Journal of Decadence Studies, 6.2 (2023), Ii-Ix
Journal of Decadence Studies, 6.2 (2023), Ii-Ix
Journal of Decadence Studies, 6.2 (2023), Ii-Ix
Volume 6, Issue 2
Autumn 2023
ISSN: 2515-0073
DOI: 10.25602/GOLD.v.v6i2.1752.g1863
volupte.gold.ac.uk
‘[…] and now and then the fantastic shadows of birds in flight
flitted across the long tussore-silk curtains that were stretched in
front of the huge window, producing a kind of momentary
Japanese effect […]’
The description of Basil Hallward’s studio – provided in the opening lines of Oscar Wilde’s The
Picture of Dorian Gray (1890) – is a feast for the senses from the start, with the ‘rich odour of roses’
inviting the reader through the door, away from the ‘dim roar of London’ to the orientalist fantasy
within.1 As in so many fin de siècle visual and literary texts, decadence is conveyed – or implied –
through vivid descriptions of the material culture surrounding, or, as in this instance, carefully
assembled by the central characters. At the heart of his description are ‘long tussore-silk curtains’
on which the ‘fantastic shadows of birds of flight’ produce ‘a kind of momentary Japanese effect’,
an exotic invocation of the Asian-inspired Aestheticism to which Wilde subscribed in his own life.2
He was perhaps the most well-known male proponent of Aesthetic Dress – most obviously
performed through velvet suits with knickerbocker trousers he famously wore during his 1882
lecture tour of North America, where he was photographed by Napoléon Sarony (fig. 1). While
Wilde’s views and practices on dress met with mixed reviews, his escapades were widely reported
and avidly followed in the British press, cultivating his celebrity even while abroad. Although he
was mocked for his attire in Boston, his ensemble as reported by the Canadian press was more
subdued:
The apostle had no lily, nor yet a sunflower. He wore a velvet jacket which seemed to be
a good jacket. He has an ordinary neck tie and wore a linen collar about number eighteen
on a neck half a dozen sizes smaller. His legs were in trousers, and his boots were
apparently the product of New York art, judging by their pointed toes. His hair is the color
of straw, slightly leonine, and when not looked after, goes climbing all over his features.3
approach to art and life, from the furnishing of one’s home, to one’s sartorial choices. ‘The
Aesthetic Movement’, as it is still often called, did not have a cohesive thesis or manifesto. For this
reason, many scholars now prefer the term ‘Aestheticism’, which acknowledges the breadth of
fields influenced by Aesthetic values, and its intersections with other contemporary movements
and ideals – including decadence. While Aestheticism is often thought to be confined to the visual
arts, unlike decadence which is primarily a literary tradition, both reflect a more eccentric and
rebellious side of Victorian culture that crosses over multiple disciplines. They develop from
similar cultural contexts and find inspiration in ideas of excess and pleasure, but equally they have
more philosophical underpinnings that suggest more serious questions around the nature of
beauty.
Fig. 1: Oscar Wilde photographed by Napoléon Sarony (1882). Photographic print on card mount, 33 x 19 cm.
Source: Wikimedia Commons.
through the lens of fashion and textiles. The theme was inspired by a online series of talks (Jeudis),
‘Decadence & Aestheticism: Truth, Beauty, Exoticism, and the Sublime in Nineteenth Century
Fashion’, which we were invited to organize by the British Association of Decadence Studies
(BADS) in Autumn 2021. Our own eagerness to explore these connections stemmed from a shared
interest in Aestheticism in dress and textile histories, particularly in relation to the performative
aspects of Artistic Dress, and its relationship to costume/fashion practice in life and on the stage.
