Sample2 (2371)
Sample2 (2371)
Sample2 (2371)
Social media has diverted from being an entertainment and communication tool. Scandals
such as; the stealing of consumer data and racist or biased algorithms on social media, are
just little pieces of a bigger issue. Social media is now used as a weapon to create conflict,
abuse human rights, and inhibit development. Moreover, social media today occupies a key
role in the politics of this world, and is being weaponized for political means. To create a
deeper understanding of the weaponization of social media, we can allude to the US capitol
riot. From a single tweet made on January 6 th by former U.S. president Donald Trump
insinuating the voting process of the 2020 presidential elections of being fraudulent, followed
by a speech which encouraged his followers to march to the Capitol; resulted in the killing of
5 individuals and equally huge property damage ("Capitol riots timeline: The evidence
presented against Trump", 2022). This thus leaves open the question: In what ways has
weapon of war. The definition of war in politics is contextual. Thus for the purpose of my
inquiry, it would be defined as conflict between two parties, be it armed or unarmed. Hence,
this essay aims at making sense of, and analyzing how social media can serve as a weapon for
one party to harm or negatively affect another one. This paper would debate the above
inquiry through a thorough analysis of collected data, from multiple perspectives, and at a
national and international level. My rationale is an avid curiosity to understand how this
dynamic issue faced by every nation in the world operates. If it is indeed rapidly being
weaponized, I wish to uncover the ways in which it is to contribute to creating awareness and
countering evil. I am eager to know how much of a threat the weaponization of social media
poses to humanity.
Engagement Activities
My political engagement activity consisted of two interviews, a survey and an online political
political issue because the news agency for which Mr Eric works is social media based, and
thus is highly exposed to the traffic on social media. From Mr Eric, I gained understanding of
the functioning of social media, how the lack of tough regulations results in its
weaponization, how social media is weaponized to bring about conflict and equally how it
weaponization of social media, and use of social media to promote our lives, that cannot be
journalist at La Cameroon Radio Television (CRTV). The objective of this interview was to
gain a deeper understanding of the functioning of social media, its algorithm, and the ways in
which it is weaponized. I was introduced by Mr. Katcham to a new perspective through the
deep analysis he made on the psychological effect of social media, which he described as the
consumer has on the weaponization, sometimes even graver that of the producer. Next, I
on the weaponization of social media. The survey aimed at depicting the use of social media,
and the degree to which consumers are vigilant about its usage to avoid contributing to its
weaponization. I sent the survey to a total of 100 participants, 50 of each age group, older
than 18, and younger than 18 years old. From this survey I gathered information about the
rate of usage and reliance on social media to get informed, and forms of weaponization of
social media.
To understand how social media is weaponized, it is crucial to understand what makes social
media a suitable weapon. Mr Eric Crepin made mention of the fact that social media is being
weaponized because of its easy access. The aim of social media is to connect the whole
world. Thus it is affordable and easy to get. To further elaborate on that, they are about 2.98
billion users of Facebook active everyday ("Facebook MAU worldwide 2021 | Statista",
2022). From the data collected in my survey 100% of respondents admitted to using social
media every day. This makes it a weapon because in order to cause war, compared to other
mediums, social media is cost-effective, exposes users to minimal risk of sanctions/ justice
In addition, social media is a weapon because it exposes the user to a large audience. This
was best substantiated by Mr Ruffin Katcham who said: "A post with sensitive information
simply associated with a Hashtag, can reach millions of people. As a result, social media is
used as a weapon because it enables the message to spread faster." This highly resonates with
reliance of groups for access to resources that sustain a living arrangement. Users of social
media are interdependent. They all rely on the information of one another for diverse reasons.
This reliance gives room for easy manipulation, thus rendering social media an effective
weapon.
In addition social media is a weapon due to the weak regulations it places on its usage and the
spread of its content. Mr. Eric communicated that there are no strict regulations on the use of
social media. There is very little verification made by the management of the platform, as to
what is being posted on it every day. As a result, individuals find it easy to use it as a weapon
since the sometimes violent and harmful content they publish could easily go under the radar.
According to the International Center for the Study of Violent Extremism (ICSVE), a full
half of 236 interviewees said internet-based recruitment and perusal of social media factored
into their decision to join ISIS. ("How Social Media Fuels Extremism — ACCO", 2022).
Nonetheless, social media platforms indeed take actions to reduce their weaponization. To
demonstrate, Facebook also announced a policy against Coordinated Social Harm, and shared
its first example of enforcement: A network of users linked to Querdenken, a German group
often compared to QAnon, has their Facebook accounts deactivated, pages and groups, as
well as their Instagram accounts, for posts that spread false and misleading information about
the pandemic, engage in hate speech and incite violence, wrote Nathaniel Gleicher,
Facebook’s head of security policy. (Dangor, 2022) Although the components of social media
make it more than suitable for weaponization, the managers of this platform, aware of that
disadvantage, take actions to make social media less weapon by limiting its access,
sanctioning users, and taking down harmful posts before they spread.
