LEGAL FICTIONS-Unit II
LEGAL FICTIONS-Unit II
LEGAL FICTIONS-Unit II
Introduction:
e.g., In ancient Rome, where every family needed a male heir, the lack of one
was overcome through the legal fiction of adoption.
In England, when courts handling civil cases were full, the Court of Queen’s (or
King’s) Bench, a criminal court, could take some of the load by pretending that the
defendant in a simple civil suit had been arrested and was in custody.
A legal fiction is a fact assumed or created by courts, which is then used in order
to help reach a decision or to apply a legal rule.
Adoption:
Child adoption is a legal fiction in that the adoptive parents become the legal
parents, notwithstanding the lack of a biological relationship. Once an order or
1
judgment of adoption is entered, the biological parents become legal strangers to
the child, legally no longer related nor with any rights related to the child.
Conversely, the adoptive parents are legally considered to be parents of the
adopted child. A new birth certificate reflecting this is issued, which is a legal
fiction.
Legal fiction continued to develop through the works of scholars in the modern
era. Lon L. Fuller, a notable legal scholar in the 1930s, emphasized the role of
legal fictions in achieving justice and maintaining legal coherence. Fuller
advocated for judicious use of legal fictions, highlighting potential risks like
undermining predictability and eroding public trust. He stressed the importance
of balancing the use of legal fictions with the need for clarity and consistency
in legal principles.
2
Legal fictions are intentional constructs by the courts or legislatures,
while presumptions are based on probabilities and evidence within legal
proceedings. Overall, legal fiction has evolved as a tool to address the
complexities of law and achieve justice in varying legal contexts.
2. Creating the fiction: The court invents a fictional assumption about the
situation. This assumption is not presented as a real fact, but rather as a necessary
tool for resolving the case.
3. Applying the fiction: With the created fiction in place, the court can now apply
existing legal principles in a way that aligns with the desired outcome and
promotes justice.
Example:
Identifying the issue: Imagine a case where a person A, enters another person's
property without permission. According to the strict application of the existing
trespass laws, the property owner has the right to take legal action against A.
However, there is a unique circumstance: A entered the property believing there
was an imminent threat to his life due to a misunderstanding.
Creating the fiction: To address the issue, the court may create a legal fiction
acknowledging that in certain cases, an individual may be justified in trespassing
if they reasonably believe their life is in danger. This legal fiction does not change
the fact that A trespassed but introduces a fictional assumption that, under
specific circumstances, trespassing might be excused if done to protect one's life.
Applying the fiction: With the legal fiction in place, the court can now consider
the circumstances surrounding A's trespass. They may evaluate whether A
3
reasonably believed his life was in danger and whether his actions were
proportionate to the perceived threat. Applying the legal fiction, the court can then
interpret the existing self-defence laws to justify or mitigate the consequences of
A's trespass.
• Corporation as a Person: Men may come and men may go but the co.
shall go on forever.
1. Presumption of Innocence:
4
• Legal Fiction: Presuming an accused person is innocent until
proven guilty.
This fiction places the burden of proof on the prosecution to establish guilt
and protects individuals from being treated as guilty before a fair trial.
3. Fiction of Jurisdiction:
This allows for the continuity of legal relationships and obligations even
when there is a change in officeholders.
5
• Legal Fiction: Assuming that the compensation offered for property
taken under eminent domain is just and fair.
This fiction allows the government to acquire private property for public use
while providing owners with what is deemed fair compensation, even if
owners may disagree on the fairness of the amount.
Legal fictions are versatile tools used in various legal systems to address
complexities, fill gaps, and achieve practical outcomes in the administration of
justice. They often serve as pragmatic solutions to legal challenges and help
maintain stability within the legal framework.
1. Age of Consent: The legal fiction of age of consent is applied to determine when
a girl is capable of giving consent to sexual activity, which varies from 16 to 18
years depending on the specific law and state.
2. Marital Rape Exception: The legal fiction that a wife is presumed to have
consented to sexual activity with her husband is embedded in the exemption of
marital rape from criminal prosecution under certain circumstances.
4. Dowry Deaths: The legal fiction of “dowry deaths” presumes that if a woman
dies within a certain time frame of marriage and evidence suggests harassment or
6
cruelty related to dowry, it is deemed as murder or suicide by the husband or in-
laws.
6. Age of Marriage: The legal fiction of a minimum age of marriage for women is
established to protect young girls from early marriage, which can have
detrimental effects on their health, education, and overall well-being.
Case Laws:
7
1. Corporation as a Person:
• Commissioner of Income Tax v. S.N. Khosla (1987): The court used the
relation back doctrine to treat capital gains arising from the sale of shares
as having accrued in an earlier year, allowing the taxpayer to avail tax
benefits.
3. Lost Grant:
• State of Bihar v. Sri Radha Krishna Singh: In this case, the Supreme
Court of India discussed the concept of legal fiction in the context of
interpreting statutory provisions related to land acquisition. The court
emphasized the importance of giving effect to legal fictions created by the
legislature while also ensuring that such fictions are not extended beyond
their intended purpose.
8
under the Bombay Sales Tax Act. The court held that for the purpose of
sales tax, when certain transactions are deemed to have occurred, they must
be treated as actual transactions, even if they did not occur in reality, to
prevent tax evasion and ensure the effectiveness of the tax legislation.