Company Management
Company Management
Company Management
14 Company Management
Minimum No. Every company shall have a minimum number of 3 directors in the case of
of Directors a public company, two directors in the case of a private company, and one
[Section 149(1)] director in the case of a One Person Company.
Residence of a According to this section 149 (3), the residence of a director in India is
director in compulsory i.e. every company shall have at least one director who has
India [Section stayed in India for a total period of not less than 182 days in the previous
149 (3)] calendar year.
Clarification by MCA:
It is clarified by MCA that the, residency requirement' would be reckoned
from the date of commencement of section 14 of the Act i.e. 1st April,
2014.
178
(a) paid–up share capital of one hundred crore rupees or more; or
(b) turnover of three hundred crore rupees or more.
Section 151 Every listed company may have one director elected by such small
shareholders.
Rule 7, Companies (Appointment and Qualifications of Directors) Rules, 2014 has laid
down the following terms and conditions for appointment of small shareholder’s director,
which are as under:
(i) 1000 or A listed company, may upon notice of not less than 1000 or one-tenth of
1/10th of the total number of small shareholders, whichever is lower, have a small
total no of shareholders’ director elected by the small shareholders.
shareholders A listed company may suo moto opt to have a director representing small
shareholders.
(ii)Notice of The small shareholders intending to propose a person as a candidate for the
candidature post of small shareholder’s director shall submit a signed notice of their
intention with the company at least 14 days before the meeting specifying
their details and proposed director’s details. The details include name,
address, shares held etc.
(iii) Statement The notice shall be accompanied by a statement signed by the proposed
by proposed director for the post of small shareholders’ director stating
director (a) his Director Identification Number;
(b) that he is not disqualified to become a director under the Act; and
(c) his consent to act as a director of the company.
(vi) If the person is not eligible for appointment according to section 164 (i.e.,
Disqualification disqualification for the appointment of director), then he can’t be appointed
under as small shareholder’s director.
section164
179
(vii) Vacation Small shareholders’ director shall vacate the office if -
of Office (a) he ceases to be a small shareholder, on and from the date of cessation;
(b) he incurs any of the disqualifications specified in section 164
(disqualification for the appointment of director);
(c) the office of the director becomes vacant in pursuance of section 167,
(Vacation of office of director);
(d) he ceases to meet the criteria of independence as provided u/s 149(6).
(viii) No. of He shall not hold the office of small shareholders’ director in more than
small two companies.
shareholder’s If second company is in competitive business or is in conflict with
directorship in business of the first company, then he shall not be appointed in second
2 companies company.
(ix) Subsequent He shall directly or indirectly not be appointed or associated in any other
to cessation of capacity with the company for a period of 3 years from the date of
small cessation as a small shareholder’s director.
shareholder’s
directorship
First Director
Normal The first directors of most of the companies are named in their articles.
company If they are not so named in the articles of a company, then subscribers to the
memorandum who are individuals shall be deemed to be the first directors of
the company until the directors are duly appointed.
One-person In the case of a One Person Company, an individual being a member shall be
company deemed to be its first director until the director(s) are duly appointed by the
member in accordance with the provisions of Section 152.
Rule 9
(1) Every individual, who is to be appointed as director of a company shall make an
application electronically in Form DIR-3 (Application for allotment of Director
180
Identification Number) to the Central Government for the allotment of a Director
Identification Number (DIN).
(2) The Central Government shall provide an electronic system to facilitate submission of
application for the allotment of DIN through the portal on the website of the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs.
(3) The applicant shall download Form DIR-3 from the portal, fill in the required particulars
and attaching photograph; proof of identity; proof of residence; and verification by the
applicant in Form DIR-4, specimen signature duly verified and sign the form digitally.
Sec 154- Allotment of DIN- C. Govt. shall within one month from the receipt of the
application u/s 153 allot a DIN to an applicant.
Rule 10
The Central Government shall, within one month from the receipt of the application under
section 153, allot a Director Identification Number to an applicant in such manner as
mentioned below:
(1) On the submission of the Form DIR-3 on the portal and payment of the requisite amount
of fees through online mode, the provisional DIN shall be generated by the system
automatically which shall not be utilized till the DIN is confirmed by the Central Government.
(2) After generation of the provisional DIN, the Central Government shall process the
application. It may approve or reject the application and communicate the same to the
applicant within a period of one month from the receipt of application.
(4) In case of rejection or invalidation of application, the provisional DIN so allotted by the
system shall get lapsed automatically and the fee so paid with the application shall neither be
refunded nor adjusted with any other application.
(5) All Director Identification Numbers allotted to individual(s) by the Central Government
before the commencement of these rules shall be deemed to have been allotted to them under
these rules.
(6) The Director Identification Number so allotted under these rules is valid for the life-time
of the applicant and shall not be allotted to any other person.
181
(e) if the concerned individual has been adjudicated an insolvent.
(f) on an application made in Form DIR-5 by the DIN holder to surrender his or her DIN along
with declaration that he has never been appointed as director in any company and the said DIN
has never been used for filing of any document with any authority, the Central Government
may deactivate such DIN but after verification of e-records.
(2) The Central Government shall incorporate the said changes in the electronic database after
due verification from the enclosed proofs and confirm the applicant by post/email/any other
mode.
(3) The DIN cell of the MCA shall also intimate the change(s) in the particulars of the director
submitted to it in Form DIR-6 to the concerned Registrar(s) under whose jurisdiction the
registered office of the company(s) in which such individual is a director is situated.
(4) The concerned individual shall also intimate the change(s) in his particulars to the
company or companies in which he is a director within fifteen days of such change.
Sec 155- Prohibition to obtain more than one DIN- No individual, who has already been
allotted a DIN u/s 154, shall apply for, obtain or possess another DIN.
Sec 156- Director to intimate DIN- Every existing director shall, within one month of the
receipt of DIN from C. Govt., intimate his DIN to the company or all companies wherein he is
a director.
Sec 157- Company to inform DIN to Registrar- within 15 days of the receipt of intimation
u/s 156.
If a company fails to furnish Director Identification Number u/s 157, before the expiry of the
270 days period from the date by which it should have been furnished with additional fee, the
company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than Rs. 25,000 but which may
extend to Rs. 1,00,000 and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable
with fine which shall not be less than Rs. 25,000 but which may extend to Rs. 1,00,000.
Sec 158- Obligation to indicate DIN – Every person or company, while furnishing any return
or information as are required to be furnished under this Act, shall mention DIN in such return
or information.
Section 159- Punishment - If any individual or director of a company, contravenes any of the
provisions of section 152,155 and 156, such individual or director of the company shall be
punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 6 months or with fine which
182
may extend to Rs. 50,000 and where the contravention is a continuing one, with a further fine
which may extend to Rs. 500 for every day after the first day during which the contravention
continues.
4. Consent to A person appointed as a director shall on or before the appointment give his
act as a consent to hold the office of director in physical form DIR-2 i.e. Consent to
director of a act as a director of a company.
company
5. [Rule 8] Company shall file Form DIR-12 (particulars of appointment of directors and
KMP along with the Form DIR-2 as an attachment within 30 days of the
appointment of a director, necessary fee.
6. Retirement of Director
Articles of the Company may provide the provisions relating to retirement of the all directors.
If there is no provision in the article, then at least two-thirds of the total number of directors of
a public company shall be liable to retire by rotation.
But they are eligible to be reappointed at annual general meeting.
However, independent directors shall not be included for the computation of total number of
directors.
At the annual general meeting of a public company one-third of such of the directors for the
time being as are liable to retire by rotation, or if their number is neither three nor a multiple of
three, then, the number nearest to one-third, shall retire from office.
The directors to retire by rotation at every annual general meeting shall be those who have
been longest in office since their last appointment.
At the annual general meeting at which a director retires as aforesaid, the company may fill up
the vacancy by appointing the retiring director or some other person thereto.
If the vacancy of the retiring director is not so filled-up and the meeting has not expressly
resolved not to fill the vacancy, the meeting shall stand adjourned till the same day in the next
week, at the same time and place, or if that day is a national holiday, till the next succeeding
day which is not a holiday, at the same time and place.
If at the adjourned meeting also, the vacancy of the retiring director is not filled up and that
meeting also has not expressly resolved not to fill the vacancy, the retiring director shall be
deemed to have been re-appointed at the adjourned meeting, unless—
(i) a resolution for the re-appointment of such director has been put to the meeting and lost;
(ii) the retiring director has expressed his unwillingness to be so re-appointed;
(iii) he is disqualified for appointment.
The additional directors can be appointed by BODs, if such power is conferred on them by the
articles of association.
Such additional directors hold office only up to the date of next annual general meeting.
183
A person who fails to get appointed as a director in a general meeting cannot be appointed as
Additional Director.
Subject to the articles of a company, the Board may appoint any person as a director
nominated by any institution.
A single resolution shall not be moved for the appointment of two or more persons as directors
of the company. A resolution moved in contravention of aforesaid provision shall be void.
Right of persons other than retiring directors to stand for directorship- Sec. 160
A person who is not a retiring director shall be eligible for appointment to the office of a
director at any general meeting, if he has, not less than fourteen days before the meeting, left at
the registered office of the company, a notice in writing under his hand signifying his
candidature as a director along with the deposit of one lakh rupees or such higher amount as
may be prescribed which shall be refunded to such person, if the person proposed gets elected
as a director or gets more than 25% of total valid votes cast either on show of hands or on poll
on such resolution.