Manipulative Information
According to the theory of ideological power by Stevens Lukes, people have the power to
influence the thoughts and wishes of others. This justifies the main way in which social
media is weaponized, which is through the publishing of false Narrative and emotionally
manipulative information, because these influence perspectives of those they are exposed to.
From Mr Eric Mougnaleba, I learned that the information we encounter on social media is
imposed on us. Users have limited power in choosing what they want to see on social media.
Equally, social media influences user's viewpoints. To illustrate, he made mention of the fact
that when an event takes place and is reported on social media, the narrative is transformed
by the publisher's emotions, beliefs and intentions. Thus the information is manipulated and
reaches a wide audience. As a result, receivers would react by emotion to such information,
In similitude, Mr. Ruffin Katcham made me conscious of the fact that Social media takes a
psychological toll on us. Its user interface is designed for that, and equally to make it
addictive. Social media is weaponized by appealing to the user's emotions in order to control
our mental processes, and push us to act. People die because of comments on social media,
and the solution to that is avoiding being passive about what we see on social media. This
explains why in many countries social media is deactivated during elections to disable the
social media to press home their views. Online posts of anti-Biya protests in Geneva in June
2019 prompted MPs from the South – largely Biya loyalists – to accuse the Western diaspora,
who are generally regarded as Kamto supporters, of tribalism. Violence broke out among
Cameroon’s Ethno-political Tensions, On and Offline", 2022) Although this could easily be
counteracted by vigilance from users. Many fail to be critical of what they see on social
"Everyone has freedom of opinion and expression..." This means individuals on social media
have that liberty of carrying on their own rational will without external coercion. Equally this
freedom of speech, gives way for the usage of social media for valuable reasons. To illustrate,
during this ongoing Anglophone crisis in Cameroon, social media has been used multiple
times, to encourage unity and non-violence; as seen with the campaigns flooded the Internet
after the assassination of students. The Cameroon Anglophone crisis clearly underscores how
social media, a key development tool, can become a force for unity and mobilization on the
one hand – as evidenced by the mobilization of Anglophone Cameroonians across the world
– and a tool to manipulate and expose violence and injustice on the other. (Gikunda, 2022).
This interconnectedness is the fruit of globalisation because social media has broken
knowledge barriers of what happens around the world. As a result, to fight injustice, with the
help of social media, communities are not left of their own, and can call on the global
manipulative information. Such information evokes emotions in targets which can lead to
conflict, division and even violence. Nevertheless, not all information that triggers our
emotions on social media is its weaponization. On social media, everyone has the right to
express themselves. Also, social media is used for valuable reasons, such as fighting political
issues in a nation.
CONCLUSION
This engagement has permitted me to quench my curiosity about the weaponization of social
media by acquiring knowledge on the fact that social media is weaponized through the use of
false narratives and emotionally manipulative information that cause in the targets, division,
violence, and even can be fatal. The reasons social media is a suitable weapon, especially to
Extremism, are its easy access, the exposure to a wide audience, and weak regulations that
they are created with. Nevertheless, given the wide spread of this weaponization, social
media platforms are taking action to make it harder for social media to be weaponized. This
can be seen through the control and regulation of content, and deactivation of harmful
accounts. In Spite of all that I learned in my engagement, I acknowledge that further research,
and interviewing individuals with more diverse perspectives would have been more fruitful.
In a world where global politics has carved itself into every domain, like social media, it is
pivotal to us to analyze how this prevails because we are all affected by such situations in the
long run.
References
BBC News. (2022). Capitol riots timeline: The evidence presented against Trump. Retrieved
https://www.mercycorps.org/research-resources/weaponization-social-media
Statista. Statista. (2022). Facebook MAU worldwide 2021 | Retrieved 5 January 2022, from
https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-
worldwide/#:~:text=How%20many%20users%20does%20Facebook,the%20biggest
%20social%20network%20worldwide.
How Social Media Fuels Extremism — ACCO. ACCO. (2022). Retrieved 8 January 2022, from
https://www.counteringcrime.org/how-social-media-fuels-extremism.
Dangor, G. (2022). Facebook Is Removing Users Who Team Up To Harass Others And Spread
https://www.forbes.com/sites/graisondangor/2021/09/16/facebook-is-removing-users-
who-team-up-to-harass-others-and-spread-misinformation/?sh=43571b7c7f3f.
On and Offline. Crisis Group. (2022). Easing Cameroon’s Ethno-political Tensions, Retrieved 8
cameroons-ethno-political-tensions-and-offline.
Nations, U. (2022). Universal Declaration of Human Rights | United Nations. United Nations.
human-rights.
Gikunda, K. (2022). Social Media & Modern Day Conflicts - Cameroon - #defyhatenow.
modern-day-conflicts-cameroon/.