Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Solutions Ch1-5

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 72
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses solutions to the book 'Principles of Mathematical Analysis' written by Rudin and covers topics such as real and complex numbers, topology, sequences, series, continuity, differentiation.

The book 'Principles of Mathematical Analysis' written by Rudin and this document provides solutions to problems in the book.

The book and document cover topics such as real and complex number systems, basic topology, numerical sequences and series, continuity, differentiation, and sequences and series of functions.

Plovers Solution Series

Volume 1:
Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis
SYLee
Meng-Gen Tsai
2
i
Preface
This solution is written for one special book named Principles of Mathemat-
ical Analysis. It is written by Rudin. The purpose I wrote this solution is
just for fun; surely, you will nd a lot of errors containing in my solution :pp
Finally, I dedicate this solution to SYLee, wwli, ljl, and many other friends.
Meng-Gen, Tsai.
ii
Contents
Preface i
1 The Real and Complex Number Systems 3
2 Basic Topology 9
3 Numerical Sequences and Series 31
4 Continuity 35
5 Dierentiation 41
6 Sequences and Series of Functions 67
1
2 CONTENTS
Chapter 1
The Real and Complex
Number Systems
3
4 CHAPTER 1. THE REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBER SYSTEMS
Written by Men-Gen Tsai
email: b89902089@ntu.edu.tw
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. Fix b > 1.
(a) If m, n, p, q are integers, n > 0, q > 0, and r = m/n = p/q, prove
that
(b
m
)
1/n
= (b
p
)
1/q
.
Hence it makes sense to dene b
r
= (b
m
)
1/n
.
(b) Prove that b
r+s
= b
r
b
s
if r and s are rational.
(c) If x is real, dene B(x) to be the set of all numbers b
t
, where t is
rational and t x. Prove that
b
r
= sup B(r)
where r is rational. Hence it makes sense to dene
b
x
= sup B(x)
for every real x.
(d) Prove that b
x+y
= b
x
b
y
for all real x and y.
Proof: For (a): mq = np since m/n = p/q. Thus b
mq
= b
np
.
By Theorem 1.21 we know that (b
mq
)
1/(mn)
= (b
np
)
1/(mn)
, that is,
(b
m
)
1/n
= (b
p
)
1/q
, that is, b
r
is well-dened.
For (b): Let r = m/n and s = p/q where m, n, p, q are integers, and
n > 0, q > 0. Hence (b
r+s
)
nq
= (b
m/n+p/q
)
nq
= (b
(mq+np)/(nq)
)
nq
=
b
mq+np
= b
mq
b
np
= (b
m/n
)
nq
(b
p/q
)
nq
= (b
m/n
b
p/q
)
nq
. By Theorem 1.21
5
we know that ((b
r+s
)
nq
)
1/(nq)
= ((b
m/n
b
p/q
)
nq
)
1/(nq)
, that is b
r+s
=
b
m/n
b
p/q
= b
r
b
s
.
For (c): Note that b
r
B(r). For all b
t
B(r) where t is rational and
t r. Hence, b
r
= b
t
b
rt
b
t
1
rt
since b > 1 and r t 0. Hence b
r
is an upper bound of B(r). Hence b
r
= sup B(r).
For (d): b
x
b
y
= sup B(x) sup B(y) b
t
x
b
t
y
= b
t
x
+t
y
for all rational
t
x
x and t
y
y. Note that t
x
+ t
y
x + y and t
x
+ t
y
is rational.
Therefore, sup B(x) sup B(y) is a upper bound of B(x + y), that is,
b
x
b
y
sup B(x + y) = b
(
x + y).
Conversely, we claim that b
x
b
r
= b
x+r
if x R
1
and r Q. The
following is my proof.
b
x+r
= sup B(x + r) = sup{b
s
: s x + r, s Q}
= sup{b
sr
b
r
: s r x, s r Q}
= b
r
sup{b
sr
: s r x, s r Q}
= b
r
sup B(x)
= b
r
b
x
.
And we also claim that b
x+y
b
x
if y 0. The following is my proof:
(r Q)
B(x) = {b
r
: r x} {b
r
: r x + y} = B(x + y),
Therefore, sup B(x + y) sup B(x), that is, b
x+y
b
x
.
Hence,
b
x+y
= sup B(x + y)
= sup{b
r
: r x + y, r Q}
= sup{b
s
b
rs
: r x + y, s x, r Q, s Q}
sup{sup B(x)b
rs
: r x + y, s x, r Q, s Q}
= sup B(x) sup{b
rs
: r x + y, s x, r Q, s Q}
= sup B(x) sup{b
rs
: r s x + y s, s x, r s Q}
6 CHAPTER 1. THE REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBER SYSTEMS
= sup B(x) sup B(x + y s)
sup B(x) sup B(y)
= b
x
b
y
Therefore, b
x+y
= b
x
b
y
.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
7
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
8 CHAPTER 1. THE REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBER SYSTEMS
Chapter 2
Basic Topology
9
10 CHAPTER 2. BASIC TOPOLOGY
Written by Men-Gen Tsai
email: b89902089@ntu.edu.tw
1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set.
Proof: For any element x of the empty set, x is also an element of
every set since x does not exist. Hence, the empty set is a subset of
every set.
2. A complex number z is said to be algebraic if there are integers a
0
, ..., a
n
,
not all zero, such that
a
0
z
n
+ a
1
z
n1
+ ... + a
n1
z + a
n
= 0.
Prove that the set of all algebraic numbers is countable. Hint: For
every positive integer N there are only nitely many equations with
n +|a
0
| +|a
1
| + ... +|a
n
| = N.
Proof: For every positive integer N there are only nitely many equa-
tions with
n +|a
0
| +|a
1
| + ... +|a
n
| = N.
(since 1 n N and 0 |a
0
| N). We collect those equations as
C
N
. Hence

C
N
is countable. For each algebraic number, we can form
an equation and this equation lies in C
M
for some M and thus the set
of all algebraic numbers is countable.
3. Prove that there exist real numbers which are not algebraic.
Proof: If not, R
1
= { all algebraic numbers } is countable, a contra-
diction.
4. Is the set of all irrational real numbers countable?
Solution: If RQ is countable, then R
1
= (RQ)

Q is countable,
a contradiction. Thus R Q is uncountable.
11
5. Construct a bounded set of real numbers with exactly three limit points.
Solution: Put
A = {1/n : n N}
_
{1 + 1/n : n N}
_
{2 + 1/n : n N}.
A is bounded by 3, and A contains three limit points - 0, 1, 2.
6. Let E

be the set of all limit points of a set E. Prove that S

is
closed. Prove that E and E have the same limit points. (Recall that
E = E

.) Do E and E

always have the same limit points?


Proof: For any point p of X E

, that is, p is not a limit point E,


there exists a neighborhood of p such that q is not in E with q = p for
every q in that neighborhood.
Hence, p is an interior point of X E

, that is, X E

is open, that
is, E

is closed.
Next, if p is a limit point of E, then p is also a limit point of E since
E = E

. If p is a limit point of E, then every neighborhood N


r
(p)
of p contains a point q = p such that q E. If q E, we completed
the proof. So we suppose that q E E = E

E. Then q is a limit
point of E. Hence,
N
r
(q)
where r

=
1
2
min(rd(p, q), d(p, q)) is a neighborhood of q and contains
a point x = q such that x E. Note that N
r
(q) contains in N
r
(p){p}.
That is, x = p and x is in N
r
(p). Hence, q also a limit point of E. Hence,
E and E have the same limit points.
Last, the answer of the nal sub-problem is no. Put
E = {1/n : n N},
and E

= {0} and (E

= .
7. Let A
1
, A
2
, A
3
, ... be subsets of a metric space. (a) If B
n
=

n
i=1
A
i
,
prove that B
n
=

n
i=1
A
i
, for n = 1, 2, 3, ... (b) If B =

i=1
, prove that
B

i=1
A
i
. Show, by an example, that this inclusion can be proper.
Proof of (a): (Method 1) B
n
is the smallest closed subset of X that
contains B
n
. Note that

A
i
is a closed subset of X that contains B
n
,
thus
B
n

n
_
i=1
A
i
.
12 CHAPTER 2. BASIC TOPOLOGY
If p B
n
B
n
, then every neighborhood of p contained a point q = p
such that q B
n
. If p is not in A
i
for all i, then there exists some
neighborhood N
r
i
(p) of p such that (N
r
i
(p) p)

A
i
= for all i. Take
r = min{r
1
, r
2
, ..., r
n
}, and we have N
r
(p)

B
n
= , a contradiction.
Thus p A
i
for some i. Hence
B
n

n
_
i=1
A
i
.
that is,
B
n
=
n
_
i=1
A
i
.
(Method 2) Since

n
i=1
A
i
is closed and B
n
=

n
i=1
A
i


n
i=1
A
i
,
B
n

n
i=1
A
i
.
Proof of (b): Since B is closed and B B A
i
, B A
i
for all i.
Hence B

A
i
.
Note: My example is A
i
= (1/i, ) for all i. Thus, A
i
= [1/i, ), and
B = (0, ), B = [0, ). Note that 0 is not in A
i
for all i. Thus this
inclusion can be proper.
8. Is every point of every open set E R
2
a limit point of E? Answer
the same question for closed sets in R
2
.
Solution: For the rst part of this problem, the answer is yes.
(Reason): For every point p of E, p is an interior point of E. That
is, there is a neighborhood N
r
(p) of p such that N
r
(p) is a subset of
E. Then for every real r

, we can choose a point q such that d(p, q) =


1/2 min(r, r

). Note that q = p, q N
r
(p), and q N
r
(p). Hence, every
neighborhood N
r
(p) contains a point q = p such that q N
r
(p) E,
that is, p is a limit points of E.
For the last part of this problem, the answer is no. Consider A =
{(0, 0)}. A

= and thus (0, 0) is not a limit point of E.


