Interview Questions
Interview Questions
Interview Questions
Cookies and local storage are two different ways to store data on the client-side (i.e., in the
user's browser) in web development.
Here are some of the key differences between cookies and local storage:
1. Size Limit: Cookies have a size limit of 4KB, whereas local storage has a much larger size
limit of at least 5MB (depending on the browser).
2. Expiration: Cookies can have an expiration date, which means they will be deleted after a
specified amount of time. Local storage, on the other hand, does not have an expiration
date, and the data will persist until it is manually cleared by the user or by the web
application.
3. Accessibility: Cookies can be accessed both by the client-side and server-side, while
local storage can only be accessed by the client-side.
4. Security: Cookies can be set to be HttpOnly, which means they cannot be accessed by
JavaScript. Local storage, on the other hand, is accessible by JavaScript by default.
5. Usage: Cookies are typically used for sending data back to the server, while local storage
is typically used for client-side data storage (such as user preferences, login status, or
data caching).
Overall, cookies are better suited for transmitting small amounts of data back and forth
between the client and the server, while local storage is better suited for storing larger amounts
of data on the client-side for use by the web application.
Worker threads allow Node.js to create additional threads that can execute JavaScript code
independently of the main thread. This can be useful for executing CPU-intensive tasks in
parallel, such as image processing or data compression.
Overall, the use of worker threads in Node.js allows for more efficient and parallel processing of
tasks, which can improve the performance and scalability of your applications.
Node.js uses an event-driven architecture, with an event loop that handles all incoming events
and requests. The event loop is responsible for processing all I/O operations in a non-blocking
way, which allows Node.js to handle large numbers of concurrent connections without
becoming blocked or unresponsive.
1. Event loop basics: The event loop is a continuously running loop that waits for events to
occur. When an event occurs, the event loop processes it by executing the corresponding
callback function.
2. Event queue: All events in Node.js are processed through an event queue. When an event
occurs, it is added to the end of the event queue.
3. Call stack: The event loop maintains a call stack, which is a data structure that stores the
currently executing function. When an event is added to the event queue, the
corresponding callback function is added to the call stack.
4. Non-blocking I/O: Node.js uses non-blocking I/O, which means that I/O operations such
as file I/O or network I/O do not block the event loop. Instead, these operations are
performed asynchronously, and a callback function is executed when the operation
completes.
5. Event loop phases: The event loop in Node.js consists of several phases, each of which
is responsible for processing a specific type of event. These phases include the timers
phase, I/O callbacks phase, idle, prepare, and close callbacks phase.
6. Microtasks queue: Microtasks are small, lightweight tasks that can be executed
immediately after the current event loop phase completes. Promises, process.nextTick()
and setImmediate() functions are examples of microtasks in Node.js.
Overall, the event loop is a critical component of Node.js architecture, as it allows Node.js to
handle large numbers of concurrent connections in a non-blocking way, which is essential for
building scalable and high-performance applications.
React Hooks provide a number of advantages over traditional class components in React,
which is why they are becoming increasingly popular among React developers. Here are some
reasons why you should use React Hooks:
1. Simplifies code: With React Hooks, it's possible to write functional components that have
state and other React features, which simplifies the code and makes it easier to read and
maintain.
2. Reusability: Hooks are reusable, which means that they can be shared between
components, making it easier to encapsulate and reuse logic across your application.
3. Better performance: Hooks can help improve performance by reducing the number of
class components needed in your application, which can help reduce the amount of
memory and CPU usage.
4. Reduces complexity: By using hooks, you can reduce the complexity of your components
and make them more modular, which makes it easier to debug and test your code.
5. Easier to learn: Since hooks are based on functional programming concepts, they can be
easier to learn and understand than class components, which can help developers
become more productive more quickly.
6. Better interoperability: Hooks can be used with other libraries and tools, which makes it
easier to integrate React with other parts of your application or with external APIs.
