The Azaria Chamberlain Case - Q&A
The Azaria Chamberlain Case - Q&A
The Azaria Chamberlain Case - Q&A
3. After searching for the missing baby what evidence was discovered by police and
Aboriginal trackers?
The baby’s jumpsuit, jacket.
4. Originally Lindy and Michael Chamberlain’s account of what happened was believed
but in 1982 a coroner’s inquest changed everything. What was the findings of the
inquest?
The findings of this inquest were Azaria’s jumpsuit which based on ultraviolet photographs
showed that there was an incised wound around the neck of the jumpsuit and an imprint of
the hand of a small adult. As well as this their Holden Torana was part of the findings.
5. How many years was Lindy Chamberlain sentenced for the murder of baby Azaria?
She was tried for murder and spent more than three years in prison and then after a second
inquest Lindy Chamberlain was sentenced to life imprisonment.
10. What was the official finding of the fourth inquest in 2012?
At the fourth inquest the official findings were that Azaria
Chamberlain was taken and killed by a dingo.
The crown alleged that Lindy Chamberlain had caught Azaria’s throat in the front seat of the
family call hiding the baby's body in a large camera case.
At a later time while other people from the campsite was searching, she disposed the body
These allegations were supported through the jumpsuit being covered in blood stains.
A nurse also reported having heard of babies cry after the time when the prosecution alleged
Azaria had been murdered
The prosecution alleged that Azaria was killed in a car which was backed with adult blood
and other organic compounds.
What theories did some Australian’s form about the disappearance of the baby?
Answer: some Australians formed that the chamberlains seventh-day Adventist religion was actually
a coach that killed infants as a part of bizarre religious ceremonies and that's how the baby
disappeared.
After reading about the case, do you NOW think Lindy Chamberlain is guilty or innocent?
Answer: I think that she is guilty because the evidence suggests otherwise. The evidence shows that
the blood found on the jumpsuit was present in the vehicle where is area was allegedly murdered
and it can't be proven that the fingers killed her because all they found was her missing jacket which
could have just ended up there.
Further information:
http://www.news.com.au/national/courts-law/we-didnt-believe-the-dingo-story/news-story/d74c0d8de348d232aa1ea59ea29680c3