9. Let E
o
denote the set of all interior points of a set E.
(a) Prove that E
o
is always open.
(b) Prove that E is open if and only if E
o
= E.
13
(c) If G is contained in E and G is open, prove that G is contained in
E
o
.
(d) Prove that the complement of E
o
is the closure of the complement
of E.
(e) Do E and E always have the same interiors?
(f) Do E and E
o
always have the same closures?
Proof of (a): If E is non-empty, take p E
o
. We need to show that
p (E
o
)
o
. Since p E
o
, there is a neighborhood N
r
of p such that
N
r
is contained in E. For each q N
r
, note that N
s
(q) is contained in
N
r
(p), where s = min{d(p, q), r d(p, q)}. Hence q is also an interior
point of E, that is, N
r
is contained in E
o
. Hence E
o
is always open.
Proof of (b): () It is clear that E
o
is contained in E. Since E is
open, every point of E is an interior point of E, that is, E is contained
in E
o
. Therefore E
o
= E.
() Since every point of E is an interior point of E (E
o
(E) = E), E
is open.
Proof of (c): If p G, p is an interior point of G since G is open. Note
that E contains G, and thus p is also an interior point of E. Hence
p E
o
. Therefore G is contained in E
o
. (Thus E
o
is the biggest open
set contained in E. Similarly, E is the smallest closed set containing
E.)
Proof of (d): Suppose p X E
o
. If p X E, then p X E
clearly. If p E, then N is not contained in E for any neighborhood
N of p. Thus N contains an point q X E. Note that q = p, that
is, p is a limit point of X E. Hence X E
o
is contained in X E.
Next, suppose p X E. If p X E, then p X E
o
clearly. If
p E, then every neighborhood of p contains a point q = p such that
q X E. Hence p is not an interior point of E. Hence X E is
contained in X E
o
. Therefore X E
o
= X E.
Solution of (e): No. Take X = R
1
and E = Q. Thus E
o
= and
E
o
= (R
1
)
o
= R
1
= .
Solution of (f ): No. Take X = R
1
and E = Q. Thus E = R
1
, and
E
o
= = .
14 CHAPTER 2. BASIC TOPOLOGY
10. Let X be an innite set. For p X and q X, dene
d(p, q) =
_
1 (if p = q)
0 (if p = q)
Prove that this is a metric. Which subsets of the resulting metric space
are open? Which are closed? Which are compact?
Proof: (a) d(p, q) = 1 > 0 if p = q; d(p, p) = 0. (b) d(p, q) = d(q, p)
since p = q implies q = p and p = q implies q = p. (c) d(p, q)
d(p, r) + d(r, q) for any r X if p = q. If p = q, then either r = p or
r = q, that is, r = p or r = q. Thus, d(p, q) = 1 d(p, r) + d(r, q). By
(a)-(c) we know that d is a metric.
Every subset of X is open and closed. We claim that for any p X,
p is not a limit point. Since d(p, q) = 1 > 1/2 if q = p, there exists an
neighborhood N
1/2
(p) of p contains no points of q = p such that q X.
Hence every subset of X contains no limit points and thus it is closed.
Since X S is closed for every subset S of X, S = X (X S) is
open. Hence every subset of X is open.
Every nite subset of X is compact. Let S = {p
1
, ..., p
n
} be nite.
Consider an open cover {G

} of S. Since S is covered by G

, p
i
is
covered by G

i
, thus {G

1
, ..., G

n
} is nite subcover of S. Hence S is
compact. Next, suppose S is innite. Consider an open cover {G
p
} of
S, where
G
p
= N1
2
(p)
for every p S. Note that q is not in G
p
if q = p. If S is compact,
then S can be covered by nite subcover, say
G
p
1
, ..., G
p
n
.
Then there exists q such that q = p
i
for all i since S is innite, a con-
tradiction. Hence only every nite subset of X is compact.
11. For x R
1
and y R
1
, dene
d
1
(x, y) = (x, y)
2
,
d
2
(x, y) =
_
|x y|,
15
d
3
(x, y) = |x
2
y
2
|,
d
4
(x, y) = |x 2y|,
d
5
(x, y) =
|x y|
1 +|x y|
.
Determine, for each of these, whether it is a metric or not.
Solution: (1) d
1
(x, y) is not a metric. Since d
1
(0, 2) = 4, d
1
(0, 1) = 1,
and d
1
(1, 2) = 1, d
1
(0, 2) > d
1
(0, 1) + d
1
(1, 2). Thus d
1
(x, y) is not a
metric.
(2) d
2
(x, y) is a metric. (a) d(p, q) > 0 if p = q; d(p, p) = 0. (b)
d(p, q) =
_
|p q| =
_
|q p| = d(q, p). (c) |p q| |p r| + |r q|,
_
|p q|
_
|p r| +|r q|
_
|p r| +
_
|r q|. That is, d(p, q)
d(p, r) + d(r, q). (3) d
3
(x, y) is not a metric since d
3
(1, 1) = 0.
(4) d
4
(x, y) is not a metric since d
4
(1, 1) = 1 = 0.
(5) d
5
(x, y) is a metric since |x y| is a metric.
Claim: d(x, y) is a metric, then
d

(x, y) =
d(x, y)
1 + d(x, y)
is also a metric.
Proof of Claim: (a) d

(p, q) > 0 if p = q; d(p, p) = 0. (b) d

(p, q) =
d

(q, p). (c) Let x = d(p, q), y = d(p, r), and z = d(r, q). Then x y+z.
d

(p, q) d

(p, r) + d

(r, q)

x
1 + x

y
1 + y
+
z
1 + z
x(1 + y)(1 + z) y(1 + z)(1 + x) + z(1 + x)(1 + y)
x + xy + xz + xyz (y + xy + yz + xyz) + (z + xz + yz + xyz)
x y + z + 2yz + xyz
x y + z
Thus, d

is also a metric.
16 CHAPTER 2. BASIC TOPOLOGY
12. Let K R
1
consist of 0 and the numbers 1/n, for n = 1, 2, 3, ....
Prove that K is compact directly from the denition (without using
the Heine-Borel theorem).
Proof: Suppose that {O

} is an arbitrary open covering of K. Let


E {O

} consists 0. Since E is open and 0 E, 0 is an interior point


of E. Thus there is a neighborhood N = N
r
(0) of 0 such that N E.
Thus N contains
1
[1/r] + 1
,
1
[1/r] + 2
, ...
Next, we take nitely many open sets E
n
{O

} such that 1/n E


n
for n = 1, 2, ..., [1/r]. Hence {E, E
1
, ..., E
[1/r]
is a nite subcover of K.
Therefore, K is compact.
Note: The unique limit point of K is 0. Suppose p = 0 is a limit point
of K. Clearly, 0 < p < 1. (p cannot be 1). Thus there exists n Z
+
such that
1
n + 1
< p <
1
n
.
Hence N
r
(p) where r = min{
1
n
p, p
1
n+1
} contains no points of K,
a contradiction.
13. Construct a compact set of real numbers whose limit points form a
countable set.
Solution: Let K be consist of 0 and the numbers 1/n for n = 1, 2, 3, ...
Let xK = {xk : k K} and x + K = {x + k : k K} for x R
1
. I
take
S
n
= (1
1
2
n
) +
K
2
n+1
,
S =

_
n=1
S
n
_
{1}.
Claim: S is compact and the set of all limit points of S is K

{1}.
Clearly, S lies in [0, 1], that is, S is bounded in R
1
. Note that S
n

[1
1
2
n
, 1
1
2
n+1
]. By Exercise 12 and its note, I have that all limit
points of S

[0, 1) is
0,
1
2
, ...,
1
2
n
, ...
17
Clearly, 1 is also a limit point of S. Therefore, the set of all limit points
of S is K

{1}. Note that K

{1} S, that is, K is compact. I com-


pleted the proof of my claim.
14. Give an example of an open cover of the segment (0, 1) which has no
nite subcover.
Solution: Take {O
n
} = {(1/n, 1)} for n = 1, 2, 3, .... The following is
my proof. For every x (0, 1),
x (
1
[1/x] + 1
, 0) {O
n
}
Hence {O
n
} is an open covering of (0, 1). Suppose there exists a nite
subcovering
(
1
n
1
, 1), ..., (
1
n
k
, 1)
where n
1
< n
2
< ... < n
k
, respectively. Clearly
1
2n
p
(0, 1) is not in
any elements of that subcover, a contradiction.
Note: By the above we know that (0, 1) is not compact.
15. Show that Theorem 2.36 and its Corollary become false (in R
1
, for ex-
ample) if the word compact is replaced by closed or by bounded.
Theorem 2.36: If {K

} is a collection of compact subsets of a metric


space X such that the intersection of every nite subcollection of {K

}
is nonempty, then

K

is nonempty.
Corollary: If {K
n
} is a sequence of nonempty compact sets such that
K
n
contains K
n+1
(n = 1, 2, 3, ...), then

K
n
is not empty.
Solution: For closed: [n, ). For bounded: (1/n, 1/n) {0}.
16. Regard Q, the set of all rational numbers, as a metric space, with
d(p, q) = |p q|. Let E be the set of all p Q such that 2 < p
2
< 3.
Show that E is closed and bounded in Q, but that E is not compact.
Is E open in Q?
18 CHAPTER 2. BASIC TOPOLOGY
Proof: Let S = (

2,

3)

3,

2). Then E = {p Q : p S}.


Clearly, E is bounded in Q. Since Q is dense in R, every limit point of
Q is in Q. (I regard Q as a metric space). Hence, E is closed in Q.
To prove that E is not compact, we form a open covering of E as
follows:
{G

} = {N
r
(p) : p E and (p r, p + r) S}
Surely, {G

} is a open covering of E. If E is compact, then there are


nitely many indices
1
, ...,
n
such that
E G

1
_
...
_
G

n
.
For every G

i
= N
r
i
(p
i
), take p = max
1in
p
i
. Thus, p is the nearest
point to

3. But N
r
(p) lies in E, thus [p + r,

3) cannot be covered
since Q is dense in R, a contradiction. Hence E is not compact.
Finally, the answer is yes. Take any p Q, then there exists a
neighborhood N(p) of p contained in E. (Take r small enough where
N
r
(p) = N(p), and Q is dense in R.) Thus every point in N(p) is also
in Q. Hence E is also open.
17. Let E be the set of all x [0, 1] whose decimal expansion contains only
the digits 4 and 7. Is E countable? Is E dense in [0, 1]? Is E compact?
Is E perfect?
Solution:
E =
_

n=1
a
n
10
n
: a
n
= 4 or a
n
= 7
_
Claim: E is uncountable.
Proof of Claim: If not, we list E as follows:
x
1
= 0.a
11
a
12
...a
1n
...
x
2
= 0.a
21
a
22
...a
2n
...
... ...
x
k
= 0.a
k1
a
k2
...a
kn
...
... ...
19
(Prevent ending with all digits 9) Let x = 0.x
1
x
2
...x
n
... where
x
n
=
_
4 if a
nn
= 7
7 if a
nn
= 4
By my construction, x / E, a contradiction. Thus E is uncountable.
Claim: E is not dense in [0, 1].
Proof of Claim: Note that E