7. Future-proof: React Hooks have been adopted as part of the React core API, and are
likely to become the preferred way to write React components in the future.
Overall, React Hooks provide a more functional programming style to React, which simplifies
the code and makes it more modular and reusable. This helps developers to create more
scalable and maintainable applications.
8. React context concept and use case.
9. Kubernetes concept, use case and difference with docker.
10. Understanding about terraform
11. Micro-frontend concept and usecase, example
12. Microservice concept, usecase and advantage/disadvantage.
13. AWS amplify, lambda
14. Use case of array and map
15. What motivates you?
16. Tell me about search algorithms and complexity.
17. What is the indexed key in RDS.
18. What is your weakness?
19. What is the difference between AWS Lambda and AWS EC2?
AWS Lambda and AWS EC2 are both AWS services that allow you to run code in the
cloud, but they have different functionalities and are designed for different purposes.
AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that allows you to run code in response to
events, such as HTTP requests, changes to data in an S3 bucket, or messages from an
Amazon SNS topic.
AWS EC2, on the other hand, is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in
the cloud. With EC2, you can launch and manage virtual machines, called instances, that
run various operating systems and applications.
Functionality: Lambda is designed for running small, stateless functions that can be
triggered by events, while EC2 is designed for running long-running applications or
workloads that require persistent storage, specialized hardware, or custom
configurations.
Scalability: Lambda scales automatically to handle any number of requests, while EC2
requires you to manually manage and scale the underlying infrastructure.
Pricing: Lambda charges you based on the number of requests and the compute time
used, while EC2 charges you based on the instance type, the usage time, and the data
transfer.
Management: Lambda is a fully managed service, which means that AWS takes care of
the underlying infrastructure, security, and scaling, while EC2 requires you to manage and
maintain the instances yourself.
* Create an AWS CodeBuild project: Create a CodeBuild project that compiles your
application code, creates a deployable artifact, and runs tests.
* Test your pipeline: Test your pipeline by making a change to your application code and
verifying that the change is automatically built and deployed to your Elastic Beanstalk
environment.
22. What is the pipeline in AWS EC2 and AWS S3 and how to implement that?
In AWS EC2, a pipeline typically refers to a CI/CD pipeline that automates the process of
building, testing, and deploying software applications on EC2 instances. This is similar to
the process described in the previous question for AWS Elastic Beanstalk, but with EC2
instances as the deployment targets. To implement a pipeline on EC2, you would
typically use services such as AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeDeploy,
along with other AWS services that are relevant to your specific use case.
In AWS S3, a pipeline typically refers to a data processing pipeline that processes objects
stored in S3 buckets. This can involve using AWS services such as AWS Lambda, AWS
Glue, or Amazon EMR to perform various operations on S3 objects, such as transforming
data, analyzing logs, or performing machine learning tasks. To implement a pipeline on
S3, you would typically create a series of AWS services that work together to process
data objects in a specific way.
23. What is the Route 53 and Cloudfront in AWS and what is the difference between them?
AWS Route 53 is a highly available and scalable DNS service that allows you to manage
your domain names and route traffic to your web applications running on AWS or
elsewhere.
AWS CloudFront, on the other hand, is a content delivery network (CDN) service that
accelerates the delivery of your web content, such as static and dynamic web pages,
images, videos, and streaming media, to users around the world.
Functionality: Route 53 is a DNS service that routes traffic to various endpoints, while
CloudFront is a CDN service that accelerates the delivery of web content to users.
Cost: Route 53 charges based on the number of hosted zones, the number of DNS
queries, and the use of advanced features, while CloudFront charges based on the
volume of data transferred and the number of requests.
Caching: Route 53 does not cache your web content, while CloudFront caches your
content at edge locations to improve performance and reduce latency.
Security: Route 53 does not provide security features for web content, while CloudFront
provides features such as signed URLs and cookies to protect your content from
unauthorized access.