis-
crimination that may occur before birth, or later on which has far-reaching implications for girl child that translate
into shorter breastfeeding times for girls, poorer nutrition, inadequate schooling and fewer inoculations. It may
mean that a female child is disadvantaged from birth; it may determine the quality and quantity of parental care and
the extent of investment in her development; and it may lead to acute discrimination, particularly in settings where
resources are scarce.
Discriminatory social and traditions practices perpetuate the notion that sons should inherit land, and that women
and girls should negotiate use of land through male relatives such as fathers, uncles, brothers, husbands, and sons.
Type II: Partial or total removal of the clitoris and labia minora, with or without excision of the labia majora.
Type III: Narrowing of the vaginal orifice by cutting and bringing together the labia minora and/or the labia majo-
ra to create a type of seal, with or without excision of the clitoris. In most instances, the cut edges of the labia are
stitched together, which is referred to as ‘infibulation’. This is the most severe form of FGM, is mostly practiced in the
north-eastern region of Africa: Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, and Sudan. In West-Africa (Guinea, Mali, Burkina
Faso, etc.). This type accounts for 10% (8 million women).
Type IV: All other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes, for example: pricking, piercing,
incising, scraping and cauterization.
According to human rights treaty bodies, FGM is a gender-based practice that targets women and girls in ways that di-
rectly diminish their ability to enjoy their human rights on an equal basis with men, thereby violating rights to non-dis-
crimination and equality.
Severe pain Cutting the nerve ends and sensitive genital tissue causes extreme pain.
The healing period is also painful
Excessive bleeding (haemorrhage) Can result if the clitoral artery or other blood vessel is cut
Shock Can be caused by pain, infection and/or haemorrhage
Genital tissue swelling Due to an inflammatory response or local infection
Infections May spread after the use of contaminated instruments (e.g. use of same
instruments in multiple genital mutilation operations), and during the
healing period
HIV infection The direct association between FGM and HIV remains unconfirmed, al-
though the cutting of genital tissues with the same surgical instrument
without sterilization could increase the risk for transmission of HIV be-
tween girls who undergo FGM together
Urination problems These may include urine retention and pain passing urine. This may be
due to tissue swelling, pain or injury to the urethra
Impaired wound healing Can lead to pain, infections and abnormal scarring
Death Death can result from infections, including tetanus, as well as haemor-
rhage that can lead to shock
Mental health problems The pain, shock and use of physical force during the event, as well as
a sense of betrayal when family members condone and/or organize the
practice, are reasons why many women describe FGM as a traumatic
event
Source: SWOP Report, 2020
Pain Due to tissue damage and scarring that may result in trapped or
unprotected nerve endings
Chronic genital infections With consequent chronic pain, and vaginal discharge and itching.
Cysts, abscesses and genital ulcers may also appear
Chronic reproductive tract infections May cause chronic back and pelvic pain
Urinary tract infections If not treated, such infections can ascend to the kidneys, poten-
tially resulting in renal failure, septicaemia and death. An increased
risk of repeated urinary tract infections is well documented in both
girls and adult women who have undergone FGM
Painful urination Due to obstruction of the urethra and recurrent urinary tract in-
fections
Vaginal problems Discharge, itching, bacterial vaginosis and other infections
Menstrual problems Obstruction of the vaginal opening may lead to painful menstrua-
tion (dysmenorrhoea), irregular menses and difficulty in passing
menstrual blood, particularly among women with type III FGM
Excessive scar tissue (keloids) Excessive scar tissue can form at the site of the cutting
HIV infection Given that the transmission of HIV is facilitated through trauma to
the vaginal epithelium, which allows the direct introduction of the
virus, it is reasonable to presume that the risk of HIV transmission
may be increased as a result of FGM due to the increased risk of
bleeding during intercourse
Sexual health problems FGM damages anatomical structures that are directly involved in
female sexual function and can therefore also have an effect on
women’s sexual health and well-being. Removal of, or damage to,
highly sensitive genital tissue, especially the clitoris, may affect
sexual sensitivity and lead to sexual problems, such as decreased
sexual desire and pleasure, pain during sex, difficulty during pene-
tration, decreased lubrication during intercourse and reduced fre-
quency or absence of orgasm (anorgasmia). Scar formation, pain
and traumatic memories associated with the procedure can also
lead to such problems
Childbirth complications (obstetric complica- FGM is associated with an increased risk of caesarean section,
tions) post-partum haemorrhage, recourse to episiotomy, difficult and/
or prolonged labour, obstetric tears/lacerations, instrumental de-
livery and extended maternal hospital stay. The risks increase with
the severity of FGM
Obstetric fistula A direct association between FGM and obstetric fistula has not
been established. However, given the causal relationship between
prolonged and obstructed labour and fistula, and the fact that FGM
is also associated with prolonged and obstructed labour, it is rea-
sonable to presume that both conditions could be linked in women
living with FGM