(d) he has been convicted by a court of any offence, whether involving moral turpitude or
otherwise, and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for not less than six months and a
period of five years has not elapsed from the date of expiry of the sentence.
If a person has been convicted of any offence and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment
for a period of seven years or more, he shall not be eligible to be appointed as a director in any
company;
(e) an order disqualifying him for appointment as a director has been passed by a court or
Tribunal and the order is in force;
(f) he has not paid any calls in respect of any shares of the company held by him, and six
months have elapsed from the last day fixed for the payment of the call;
(g) he has been convicted of the offence dealing with related party transactions under section
188 at any time during the last preceding five years; or
(2) An additional disqualification is provided in sub section (2) of Section 164 relating to
consequences of non-filing of financial statements or annual returns. Any person who is or has
been director of any company which has not filed any financial statements and Annual Return
for 3 continuous financial year or has defaulted in payment of debentures/deposit/dividend
etc., shall also not be eligible for appointment as director of any public company and for re-
appointment in the same company for a period of five years from the date on which the said
company fails to do so.
Rule 14 prescribed that every director who disqualified u/s 164 (2), shall inform to the
company concerned in Form DIR-8 (Intimation by Director) before he is appointed or re-
appointed.
Whenever a company fails to file the financial statements/annual returns/fails to repay any
deposit, interest, dividend/fails to redeem its debentures as specified u/s 164 (2), the company
shall immediately file Form DIR-9 (Report by the company to Registrar), to the Registrar
furnishing therein the names and addresses of all the directors of the company during the
relevant financial years.
But when a company fails to file the Form DIR-9 within a period of 30 days of the failure it
would attract the disqualification u/s 164(2), officers of the company shall be the officers in
default.
Upon receipt of the Form DIR-9 the Registrar shall immediately register the document and
place it in the document file for public inspection.
Any application for removal of disqualification of directors shall be made in Form DIR-10.
185
Duties of directors- Section 166
(b) He absents himself from all the meetings of the Board of Directors held during a period
of twelve months with or without seeking leave of absence of the Board;
(c) He acts in contravention of the provisions of section 184 relating to entering into
contracts or arrangements in which he is directly or indirectly interested;
(d) He fails to disclose his interest in any contract or arrangement in which he is directly or
indirectly interested
(f) He is convicted by a court of any offence, whether involving moral turpitude and
sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for not less than 6 months;
Provided that the office shall be vacated by the director even if he has filed an appeal against
the order of such court;
Contravention If a person, functions as a director even when he knows that the office of
director held by him has become vacant on account of any of the
disqualifications specified above, he shall be punishable with imprisonment
for a term which may extend to 1 year or with fine which shall not be less
than Rs. 1,00,000 but which may extend to Rs. 5,00,000 or with both.
186
Where all the directors of a company vacate their offices under any of the disqualifications
specified above, the promoter or, in his absence, the Central Government shall appoint the
required number of directors who shall hold office till the directors are appointed by the
company in the general meeting.
A director may resign from his office by giving notice in writing. The Board shall, on receipt
of such notice within 30 days intimate the Registrar in Form DIR-12 and also place the fact of
such resignation in the Directors’ Report of subsequent general meeting of the company and
post the information on its website. The director shall also forward a copy of resignation along
with detailed reasons for the resignation to the Registrar in Form DIR-11 within 30 days from
the date of resignation. The notice shall become effective from the date on which the notice is
received by the company or the date, if any, specified by the director in the notice, whichever
is later.
The director who has resigned shall be liable even after his resignation for the offences which
occurred during his tenure.
If all the directors of a company resign from their office or vacate their office, the promoter or
in his absence the Central Government shall appoint the required number of directors to hold
office till the directors are appointed by the company in General Meeting.
187
Ch. 15 Independent Directors
Introduction
In order to provide better governance, and to act as an oversight body in monitoring the
performance and should raise red flags whenever suspicion occurs in the functioning of the
company, the concept of Independent Directors arises.
Companies Act 2013 mandates appointment of independent directors by listed companies and
other class of companies.
It also prescribes other aspects such as maximum tenure of independent directors, separate
meeting of independent directors, tenure, their qualifications, liability, appointment,
remuneration and other aspect.
Pecuniary Interest
(i) Section 149(6)(c): "pecuniary interest in certain transactions”: -
(a) This provision inter alia requires that an 'ID' should have no 'pecuniary relationship' with
the company concerned or its holding/ subsidiary/ associate company and certain other
categories specified therein during the current and last two preceding financial years.
Clarifications have been sought whether a transaction entered into by an 'ID' with the
company concerned at par with any member of the general public and at the same price as is
payable/paid by such member of public would attract the bar of 'pecuniary relationship' under
section 149(6)(c).
The matter has been examined and it is hereby clarified that in view of the provisions of
section 188 which take away transactions in the ordinary course of business at arm's length
price from the purview of related party transactions, an 'ID' will not be said to have
'pecuniary relationship', under section 149(6)(c) in such cases.
(b) Stakeholders have also sought clarification whether receipt of remuneration by an ‘ID’
from a company would be considered as having pecuniary interest while considering his
appointment in the holding company, subsidiary company or associate company of such
company.
188
The matter has been examined in consultation with SEBI and it is clarified that 'pecuniary
relationship' provided in section 149(6)(c) of the Act does not include receipt of remuneration,
from one or more companies, by way of fee, reimbursement of expenses for participation in the
Board and other meetings and profit related commission approved by the members, in
accordance with the provisions of the Act.
(d) none of whose relatives has or had pecuniary relationship or transaction with the
company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company, or their promoters, or directors,
amounting to two percent or more of its gross turnover or total income or fifty lakh
rupees or
such higher amount as may be prescribed,
whichever is lower, during the two immediately preceding financial years or during the current
financial year;
Explanation—For the purposes of this section, “nominee director” means a director nominated
by any financial institution in pursuance of the provisions of any law for the time being in
force, or of any agreement, or appointed by any Government, or any other person to represent
its interests.
Every listed public company shall have at least one-third of the total number of directors
as independent directors and the Central Government may prescribe the minimum number of
independent directors in case of other classes of public companies
189
Rule 4 of Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules 2014, provides
that the following classes of companies shall have at least two directors as independent
directors -
(i) the Public Companies having paid up share capital of ten crore rupees or more; or
(ii) the Public Companies having turnover of one hundred crore rupees or more; or
(iii) the Public Companies which have, in aggregate, outstanding loans, debentures and
deposits, exceeding fifty crore rupees.
Independent directors may be selected from a data bank of eligible and willing persons
maintained by the agency (as may be authorized by Central Government). Such agency shall
put data bank of independent directors on the website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs or any
other notified website. Company must exercise due diligence before selecting a person from
the data bank referred to above, as an independent director.
Any person who desires to get his name included in the data bank of independent directors
shall make an application to the agency in Form DIR-1 Application for inclusion of name in
the databank of Independent Directors which includes the personal, educational, professional,
work experience, other Board details of the applicant [Rule 6(4)].
The agency may charge a reasonable fee from the applicant for inclusion of his name in the
data bank of independent directors [Rule 6 (5)].
An existing or applicant of such data bank of independent directors shall intimate any changes
in his particulars within fifteen days of such change to the agency [Rule 6 (6)].
Section 149(7) provides that every independent director shall at the first meeting of the
Board in which he participates as a director and thereafter at the first meeting of the Board in
190
every financial year or whenever there is any change in the circumstances which may affect
his status as an independent director, give a declaration that he meets the criteria of
independence as provided in section 149 (6).
The company and independent directors shall abide by the provisions specified in Schedule
IV (Code of Conduct for Independent Director). It is a guide to professional conduct for
independent directors.
Code of Conduct includes:
1. Guidelines of professional conduct
2. Role and functions
3. Duties
4. Manner of appointment
5. Re-appointment
6. Resignation or removal
7. Separate meetings
8. Evaluation mechanism
191
(5) safeguard the interests of all stakeholders;
(6) balance the conflicting interest of the stakeholders;
(7) determine appropriate levels of remuneration of executive directors, key
managerial personnel and senior management and have a prime role in
appointing and where necessary recommend removal of executive directors,
key managerial personnel and senior management;
(8) arbitrate in the interest of the company as a whole, in situations of conflict
between management and shareholder’s interest.
(3) The explanatory statement attached to the notice of the meeting for
approving the appointment of independent director shall include a statement
that in the opinion of the Board, the independent director proposed to be
192
appointed fulfils the conditions specified in the Act and the rules made
thereunder and that the proposed director is independent of the management.
(3) Where the company fulfils the requirement of independent directors in its
Board even without filling the vacancy created by such resignation or removal,
as the case may be, the requirement of replacement by a new independent
director shall not apply.
7. Separate (1) The independent directors of the company shall hold at least one meeting
meetings in a year, without the attendance of non-independent directors and members of
management;
(2) All the independent directors of the company shall strive to be present at
such meeting;
193
(b) review the performance of the Chairperson of the company, taking
into account the views of executive directors and non-executive directors;
(c) assess the quality, quantity and timeliness of flow of information
between the company management and the Board that is necessary for
the Board to effectively and reasonably perform their duties.
Section 149(10) provides that subject to the provisions of section 152 (Appointment of
Directors),
(a) an independent director shall hold office for a term up to five consecutive years on the
Board of a company.