(0.47, 0.74) = . Hence E is not dense


in [0, 1].
Claim: E is compact.
Proof of Claim: Clearly, E is bounded. For every limit point p of E,
I show that p E. If not, write the decimal expansion of p as follows
p = 0.p
1
p
2
...p
n
...
Since p / E, there exists the smallest k such that p
k
= 4 and p
k
= 7.
When p
k
= 0, 1, 2, 3, select the smallest l such that p
l
= 7 if possible.
(If l does not exist, then p < 0.4. Thus there is a neighborhood of p
such that contains no points of E, a contradiction.) Thus
0.p
1
...p
l1
4p
l+1
...p
k1
7 < p < 0.p
1
...p
k1
4.
Thus there is a neighborhood of p such that contains no points of E, a
contradiction.
When p
k
= 5, 6,
0.p
1
...p
k1
47 < p < 0.p
1
...p
k1
74.
Thus there is a neighborhood of p such that contains no points of E, a
contradiction.
When p
k
= 8, 9, it is similar. Hence E is closed. Therefore E is
compact.
Claim: E is perfect.
Proof of Claim: Take any p E, and I claim that p is a limit point
of E. Write p = 0.p
1
p
2
...p
n
... Let
x
k
= 0.y
1
y
2
...y
n
...
20 CHAPTER 2. BASIC TOPOLOGY
where
y
n
=
_

_
p
k
if k = n
4 if p
n
= 7
7 if p
n
= 4
Thus, |x
k
p| 0 as k . Also, x
k
= p for all k. Hence p is a limit
point of E. Therefore E is perfect.
18. Is there a nonempty perfect set in R
1
which contains no rational num-
ber?
Solution: Yes. The following claim will show the reason.
Claim: Given a measure zero set S, we have a perfect set P contains
no elements in S.
Proof of Claim: (due to SYLee). Since S has measure zero, there
exists a collection of open intervals {I
n
} such that
S
_
I
n
and

|I
n
| < 1.
Consider E = R
1

I
n
. E is nonempty since E has positive mea-
sure. Thus E is uncountable and E is closed. Therefore there exists
a nonempty perfect set P contained in E by Exercise 28. P

S = .
Thus P is our required perfect set.
19. (a) If A and B are disjoint closed sets in some metric space X, prove
that they are separated.
(b) Prove the same for disjoint open sets.
(c) Fix p X, > 0, dene A to be the set of all q X for which
d(p, q) < , dene B similarly, with > in place of <. Prove that A and
B are separated.
(d) Prove that every connected metric space with at least two points
is uncountable. Hint: Use (c).
Proof of (a): Recall the denition of separated: A and B are sep-
arated if A

B and A

B are empty. Since A and B are closed sets,


A = A and B = B. Hence A

B = A

B = A

B = . Hence A and
B are separated.
21
Proof of (b): Suppose A

B is not empty. Thus there exists p such


that p A and p B. For p A, there exists a neighborhood N
r
(p) of
p contained in A since A is open. For p B = B

, if p B, then
p A

B. Note that A and B are disjoint, and its a contradiction.


If p B

, then p is a limit point of B. Thus every neighborhood of p


contains a point q = p such that q B. Take an neighborhood N
r
(p)of
p containing a point q = p such that q B. Note that N
r
(p) A,
thus q A. With A and B are disjoint, we get a contradiction. Hence
A

(B) is empty.
Similarly, A

B is also empty. Thus A and B are separated.


Proof of (c): Suppose A

B is not empty. Thus there exists x such


that x A and x B. Since x A, d(p, x) < . x B = B

, thus
if x B, then d(p, x) > , a contradiction. The only possible is x is a
limit point of B. Hence we take a neighborhood N
r
(x) of x contains y
with y B where r =
d(x,p)
2
. Clearly, d(y, p) > . But,
d(y, p) d(y, x) + d(x, p)
< r + d(x, p)
=
d(x, p)
2
+ d(x, p)
=
+ d(x, p)
2
<
+
2
= .
A contradiction. Hence A

B is empty. Similarly, A

B is also empty.
Thus A and B are separated.
Note: Take care of > 0. Think a while and you can prove the next
sub-exercise.
Proof of (d): Let X be a connected metric space. Take p X, q X
with p = q, thus d(p, q) > 0 is xed. Let
A = {x X : d(x, p) < }; B = {x X : d(x, p) > }.
Take =
t
= td(p, q) where t (0, 1). Thus 0 < < d(p, q). p A
since d(p, p) = 0 < , and q B since d(p, q) > . Thus A and B are
non-empty.
22 CHAPTER 2. BASIC TOPOLOGY
By (c), A and B are separated. If X = A

B, then X is not connected,


a contradiction. Thus there exists y
t
X such that y / A

B. Let
E = E
t
= {x X : d(x, p) =
t
} y
t
.
For any real t (0, 1), E
t
is non-empty. Next, E
t
and E
s
are disjoint
if t = s (since a metric is well-dened). Thus X contains a uncount-
able set {y
t
: t (0, 1)} since (0, 1) is uncountable. Therefore, X is
uncountable.
Note: It is a good exercise. If that metric space contains only one
point, then it must be separated.
Similar Exercise Given by SYLee: (a) Let A = {x : d(p, x) < r}
and B = {x : d(p, x) > r} for some p in a metric space X. Show that
A, B are separated.
(b) Show that a connected metric space with at least two points must
be uncountable. [Hint: Use (a)]
Proof of (a): By denition of separated sets, we want to show A

B =
, and B

A = . In order to do these, it is sucient to show A

B =
. Let x A

B = , then we have:
(1) x A d(x, p) r(2) x B d(x, p) > r
It is impossible. So, A

B = .
Proof of (b): Suppose that C is countable, say C = a, b, x
3
, .... We
want to show C is disconnected. So, if C is a connected metric space
with at least two points, it must be uncountable. Consider the set
S = {d(a, x
i
) : x
i
C}, and thus let r R S and inf S < r < sup S.
And construct A and B as in (a), we have C = A

B, where A and B
are separated. That is C is disconnected.
Another Proof of (b): Let a C, b C, consider the continuous
function f from C into R dened by f(x) = d(x, a). So, f(C) is con-
nected and f(a) = 0, f(b) > 0. That is, f(C) is an interval. Therefore,
C is uncountable.
20. Are closures and interiors of connected sets always connected? (Look
at subsets of R
2
.)
23
Solution: Closures of connected sets is always connected, but interiors
of those is not. The counterexample is
S = N
1
(2, 0)
_
N
1
(2, 0)
_
{x axis} R
2
.
Since S is path-connected, S is connect. But S
o
= N
1
(2)

N
1
(2) is
disconnected clearly.
Claim: If S is a connected subset of a metric space, then S is con-
nected.
Pf of Claim: If not, then S is a union of two nonempty separated set
A and B. Thus A

B = A

B = . Note that
S = S T
= A
_
B T
= (A
_
B)

T
c
= (A

T
c
)
_
(B

T
c
)
where T = S S. Thus
(A

T
c
)

T
c
(A

T
c
)

T
c
A

B
= .
Hence (A

T
c
)

T
c
= . Similarly, A

T
c

(B

T
c
) = .
Now we claim that both A

T
c
and B

T
c
are nonempty. Suppose
that B

T
c
= . Thus
A

T
c
= S A

(S S)
c
= S
A

(A
_
B S)
c
= S
A

((A
_
B)

S
c
)
c
= S
A

((A
c

B
c
)
_
S) = S
(A

S)
_
(A

A
c

B
c
) = S
A

S = S.
24 CHAPTER 2. BASIC TOPOLOGY
Thus B is empty, a contradiction. Thus B

T
c
is nonempty. Similarly,
A

T
c
nonempty. Therefore S is a union of two nonempty separated
sets, a contradiction. Hence S is connected.
21. Let A and B be separated subsets of some R
k
, suppose a A, b B,
and dene
p(t) = (1 t)a + tb
for t R
1
. Put A
0
= p
1
(A), B
0
= p
1
(B). [Thus t A
0
if and only
if p(t) A.]
(a) Prove that A
0
and B
0
are separated subsets of R
1
.
(b) Prove that there exists t
0
(0, 1) such that p(t
0
) / A

B.
(c) Prove that every convex subset of R
k
is connected.
Proof of (a): I claim that A
0

B
0
is empty. (B
0

A
0
is similar). If
not, take x A
0

B
0
. x A
0
and x B
0
. x B
0
or x is a limit
point of B
0
. x B
0
will make x A
0

B
0
, that is, p(x) A

B, a
contradiction since A and B are separated.
Claim: x is a limit point of B
0
p(x) is a limit point of B. Take any
neighborhood N
r
of p(x), and p(t) lies in B for small enough t. More
precisely,
x
r
|b a|
< t < x +
r
|b a|
.
Since x is a limit point of B
0
, and (x r/|b a|, x + r/|b a|) is a
neighborhood N of x, thus N contains a point y = x such that y B
0
,
that is, p(y) B. Also, p(y) N
r
. Therefore, p(x) is a limit point of
B. Hence p(x) A

B, a contradiction since A and B are separated.


Hence A
0

B
0
is empty, that is, A
0
and B
0
are separated subsets of
R
1
.
Proof of (b): Suppose not. For every t
0
(0, 1), neither p(t
0
) A
nor p(t
0
) B (since A and B are separated). Also, p(t
0
) A

B for
all t
0
(0, 1). Hence (0, 1) = A
0

B
0
, a contradiction since (0, 1) is
connected. I completed the proof.
Proof of (c): Let S be a convex subset of R
k
. If S is not connected,
then S is a union of two nonempty separated sets A and B. By (b),
there exists t
0
(0, 1) such that p(t
0
) / A

B. But S is convex, p(t


0
)
25
must lie in A

B, a contradiction. Hence S is connected.


