Module 1
Module 1
Module 1
finance. Governments or companies prefer project finance for long gestation projects or for
joint venture arrangements or collaboration arrangements.
Project finance model adopted in BOT (build, operate, and transfer) model contains multiple
key elements. The funds are arranged through a special purpose vehicle (SPV).
A company may carry the project themselves or subcontract a portion of the project. In the
absence of revenues during the construction phase, the interest on debt capital is paid after the
commencement of operations.
Project financing is for projects which carry high risks on the capital employed. There is
no revenue for the companies participating until the commencement of operations. During the
construction phase, there may be one or two offtake agreements, but no revenue streams.
There is no recourse available to the parties funding the projects.
The project generally remains off the balance sheet for the financing parties and the
government. Companies typically hold the project debt in a subsidiary with a minority
holding. This helps in maintaining the debt ratios of the company. For the government, they
may wish to keep the project off their balance sheet to have more fiscal room.
Conclusion
In project financing, the lenders have limited recourse. This means that in the case of a
default, the lenders have recourse to the assets under the project, securing completion and
using performance guarantees under the project.
The project financing is contrary to recourse financing, where the lenders get a full claim to
the owner’s assets or cash flows. Hence, project financing requires sound financial and
relevant technical knowledge.
4. Encourage teamwork
Teamwork is important to the project because many projects require the efforts of
multiple people or departments working together. Encouraging teamwork helps keep
employees focused on the power of working together. As a leader, it will encourage
teamwork by participating in the project to set an example, providing the right tools
for the project and communicating with team members about changes, progress and
scope creep.
5. Set clear expectations
Clear expectations minimize the margin for error because they unite everyone under
the same guidelines. For example, an expectation that a project ends in the next two
weeks keeps everyone focused on the deadline and provides a mutual understanding
for the client, team and leadership. Setting clear expectations means frequently
communicating with teams and clients, sending expectation reminders and accepting
feedback.
6. Manage project risks
Some projects come with risks or financial implications, which can affect the overall
outcome of the project. Consider performing a risk analysis before the project's
initiation to identify risks, create potential solutions and understand the potential
damage that risks can create. The more a project manager understands the project's
risks, the less surprising they are during each phase of the project.
1. It can help in tracking the progress and make sure that project is on track to achieve
the goals.
2. It can help to identify areas where problems can occur and stay agile enough to
improve future projects.
3. It will allow to easily communicate plans to streamline the process and move forward.
There are other benefits as well but by proactively keeping those key directives in mind,
project evaluation can become a useful tool in any project management process.
As referenced above, several key factors should be reviewed. Let’s take a look at some of the
most important, and examine some ways in which they can be evaluated.
Time
Not every project has a clear timeline before it begins but also without proper time
management, it can quickly get out of hand thus it’s important to have some way of
determining whether or not the project is on track.
You can use a variety of tools for this, such as Gantt charts or the Critical Path Method
(CPM).
Once a project is started, evaluating the time that each process is taking is important. This
will help to identify any bottlenecks and see if the team is on track to meet the deadline. As
the project gets closer to completion, final review should be done to make sure that
everything is on track.
At the end of a project, once all of the deliverables have been produced, it’s important to
compare the actual time it took to complete the project with the original estimate. This will
help to determine if there were any delays or unexpected problems that arose.
For example, if the project was estimated to take two months but ended up taking four, you
would want to investigate what caused the delay and put in place measures to prevent it from
falling behind schedule again.
Cost
One of the most important factors in any business is profit, and that’s no different when it
comes to projects. It is important to to measure how much money was spent on the project
and compare it to how much money was made. This will help to determine whether or not the
project was successful and, if not, where the money was lost during the project.
There are a few ways to track cost:
Actual cost: This is the amount of money that was spent on the project. It includes
material costs, labor costs, and any other associated expenses.
Budgeted cost: This is the amount of money that was planned to be spent on the
project. It may not reflect the actual cost, especially if the project went over budget.
Actual vs. budgeted cost: This compares the actual cost to the budgeted cost and
shows how much (if any) money was overspent or underspent.
Sometimes, it’s not as simple as comparing against a direct revenue source. For example, a
project may be targeted to increase brand awareness or company culture instead of direct
sales, which may not be easily reflected in the immediate financial reports.
In these cases, it is needed to use a metric that can reflect the long-term value of the project.