(b) He shall be eligible for reappointment on passing of a special resolution by the company
and disclosure of such appointment in the Board's report.
(c) No independent director shall hold office for more than two consecutive terms.
(d) An independent director shall be eligible for appointment after the expiration of three years
of ceasing to become an independent director. During the said period of three years, an
independent director shall not be appointed in or be associated with the company in any other
capacity, either directly or indirectly.
Clarification has been sought if "IDs' appointed prior to April 1, 2014 may continue and
complete their remaining tenure, under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 or they
should demit office and be re-appointed (should the company so decide) in accordance with
the provisions of the new Act.
Explanation to section 149(11) clearly provides that any tenure of an "ID' on the date of
commencement of the Act shall not be counted for his appointment/ holding office of director
under the Act.
It is clarified that section 149(10) of the Act provides a term of "upto five consecutive years"
for an 'ID’. As such while appointment of an ‘ID' for a term of less than five years would be
permissible, appointment for any term (whether for five years or less) is to be treated as a one
term under section 149(10) of the Act.
Further, under section 149(11) of the Act, no person can hold office of 'ID' for more than 'two
consecutive terms'. Such a person shall have to demit office after two consecutive terms even
if the total number of years of his appointment in such two consecutive terms is less than 10
years.
194
In such a case the person completing 'consecutive terms of less than ten years' shall be eligible
for appointment only after the expiry of the requisite cooling-off period of three years.
Independent Director shall hold office for a term up to 5 consecutive years, but shall be
eligible for reappointment on passing of a special resolution. He shall not hold office for more
than 2 consecutive terms, but such independent director shall be eligible for appointment after
the expiration of 3 years of ceasing to become an independent director.
Section 149(9) provides that an independent director shall not be entitled to any stock option
and may receive remuneration by way of fee, reimbursement of expenses for participation in
the Board and other meetings.
Section 149(13) states that the provisions relating to retirement of directors by rotation shall not
be applicable to appointment of independent directors.
Office of Office of Chairman and CEO cannot be held by same individual. (Section
Chairman and 203)
CEO
Lead Not required to be appointed
Independent
Director
Nominee An independent director in relation to a company, means a director other
Director than a MD or a WTD or a nominee director. (Section 149(6)
195
Qualification Companies (Appointment and qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014
of specifies certain criteria as to qualification.
Independent
Directors
Stock Options Independent Directors are not entitled to any stock option [section 197(7)]
Separate The IDs of the company shall hold at least one meeting in a year, without
Meeting of the attendance of non-independent directors and members of management.
Independent [ Section 149]
Directors
Audit (1) The Board of Directors of every listed company and such other class
Committee or classes of companies, as may be prescribed, shall constitute an Audit
Committee.
(2) The Audit Committee shall consist of a minimum of three directors
with independent directors forming a majority. [Section 177.]
CSR Every company having net worth of rupees five hundred crore or more, or
Committee turnover of rupees one thousand crore or more or a net profit of rupees
five crore or more during any financial year shall constitute a Corporate
Social Responsibility Committee of the Board consisting of three or more
directors, out of which at least one director shall be an independent
director. [Sec. 135. (1)]
Stakeholders The Board of Directors of a company which consists of more than one
Grievance thousand shareholders, debenture-holders, deposit holders and any other
Committee security holders at any time during a financial year shall constitute a
Stakeholders Relationship Committee
consisting of a chairperson who shall be a non-executive director and such
other members as may be decided by the Board.
The SRC shall consider and resolve the grievances of security holders of
the company [Section 178(5)].
196
of management in accordance with the criteria laid down, recommend to the
Independent Board their appointment and removal and shall carry out evaluation of
Directors every director’s performance.
The performance evaluation of independent directors shall be done by the
entire Board of Directors, excluding the director being evaluated. On the
basis of the report of performance evaluation, it shall be determined
whether to extend or continue the term of appointment of the independent
director.
Tenure of An independent director shall hold office for a term up to five consecutive
Independent years on the Board of a company, but shall be eligible for reappointment
Directors on passing of a special resolution by the company and disclosure of such
appointment in the Board's report. No independent director shall hold
office for more than two consecutive terms, but such independent director
shall be eligible for appointment after the expiration of three years of
ceasing to become an independent director.
197
of management in accordance with the criteria laid down, recommend to the
Independent Board their appointment and removal and shall carry out evaluation of
Directors every director’s performance.
The performance evaluation of independent directors shall be done by the
entire Board of Directors, excluding the director being evaluated. On the
basis of the report of performance evaluation, it shall be determined
whether to extend or continue the term of appointment of the independent
director.
Tenure of An independent director shall hold office for a term up to five consecutive
Independent years on the Board of a company, but shall be eligible for reappointment
Directors on passing of a special resolution by the company and disclosure of such
appointment in the Board's report. No independent director shall hold
office for more than two consecutive terms, but such independent director
shall be eligible for appointment after the expiration of three years of
ceasing to become an independent director.
197
Some of its powers may, according to its articles, be exercised by directors, certain other
powers may be reserved for the shareholders in general meeting.
The powers of management are vested in the directors. They and they alone can exercise these
powers.
The only way in which the general body of the shareholders can control over the powers of dire
tors, is by altering the articles, or if opportunity arises, by refusing to re-elect the directors
whose action they disapprove. They cannot themselves usurp the powers which by the articles
are vested in the directors.
In Milan Sen vs. Guardian Plasticate Ltd., the directors passed a resolution for rights issue
which was questioned by certain shareholders.
The Calcutta High Court held that the question whether the company needed additional capital
was a question which should primarily be decided by the directors of the company and if they
were of the view that further capital in the form of rights issue was required, the Court would
be slow to disturb the same unless there were extreme circumstances of mala-fides or breach of
trust.
The Companies Act, 2013 has reserved some powers especially for the Board e.g. appointing
directors in casual vacancies, the power to issue debentures, etc.
On the other hand, some powers are exclusively reserved for the members in general meeting
e.g. borrowing in excess of the paid-up capital and free reserves, selling or disposing off the
whole or substantially the whole of the undertaking etc.
However, in the following exceptional cases, the general body of shareholders is competent to
act even in matters delegated to the Board:
GB competent to decide matters even though they are delegated to the BoDs.
1.Directors The general body of shareholders can intervene when it is proved that the
Acting directors have acted with bad intention.
Mala-fide
In Satya Charan Lal vs. Romeshwar Prasad Bajoria, it was stated that
ordinarily the directors of a company are the only persons who can conduct
litigation in the name of company, but when they are themselves the wrong doers,
and have acted mala-fide and their personal interest is in conflict with their duty
in such a way that they cannot or will not take steps to seek redress for the wrong
done to the company, the majority of the shareholders may take steps for
redressal of the wrong.
Marshal’s Valve Gear Co. Ltd. vs. Manning Wardle & Co. Ltd.
Mr. A and three other persons were four directors of Marshal’s Valve Gear Co.
Ltd (M. Co.) and they held almost the whole of the subscribed capital of the
company. Mr. A was the majority shareholder, but held less than three-fourth of
the share capital.
198
Another company, Manning Wardle & Co. Ltd. (say as N. Co.) was committing
infringement of M. Co.’s trademark and other three directors were interested in
that company (N. Co.).
The result was that at a meeting of the Board they (other three directors) declined
to sanction any proceeding against N. Co.
2. The general body of shareholders may exercise the powers vested in the Board
Incompetent when the Board is incompetent to act, for instance, where all the directors are
Board interested in the transaction or when there are no validly appointed directors
functioning.
AOA of the company authorized the directors to fill casual vacancies and also
to increase the number of directors within the maximum number fixed in the
articles.
Some casual vacancies occurred, and they were promptly filled at a general
meeting of the shareholders. This was challenged on the ground that once the
power to appoint was delegated to the Board, it could not have been exercised
at a general meeting.
3.Deadlock If the directors are unable or unwilling to act, on account of deadlock, the
in the Board shareholders have the inherent power to act.
1. The Act provides that the first Board meeting should be held within thirty days of the date
of incorporation.
199
2. There shall be minimum of four Board meetings every year and not more one hundred and
twenty days shall intervene between two consecutive Board meetings.
3. In case of One Person Company (OPC), small company and dormant company, at least one
Board meeting should be conducted in each half of the calendar year and the gap between
two meetings should not be less than ninety days.
1. The Act requires that not less than seven days’ notice in writing shall be given to every
director at the registered address as available with the company. The notice can be given by
hand delivery or by post or by electronic means.
2. In case the Board meeting is called at shorter notice, at least one independent director
shall be present at the meeting. If he is not present, then decision of the meeting shall be
circulated to all directors and it shall be final only after ratification of decision by at least one
Independent Director.
The Act does not prescribe such requirement to circulate Agenda etc. However Good
governance envisage such requirement.
1. The SS-1 issued by ICSI requires a Company to circulate Agenda, setting out the business to
be transacted at the Meeting, and Notes on Agenda to the Directors at least seven days before
the date of the Meeting, unless the Articles prescribe a longer period.
2. Notes on items of business which are in the nature of Unpublished Price Sensitive
Information may be given at a shorter period of time than stated above, with the consent of a
majority of the Directors, which shall include at least one Independent Director.
Directors may participate in the meeting either in person or through video conferencing or other
audio visual means.