22. A metric space is called separable if it contains a countable dense sub-
set. Show that R
k
is separable. Hint: Consider the set of points which
have only rational coordinates.
Proof: Consider S = the set of points which have only rational coor-
dinates. For any point x = (x
1
, x
2
, ..., x
k
) R
k
, we can nd a rational
sequence {r
i
j
} x
j
for j = 1, ..., k since Q is dense in R
1
. Thus,
r
i
= (r
i
1
, r
i
2
, ..., r
i
k
) x
and r
i
S for all i. Hence S is dense in R
k
. Also, S is countable, that
is, S is a countable dense subset in R
k
, R
k
is separable.
23. A collection {V

} of open subsets of X is said to be a base for X if the


following is true: For every x X and every open set G X such that
x G, we have x V

G for some . In other words, every open set


in X is the union of a subcollection of {V

}.
Prove that every separable metric space has a countable base. Hint:
Take all neighborhoods with rational radius and center in some count-
able dense subset of X.
Proof: Let X be a separable metric space, and S be a countable dense
subset of X. Let a collection {V

} = { all neighborhoods with rational


radius and center in S }. We claim that {V

} is a base for X.
For every x X and every open set G X such that x G, there
exists a neighborhood N
r
(p) of p such that N
r
(p) G since x is an
interior point of G. Since S is dense in X, there exists {s
n
} x. Take
a rational number r
n
such that r
n
<
r
2
, and {V

} N
r
n
(s
n
) N
r
(p)
for enough large n. Hence we have x V

G for some . Hence


{V

} is a base for X.
24. Let X be a metric space in which every innite subset has a limit
point. Prove that X is separable. Hint: Fix > 0, and pick x
1

X. Having chosen x
1
, ..., x
j
X, choose x
j+1
, if possible, so that
d(x
i
, x
j+1
) for i = 1, ..., j. Show that this process must stop after
26 CHAPTER 2. BASIC TOPOLOGY
nite number of steps, and that X can therefore be covered by nite
many neighborhoods of radius . Take = 1/n(n = 1, 2, 3, ...), and
consider the centers of the corresponding neighborhoods.
Proof: Fix > 0, and pick x
1
X. Having chosen x
1
, ..., x
j
X,
choose x
j+1
, if possible, so that d(x
i
, x
j+1
) for i = 1, ..., j. If
this process cannot stop, then consider the set A = {x
1
, x
2
, ..., x
k
}. If
p is a limit point of A, then a neighborhood N
/3
(p) of p contains a
point q = p such that q A. q = x
k
for only one k N. If not,
d(x
i
, x
j
) d(x
i
, p) + d(x
j
, p) /3 + /3 < , and it contradicts the
fact that d(x
i
, x
j
) for i = j. Hence, this process must stop after
nite number of steps.
Suppose this process stop after k steps, and X is covered by N

(x
1
),
N

(x
2
), ..., N

(x
k
), that is, X can therefore be covered by nite many
neighborhoods of radius .
Take = 1/n(n = 1, 2, 3, ...), and consider the set A of the centers of
the corresponding neighborhoods.
Fix p X. Suppose that p is not in A, and every neighborhood
N
r
(p). Note that N
r/2
(p) can be covered by nite many neighborhoods
N
s
(x
1
), ..., N
s
(x
k
) of radius s = 1/n where n = [2/r] + 1 and x
i
A
for i = 1, ..., k. Hence, d(x
1
, p) d(x
1
, q) +d(q, p) r/2 +s < r where
q N
r/2
(p)

N
s
(x
1
). Therefore, x
1
N
r
(p) and x
1
= p since p is not
in A. Hence, p is a limit point of A if p is not in A, that is, A is a
countable dense subset, that is, X is separable.
25. Prove that every compact metric space K has a countable base, and
that K is therefore separable. Hint: For every positive integer n, there
are nitely many neighborhood of radius 1/n whose union covers K.
Proof: For every positive integer n, there are nitely many neighbor-
hood of radius 1/n whose union covers K (since K is compact). Collect
all of them, say {V

}, and it forms a countable collection. We claim


{V

} is a base.
For every x X and every open set G X, there exists N
r
(x) such that
N
r
(x) G since x is an interior point of G. Hence x N
m
(p) {V

}
for some p where m = [2/r] + 1. For every y N
m
(p), we have
d(y, x) d(y, p) + d(p, x) < m + m = 2m < r.
27
Hence N
m
(p) G, that is, V

G for some , and therefore {V

} is a
countable base of K. Next, collect all of the center of V

, say D, and
we claim D is dense in K (D is countable since V

is countable). For all


p K and any > 0 we can nd N
n
(x
n
) {V

} where n = [1/] + 1.
Note that x
n
D for all n and d(p, x
n
) 0 as n . Hence D is
dense in K.
26. Let X be a metric space in which every innite subsets has a limit
point. Prove that X is compact. Hint: By Exercises 23 and 24, X has
a countable base. It follows that every open cover of X has a countable
subcover {G
n
}, n = 1, 2, 3, .... If no nite subcollection of {G
n
} covers
X, then the complement F
n
of G
1

...

G
n
is nonempty for each n,
but

F
n
is empty. If E is a set contains a point from each F
n
, consider
a limit point of E, and obtain a contradiction.
Proof: By Exercises 23 and 24, X has a countable base. It follows that
every open cover of X has a countable subcover {G
n
}, n = 1, 2, 3, ....
If no nite subcollection of {G
n
} covers X, then the complement F
n
of
G
1

...

G
n
is nonempty for each n, but

F
n
is empty. If E is a set
contains a point from each F
n
, consider a limit point of E.
Note that F
k
F
k+1
... and F
n
is closed for all n, thus p lies in F
k
for all k. Hence p lies in

F
n
, but

F
n
is empty, a contradiction.
27. Dene a point p in a metric space X to be a condensation point of a set
E X if every neighborhood of p contains uncountably many points
of E.
Suppose E R
k
, E is uncountable, and let P be the set of all conden-
sation points of E. Prove that P is perfect and that at most countably
many points of E are not in P. In other words, show that P
c

E is at
most countable. Hint: Let {V
n
} be a countable base of R
k
, let W be
the union of those V
n
for which E

V
n
is at most countable, and show
that P = W
c
.
Proof: Let {V
n
} be a countable base of R
k
, let W be the union of
those V
n
for which E

V
n
is at most countable, and we will show that
P = W
c
. Suppose x P. (x is a condensation point of E). If
x V
n
for some n, then E

V
n
is uncountable since V
n
is open. Thus
28 CHAPTER 2. BASIC TOPOLOGY
x W
c
. (If x W, then there exists V
n
such that x V
n
and E

V
n
is uncountable, a contradiction). Therefore P W
c
.
Conversely, suppose x W
c
. x / V
n
for any n such that E

V
n
is
countable. Take any neighborhood N(x) of x. Take x V
n
N(x),
and E

V
n
is uncountable. Thus E

N(x) is also uncountable, x is a


condensation point of E. Thus W
c
P. Therefore P = W
c
. Note that
W is countable, and thus W W

E = P
c

E is at most countable.
To show that P is perfect, it is enough to show that P contains no
isolated point. (since P is closed). If p is an isolated point of P, then
there exists a neighborhood N of p such that N

E = . p is not a
condensation point of E, a contradiction. Therefore P is perfect.
28. Prove that every closed set in a separable metric space is the union
of a (possible empty) perfect set and a set which is at most countable.
(Corollary: Every countable closed set in R
k
has isolated points.) Hint:
Use Exercise 27.
Proof: Let X be a separable metric space, let E be a closed set on
X. Suppose E is uncountable. (If E is countable, there is nothing
to prove.) Let P be the set of all condensation points of E. Since X
has a countable base, P is perfect, and P
c

E is at most countable by
Exercise 27. Since E is closed, P E. Also, P
c

E = E P. Hence
E = P

(E P).
For corollary: if there is no isolated point in E, then E is perfect. Thus
E is uncountable, a contradiction.
Note: Its also called Cauchy-Bendixon Theorem.
29. Prove that every open set in R
1
is the union of an at most countable
collection of disjoint segments. Hint: Use Exercise 22.
Proof: (due to H.L.Royden, Real Analysis) Since O is open, for each x
in O, there is a y > x such that (x, y) O. Let b = sup{y : (x, y) O}.
Let a = inf{z : (z, x) O}. Then a < x < b, and I
x
= (a, b) is an open
interval containing x.
Now I
x
O, for if w I
x
, say x < w < b, we have by the denition of
b a number y > w such that (x, y) O, and so w O).
29
Moreover, b / O, for if b O, then for some > 0 we have (b, b+)
O, whence (x, b + ) O, contradicting the denition of b. Similarly,
a / O.
Consider the collection of open intervals {I
x
}, x O. Since each x O
is contained in I
x
, and each I
x
O, we have O =

I
x
.
Let (a, b) and (c, d) be two intervals in this collection with a point in
common. Then we must have c < b and a < d. Since c / O, it does not
belong to (a, b) and we have c a. Since a / O and hence not to (c, d),
we have a c. Thus a = c. Similarly, b = d, and (a, b) = (c, d). Thus
two dierent intervals in the collection {I
x
} must be disjoint. Thus
O is the union of the disjoint collection {I
x
} of open intervals, and it
remains only to show that this collection is countable. But each open
interval contains a rational number since Q is dense in R. Since we
have a collection of disjoint open intervals, each open interval contains
a dierent rational number, and the collection can be put in one-to-one
correspondence with a subset of the rationals. Thus it is a countable
collection.
30. Imitate the proof of Theorem 2.43 to obtain the following result:
If R
k
=

1
F
n
, where each F
n
is a closed subset of R
k
, then
at least one F
n
has a nonempty interior.
Equivalent statement: If G
n
is a dense open subset of R
k
, for
n = 1, 2, 3, ..., then

1
G
n
is not empty (in fact, it is dense
in R
k
).
(This is a special case of Baires theorem; see Exercise 22, Chap. 3, for
the general case.)
Proof: I prove Baires theorem directly. Let G
n
be a dense open
subset of R
k
for n = 1, 2, 3, .... I need to prove that

1
G
n
intersects
any nonempty open subset of R
k
is not empty.
Let G
0
is a nonempty open subset of R
k
. Since G
1
is dense and G
0
is nonempty, G
0

G
1
= . Suppose x
1
G
0

G
1
. Since G
0
and G
1
are open, G
0

G
1
is also open, that is, there exist a neighborhood V
1
such that V
1
G
0

G
1
. Next, since G
2
is a dense open set and V
1
is a nonempty open set, V
1

G
2
= . Thus, I can nd a nonempty
30 CHAPTER 2. BASIC TOPOLOGY
open set V
2
such that V
2
V
1

G
2
. Suppose I have get n nonempty
open sets V
1
, V
2
, ..., V
n
such that V
1
G
0

G
1
and V
i+1
V
i

G
n+1
for all i = 1, 2, ..., n 1. Since G
n+1
is a dense open set and V
n
is a
nonempty open set, V
n

G
n+1
is a nonempty open set. Thus I can nd
a nonempty open set V
n+1
such that V
n+1
V
n

G
n+1
. By induction, I
can form a sequence of open sets {V
n
: n Z
+
} such that V
1
G
0