The papers shared at the four Jeudi events highlighted the ways in which fashion and textiles –
including objects such as clothing, costumes, and interior soft furnishings – can become narrative
agents in literature, and within both historical and contemporary creative practice, including ‘neo’
and revivalist responses to these periods. We therefore wish to note (and thank again) the
contributors who initiated these important conversations, some of whom are also represented in
this issue:
Truth
Emily Taylor, ‘Material Constructions: Making, Outré and Taste in late-19th Century Dress’
Stefanie John, ‘Unveiling Truth and Beauty: Textiles in Sarah Grand’s Short Fiction’
Hilary Davidson, ‘Looking Back Through Fashion: Regency Romanticisms’
Beauty
Ailsa Boyd, ‘Some Americans in the “House Beautiful”: Edith Wharton and Wildean
Aesthetics’
Max Donnelly, ‘Daniel Cottier and the House Beautiful’
Kimberly Wahl, ‘Decadent Beauty: Haptic Modes in Aesthetic Dress and Design’
Exoticism
Samuel Love, ‘Send in the Clowns: The Pierrot Costume as Decadent Cipher’
Louise Wenman-James, ‘“Oh, I didn’t know you were a Selfridgette!”: Power Play, Self-
Construction, and Fashion in Ada Leverson’s Bird of Paradise’
Veronica Isaac, ‘Shopping in Byzantium: Costumes fit for a “Temple of Art”’
Sublime
Robyne Calvert, ‘Dark Decadence: The Gothic in Aestheticism and Neo-Aestheticism’
Rachael Grew, ‘Rags to Sequins: Dressing the Witch’
Catherine Spooner, ‘Unwrapping the Mummy’s Bandages: Whiteness, Fabric and Horror in
Imperial Gothic Fictions’
dress and textiles within both decadence and Aestheticism, and the interrelationship between
individuals and their values. We were therefore delighted to accept an invitation to edit this special
issue of Volupté, which engages with debates and ideas connected to the opulence and splendour
What we have compiled is an exploratory issue, applying approaches from material culture
to a literary field and thereby offering interdisciplinary considerations which include not just astute
textual analyses, but creative pieces of fiction, poetry, and art practice as well. This collection
encompasses a range of sources, disciplines and time periods representing texts, textiles, film,
images, interiors, dress, and accessories – real and imagined. The creative responses in particular
are living fields that provide inspiration for creativity, questioning, and analysis. The exploration
of fashion in relation to decadence is nascent in terms of scholarship: amongst the most recent
Decadent Stylings’ in The Oxford Handbook of Decadence edited by Jane Desmarais and David Weir
(2021).
The first two critical essays in this edition directly discuss how Aestheticism and decadence
manifest through dress and textiles in late Victorian fiction, focusing on the artistic side of the
‘Gilded Age’ in the work of two important women authors. In ‘Some Americans in the “House
Beautiful”: Edith Wharton, Oscar Wilde, and Aestheticism’, Ailsa Boyd presents a consideration
of aesthetic theories in the work of Edith Wharton (1862-1937), whose first published book was
an interior design manual, The Decoration of Houses (1897). Following a concise overview of the
transatlantic exchange of Aestheticism in the 1880s, Boyd discusses the influence of Pater and
Wilde in Wharton’s fiction (Wharton may have seen Wilde lecture). She observes that while
Wharton’s taste in her own home did not exhibit the decadence that Wilde indulged in,
‘Aestheticism gave Wharton a language with which to discuss beauty in her own writings’ (p. 1).
Aestheticist principles translated into the author’s homes: ‘Wharton decorated several homes
according to the principles of her book, and built The Mount at Lenox, Massachusetts in 1902,
probably exerting influence in the architectural design as well as the interior’ (p. 18), thus providing
an important and underappreciated example of a successful woman artist embodying the Aesthetic
In ‘Fibres, Folds, and Trimmings: The Decadent Materials of Sarah Grand’s Emotional
Moments’, Stefanie John explores Aestheticism, decadence, and the New Woman in the short
stories of Sarah Grand (1854-1943), particularly those published in the collection Emotional Moments
(1908). John observes that within these stories, ‘narrative appropriations of material culture
accentuate Grand’s subversion of gender norms and furthermore reveal her appropriation of
Aesthetic and decadent culture.’ (p. 30) In her shrewd analysis, John points to the ways in which
Grand – like Wilde – uses textiles as a metaphor for atmosphere, and, by extension, aesthetic
sensibilities. However, John also elucidates the ways in which Grand’s work has the added
complexity of using dress and textiles to comment on gender and power in what would now be
deemed a feminist critique; showing how Grand’s stories both partake in and parody aestheticism
and decadence.