Rule 3 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014 provides:
(1) Every company shall make necessary arrangements to avoid failure of video or audio visual
connection.
(2) The Chairperson of the meeting and the company secretary shall take due and reasonable
care:
(a) to safeguard the integrity of the meeting by ensuring sufficient security and
identification procedures;
(b) to ensure the availability of proper video conferencing or other audio visual
equipment or facilities for providing transmission of the communications for effective
participation of the directors and other authorized participants at the Board meeting;
(c) to record the proceedings and prepare the minutes of the meeting;
(d) to store for safekeeping and marking the tape recording(s) or other electronic
recording mechanism as part of the records of the company at least before the time of
completion of audit of that particular year;
200
(e) to ensure that no person other than the concerned director are attending or have access
to the proceedings of the meeting through video conferencing mode or other audio visual
means; and
(f) to ensure that participants attending the meeting through audio visual means are able
to hear and see the other participants clearly during the course of the meeting.
3. (a) The notices of the meeting shall be sent to all the directors.
(b) The notice of the meeting shall inform the directors regarding the option available to them
to participate through video conferencing mode or other audio visual means, and shall provide
all the necessary information to enable the directors to participate through video conferencing
mode or other audio visual means.
(c) A director intending to participate through video conferencing mode or audio visual means
shall communicate his intention to the Chairman or the company secretary of the company.
(d) If the director intends to participate through video conferencing or other audio visual means,
he shall give prior intimation to that effect sufficiently in advance so that company is able to
make suitable arrangement in this behalf.
(e) The director, who desire, to participate may intimate his intention of participation through
the electronic mode at the beginning of the calendar year and such declaration shall be valid for
one calendar year.
(f) In the absence of any such intimation from the director, it shall be assumed that the director
will attend the meeting in person.
4. At the commencement of the meeting, a roll call shall be taken by the Chairperson when
every director participating through video conferencing or other audio visual means shall state,
for the record, the following namely:
(a) name;
(b) the location from where he is participating;
(c) that he can completely and clearly see, hear and communicate with the other
participants;
(d) that he has received the agenda and all the relevant material for the meeting; and
(e) that no one other than the concerned director is attending or having access to the
proceedings of the meeting at the location mentioned in (b) above.
5. (a) After the roll call, the Chairperson or the Secretary shall inform the Board about the
names of persons other than the directors who are present for the said meeting at the request or
with the permission of the Chairman and confirm that the required quorum is complete.
(6) With respect to every meeting conducted through video conferencing or other audio visual
means authorized under these rules, the scheduled venue of the meeting as set forth in the
notice convening the meeting, which shall be in India, shall be deemed to be the place of the
said meeting and all recordings of the proceedings at the meeting shall be deemed to be made at
such place.
201
(7) The statutory registers which are required to be placed in the Board meeting as per the
provisions of the Act shall be placed at the scheduled venue of the meeting.
(8) (a) Every participant shall identify himself for the record before speaking on any item of
business on the agenda.
(b) If a statement of a director in the meeting through video conferencing or other audio visual
means is interrupted, the Chairperson or company secretary shall request for a repeat or
reiteration by the director.
(9) If a motion is objected to and there is a need to put it to vote, the Chairperson shall call the
roll and note the vote of each director who shall identify himself while casting his vote.
(10) From the commencement of the meeting until the conclusion of such meeting, no person
other than the Chairperson, directors, Secretary and any other person whose presence is
required by the Board shall be allowed access to the place where any director is attending the
meeting either physically or through video conferencing without the permission of the Board.
(11) (a) At the end of discussion on each agenda item, the Chairperson of the meeting shall
announce the summary of the decision taken on such item along with names of the directors, if
any, dissented from the decision taken by majority.
(b) The minutes shall disclose the particulars of the directors who attended the meeting through
video conferencing or other audio visual means.
(12) (a) The draft minutes of the meeting shall be circulated among all the directors within
fifteen days of the meeting either in writing or in electronic mode as may be decided by the
Board.
(b) Every director who attended the meeting, whether personally or through video conferencing
or other audio visual means, shall confirm or give his comments, about the accuracy of
recording of the proceedings of that particular meeting in the draft minutes, within seven days
or some reasonable time as decided by the Board, after receipt of the draft minutes failing
which his approval shall be presumed.
(c) After completion of the meeting, the minutes shall be entered in the minute book as
specified under section 118 of the Act and signed by the Chairperson.
Matters not to be dealt with in a Meeting through Video Conferencing or other Audio
Visual Means
Rule 4 prescribe restriction on following matters which shall not be dealt with in any meeting
held through video conferencing or other audio visual means:
(i) the approval of the annual financial statements;
(ii) the approval of the Board’s report;
(iii) the approval of the prospectus;
(iv) the Audit Committee Meetings for consideration of accounts; and
(v) the approval of the matter relating to amalgamation, merger, demerger, acquisition and
takeover.
Penalty Every officer of the company who is duty bound to give notice under this section if
fails to do so shall be liable to a penalty of twenty-five thousand rupees.
202
Quorum for Board Meetings [Section 174]
One third of total strength of directors or two directors, whichever is higher, shall be the
quorum for a meeting.
For the purpose of determining the quorum, the participation by a director through Video
Conferencing or other audio visual means shall also be counted.
If at any time the number of interested directors exceeds or is equal to two-thirds of the total
strength of the Board of directors, the number of directors who are not interested and present at
the meeting, being not less than two shall be the quorum during such time.
The meeting shall be adjourned due to want of quorum, shall be held to the same day at the
same time and place in the next week or if the day is National Holiday, the next working day at
the same time and place.
Quorum shall be present not only at the time of commencement of the Meeting but also while
transacting business.
"Provided that the quorum shall not be less than two members."
Note: In case of Section 8 companies the quorum for the board meetings shall be either eight
members or twenty-five per cent of its total strength whichever is less. However, the quorum
shall not be less than two members.
A company may pass the resolutions through circulation. The resolution in draft form together
with the necessary papers may be circulated to the directors or members of committee at their
address registered with the company in India or through electronic means which may include e-
mail or fax.
The said resolution must be passed by majority of directors or members entitled to vote. If more
than one third of directors require that the resolution must be decided at the meeting, the
chairperson shall put the resolution to be decided at the meeting.
203
Defects in Appointment of Directors not to Invalidate Actions Taken: Section 176
All acts done by directors shall be valid notwithstanding that it is subsequently noticed that his
appointment was invalid by reason of any defect or disqualifications or had terminated by
virtue of the provisions of Companies Act or the articles of the company.
BOARD COMMITTEES
COMMITTEES
Committees are usually formed as a means of improving board effectiveness and efficiency in
areas where more focused, specialized and technical discussions are required. These
committees prepare the groundwork for decision-making and report at the subsequent board
meeting. Committees enable better management of full board’s time and allow in-depth
scrutiny and focused attention.
The Companies Act, 2013 does not prescribe the quorum with respect to Board Committee
meetings.
Whereas the SS-1 states that the presence of all the members of any Committee constituted by
the Board is necessary to form the Quorum for Meetings of such Committee unless otherwise
stipulated in the Act or other law or the Articles or by the Board.
Audit Committee
Purpose
A key element in the corporate governance process of any organization is its audit committee.
The purpose of constitution of this committee is to make it responsible for the oversight of the
quality and integrity of the company’s accounting and reporting practices; controls and
204
financial statements; legal and regulatory compliance, etc. The committee functions as liaison
between the board of directors and the auditors- external & internal.
The Act has enlarged the responsibilities of auditors to include valuation of their performance,
approval of modification of related-party transactions, scrutiny of loans and investments,
valuation of assets and evaluation of internal controls and risk management. They have to
establish a vigil mechanism and protection for any whistle-blower. The members must be able
to understand financial statements and have a majority of Independent Directors. Large
companies must mandatorily have professional internal auditors.
Constitution
1. The requirement of constitution of Audit Committee has been limited to:
(a) Every listed Companies; or
(b) The following class of companies –
(i) all public companies with a paid up capital of ten crore rupees or more;
(ii) all public companies having turnover of one hundred crore rupees or more;
(iii) all public companies, having in aggregate, outstanding loans or borrowings or debentures;
or deposits exceeding fifty crore rupees or more.
Explanation - The paid up share capital or turnover or outstanding loans, or borrowings or
debentures or deposits, as the case may be, as existing on the date of last audited Financial
Statements shall be taken into account for the purposes of this rule.
2. The Committee shall comprise of minimum 3 directors with majority of the directors being
Independent Directors. The majority of members of audit committee including its chairperson
shall be person with ability to read and understand the financial statement.
3. A transition period of one year from the date on which the new Act comes into effect has
been provided to enable companies to reconstitute the Audit Committee.
4. The terms of reference of the Audit Committee have now been specified and inter alia
includes, -
(i) the recommendation for appointment, remuneration and terms of appointment of auditors of
the company;
(ii) review and monitor the auditor’s independence and performance, and effectiveness of audit
process;
(iii) examination of the financial statement and the auditors’ report thereon;
(iv) approval or any subsequent modification of transactions of the company with related
parties;
(v) scrutiny of inter-corporate loans and investments;
(vi) valuation of undertakings or assets of the company, wherever it is necessary;
(vii) evaluation of internal financial controls and risk management systems;
(viii) monitoring the end use of funds raised through public offers and related matters.
5. The Audit Committee may call for the comments of the auditors about internal control
systems, the scope of audit.