G
1
and V
i+1
V
i

G
i+1
for all n Z
+
. Since V
1
is bounded and V
1

V
2
... V
n
..., by Theorem 2.39 I know that

n=1
V
n
= .
Since V
1
G
0

G
1
and V
n+1
G
n+1
, G
0

n=1
G
n
) = . Proved.
Note: By Baires theorem, Ive proved the equivalent statement. Next,
F
n
has a empty interior if and only if G
n
= R
k
F
n
is dense in R
k
.
Hence we completed all proof.
Chapter 3
Numerical Sequences and
Series
31
32 CHAPTER 3. NUMERICAL SEQUENCES AND SERIES
Written by Men-Gen Tsai
email: b89902089@ntu.edu.tw
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13. Prove that the Cauchy product of two absolutely convergent series con-
verges absolutely.
Note: Given

a
n
and

b
n
, we put c
n
=

n
k=0
a
k
b
nk
and call

c
n
the Cauchy product of the two given series.
Proof: Put A
n
=

n
k=0
|a
k
|, B
n
=

n
k=0
|b
k
|, C
n
=

n
k=0
|c
k
|. Then
C
n
= |a
0
b
0
| +|a
0
b
1
+ a
1
b
0
| + ... +|a
0
b
n
+ a
1
b
n1
+ ... + a
n
b
0
|
|a
0
||b
0
| + (|a
0
||b
1
| +|a
1
||b
0
|) + ...
+(|a
0
||b
n
| +|a
1
||b
n1
| + ... +|a
n
||b
0
|)
= |a
0
|B
n
+|a
1
|B
n1
+ ... +|a
n
|B
0
33
|a
0
|B
n
+|a
1
|B
n
+ ... +|a
n
|B
n
= (|a
0
| +|a
1
| + ... +|a
n
|)B
n
= A
n
B
n
AB
where A = limA
n
and B = limB
n
. Hence {C
n
} is bounded. Note
that {C
n
} is increasing, and thus C
n
is a convergent sequence, that
is, the Cauchy product of two absolutely convergent series converges
absolutely.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23. Suppose {p
n
} and {q
n
} are Cauchy sequences in a metric space X.
Show that the sequence {d(p
n
, q
n
)} converges. Hint: For any m, n,
d(p
n
, q
n
) d(p
n
, p
m
) + d(p
m
, q
m
) + d(q
m
, q
n
);
it follows that
|d(p
n
, q
n
) d(p
m
, q
m
)|
is small if m and n are large.
Proof: For any > 0, there exists N such that d(p
n
, p
m
) < and
d(q
m
, q
n
) < whenever m, n N. Note that
d(p
n
, q
n
) d(p
n
, p
m
) + d(p
m
, q
m
) + d(q
m
, q
n
).
34 CHAPTER 3. NUMERICAL SEQUENCES AND SERIES
It follows that
|d(p
n
, q
n
) d(p
m
, q
m
)| d(p
n
, p
m
) + d(q
m
, q
n
) < 2.
Thus {d(p
n
, q
n
)} is a Cauchy sequence in X. Hence {d(p
n
, q
n
)} con-
verges.
24.
25.
Chapter 4
Continuity
35
36 CHAPTER 4. CONTINUITY
Written by Men-Gen Tsai
email: b89902089@ntu.edu.tw
1. Suppose f is a real function dene on R
1
which satises
lim
h0
[f(x + h) f(x h)] = 0
for every x R
1
. Does this imply that f is continuous?
Solution: No. Take f(x) = 1, if x Z; f(x) = 0. otherwise.
2.
3.
4.
5. If f is a real continuous function dened on a closed set E R
1
, prove
that there exist continuous real function g on R
1
such that g(x) = f(x)
for all x E. (Such functions g are called continuous extensions of f
from E to R
1
.) Show that the result becomes false if the word closed
is omitted. Extend the result to vector valued functions. Hint: Let the
graph of g be a straight line on each of the segments which constitute
the complement of E (compare Exercise 29, Chap. 2). The result re-
mains true if R
1
is replaced by any metric space, but the proof is not
so simple.
Proof: Note that the following fact:
Every open set of real numbers is the union of a countable
collection of disjoint open intervals.
Thus, consider E
c
=

(a
i
, b
i
), where i Z, and a
i
< b
i
< a
i+1
< b
i+1
.
We extend g on (a
i
, b
i
) as following:
g(x) = f(a
i
) + (x a
i
)
f(b
i
) f(a
i
)
b
i
a
i
(g(x) = f(x) for x E). Thus g is well-dened on R
1
, and g is contin-
uous on R
1
clearly.
37
Next, consider f(x) = 1/x on a open set E = R0. f is continuous on
E, but we cannot redene f(0) = any real number to make new f(x)
continue at x = 0.
Next, consider a vector valued function
f(x) = (f
1
(x), ..., f
n
(x)),
where f
i
(x) is a real valued function. Since f is continuous on E, each
component of f, f
i
, is also continuous on E, thus we can extend f
i
, say
g
i
, for each i = 1, ..., n. Thus,
g(x) = (g
1
(x), ..., g
n
(x))
is a extension of f(x) since each component of g, g
i
, is continuous on
R
1
implies g is continuous on R
n
.
Note: The above fact only holds in R
1
. If we change R
1
into any
metric spaces, we have no the previous fact.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
38 CHAPTER 4. CONTINUITY
17.
18.
19. Suppose f is a real function with domain R
1
which has the interme-
diate value property: If f(a) < c < f(b), then f(x) = c for some x
between a and b.
Suppose also, for every rational r, that the set of all x with f(x) = r
is closed. Prove that f is continuous.
Hint: If x
n
x
0
, but f(x
n
) > r > f(x
0
) for some r and all n, then
f(t
n
) = r for some t
n
between x
0
and x
n
; thus t
n
x
0
. Find a contra-
diction. (N. J. Fine, Amer. Math. Monthly, vol. 73, 1966, p. 782.)
Proof: Let S = {x : f(x) = r}. If x
n
x
0
, but f(x
n
) > r > f(x
0
)
for some r and all n since Q is dense in R
1
, then f(t
n
) = r for some t
n
between x
0
and x
n
; thus t
n
x
0
. Hence x
0
is a limit point of S. Since
S is closed, f(x
0
) = r, a contradiction. Hence, limsup f(x
n
) f(x
0
).
Similarly, liminf f(x
n
) f(x
0
). Hence, limf(x
n
) = f(x
0
), and f is
continuous at x
0
.
Note: Original problem is stated as follows:
Let f be a function from the reals to the reals, dierentiable
at every point. Suppose that, for every r, the set of points
x, where f

(x) = r, is closed. Prove that f

is continuous.
If we replace Q into any dense subsets of R
1
, the conclusion also holds.
20.
21.
22. Let A and B be disjoint nonempty closed sets in a metric space X, and
dene
f(p) =

A
(p)

A
(p) +
B
(p)
, (p X).
39
Show that f is a continuous function on X whose range lies in [0, 1],
that f(p) = 0 precisely on A and f(p) = 1 precisely on B. This
establishes a converse of Exercise 3: Every closed set A contained in X
is Z(f) for some continuous real f on X. Setting
V = f
1
([0, 1/2)), W = f
1
((1/2, 1]),
show that V and W are open and disjoint, and that A is contained in
V , B is contained in W. (Thus pairs of disjoint closed set in a metric
space can be covered by pairs of disjoint open sets. This property of
metric spaces is called normality.)
Proof: Note that
A
(p) and
B
(p) are (uniformly) continuous on X,
and
A
(p) +
B
(p) > 0. (Clearly,
A
(p) +
B
(p) 0 by the denition.
If
A
(p) +
B
(p) = 0, then p A

B by Exercise 20, a contradiction).


Thus f(p) =
A
(p)/(
A
(p)+
B
(p)) is continuous on X. Next, f(p) 0,
and f(p) 1 since
A
(p)
A
(p) +
B
(p). Thus f(X) lies in [0, 1].
Next, f(p) = 0
A
(p) = 0 p A precisely, and f(p) = 1

B
(p) = 0 p B precisely by Exercise 20.
Now we prove a converse of Exercise 3: Every closed set A X is Z(f)
for some continuous real f on X. If Z(f) = , then f(x) = 1 for all
x X satises our requirement. If Z(f) = , we consider two possible
cases: (1) Z(f) = X; (2) Z(f) = X. If Z(f) = X, then f(x) = 0 for
all x X. If Z(f) = X, we can choose p X such that f(p) = 0.
Note that Z(f) and {p} are one pair of disjoint closed sets. Hence we
let
f(x) =

Z(f)
(x)

Z(f)
(x) +
{p}
(x)
.
By the previous result, we know that f(x) satises our requirement.
Hence we complete the whole proof.
Note that [0, 1/2) and (1/2, 1] are two open sets of f(X). Since f is
continuous, V = f
1
([0, 1/2)) and W = f
1
((1/2, 1]) are two open sets.
f
1
({0}) f
1
([0, 1/2)), and f
1
({1}) f
1
((1/2, 1]). Thus, A V
and B W. Thus a metric space X is normal.
40 CHAPTER 4. CONTINUITY
23.
24.
25.
26.
Chapter 5
Dierentiation
41
42 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
Written by Men-Gen Tsai
email: b89902089@ntu.edu.tw
1. Let f be dened for all real x, and suppose that
|f(x) f(y)| (x y)
2
for all real x and y. Prove that f is constant.
Proof: |f(x) f(y)| (xy)
2
for all real x and y. Fix y, |
f(x)f(y)
xy
|
|x y|. Let x y, therefore,
0 lim
xy
f(x) f(y)
x y
lim
xy
|x y| = 0
It implies that (f(x) f(y))/(x y) 0 as x y. Hence f

(y) = 0,
f = const.
2. Suppose f

(x) > 0 in (a, b). Prove that f is strictly increasing in (a, b),
and let g be its inverse function. Prove that g is dierentible, and that
g

(f(x)) =
1
f

(x)
(a < x < b).
Proof: For every pair x > y in (a, b), f(x) f(y) = f

(c)(xy) where
y < c < x by Mean-Value Theorem. Note that c (a, b) and f

(x) > 0
in (a, b), hence f

(c) > 0. f(x) f(y) > 0, f(x) > f(y) if x > y, f is


strictly increasing in (a, b).
Let g = g(x
0
+ h) g(x
0
). Note that x
0
= f(g(x
0
)), and thus,
(x
0
+ h) x
0
= f(g(x
0
+ h)) f(g(x
0
)),
h = f(g(x
0
) + g) f(g(x
0
)) = f(g + g) f(g).
Thus we apply the fundamental lemma of dierentiation,
h = [f

(g) + (g)]g,
1
f

(g) + (g)
=
g
h
43
Note that f

(g(x)) > 0 for all x (a, b) and (g) 0 as h 0, thus,


lim
h0
g/h = lim
h0
1
f

(g) + (g)
=
1
f

(g(x))
.
Thus g

(x) =
1
f

(g(x))
, g

(f(x)) =
1
f

(x)
.
3. Suppose g is a real function on R
1
, with bounded derivative (say
|g

| M). Fix > 0, and dene f(x) = x + g(x). Prove that f


is one-to-one if is small enough. (A set of admissible values of can
be determined which depends only on M.)
Proof: For every x < y, and x, y R, we will show that f(x) = f(y).
By using Mean-Value Theorem:
g(x) g(y) = g

(c)(x y) where x < c < y,


(x y) + ((x) g(y)) = (g

(c) + 1)(x y),


that is,
f(x) f(y) = (g

(c) + 1)(x y). ()