Either way, evaluating the cost of a project and comparing it to those predetermined value
metrics is crucial to understanding whether or not it was a success, failure, or if it is even
worth repeating.
Resources Used
When someone mentions resources, the focus often goes to physical materials that may be
consumed in the process of creating something new. In business, resources don’t just
mean physical inventory though, and can instead refer to things like time, energy, and
workforce.
Evaluating how resources are used can helps to answer important questions such as:
All of this information can help to make better decisions for future projects.
For example, if burnout employee slowed down a project because there weren’t enough
workers, and may want to consider making new hires or expanding the budget of a certain
department to avoid any future disruptions.
You may still feel like you’re in the dark on how to best start evaluating your projects.
Luckily, we have a handy guide for some of the most common techniques and methods used
today.
The most popular and common way to evaluate a project is through its return on investment
(ROI). This approach calculates the amount of money gained or lost as a result of the project.
The calculation compares the initial investment with the final revenue generated by the
project. A positive ROI means that the benefits are greater than the costs, while a negative
ROI indicates that the costs outweighed any benefits.
Importantly, this does not necessarily need to be measured in revenue, and can instead take
into account other things such as environmental or social benefits.
3. Net Present Value (NPV)
The NPV measures the present value of all cash flows associated with a project — both
benefits and costs. This approach is often used for long-term projects where some cash flows
are received in the future.
NPV takes into account both the time value of money (the fact that money today is worth
more than money tomorrow) and the risks associated with future cash flows. A positive NPV
means that the present value of all benefits exceeds the present value of all costs, while a
negative NPV means the opposite.
An IRR is used to determine how profitable a project is. It calculates the rate of return that
would make the net present value of all cash flows from the project equal to zero. This can
help you decide if a project is worth doing, and whether or not it’s worth borrowing money to
finance it. Generally, the higher the IRR, the better the investment.
The payback period method measures how long it will take for a project to generate enough
cash flow to cover its initial costs. It ignores cash flows after the payback period has been
reached. This method is often used when there is uncertainty about future cash flows.
Related but slightly different than a CBA, the benefit-cost ratio is an individual number that
can be an easy way to tell if a project is going to provide positive value. A ratio greater than
1.0 would mean that it is expected to provide value, and could then be applied to several
other analysis techniques to determine if the project is worthwhile.
Again, this can include benefits that are not directly tied to revenue, though a value will need
to be assigned. In today’s market, for instance, corporate social responsibility and
sustainability can be just as important as anything else.
7. Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate (RADR)
Instead of just looking at straight costs and benefits, a RADR takes into account the risk
associated with a project and adjusts the discount rate accordingly. This can help you make
better decisions about whether or not to undertake a risky project, giving you a more accurate
estimate of future returns.
Each of these methods has its strengths and weaknesses, and you may find that one works
better for your particular project than another. It’s important to tailor the evaluation method
to the project at hand so that you can get the most accurate results.
PROJECT PLANNING
4. Set goals. Take what is gleaned from the meeting and refine it into
a project plan. It should include goals and deliverables that define
what the product or service will result in.
Throu
gh these steps, an organization can ensure that a project plan is reliable and well-
communicated.
5 phases of a project
Projects typically pass through five phases. The project lifecycle includes
the following:
Planni
ng is the second step in the project lifecycle, but it affects all of the phases of the project
lifecycle.
PROJECT MONITORING
Before the project actually get started with any active monitoring, the
project manager wants to understand the project’s scope, budget, and
timeline. This helps provide a benchmark for success throughout the
completion of the project.
Scope verification
In order to keep a record and ensure stakeholders and team are on the
same page, it’s important to secure documentation related to each phase of
the project’s completion. This shows that the project is accepted at each
stage of execution.
This is where schedules and costs are monitored closely. Deadlines are
tracked and followed-up on if necessary, and budgets are consistently
watched. Updates to cost and timeline estimates are made here.
Quality control
A project can be done on-time and on-budget, but if it’s not what the
stakeholder wants or the quality of the work is poor, it’s of little value to
anyone. Quality control is an essential part of the project monitoring
process. This is where specific project results and deliverables are looked
at in comparison to established quality standards. If issues are found,
changes are requested and made.
Performance reporting
This is like a report card for the project. Performance reporting consists of
collecting and sharing any data related to project performance in relation to
baseline goals and standards. At this stage it is important to create and find
status reports, progress notes, and future forecasts (using collected data).