6. The audit committee hold the authority to investigate into matters or referred by the Board
and have the powers to obtain professional advice from external sources and have full access to
records of the company.
205
7. In addition to the auditor, the KMP shall also have a right to be heard in the meetings of the
Audit Committee.
8. Every listed company and the companies belonging to the following class or classes shall
establish a vigil mechanism for their directors and employees to report genuine concerns or
grievances
(a) The companies which accept deposits from the public;
(b) The companies which have borrowed money from banks and public financial institutions in
excess of fifty crore rupees.
Default
If a default is made in complying with the provisions of section 177 of the Companies Act,
2013, the company and every officer who is in default, shall be punishable with imprisonment
for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to fifty thousand
rupees or with both.
Additional role of the Audit Committee under SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure
Requirements) Regulations, 2015
Role of The role of Audit Committee are as follows:
Audit 1. Oversight of the company’s financial reporting process and the disclosure of
Committee its financial information to ensure that the financial statement is correct,
sufficient and credible.
2. Recommending to the Board, the appointment, re-appointment and, if
required, the replacement or removal of the statutory auditor and the fixation of
audit fees and terms of engagement.
3. Reviewing, with the management, the annual/quarterly financial statements
before submission to the Board for approval.
4. Reviewing, with the management, performance of statutory and internal
auditors.
5. Discussion with internal auditors, any significant findings and follow up
there on.
6. Reviewing the findings of any internal investigations by the internal auditors
into matters where there is suspected fraud or irregularity and reporting the
matter to the board.
7. Discussion with statutory auditors before the audit commences, about the
nature and scope of audit as well as post-audit discussion to ascertain any areas
of concern.
8. To look into the reasons for substantial defaults in the payment to the
depositors, debenture holders, shareholders (in case of non-payment of declared
dividends) and creditors.
9. To review the functioning of the Whistle Blower mechanism, in case the
same is existing.
10. Approval of appointment of CFO after assessing the qualifications,
experience & background, etc. of the candidate.
Mandatory The Audit Committee shall mandatorily review the following information
Review of 1. Management discussion and analysis of financial condition and results
information of operations;
by Audit 2. Statement of significant related party transactions (as defined by the
Committee audit committee), submitted by management;
206
3. Management letters/letters of internal control weaknesses issued by the
statutory auditors;
4. Internal audit reports relating to internal control weaknesses; and
5. The appointment, removal and remuneration of the Chief internal
auditor.
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee helps the Board of Directors in the preparations
relating to the election of members of the Board of Directors, and in handling matters that relate
to the conditions of employment and remuneration of senior management, and to
management’s and personnel’s remuneration and incentive schemes.
Except for certain large listed companies, the importance of constitution of the Nomination and
remuneration Committee has not been realized fully in India. The Board of directors of
following companies shall constitute:
NOTE: After exemption notification dated 05.06.2015 the provisions of Section 178 of the
Act are not applicable to the Section 8 Companies.
The committee shall consist of three or more non-executive directors out of which not less than
one-half shall be independent directors. The chairperson of the company may be appointed as
member, but shall not chair such committee.
The Committee shall identify the person qualified to become directors and may be appointed in
senior management and recommend their appointment and removal and also carry out
evaluation of every director.
The Committee shall formulate the criteria, for determining qualifications, and independence of
a director and recommend to the Board the policy relating to remuneration for directors, KMPs
and other employees.
While formulating its policy, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee shall ensure that
(a) the level and composition of remuneration is reasonable and sufficient to attract, retain and
motivate the directors
(b) relationship of remuneration to performance is clear and
(c) remuneration to Directors, KMP and senior management involves a balance between fixed
and incentive pay reflecting short and long term performance objectives which are suitable for
the working of the company and its objectives.
NOTE: After exemption notification dated 05.06.2015, in case of the Government Company
provisions of Section 178 shall apply for the appointment of Senior management and other
employees only.
207
Duties of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee
Section 178(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for constitution of the Stakeholders
Relationship Committee. The Board of a company that has more than one thousand
shareholders, debenture-holders, deposit-holders and any other security holders at any time
during a financial year is required to constitute a Stakeholders Relationship Committee
consisting of a chairperson who shall be a non-executive director and such other members as
may be decided by the Board. The Stakeholders Relationship Committee shall consider and
resolve the grievances of security holders of the company.
Who can attend the general meeting of the company on behalf of committee constituted under
this section?
The chairperson of each of the committees constituted under this section or, in his absence, any
other member of the committee authorized by him in this behalf shall attend the general
meetings of the company.
208
4. Corporate Social Responsibility Committee
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) refers to way that businesses are managed to bring
about an overall positive impact on the communities, cultures, societies and environments in
which they operate. The fundamentals of CSR rest on the fact that not only public policy but
even corporate should be responsible enough to address social issues.
The basic objective of CSR in these days is to maximize the company’s overall impact on the
society and stakeholders. CSR policies, practices and programs are being comprehensively
integrated by an increasing number of companies throughout their business operations.
One of the key changes in the Companies Act, 2013 is the introduction of a Corporate Social
Responsibility section making India the first country to mandate CSR through a statutory
provision. While CSR is not mandatory for companies, the rules are in line with the ‘Comply
or Explain’ principle with penalties applicable only if an explanation is not offered.
209
5. The contents of the Policy shall be disclosed in the Board’s report.
6. It shall also be placed on the Company’s website, if any, in a manner to be prescribed by the
Central Government.
7. The Board shall ensure that the activities as are included in the CSR Policy (from the
activities as specified in Schedule VII) are undertaken by the Company.
A company may constitute Corporate Governance committee to develop and recommend the
board a set of corporate governance guidelines applicable to the company and implement
policies relating to corporate governance. Many companies give the mandate of corporate
governance to nomination committee and is given the nomenclature Nomination and
Corporate Governance Committee.
Regulatory, Compliance & Government Affairs Committee
It:
• Monitors and reviews the overall strategy, direction and effectiveness of the Company’s
research and development.
• Provides input, as needed, regarding the scientific and technological aspects of product
safety matters.
• Reviews the Company’s policies, programs and practices on environment, health, safety
and un- sustainability.
• Assists the Board in identifying and comprehending significant emerging science and
technology policy and public health issues.
• Assists the Board in the Company’s major acquisitions and the acquisition or development
of new science or technology.
210
Risk Management Committee under SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure
Requirement) Additional Regulations, 2015
As per regulations 21of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirement)
Regulations, 2015, the board of directors of the top 100 listed entities, determined on the basis
of market capitalization, as at the end of the immediate previous financial year shall constitute
a Risk Management Committee.
The majority of members of Risk Management Committee shall consist of members of the
board of directors.
The Chairperson of the Risk management committee shall be a member of the board of
directors and senior executives of the listed entity may be members of the committee.
The board of directors shall define the role and responsibility of the Risk Management
Committee and may delegate monitoring and reviewing of the risk management plan to the
committee and such other functions as it may deem fit.
The power of the company is divided into two parts, i.e., powers to be exercised by the BODs
and the powers to be exercised by the shareholders in the general body meeting.
The following [section 179(3) and Rule 8] powers of the Board of directors shall be exercised
only by means of resolutions passed at meetings of the Board, namely: -
(1) to make calls on shareholders in respect of money unpaid on their shares;
(2) to authorize buy-back of securities under section 68;
(3) to issue securities, including debentures, whether in or outside India;
(4) to borrow monies;
(5) to invest the funds of the company;
(6) to grant loans or give guarantee or provide security in respect of loans;
(7) to approve financial statement;
(8) to diversify the business of the company;
(9) to approve amalgamation, or merger;
(10) to take over a company or acquire a controlling or substantial stake in another company;
(11) to make political contributions;
(12) to appoint or remove key managerial personnel (KMP); etc.
The Board may, by a resolution passed at a meeting, delegate to any committee of directors,
the managing director, the manager, the powers specified in (4) to (6) above on such
conditions as it may specify.
The board can exercise the following powers only with the consent of the company by special
resolution, namely –
211
(a) to sell, lease or otherwise dispose of the whole or substantially the whole of the
undertaking of the company.
(b) to invest the amount of compensation received by it as a result of any merger or
amalgamation;
(c) to borrow money, where the money to be borrowed, together with the money already
borrowed by the company will exceed aggregate of its paid-up share capital and free reserves;
(d) to give time for the repayment of, any debt due from a director.
The power of making contribution to ‘bona fide’ charitable and other funds is available to the
board subject to certain limits.
Further, the permission of company in general meeting is required if such contribution exceeds
five percent of its average net profits for the three immediately preceding previous years.
The non-government company or the company which has been in existence for less than three
financial years may contribute any amount directly or indirectly to any political party.
Further, the limit of contribution to political parties is 7.5% of the average net profits during
the three immediately preceding financial years.
The contribution so made if or likely to affect the public support for a political party deemed to
be the contribution for political purpose.
The company is required to disclose in its profit and loss account any amount or amounts
contributed by it to any political party during the financial year and the particular of total
amount contributed and the name of political party to whom the contribution so made.
The contribution in contravention of the provisions of this section, the company shall be
punishable for an amount of which may extend to five times of the amount so contributed and
every officer who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may
extend to six months and with fine which may extend to five times of the amount so
contributed.
Power of Board and other Persons to make Contributions to National Defence Fund, etc.