Since |g

(x)| M, M g

(x) M for all x R. Thus 1 M


g

(c) +1 1 +M, where x < c < y. Take c =


1
2M
, and g

(c) +1 > 0
where x < c < y for all x, y. Take into equation (*), and f(x)f(y) < 0
since xy < 0, that is, f(x) = f(y), that is, f is one-to-one (injective).
4. If
C
0
+
C
1
2
+ ... +
C
n1
n
+
C
n
n + 1
= 0,
where C
0
, ..., C
n
are real constants, prove that the equation
C
0
+ C
1
x + ... + C
n1
x
n1
+ C
n
x
n
= 0
has at least one real root between 0 and 1.
Proof: Let f(x) = C
0
x + ... +
C
n
n+1
x
n+1
. f is dierentiable in R
1
and f(0) = f(1) = 0. Thus, f(1) f(0) = f

(c) where c (0, 1) by


Mean-Value Theorem. Note that
f

(x) = C
0
+ C
1
x + ... + C
n1
x
n1
+ C
n
x
n
.
44 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
Thus, c (0, 1) is one real root between 0 and 1 of that equation.
5. Suppose f is dened and dierentiable for every x > 0, and f

(x) 0
as x +. Put g(x) = f(x + 1) f(x). Prove that g(x) 0 as
x +.
Proof: f(x + 1) f(x) = f

(c)(x + 1 x) where x < c < x + 1


by Mean-Value Theorem. Thus, g(x) = f

(c) where x < c < x + 1,


that is,
lim
x+
g(x) = lim
x+
f

(c) = lim
c+
f

(c) = 0.
6. Suppose
(a) f is continuous for x 0,
(b) f

(x) exists for x > 0,


(c) f(0) = 0,
(d) f

is monotonically increasing.
Put
g(x) =
f(x)
x
(x > 0)
and prove that g is monotonically increasing.
Proof: Our goal is to show g

(x) > 0 for all x > 0


g

(x) =
xf

(x)f(x)
x
2
> 0 f

(x) >
f(x)
x
.
Since f

(x) exists, f(x) f(0) = f

(c)(x 0) where 0 < c < x by


Mean-Value Theorem. f

(c) =
f(x)
x
where 0 < c < x. Since f

is
monotonically increasing, f

(x) > f

(c), that is, f

(x) >
f(x)
x
for all
x > 0.
7. Suppose f

(x), g

(x) exist, g

(x) = 0, and f(x) = g(x) = 0. Prove that


lim
tx
f(t)
g(t)
=
f

(x)
g

(x)
.
45
(This holds also for complex functions.)
Proof:
f

(t)
g

(t)
=
lim
tx
f(t)f(x)
tx
lim
tx
g(t)g(x)
tx
=
lim
tx
f(t)
lim
tx
g(t)
= lim
tx
f(t)
g(t)
Surely, this holds also for complex functions.
8. Suppose f

(x) is continuous on [a, b] and > 0. Prove that there exists


> 0 such that
|
f(t) f(x)
t x
f

(x)| <
whenever 0 < |t x| < , a x b, a t b. (This could be
expressed by saying f is uniformly dierentiable on [a, b] if f

is contin-
uous on [a, b].) Does this hold for vector-valued functions too?
Proof: Since f

(x) is continuous on a compact set [a, b], f

(x) is uni-
formly continuous on [a, b]. Hence, for any > 0 there exists > 0
such that
|f

(t) f

(x)| <
whenever 0 < |t x| < , a x b, a t b. Thus, f

(c) =
f(t)f(x)
tx
where c between t and x by Mean-Value Theorem. Note that
0 < |c x| < and thus |f

(c) f

(x)| < , thus,


|
f(t) f(x)
t x
f

(x)| <
whenever 0 < |t x| < , a x b, a t b.
Note: It does not hold for vector-valued functions. If not, take
f(x) = (cos x, sin x),
[a, b] = [0, 2], and x = 0. Hence f

(x) = (sin x, cos x). Take any


1 > > 0, there exists > 0 such that
|
f(t) f(0)
t 0
f

(0)| <
46 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
whenever 0 < |t| < by our hypothesis. With calculating,
|(
cos t 1
t
,
sin t
t
) (0, 1)| <
|(
cos t 1
t
,
sin t
t
1)| <
(
cos t 1
t
)
2
+ (
sin t
t
1)
2
<
2
<
2
t
2
+ 1
2(cos t + sin t)
t
<
since 1 > > 0. Note that
2
t
2
+ 1
4
t
<
2
t
2
+ 1
2(cos t + sin t)
t
But
2
t
2
+ 1
4
t
+ as t 0. It contradicts.
9. Let f be a continuous real function on R
1
, of which it is known that
f

(x) exists for all x = 0 and that f

(x) 0 as x 0. Dose it follow


that f

(0) exists?
Note: We prove a more general exercise as following.
Suppose that f is continuous on an open interval I containing x
0
, sup-
pose that f

is dened on I except possibly at x


0
, and suppose that
f

(x) L as x x
0
. Prove that f

(x
0
) = L.
Proof of the Note: Using LHospitals rule:
lim
h0
f(x
0
+ h) f(x
0
)
h
= lim
h0
f

(x
0
+ h)
By our hypothesis: f

(x) L as x x
0
. Thus,
lim
h0
f(x
0
+ h) f(x
0
)
h
= L,
Thus f

(x
0
) exists and
f

(x
0
) = L.
47
10. Suppose f and g are complex dierentiable functions on (0, 1), f(x) 0,
g(x) 0, f

(x) A, g

(x) B as x 0, where A and B are complex


numbers, B = 0. Prove that
lim
x0
f(x)
g(x)
=
A
B
.
Compare with Example 5.18. Hint:
f(x)
g(x)
= (
f(x)
x
A)
x
g(x)
+ A
x
g(x)
.
Apply Theorem 5.13 to the real and imaginary parts of
f(x)
x
and
g(x)
x
.
Proof: Write f(x) = f
1
(x) +if
2
(x), where f
1
(x), f
2
(x) are real-valued
functions. Thus,
df(x)
dx
=
df
1
(x)
dx
+ i
df
2
(x)
dx
,
Apply LHospitals rule to
f
1
(x)
x
and
f
2
(x)
x
, we have
lim
x0
f
1
(x)
x
= lim
x0
f

1
(x)
lim
x0
f
2
(x)
x
= lim
x0
f

2
(x)
Combine f
1
(x) and f
2
(x), we have
lim
x0
f
1
(x)
x
+ i lim
x0
f
2
(x)
x
= lim
x0
f
1
(x)
x
+ i
f
2
(x)
x
= lim
x0
f(x)
x
or
lim
x0
f
1
(x)
x
+ i lim
x0
f
2
(x)
x
= lim
x0
f

1
(x) + i lim
x0
f

2
(x) = lim
x0
f

(x)
Thus, lim
x0
f(x)
x
= lim
x0
f

(x). Similarly, lim


x0
g(x)
x
= lim
x0
g

(x).
Note that B = 0. Thus,
lim
x0
f(x)
g(x)
= lim
x0
(
f(x)
x
A)
x
g(x)
+ A
x
g(x)
= (A A)
1
B
+
A
B
=
A
B
.
48 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
Note: In Theorem 5.13, we know g(x) + as x 0. (f(x) = x,
and g(x) = x + x
2
e
i
x
2
).
11. Suppose f is dened in a neighborhood of x, and suppose f(x) exists.
Show that
lim
h0
f(x + h) + f(x h) 2f(x)
h
2
= f

(x).
Show by an example that the limit may exist even if f(x) dose not.
Hint: Use Theorem 5.13.
Proof: By using LHospitals rule: (respect to h.)
lim
h0
f(x + h) + f(x h) 2f(x)
h
2
= lim
h0
f

(x + h) f

(x h)
2h
Note that
f

(x) =
1
2
(f

(x) + f

(x))
=
1
2
(lim
h0
f

(x + h) f

(x)
h
+ lim
h0
f

(x h) f

(x)
h
)
=
1
2
lim
h0
f

(x + h) f

(x h)
h
= lim
h0
f

(x + h) f

(x h)
2h
Thus,
f(x + h) + f(x h) 2f(x)
h
2
f

(x)
as h 0. Counter-example: f(x) = x|x| for all real x.
12. If f(x) = |x|
3
, compute f

(x), f

(x) for all real x, and show that f


(3)
(0)
does not exist.
Proof: f

(x) = 3|x|
2
if x = 0. Consider
f(h) f(0)
h
=
|h|
3
h
49
Note that |h|/h is bounded and |h|
2
0 as h 0. Thus,
f

(0) = lim
h0
f(h) f(0)
h
= 0.
Hence, f

(x) = 3|x|
2
for all x. Similarly,
f

(x) = 6|x|.
Thus,
f

(h) f(0)
h
= 6
|h|
h
Since
|h|
h
= 1 if h > 0 and = 1 if h < 0, f

(0) does not exist.


13. Suppose a and c are real numbers, c > 0, and f is dened on [1, 1] by
f(x) =
_
x
a
sin (x
c
) (if x = 0),
0 (if x = 0).
Prove the following statements:
(a) f is continuous if and only if a > 0.
(b) f

(0) exists if and only if a > 1.


(c) f

is bounded if and only if a 1 + c.


(d) f

is continuous if and only if a > 1 + c.


(e) f

(0) exists if and only if a > 2 + c.


(f) f

is bounded if and only if a 2 + 2c.


(g) f

is continuous if and only if a > 2 + 2c.


Proof: For (a): () f is continuous i for any sequence {x
n
} 0
with x
n
= 0, x
a
n
sin x
c
n
0 as n . In particular, take
x
n
= (
1
2n + /2
)
1
c
> 0
and thus x
a
n
0 as n . Hence a > 0. (If not, then a = 0 or a < 0.
When a = 0, x
a
n
= 1. When a < 0, x
a
n
= 1/x
a
n
as n . It
contradicts.)
() f is continuous on [1, 1] {0} clearly. Note that
|x
a
| x
a
sin (x
c
) |x
a
|,
50 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
and |x
a
| 0 as x 0 since a > 0. Thus f is continuous at x = 0.
Hence f is continuous.
For (b): f

(0) exists i x
a1
sin (x
c
) 0 as x 0. In the previous
proof we know that f

(0) exists if and only if a1 > 0. Also, f

(0) = 0.
14. Let f be a dierentiable real function dened in (a, b). Prove that f is
convex if and only if f

is monotonically increasing. Assume next that


f

(x) exist for every x (a, b), and prove that f is convex if and only
if f

(x) 0 for all x (a, b).


