Puttingthelastedsoftcontactlensresearchto Practice
Puttingthelastedsoftcontactlensresearchto Practice
Puttingthelastedsoftcontactlensresearchto Practice
net/publication/375449840
CITATIONS READS
0 15
1 author:
Thibaud Syre
Alpes Vision
2 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Thibaud Syre on 07 November 2023.
Introduction
In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic wrought significant havoc on our healthcare system and
daily lives. The implementation of public health measures, aimed at safeguarding the
population, reshaped our professional landscape. We witnessed a surge in demand for
contact lens fittings, coinciding with the return of our regular wearers seeking adjustments.
These trends were primarily driven by the discomfort caused by mask-wearing, as well as the
growing prevalence of remote work, which placed increased demands on near vision.
Consequently, our workload escalated, necessitating the restructuring of our clinics for
enhanced efficiency.
Case report
Allow me to illustrate how such research, requiring no additional equipment beyond what is
already available in our clinics, could streamline the process of refitting long-time wearers
while minimizing the time spent in the chair.
Consider the case of a 49-year-old male, a long-time contact lens wearer, who previously
reported optimal comfort with his lenses:
Visual acuity was good with OD 20/20 (1.0) and OS 20/20 (ODS 20/20)
Fitting: Optimal, with excellent lens centering. A slight movement was observed during
ocular versions, but a good return to the push-up position. Lens surface condition remained
good after 11 hours of continuous wear.
However, the reason for his appointment was the lens type the patient was currently
wearing successfully was going to be discontinued, necessitating the search for an
alternative. He had already sought assistance from his longstanding fitter but without
success.
Here we find the trials done in the context of refit. It is important to note that these tests
were repeated for the writing of this report, as we did not have access to the previous
observations.
1st trial :
Result: Excessive lens movement and visual instability. The lenses cannot be worn longer
than one hour.
2nd trial:
Result: Improved lens stability, but excessive movement persisted. The discomfort was
reported after a few hours of wear, rendering this lens unsuitable as a substitute for the his
previous lenses.
3rd trial:
Result: Even though the surface of this lens appeared to be greatly improved, the dynamic
behavior remained unacceptable. The patient even noted that, during trials, the entire lens
slid over the cornea.
Making a Change
In a fresh perspective on this refitting challenge, we turned to the latest research insights. In
January 2021, van der Worp et al. introduced a CL-SAG analysis for today's most popular soft
lenses. Notably, Soflens 66 Toric (Alphafilcon A) exhibited the highest SAG in the chart at
4157 µm. This aligns with historical practices of using this lens for steeper corneas
specifically, as confirmed by this research.
It is therefore interesting to compare the previously used unsuccessful lenses with the CL-
SAG value of his previous successful lens :
For the Ultra for Astigmatism (Samfilcon A), the SAG difference is 188 µm.
For the Oasys for Astigmatism (Senofilcon A), the SAG difference is 277 µm.
For the Biofinity toric (Comfilcon A), the SAG difference is 297 µm.
This correlation with clinical analysis is striking. Regardless of the radius of curvature and
lens diameter (the only parameters easily accessible to the fitter), it is evident that the
sagittal height of a soft lens significantly influences its behavior on the wearer's eye.
With this revelation, we opted to select a lens with the closest SAG to Soflens 66 Toric
(Alphafilcon A). Consequently, we ordered the following lenses for trial:
According to van der Worp et al., the CL-SAG of Biotrue One Day for Astigmatism (Nesofilcon
A) is 4153 µm. Compared to the historical lens, the SAG difference is only 7 µm.
After one day's wear, the patient reported regaining the comfort he had with his old lenses.
The examination revealed a well-centered lens with good mobility and a movement back to
the standard location was observed as is desired. The surface condition remained
unchanged, even after extended wear and when the lenses are removed, fluorescein
examination reveals no staining.
Closing Remarks
In summary, this case underscores how university research, utilizing existing clinic
equipment, can rapidly identify a first-choice replacement lens. In this instance, it could have
averted three unsuccessful trials, saving considerable consultation time. It also prompts us
to reconsider our lens selection methodology, both initially and for optimization purposes.
Moreover, this case report reaffirms that there is no direct correlation between the
diameter/base curve and the actual behavior of the worn lens on-eye.
This also prompts us to reconsider the significance of made-to-order soft contact lenses,
which continue to be an effective tool for controlling the sagittal heights of the fitted lenses.
In our case, we had the option to also switch to a daily replacement; otherwise, we would
have had to opt for custom soft lenses.
It would therefore be interesting to pursue this work to complete the lens types analyzed
with new lenses that come to the market, and facilitate the use of this work at a time when
the notions of sagittal height are being gaining more attention with the increasing
popularization of scleral lens fitting
1
van der Worp E, Lampa M, Kinoshita B, Fujimoto MJ, Coldrick BJ, Caroline P. Variation in sag
values in daily disposable, reusable and toric soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye.
2021;44(6):101386. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.11.006