[Section 183]
The Board is authorised to contribute such amount as it thinks fit to the National Defence Fund
or any other fund approved by the Government for the purpose of national defence.
The company is required to disclose in its P&L Account the total amount contributed by it
during the financial year.
212
The Act provides for the disclosure by directors relating his interest in any company or
companies, firms or other association of individuals by giving a notice in writing in Form
MBP -1 (Rule 9(1)) at the first meeting of board after being appointed as director and at first
meeting of board of every financial year.
As per section 184 (2) of the Act, every director is required to disclose the nature of his
concern or interest at the meeting of board in which the contract or arrangement is discussed
and he has not to participate in such meeting.
The above mentioned interest may be direct or indirect and relating to some contract or
arrangement entered into or to be entered into with a body corporate in which such director or
such director in association with other director holds more than two percent shareholding or is
a promoter, manager, Chief Executive Officer of that body corporate or with a firm or other
entity in which such director is a partner, owner or member as the case maybe.
If a director is not interested at the time of contract but, subsequently becomes interested is
required to disclose his interest or concern at the first meeting of the board.
NOTE: In case of private companies the interested directors may participate in the Board
Meetings after disclosure of interest. [Vide exemption notification dated 5th June, 2015.]
No company shall directly or indirectly advance any loan to any of its directors or to any
person in whom director is interested or give any guarantee or provide any security in
connection with any loan taken by him or such other person.
But a company may advance loan to managing or whole-time director as part of the conditions
of service extended by the company to all its employees or pursuant to any scheme approved
by the members by a special resolution or the company provides loans or gives guarantee or
securities for the due repayment of any loan in due course of its business.
Rule 10 provides that any loan made by a holding company to its wholly owned subsidiary
company or any guarantee given or security provided by a holding company in respect of any
loan made to its wholly owned subsidiary company is exempted from the requirements under
this section and any guarantee given or security provided by a holding company in respect of
loan made by any bank or financial institution to its subsidiary company is exempted from the
requirements under this section; provided that such loans are utilized by the subsidiary
company for its principle business activities.
Penalty
213
In case of contravention of any provisions of this section, there is punishment with fine which
shall not be less than five lakh rupees but which may extend to twenty-five lakh rupees. The
director or to whom loan or advance is given or guarantee or security is given or provided shall
be imprisonment which may extend to six months or with fine mentioned above or with both.
The scope of dealing with Related Party Transactions has been widened in Companies Act,
2013.
Section 188(1) of the 2013 Act provides below for approval of related party transactions:
Except with the consent of the Board of Directors given by a resolution at a meeting of the Board
and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed, no company shall enter into any contract
or arrangement with a related party with respect to:
(a) sale, purchase or supply of any goods or materials;
(b) selling or otherwise disposing of, or buying, property of any kind;
(c) leasing of property of any kind;
(d) availing or rendering of any services;
(e) appointment of any agent for purchase or sale of goods, materials, services or property;
(f) such related party’s appointment to any office or place of profit in the company, its
subsidiary company or associate company; and
(g) underwriting the subscription of any securities of the company.
The expression “arm’s length transaction” means a transaction between two related parties
that is conducted as if they were unrelated, so that there is no conflict of interest.
214
However, nature of transactions covered are comprehensive as they include routine to rare
supply of goods or material either by way of direct sale, purchase or supply of any goods or
services (technical support, maintenance, consultancy, advisory, or sharing professional
knowledge etc.) or by appointing agent for the same and underwriting financial instruments of
the Company. While entering into such type of transactions, Company will be required to take
prior approval of Board of Directors, by way of a resolution passed in the board meeting. The
transactions done in ordinary course of business on arm length’s basis shall be outside the
scope of this provision.
As per second proviso of the section 188(1) of the Act, no member of the company, shall vote
on such resolution if such member is a related party to the contract or arrangement which may
be entered in to by the company.
Note: After exemption notification dated 05.06.2015 the second proviso of the section 188(1)
of the Act shall not apply to the private company.
Entering into Contract or Arrangement with Related Party [Rule 15 of The Companies
(Meeting of Board and its Powers) Rules 2014]
A company shall enter into any contract or arrangement with a related party subject to the
following (Rule 15) conditions –
(1) The agenda of the Board meeting at which the resolution is proposed to be moved shall
disclose-
(a) the name of the related party and nature of relationship;
(b) the nature, duration of the contract and particulars of the contract or arrangement;
(c) the material terms of the contract or arrangement including the value, if any;
(d) any advance paid or received for the contract or arrangement, if any;
(e) the manner of determining the pricing and other commercial terms, both included as part of
contract;
(f) whether all factors relevant to the contract have been considered, if not, the details of
factors not considered with the rationale for not considering those factors; and
(g) any other information relevant or important for the Board to take a decision on the
proposed transaction.
(2) Where any director is interested in any contract or arrangement with a related party, such
director shall not be present at the meeting during discussions on the subject matter of the
resolution relating to such contract or arrangement.
(3) For the purposes of first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 188, except with the prior
approval of the company by a special resolution –
(i) a company having a paid-up share capital of ten crore rupees or more shall not enter into a
contract or arrangement with any related party; or
(ii) a company shall not enter into a transaction or transactions, where the transaction or
transactions to be entered into –
(a) as contracts or arrangements with respect to clauses (a) to (e) of sub-section (1) of
section 188 with criteria, as mentioned below –
(i) sale, purchase or supply of any goods or materials directly or through
appointment of agents exceeding twenty-five percent of the annual
turnover as mentioned in clause (a) and clause (e) respectively of sub-
section (1) of section 188;
215
(ii) selling or otherwise disposing of, or buying, property of any kind directly
or through appointment of agents exceeding ten percent of net worth as
mentioned in clause (b) and clause (e) respectively of sub-section (1) of
section 188;
(iii) leasing of property of any kind exceeding ten percent of the net worth
or exceeding ten percent of turnover as mentioned in clause (c) of sub-
section (1) of section 188;
(iv) availing or rendering of any services directly or through appointment of
agents exceeding ten percent of the net worth as mentioned in clause (d)
and clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 188;
(b) appointment to any office or place of profit in the company, its subsidiary
company or associate company at a monthly remuneration exceeding two and half
lakh rupees as mentioned in clause (f) of sub-section (1) of section 188; or
(c) remuneration for underwriting the subscription of any securities or derivatives
thereof of the company exceeding one percent of the net worth as mentioned in
clause (g) of subsection (1) of section 188.
In case of wholly owned subsidiary, the special resolution passed by the holding company
shall be sufficient for the purpose of entering into the transactions between wholly owned
subsidiary and holding company.
Every related party contracts or arrangements shall have to be disclosed in the Board’s report
and referred to shareholders along with the justification for entering into such type of
transactions.
Consequences of Contravention of Provisions
In case, where any contract or arrangement is entered into by a director or any other employee,
without obtaining the consent of the Board or approval by a special resolution in the general
meeting under subsection (1) and,
(i) if it is not ratified by the Board or
(ii) by the shareholders at a meeting within three months from the date on which such contract
or arrangement was entered into, such contract or arrangement shall be voidable at the option
of the Board and if the contract or arrangement is with a related party to any director, or is
authorised by any other director, the directors concerned shall indemnify the company against
any loss incurred by it.
216
Besides subsequent approval, it shall be open to the company to proceed against a director or
any other employee who had entered into such contract or arrangement in contravention of the
provisions of this section for recovery of any loss sustained by it as a result of such contract or
arrangement.
Penal Provisions
Any director or any other employee of a company, who authorised to enter into the contracts
or arrangement, in violation of the provisions of this section, shall be punishable as under -
(i) In case of listed company – Any director or other employee of the listed company be
punishable with,
(a) imprisonment for a term which may extend to 1 year; or
(b) fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may
extend to five lakh rupees; or
(c) with both.
(ii) In case of other than listed company – Any director or other employee of the unlisted
company be punishable with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but
which may extend to five lakh rupees.
Additional requirement for Related Party Transactions under the Listing Regulations
As per Regulation 23 of the SEBI (Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements)
Regulations, 2015,
(1) The listed entity shall formulate a policy on materiality of related party transactions and on
dealing with related party transactions which shall also be placed on the website of the
company.
Explanation- A transaction with a related party shall be considered material if the transaction(s)
to be entered into individually or taken together with previous transactions during a financial
year, exceeds ten percent of the annual consolidated turnover of the listed entity as per the last
audited financial statements of the listed entity.
(2) All related party transactions shall require prior approval of the audit committee.
(3) Audit committee may grant omnibus approval for related party transactions proposed to be
entered into by the listed entity subject to the following conditions, namely-
(a) the audit committee shall lay down the criteria for granting the omnibus (compilation,
collection) approval in line with the policy on related party transactions of the listed entity and
such approval shall be applicable in respect of transactions which are repetitive in nature;
(b) the audit committee shall satisfy itself regarding the need for such omnibus approval and
that such approval is in the interest of the listed entity;
(c) the omnibus approval shall specify:
(i) the name(s) of the related party, nature of transaction, period of transaction, maximum
amount of transactions that shall be entered into,
(ii) the indicative base price / current contracted price and the formula for variation in the
price if any; and
(iii) such other conditions as the audit committee may deem fit:
Provided that where the need for related party transaction cannot be foreseen and aforesaid
details are not available, audit committee may grant omnibus approval for such
transactions subject to their value not exceeding rupees one crore per transaction.