15. Suppose a R
1
, f is a twice-dierentiable real function on (a, ),
and M
0
, M
1
, M
2
are the least upper bounds of |f(x)|, |f

(x)|, |f

(x)|,
respectively, on (a, ). Prove that
M
2
1
4M
0
M
2
.
Hint: If h > 0, Taylors theorem shows that
f

(x) =
1
2h
[f(x + 2h) f(x)] hf

()
for some (x, x + 2h). Hence
|f

(x)| hM
2
+
M
0
h
.
To show that M
2
1
= 4M
0
M
2
can actually happen, take a = 1, dene
f(x) =
_
2x
2
1 (1 < x < 0),
x
2
1
x
2
+1
(0 x < ),
and show that M
0
= 1, M
1
= 4, M
2
= 4. Does M
2
1
4M
0
M
2
hold for
vector-valued functions too?
Proof: Suppose h > 0. By using Taylors theorem:
f(x + h) = f(x) + hf

(x) +
h
2
2
f

()
for some x < < x + 2h. Thus
h|f

(x)| |f(x + h)| +|f(x)| +


h
2
2
|f

()|
51
h|f

(x)| 2M
0
+
h
2
2
M
2
.
h
2
M
2
2h|f

(x)| + 4M
0
0 ()
Since equation (*) holds for all h > 0, its determinant must be non-
positive.
4|f

(x)|
2
4M
2
(4M
0
) 0
|f

(x)|
2
4M
0
M
2
(M
1
)
2
2M
0
M
2
Note: There is a similar exercise:
Suppose f(x)( < x < +) is a twice-dierentiable real function,
and
M
k
= sup
<x<+
|f
(k)
(x)| < + (k = 0, 1, 2).
Prove that M
2
1
2M
0
M
2
.
Proof of Note:
f(x + h) = f(x) + f

(x)h +
f

(
1
)
2
h
2
(x <
1
< x + h or x >
1
> x + h) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (*)
f(x h) = f(x) f

(x)h +
f

(
2
)
2
h
2
(x h <
2
< x or x h >
2
> x) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (**)
(*) minus (**):
f(x + h) f(x h) = 2f

(x)h +
h
2
2
(f

(
1
) f

(
2
)).
2h|f

(x)| |2hf

(x)|
2h|f

(x)| |f(x + h)| +|f(x h)| +


h
2
2
(|f

(
1
)| +|f

(
2
)|)
2h|f

(x)| 2M
0
+ h
2
M
2
M
2
h
2
2|f

(x)|h + 2M
0
0
52 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
Since this equation holds for all h, its determinant must be non-positive:
4|f

(x)|
2
4M
2
(2M
0
) 0,
|f

(x)|
2
2M
0
M
2
Thus
M
2
1
2M
0
M
2
16. Suppose f is twice-dierentiable on (0, ), f

is bounded on (0, ),
and f(x) 0 as x . Prove that f

(x) 0 as x . Hint: Let


a in Exercise 15.
Proof: Suppose a (0, ), and M
0
, M
1
, M
2
are the least upper
bounds of |f(x)|, |f

(x)|, |f

(x)| on (a, ). Hence, M


2
1
4M
0
M
2
. Let
a , M
0
= sup |f(x)| 0. Since M
2
is bounded, therefore M
2
1
0
as a . It implies that sup |f

(x)| 0 as x .
17. Suppose f is a real, three times dierentiable function on [1, 1], such
that
f(1) = 0, f(0) = 0, f(1) = 1, f

(0) = 0.
Prove that f
(3)
(x) 3 for some x (1, 1).
Note that equality holds for
1
2
(x
3
+ x
2
).
Hint: Use Theorem 5.15, with = 0 and = 1, 1, to show that
there exist s (0, 1) and t (1, 0) such that
f
(3)
(s) + f
(3)
(t) = 6.
Proof: By Theorem 5.15, we take = 0, = 1,
f(1) = f(0) + f

(0) +
f

(0)
2
+
f
(3)
(s)
6
where s (0, 1). Take = 0, and = 1,
f(1) = f(0) f

(0) +
f

(0)
2

f
(3)
(t)
6
53
where t (1, 0). Thus
1 =
f

(0)
2
+
f
(3)
(s)
6
, s (0, 1) ()
0 =
f

(0)
2

f
(3)
(s)
6
, s (1, 0) ()
Equation (*) - equation (**):
f
(3)
(s)
6
+
f
(3)
(t)
6
, s (0, 1), t (1, 0).
f
(3)
(s) + f
(3)
(t) = 6, s, t (1, 1).
f
(3)
(x) 3 for some x (1, 1).
Theorem 5.15: Suppose f is a real function on [a, b], n is a positive
integer, f
(n1)
is continuous on [a, b], f
(n)
(t) exists for every t (a, b).
Let , be distinct points of [a, b], and dene
P(t) =
n1

k=0
f
(k)
()
k!
(t )
k
.
Then there exists a point x between and such that
f() = P() +
f
(n)
(x)
n!
( )
n
.
18. Suppose f is a real function on [a, b], n is a positive integer, and f
(n1)
exists for every t [a, b]. Let , , and P be as in Taylors theorem
(5.15). Dene
Q(t) =
f(t) f()
t
for t [a, b], t = , dierentiate
f(t) f() = (t )Q(t)
54 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
n 1 times at t = , and derive the following version of Taylors
theorem:
f() = P() +
Q
(n1)
()
(n 1)!
( )
n
.
19. Suppose f is dened in (1, 1) and f

(0) exists. Suppose 1 <


n
<

n
< 1,
n
0, and
n
0 as n . Dene the dierence quotients
D
n
=
f(
n
) f(
n
)

n
Prove the following statements:
(a) If
n
< 0 <
n
, then limD
n
= f

(0).
(b) If 0 <
n
<
n
and {
n
/(
n

n
)} is bounded, then limD
n
= f

(0).
(c) If f

is continuous in (1, 1), then limD


n
= f

(0).
Give an example in which f is dierentiable in (1, 1) (but f

is not
continuous at 0) and in which
n
,
n
tend to 0 in such a way that
limD
n
exists but is dierent from f

(0).
Proof: For (a):
D
n
=
f(
n
) f(0)

n
+
f(
n
) f(0)

n
Note that
f

(0) = lim
n
f(
n
) f(0)

n
= lim
n
f(
n
) f(0)

n
Thus for any > 0, there exists N such that
L <
f(
n
) f(0)

n
< L + ,
L <
f(
n
) f(0)

n
< L + ,
55
whenever n > N where L = f

(0) respectively. Note that


n
/(
n

n
)
and
n
/(
n

n
) are positive. Hence,

n
(L ) <
f(
n
) f(0)

n
<

n

n
(L + )

n
(L ) <
f(
n
) f(0)

n
<

n

n
(L + )
Combine two inequations,
L < D
n
< L +
Hence, limD
n
= L = f

(0).
For (b): We process as above prove, but note that
n
/(
n

n
) < 0.
Thus we only have the following inequations:

n
(L ) <
f(
n
) f(0)

n
<

n

n
(L + )

n
(L + ) <
f(
n
) f(0)

n
<

n

n
(L )
Combine them:
L

n
+
n

n
< D
n
< L +

n
+
n

Note that {
n
/(
n

n
)} is bounded, ie,
|

n

n
| M
for some constant M. Thus
|

n
+
n

n
| = |
2
n

n
1| 2M + 1
Hence,
L (2M + 1) < D
n
< L + (2M + 1)
Hence, limD
n
= L = f

(0).
56 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
For (c): By using Mean-Value Theorem,
D
n
= f

(t
n
)
where t
n
is between
n
and
n
. Note that
min{
n
,
n
} < t
n
< max{
n
,
n
}
and
max{
n
,
n
} =
1
2
(
n
+
n
+|
n

n
|)
min{
n
,
n
} =
1
2
(
n
+
n
|
n

n
|)
Thus, max{
n
,
n
} 0 and min{
n
,
n
} 0 as
n
0 and
n
0.
By squeezing principle for limits, t
n
0. With the continuity of f

,
we have
limD
n
= limf

(t
n
) = f

(limt
n
) = f

(0).
Example: Let f be dened by
f(x) =
_
x
2
sin(1/x) (x = 0),
0 (x = 0).
Thus f

(x) is not continuous at x = 0, and f

(0) = 0. Take
n
=
1
/2+2n
and
n
=
1
2n
. It is clear that
n
0, and
n
0 as n .
Also,
D
n
=
4n
(/2 + 2n)

2

as n . Thus, limD
n
= 2/ exists and is dierent from 0 = f

(0).
20.
21.
22. Suppose f is a real function on (, ). Call x a xed point of f if
f(x) = x.
(a) If f is dierentiable and f

(t) = 1 for every real t, prove that f has


at most one xed point.
57
(b) Show that the function f dened by
f(t) = t + (1 + e
t
)
1
has no xed point, although 0 < f

(t) < 1 for all real t.


(c) However, if there is a constant A < 1 such that |f

(t)| A for all


real t, prove that a xed point x of f exists, and that x = limx
n
, where
x
1
is an arbitrary real number and
x
n+1
= f(x
n
)
for n = 1, 2, 3, ...
(d) Show that the process describe in (c) can be visualized by the zig-
zag path
(x
1
, x
2
) (x
2
, x
2
) (x
2
, x
3
) (x
3
, x
3
) (x
3
, x
4
) ....
Proof: For (a): If not, then there exists two distinct xed points, say
x and y, of f. Thus f(x) = x and f(y) = y. Since f is diereniable,
by applying Mean-Value Theorem we know that
f(x) f(y) = f

(t)(x y)
where t is between x and y. Since x = y, f

(t) = 1. It contradicts.
For (b): We show that 0 < f

(t) < 1 for all real t rst:


f

(t) = 1 + (1)(1 + e
t
)
2
e
t
= 1
e
t
(1 + e
t
)
2
Since
e
t
> 0
(1 + e
t
)
2
= (1 + e
t
)(1 + e
t
) > 1(1 + e
t
) = 1 + e
t
> e
t
> 0
for all real t, thus
(1 + e
t
)
2
e
t
> 0
(1 + e
t
)
2
e
t
< 1
for all real t. Hence 0 < f

(t) < 1 for all real t.