Söderberg’s Writing: Translations of “The Fur Coat” (1898) and “A Grey Waistcoat or Justice in
Munich” (1913)’, directs the attention of decadence studies to late nineteenth and early twentieth-
century Sweden. Both decadence and fashion are, as Chapot shows, taken seriously in author,
translator, and journalist Hjalmar Söderberg’s (1869-1941) work. The two short stories on which
Chapot’s analysis centres are distinguished by a meticulous attention to detail in the description of
the clothing, with an incisive focus on specific elements of dress – the colour of a coat, the number
of buttons – and the socially and culturally specific information they communicated about their
wearer. Building on this point, Chapot argues that ‘In this rapidly changing social landscape,
individuals could make themselves readable and interpretable.’ (p. 53) Like Söderberg’s writing,
Chapot’s article is a testament to the power and significance of clothing - specifically its enduring
ability - ‘like decadence itself’ to ‘mean many different things simultaneously.’ (p. 57)
In his article ‘Rag Time: Decadent Textiles in the Louisiana Gothic of the Fin de Siècle’,
Ryan Atticus Doherty takes us on a journey to late nineteenth-century Louisiana which, he argues,
has been underexplored in terms of decadence. Doherty analyses the use of textiles to reflect the
sense of decay in the deep South after the Civil War, providing metaphorical fabric for Louisianian
Washington Cable (1844-1925), and Alfred Mercier (1816-1894) to ‘grappl[e] with the concept of
decadence in the American South’s postbellum years’. (p. 76) Doherty proposes Southern
decadence should be reconsidered within a broader framework of the historic and cultural
confluence of European colonialism, the Caribbean, and the American South, to allow for a re-
evaluation of this unique literary genre. Like Chapot, Doherty presents an intriguing analysis that
shows the malleability of cloth and clothing to signify multiple connotations around class, race,
The final two essays expose and engage with the darker side of decadence through clothing
and textiles as cyphers for excess, extravagance, conceit, artifact, deception, corruption, and even
violence. In ‘Finishing Touches: Clothing and Accessories as Tokens of Evil in Rachilde and
Barbey d’Aurevilly’, Elise Bouley argues that ‘the sartorial realm [is] the perfect location from
which to read the decadent woman as an idol of beauty and perversity.’ (p. 103) Her exploration
of the ‘cross-fertilization between appearance and cruelty’ (p. 102) centres on three short stories
from Jules Barbey d’Aurevilly’s 1874 collection Les Diaboliques (‘Le Rideau Cramoisi’ [‘The
Crimson Curtain’], ‘Le Plus Bel Amour de Don Juan’ [‘The Most Beautiful Love of Don Juan’],
and ‘Le Bonheur dans le crime’ [‘Happiness in Crime’]), which she reads alongside, and in
conversation with, Rachilde’s novel La Marquise de Sade (1887). In a piece which is unflinching and
women who are, quite literally, dressed to kill: their male victims both enraptured and emasculated
by ensembles which herald, and in some instances directly initiate, doom and destruction.
Like Bouley, David Wingrove explores the darker side of decadence in ‘(Un)Dressing
Decadence: Masquerade and Murder in Mascara’. Centring on a close reading of the 1987 film
Mascara, directed by Patrick Conrad, Wingrove ventures into a world in which supreme beauty co-
exists with, is tainted, and ultimately corrupted by, passion, violence, and murder. His article
exposes the unease and potential anger provoked by the fear surrounding identities and garments
which remain in flux and refuse to conform to stable social and cultural norms. Wingrove’s piece
makes a compelling case for the continued, and heightened relevance of the film given the current
and growing unease and division provoked by ‘culture wars’ over gender identity and transgender
rights, arguing that Mascara feels like ‘a film whose time has come’ (p. 138).
Adjacent to these critical pieces (and in addition to the Jeudi talks noted above), Spooner
has contributed to this issue a sublime short story, ‘Arrangements in White and Red’, which picks
up on these themes in a wonderful Whistlerian way. Equally, Aubrey Beardsley has been literally
and figuratively woven into both Azadeh Monzavi’s textile work entitled The Yellow Art Piece, and
Andrew Nightingale’s poems, extracts from a sequence based on portraits of Marchesa Luisa
Casati. Pre-Raphaelite art and the fiction of Lewis Carroll inspired Otherscapes, contemporary
fashion photographs through the fantastical lens of Jade Starmore. Collaborating with designer
Deniz Uster of Otherscapes Studio, and featuring model Rebecca Wyman, the images craft a
contemporary faerie tale exploring the body’s relationship with the natural world, decay, comfort,
and ruination.
There are still many questions which this issue of Volupté does not address as fully as we
would like. For example, we recognize the importance of the debates initiated by the previous issue
on Decolonizing Decadence, and there is a great deal more work to be done in this area to
deconstruct issues of gender, race, and class. We therefore offer this issue as more of a provocation,
undertake further discussion and research on fashion and textiles in decadence studies, particularly
as narrative agents that may reveal deeper complexities and new readings of material and literary
1 Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891; Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979), p. 7.
2 Ibid.
3 Walter Hamilton, The Aesthetic Movement in England (London: Reeves & Turner, 1882), pp. 120-21.