217
(d) the audit committee shall review, at least on a quarterly basis, the details of related party
transactions entered into by the listed entity pursuant to each of the omnibus approvals given.
(e) Such omnibus approvals shall be valid for a period not exceeding one year and shall require
fresh approvals after the expiry of one year.
(4) All material related party transactions shall require approval of the shareholders through
resolution and the related parties shall abstain from voting on such resolutions whether the
entity is a related party to the particular transaction or not.
(5) The provisions of sub-regulations (2), (3) and (4) shall not be applicable in the following
cases:
(a) transactions entered into between two government companies;
(b) transactions entered into between a holding company and its wholly owned subsidiary
whose accounts are consolidated with such holding company and placed before the
shareholders at the general meeting for approval.
(6) The provisions of this regulation shall be applicable to all prospective transactions.
(7) For the purpose of this regulation, all entities falling under the definition of related parties
shall abstain from voting irrespective of whether the entity is a party to the particular
transaction or not.
(8) All existing material related party contracts or arrangements entered into prior to the date of
notification of these regulations and which may continue beyond such date shall be placed for
approval of the shareholders in the first General Meeting subsequent to notification of these
regulations.
Every company is required to keep one or more registers in Form MBP 4 giving separately the
particulars of all contracts or arrangements and shall enter therein the particulars of (Rule
16(1))- company or companies or bodies corporate, firms or other association of individuals, in
which any director has any concern or interest.
But the particulars of the company or companies or bodies corporate in which a director himself
together with any other director holds two percent or less of the paid-up share capital would not
be required to be entered in the register.
The entries in the register shall be made at once, whenever there is a cause to make entry, in
chronological order and shall be authenticated by the company secretary of the company or by
any other person authorized by the Board for the purpose. (Rule 16(2))
Such register shall be kept at the registered office of the company and the register shall be
preserved permanently and shall be kept in the custody of the company secretary of the
company or any other person authorized by the Board for the purpose. (Rule 16(3))
Such register or registers are required to be placed before the next meeting of the Board and
signed by all the directors present at the meeting.
Every director within thirty days of his appointment or relinquishment is required to disclose
his concern or interest in other associations, which are required to be included in the register.
218
The register be kept at the registered office of the company and also open for inspection during
business hours. The company shall provide extracts from such register to a member of the
company on his request, within seven days from the date on which such request is made upon
the payment of such fee as may be specified in the articles of the company but not exceeding
ten rupees per page. (Rule 16(4))
Penalty
Every director who fails to comply is liable to a penalty of twenty- five thousand rupees.
Every company which is not a private company is required to keep the copy of contract if in
writing with a managing director or whole-time director for contract of service or a written
memorandum setting its terms if not in writing.
The abovementioned copies required to be kept open to inspection for any member of the
company free of cost.
Penalty
The default in complying with the provisions of this section, the company is liable to a penalty
of twenty-five thousand rupees and every officer of the company who is in default liable to a
penalty of five thousand rupees for each default.
Section 191: Payment to Director for Loss of Office, etc., in Connection with Transfer of
Undertaking, Property or Shares
No director of a company shall receive any payment by way of compensation in case of transfer
of the whole or any part of any under taking or property of the company or the transfer to any
person of all or any of the shares in a company.
The following particulars mentioned in Rules 17 are required to be disclosed to the members of
the company and they pass a resolution at a general meeting approving the payment of such
amount: -
(a) name of the director
(b) amount proposed to be paid;
(c) event due to which compensation become payable;
(d) date of Board meeting recommending such payment;
(e) basis for the amount determined;
(f) reason/justification for the payment;
(g) manner of payment - whether payable in cash or otherwise and how;
(h) sources of payment; and
(i) any other relevant particulars as the Board may think fit.
Any payment made by the company to a managing director or whole-time director or manager
of the company by way of compensation for loss of office or as a consideration for retirement
from office or in connection with such loss or retirement subject to the limit as set out under
section 202. (Rule 17(2))
219
No payment shall be made to the managing director or whole time director or manager of the
company by way of compensation for the loss of office or as consideration for retirement from
office (Rule 17(3)) (other than notice pay and statutory payments in accordance with the terms
of appointment of such director or manager, as applicable) or in connection with such loss or
retirement if:
(a) the company is in default in repayment of public deposits or payment of interest thereon;
(b) the company is in default in redemption of debentures or payment of interest thereon;
(c) the company is in default in repayment of any liability, secured or unsecured, payable to any
bank, public financial institution or any other financial institution;
(d) the company is in default in payment of any dues towards income tax, VAT, excise duty,
service tax or any other tax or duty, by whatever name called, payable to the Central
Government or any State Government, statutory authority or local authority (other than in cases
where the company has disputed the liability to pay such dues);
(e) there are outstanding statutory dues to the employees or workmen of the company which
have not been paid by the company (other than in cases where the company has disputed the
liability to pay such dues); and
(f) the company has not paid dividend on preference shares or not redeemed preference shares
on due date.
If the payment is not approved for want of quorum either in a meeting or an adjourned meeting,
the proposal shall not be deemed to have been approved.
The notice for approval of the resolution by the company or holding company in general
meeting shall include the particulars of the arrangement along with the value of the assets
involved in such arrangement duly calculated by a registered valuer.
220
In case of Where One Person Company limited by shares or by guarantee enters into a
OPC contract except in its ordinary course of business with the sole member of the
company who is also the director of the company, the company shall ensure
that the contract is in writing. If the contract is not in writing, it ensures that the
terms of the contract or offer are contained in a memorandum or are recorded in
the minutes of the first meeting of the Board of Directors of the company held
next after entering into contract.
The company is required to inform the Registrar about every contract entered
into by the company and recorded in the minutes of the meeting of its Board
within a period of fifteen days of the date of approval by the Board.
Prohibited Insider trading is totally prohibited in the Act, including any trading by
director or key managerial personnel.
221
CH. 17 APPOINTMENT AND REMUNERATION OF KMP
The executive management of a company is responsible for the day to day management of a
company. The companies Act, 2013 has used the term key management personnel to define
the executive management.
While the Board of Directors are responsible for providing the oversight, it is the key
management personnel who are responsible for laying down the strategies as well as its
implementation.
MANAGING DIRECTOR
The Board of directors manage the affairs of a company either by mean of a committee of its
own or by appointing managerial personnel such a Managing Directors, Whole Time Directors
and managers to work under their superintendence.
Ways to The companies must opt between two modes of management- namely by a
manage Managing Director or by a Manager. But both Managing Director and
Manager cannot co-exist, as section 196 prohibits the simultaneous
appointment of a Managing Director and a Manager in a company.
Meaning & Section 2 (54) of the Companies Act defines 'Managing Director' as a
Appointment director who by
of Managing (a) virtue of an agreement with the company, or
Director (b) a resolution passed by the company in a general meeting, or
(c) its Board of directors, or
(d) virtue of its Memorandum or Articles, is entrusted with 'substantial'
powers of management of the affairs of the company and includes a director
occupying the position of a Managing Director.
222
The power to do acts of routine nature such as, power to affix the common
seal of the company to any document, or to draw and endorse any cheque on
account of the company in any bank, or to sign any share certificate, shall
not be included within substantial powers of management.
The Managing Director is the executive head of the company, who exercises
his powers subject to the superintendence, control and direction of the Board
of Directors.
This means that any director entrusted with managerial functions will be a
Managing Director.
Further, a company shall not appoint or reappoint any person as its Managing Director, Whole
Time Director or manager for a term exceeding five years at a time and no reappointment shall
be made earlier than one year before the expiry of his term.
The appointment of a managing director or whole-time director or manager and the terms and
conditions of such appointment and remuneration payable thereon must be first approved by
the Board of directors at a meeting and then by an ordinary resolution passed at a general
meeting of the company.
223
(ii) the Central Excise Act, 1944,
(iii) the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951,
(iv) the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954,
(v) the Essential Commodities Act, 1955,
(vi) the Companies Act, 2013,
(vii) the Securities Contracts (Regulation Act) 1956,
(viii) the Wealth Tax Act 1957,
(ix) the Income Tax Act 1961,
(x) the Customs Act 1962,
(xi) the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1969,
(xii) the FEMA, 1999
(xiii) the Sick Industrial Companies Act 1985,
(xiv) the Securities & Exchange Board of India Act, 1992,
(xv) the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act 1992;
(b) he had never been detained for any period under Conservation of Foreign Exchange and
Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act 1974.
NOTE: Where Central Government has given its approval to the appointment of a personnel
convicted or detained under clause (a) or (b) of Schedule V, no further approval of Central
Government shall be necessary for subsequent appointments if he has not been convicted or
detained after such appointment.
(c) He has completed the age of 21 years and has not attained the age of 70 years.
NOTE: Where he is already 70 years or more, then a special resolution should be passed by
the shareholders in the annual general meeting approving his appointment. The explanatory
statement annexed to the notice for such a meeting should indicate the justification for the
appointing such a person.
(d) Where he is a managerial person in more than one company, draws remuneration from one
or more companies subject to ceilings given in Part II of Schedule V.
Other conditions
In addition to requirements given by Schedule V, the conditions prescribed by section 196 for
the appointment of Managing Director, Whole Time Director or Manager must be met.