58 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
Next, since f(t) t = (1 e
t
)
1
> 0 for all real t, f(t) has no xed
point.
For (c): Suppose x
n+1
= x
n
for all n. (If x
n+1
= x
n
, then x
n
= x
n+1
=
... and x
n
is a xed point of f).
By Mean-Value Theorem,
f(x
n+1
) f(x
n
) = f

(t
n
)(x
n+1
x
n
)
where t
n
is betweem x
n
and x
n+1
. Thus,
|f(x
n+1
) f(x
n
)| = |f

(t
n
)||(x
n+1
x
n
)|
Note that |f

(t
n
)| is bounded by A < 1, f(x
n
) = x
n+1
, and f(x
n+1
) =
x
n+2
. Thus
|x
n+2
x
n+1
| A|x
n+1
x
n
|
|x
n+1
x
n
| CA
n1
where C = |x
2
x
1
|. For two positive integers p > q,
|x
p
x
q
| |x
p
x
p1
| + ... +|x
q+1
x
q
|
= C(A
q1
+ A
q
+ ... + A
p2
)

CA
q1
1 A
.
Hence
|x
p
x
q
|
CA
q1
1 A
.
Hence, for any > 0, there exists N = [log
A
(1A)
C
] + 2 such that
|x
p
x
q
| < whenever p > q N. By Cauchy criterion we know that
{x
n
} converges to x. Thus,
lim
n
x
n+1
= f( lim
n
x
n
)
since f is continuous. Thus,
x = f(x).
x is a xed point of f.
For (d): Since x
n+1
= f(x
n
), it is trivial.
59
23.
24.
25. Suppose f is twice dierentiable on [a, b], f(a) < 0, f(b) > 0, f

(x)
> 0, and 0 f

(x) M for all x [a, b]. Let be the unique point


in (a, b) at which f() = 0.
Complete the details in the following outline of Newtons method for
computing .
(a) Choose x
1
(, b), and dene {x
n
} by
x
n+1
= x
n

f(x
n
)
f

(x
n
)
.
Interpret this geometrically, in terms of a tangent to the graph of f.
(b) Prove that x
n+1
< x
n
and that
lim
n>oo
x
n
= .
(c) Use Taylors theorem to show that
x
n+1
=
f

(t
n
)
2f

(x
n
)
(x
n
)
2
for some t
n
(, x
n
).
(d) If A =
M
2
, deduce that
0 x
n+1

1
A
[A(x
1
)]
2
n
.
(Compare with Exercise 16 and 18, Chap. 3)
(e) Show that Newtons method amounts to nding a xed point of the
function g dened by
g(x) = x
f(x)
f

(x)
.
How does g

(x) behave for x near ?


(f) Put f(x) = x
1/3
on (, ) and try Newtons method. What
happens?
60 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
Proof: For (a): You can see the picture in the following URL:
http://archives.math.utk.edu/visual.calculus/3/newton.5/1.html.
For (b): We show that x
n
x
n+1
. (induction). By Mean-Value
Theorem, f(x
n
) f() = f

(c
n
)(x
n
) where c
n
(, x
n
). Since
f

0, f

is increasing and thus


f(x
n
)
x
n

= f

(c
n
) f

(x
n
) =
f(x
n
)
x
n
x
n+1
f(x
n
)(x
n
) f(x
n
)(x
n
x
n+1
)
Note that f(x
n
) > f() = 0 since f

> 0 and f is strictly increasing.


Thus,
x
n
x
n
x
n+1
x
n+1
Note that f(x
n
) > 0 and f

(x
n
) > 0. Thus x
n+1
< x
n
. Hence,
x
n
> x
n+1
.
Thus, {x
n
} converges to a real number . Suppose = , then
x
n+1
= x
n

f(x
n
)
f

(x
n
)
Note that
f(x
n
)
f

(x
n
)
>
f()

. Let =
f()

> 0, be a constant. Thus,


x
n+1
< x
n

for all n. Thus, x


n
< x
1
(n 1), that is, x
n
as n . It
contradicts. Thus, {x
n
} converges to .
For (c): By using Taylors theorem,
f() = f(x
n
) + f

(x
n
)( x
n
) +
f

(t
n
)
2(x
n
)
2
0 = f(x
n
) + f

(x
n
)( x
n
) +
f

(t
n
)
2(x
n
)
2
0 =
f(x
n
)
f

(x
n
)
x
n
+ +
f

(t
n
)
2f

(x
n
)
(x
n
)
2
61
x
n+1
=
f

(t
n
)
2f

(x
n
)
(x
n
)
2
where t
n
(, x
n
).
For (d): By (b) we know that 0 x
n+1
for all n. Next by (c) we
know that
x
n+1
=
f

(t
n
)
2f

(x
n
)
(x
n
)
2
Note that f

M and f

> 0. Thus
x
n+1
A(x
n
)
2

1
A
(A(x
1
))
2
n
by the induction. Thus,
0 x
n+1

1
A
[A(x
1
)]
2
n
.
For (e): If x
0
is a xed point of g(x), then g(x
0
) = x
0
, that is,
x
0

f(x
0
)
f

(x
0
)
= x
0
f(x
0
) = 0.
It implies that x
0
= and x
0
is unique since f is strictly increasing.
Thus, we choose x
1
(, b) and apply Newtons method, we can nd
out . Hence we can nd out x
0
.
Next, by calculating
g

(x) =
f(x)f

(x)
f

(x)
2
0 g

(x) f(x)
M

2
.
As x near from right hand side, g

(x) near f() = 0.


For (f ): x
n+1
= x
n

f(x
n
)
f

(x
n
)
= 2x
n
by calculating. Thus,
x
n
= (2)
n1
x
1
for all n, thus {x
n
} does not converges for any choice of x
1
, and we
cannot nd such that f() = 0 in this case.
62 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
26. Suppose f is dierentiable on [a, b], f(a) = 0, and there is a real number
A such that |f

(x)| A|f(x)| on [a, b]. Prove that f(x) = 0 for all


x [a, b]. Hint: Fix x
0
[a, b], let
M
0
= sup |f(x)|, M
1
= sup |f

(x)|
for a x x
0
. For any such x,
|f(x)| M
1
(x
0
a) A(x
0
a)M
0
.
Hence M
0
= 0 if A(x
0
a) < 1. That is, f = 0 on [a, x
0
]. Proceed.
Proof: Suppose A > 0. (If not, then f = 0 on [a, b] clearly.) Fix
x
0
[a, b], let
M
0
= sup |f(x)|, M
1
= sup |f

(x)|
for a x x
0
. For any such x,
f(x) f(a) = f

(c)(x a)
where c is between x and a by using Mean-Value Theorem. Thus
|f(x)| M
1
(x a) M
1
(x
0
a) A(x
0
a)M
0
Hence M
0
= 0 if A(x
0
a) < 1. That is, f = 0 on [a, x
0
] by taking
x
0
= a +
1
2A
. Repeat the above argument by replacing a with x
0
, and
note that
1
2A
is a constant. Hence, f = 0 on [a, b].
27. Let be a real function dened on a rectangle R in the plane, given
by a x b, y . A solution of the initial-value problem
y

= (x, y), y(a) = c ( c )


is, by denition, a dierentiable function f on [a, b] such that f(a) = c,
f(x) , and
f

(x) = (x, f(x)) (a x b)


Prove that such a problem has at most one solution if there is a constant
A such that
|(x, y
2
) (x, y
1
)| A|y
2
y
1
|
63
whenever (x, y
1
) R and (x, y
2
) R.
Hint: Apply Exercise 26 to the dierence of two solutions. Note that
this uniqueness theorem does not hold for the initial-value problem
y

= y
1/2
, y(0) = 0,
which has two solutions: f(x) = 0 and f(x) = x
2
/4. Find all other
solutions.
Proof: Suppose y
1
and y
2
are solutions of that problem. Since
|(x, y
2
) (x, y
1
)| A|y
2
y
1
|,
y(a) = c, y

1
= (x, y
1
), and y

2
= (x, y
2
), by Exercise 26 we know that
y
1
y
2
= 0, y
1
= y
2
. Hence, such a problem has at most one solution.
Note: Suppose there is initial-value problem
y

= y
1/2
, y(0) = 0.
If y
1/2
= 0, then y
1/2
dy = dx. By integrating each side and noting that
y(0) = 0, we know that f(x) = x
2
/4. With y
1/2
= 0, or y = 0. All
solutions of that problem are
f(x) = 0 and f(x) = x
2
/4
Why the uniqueness theorem does not hold for this problem? One
reason is that there does not exist a constant A satisfying
|y

1
y

2
| A|y
1
y
2
|
if y
1
and y
2
are solutions of that problem. (since 2/x as x 0
and thus A does not exist).
28. Formulate and prove an analogous uniqueness theorem for systems of
dierential equations of the form
y

j
=
j
(x, y
1
, ..., y
k
), y
j
(a) = c
j
(j = 1, ..., k)
Note that this can be rewritten in the form
y

= (x, y), y(a) = c


64 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
where y = (y
1
, ..., y
k
) ranges over a k-cell, is the mapping of a (k+1)-
cell into the Euclidean k-space whose components are the function

1
, ...,
k
, and c is the vector (c
1
, ..., c
k
). Use Exercise 26, for vector-
valued functions.
Theorem: Let
j
(j = 1, ..., k) be real functions dened on a rectangle
R
j
in the plane given by a x b,
j
y
j

j
.
A solution of the initial-value problem
y

j
= (x, y
j
), y
j
(a) = c
j
(
j
c
j

j
)
is, by denition, a dierentiable function f
j
on [a, b] such that f
j
(a) =
c
j
,
j
f
j
(x)
j
, and
f

j
(x) =
j
(x, f
j
(x)) (a x b)
Then this problem has at most one solution if there is a constant A
such that
|
j
(x, y
j
2
)
j
(x, y
j
1
)| A|y
j
2
y
j
1
|
whenever (x, y
j
1
) R
j
and (x, y
j
2
) R
j
.
Proof: Suppose y
1
and y
2
are solutions of that problem. For each
components of y
1
and y
2
, say y
1j
and y
2j
respectively, y
1j
= y
2j
by
using Exercise 26. Thus, y
1
= y
2
29. Specialize Exercise 28 by considering the system
y

j
= y
j+1
(j = 1, ..., k 1),
y

k
= f(x)
k

j=1
g
j
(x)y
j
where f, g
1
, ..., g
k
are continuous real functions on [a, b], and derive a
uniqueness theorem for solutions of the equation
y
(k)
+ g
k
(x)y
(k1)
+ ... + g
2
(x)y

+ g
1
(x)y = f(x),
65
subject to initial conditions
y(a) = c
1
, y

(a) = c
1
, ..., y
(k1)
(a) = c
k
.
Theorem: Let R
j
be a rectangle in the plain, given by a x b,
min y
j
y
j
max y
j
. (since y
j
is continuous on the compact set, say
[a, b], we know that y
j
attains minimal and maximal.) If there is a
constant A such that
_
|y
j+1,1
y
j+1,2
| A|y
j,1
y
j,2
| (j < k)
|

k
j=1
g
j
(x)(y
j,1
y
j,2
)| A|y
k,1
y
k,2
|
whenever (x, y
j,1
) R
j
and (x, y
j,2
) R
j
.
Proof: Since the system y

1
, ..., y

k
with initial conditions satises a fact
that there is a constant A such that |y

1
y

2
| A|y
1
y
2
|, that system
has at most one solution. Hence,
y
(k)
+ g
k
(x)y
(k1)
+ ... + g
2
(x)y

+ g
1
(x)y = f(x),
with initial conditions has at most one solution.
66 CHAPTER 5. DIFFERENTIATION
Chapter 6
Sequences and Series of
Functions
67
68 CHAPTER 6. SEQUENCES AND SERIES OF FUNCTIONS

You might also like