Disqualifications
Section 196(3) provides that no company shall appoint or continue the employment of any
person as Managing Director, Whole Time Director, or Manager who:
(a) is below the age of 21 years,
(b) is an undischarged insolvent or has at any time been adjudged as an insolvent,
(c) has at any time suspended payment to its creditors, or
(d) has at any time being convicted by a court of an offence and sentenced for a period of more
than 6 months.
224
Appointment with the Approval of Central Government
In case the provisions of Schedule V of the Companies Act, 2013 are not fulfilled by company,
an application seeking approval to the appointment of a managing director (Whole-time
director or manager) shall be made to the Central Government, in e-Form No. MR 2.
According to section 200, the Central Government or a company may, while according its
approval under section 196, to any appointment of a managing director, whole-time director or
manager, the Central Government or the company shall have regard to—
(a) the financial position of the company;
(b) the remuneration or commission drawn by the individual concerned in any other capacity;
(c) the remuneration or commission drawn by him from any other company;
(d) professional qualifications and experience of the individual concerned;
(e) such other matters as may be prescribed.
Case Law
Wasava Tyres vs. Printers (Mysore) Ltd.
The managing director of a company filed a suit on behalf of the company against the tenants
and the trial court granted decree directing the tenants to vacate and deliver possession of the
tenanted premises. The court also directed payment of damages and, in default, to pay interest.
The tenants filed an application and contended that in the instant case, the managing director,
who had filed suit, had no proper authorization from the board of directors. The Court
dismissed the application of the tenants and held that the words ‘substantial powers of
management’ specifically excludes certain acts from its purview. Therefore, except the
excluded acts, the managing director has power and privilege of conducting the business of the
company in accordance with the memorandum and articles of association of the company. The
institution of the suit on behalf of the company by the managing director is deemed to be
within the meaning of ‘substantial powers of management’, since such a power is necessary
and incidental to manage the day-to day affairs and business of the company.
The suit was obviously filed for the benefit of the company. In that view of the matter, the
contention that the managing director had no authority to file a suit is untenable and the same
is rejected.
A managing director is an ordinary director entrusted with special powers. If a company wants
to appoint a person as managing director, who is not a director of the company, he has first to
be appointed as an additional director in accordance with the provisions of section 161 of the
Companies Act, 2013 of the Act.
225
Managerial Remuneration
Section 196(4) provides that subject to the provision of Section 197 which deals with overall
managerial remuneration, a Managing Director, Whole-time Director or Manager shall be
appointed by the Board of Directors at a meeting, which is convened through a notice
specifying the terms and conditions of such appointment, remuneration payable etc.
Subsequent to their appointment at a Board meeting, Managing Director, Whole-time Director
or Manager's appointment must be approved by an ordinary resolution passed at the next
general meeting of the company.
Exemption to private company for section 196(4) & (5) vide notification dated 05.06.2015
Section 196(4) and Section 196(5) is not applicable to Private Company
Note: Exemption is given to the private companies for Section 196(4) which deals with
appointment of Managing/Whole time director /manager /approval of Central Government as
the case may be and Section 196(5) deals with validating actions of Managing/Whole time
Director/manager, if the appointment is not approved by a company in general meeting.
Tenure of According to Section 196, the term of office of a Managing Director cannot
Appointment exceed 5 years at a time. However, reappointment or extension is possible
within the last 1 year of the present appointment.
Reappointment or extension cannot exceed more than 5 years on each
occasion.
226
WHOLE TIME DIRECTOR
Meaning Section 2(94) provides that the term Whole Time Director includes a
director in the whole time employment of the company.
Thus, a Whole Time Director means a director who devotes all his time and attention to the
carrying on of the affairs of the company as may be assigned to him by the Board. Therefore,
he is almost like a Managing Director though not so designated.
But a person who does not devote "substantiality the whole of his time to manage the affairs of
the company" is not a Whole Time Director.
NOTE: A company can have more than one whole-time director, each looking after a different
aspect of the business of the company such as Whole-Time Director Finance, Whole Time
Director Marketing.
227
3. Powers A Managing Director is A Whole Time Director
entrusted with substantial exercises the powers as per the terms
powers of management i.e., of his employment, which need not
discretionary powers to take be as wide as those of a Managing
decisions regarding policy Director.
matters.
4. Manager A Managing Director cannot A Whole Time Director can be
coexist with a Manager. appointed together with the Manager.
MANAGER
Meaning As per Section 2 (53), Manager means "an individual, who subject to the
superintendence, control and direction of the Board of Directors, has the
management of the whole, or substantially the whole of the affairs of a
company, and includes a director or any other person occupying the position
of a director, by whatever name called, whether under a contract of service
or not."
From the above definition, it is clear that only an individual can be appointed as the Manager
of a company. No company can appoint any firm, body corporate or association of persons as
its Manager.
Again, a Manager may be a director of the company. Where a director is a Manager of a
company and for some reason, his office of director is vacated, the office of Manager held by
him shall not be affected.
A Manager, shall have the management of the whole or substantially the whole of the affairs
of a company.
Manager is not an agent who has to act as a servant or who is to obey orders, but a person who
is entrusted with the power to transact the whole of the affairs of the company.
NOTE: A person who is one of the departmental Manager or a branch Manager is not deemed
to be a Manager in this sense.
Appointment The provisions of Section 196 which are applicable to a Managing Director
of Manager and Whole Time Director regarding appointment and reappointment shall
apply to a Manager also.
Number of Section 203 provides that no company shall appoint any person as Manager
Manager if he is either the Manager or the Managing Director of any other company
ships unless his appointment is approved by the unanimous consent of the
directors at the Board meeting provided that a specific notice for the meeting
had been given to all the directors then in India.
228
Disqualificati The provisions of Section 196 which prescribed conditions for the
ons of appointment of persons as Managing Directors or Whole Time Director
Manager equally apply to Managers.
2. Number There cannot be more than There may be more than one
one Manager in a company. Managing Director in a company.
4. Remuneration The maximum remuneration Where there are more than one
payable to a Manager cannot Managing Director, the maximum
exceed 5% of the net profits. remuneration payable will be
limited to 10% of the net profits.
A director may receive remuneration by way of fee for attending the Board/Committee
meetings or for any other purpose as may be decided by the Board.
The Central Government through rules prescribed that the amount of sitting fees payable to a
director for attending meetings of the Board or committees thereof may be such as may be
decided by the Board of directors or the Remuneration Committee thereof which shall not
exceed the sum of rupees 1 lakh per meeting of the Board or committee thereof.
The Board may decide different sitting fee payable to independent and non-independent
directors other than whole-time directors.
Section I: A company having profits in a financial year may pay remuneration to its
Remuneration managerial persons in accordance with Section 197.
229
by companies
having Profits
Section II: Where in any financial year during the currency of tenure of a managerial
Remuneration person, a company has no profits or its profits are inadequate, it, may, without
by Central Government approval, pay remuneration to the managerial person not
Companies exceeding the higher of the limits under (A) and (B) below:
having no (A)
profits or Where the effective capital is Limit of yearly remuneration payable
inadequate shall not exceed (Rs)
profits Less than 5 Crore 30 Lakhs
without 5 Crore and above but less 42 Lakhs
Central Govt. than 100 Crore
approval 100 Crore and above but less than 60 Lakhs
250 Crore
250 Crore and above 60 Lakhs plus 0.01% of the effective
capital in excess of Rs. 250 Crore
If a special resolution is passed by the shareholders, the above limits shall
be doubled.
(B) In the case of managerial person who was not a shareholder, employee or
a Director of the company at any time during the two years prior to his
appointment as managerial person- 2.5% of the current relevant profit.
In case, where the company has inadequate or no profits, the Central Government or a
company may fix the remuneration within the limits specified in the Act. While doing so, the
Central Government or the company shall have regard to—
(a) the financial position of the company;
(b) the remuneration or commission drawn by the individual concerned in any other capacity;
(c) the remuneration or commission drawn by him from any other company;
(d) professional qualifications and experience of the individual concerned;
Compensation for Loss of Office of Managing or Whole- time Director or Manager (Sec
202)
Section 202 provides that a company may make payment to a managing or whole-time director
or manager, but not to any other director, by way of compensation for loss of office.
(a) where the director resigns from his office as a result of the reconstruction/amalgamation of
the company and is appointed as the managing or whole-time director, manager or other
officer of the reconstructed company/of resulting company from the amalgamation;
(b) where the office of the director is vacated due to disqualification;
(c) where the company is being wound up due to the negligence or default of the director;
(d) where the director has been guilty of fraud or breach of trust or gross negligence or
230
mismanagement of the conduct of the affairs of the company or any subsidiary company or
holding company; and
(e) where the director has instigated, or has taken part directly or indirectly in bringing about,
the termination of his office.
Overall Section 197 of the Companies Act, 2013 prescribed the maximum ceiling for
managerial payment of managerial remuneration by a public company to its managing
remuneration director whole-time director and manager which shall not exceed 11% of the
net profit of the company in that financial year.
The remuneration payable to any one managing director or whole- time director or manager
shall not exceed 5% of the net profits of the company and if there are more than one such
director remuneration shall not exceed 10% of the net profits to all such directors and manager
taken together.
Except with the approval of the company in general meeting, the remuneration payable to
directors who are neither managing directors nor whole-time directors shall not exceed, - 1%
of the net profits of the company, if there is a managing or whole-time director or manager; -
3% of the net profits in any other case.
231