Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views4 pages

Lesson 2.4

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 4

ScSc12n – Readings in Philippine History

Department of Liberal Arts and Behavioral Sciences


Visayas State University

Lesson 2.4: Historical Source during the


Period of Reforms and Propaganda

Lesson Summary
This lesson will be focused on the events that took place during the reforms
and propaganda period, during the last twenty years of Spanish dominion in the
Philippines. The selected texts included in this study are some works made by
Marcelo H. del Pilar – one of the great Filipino propagandists.

Learning Outcomes
At the end of this lesson, you are expected to:
1. Describe the condition of the Philippines during the period of
propaganda and reform movement.
2. Dissect and analyze works of Marcelo H. del Pilar.
3. Recognize the importance of the works of the propagandists in the
formation of the concept of nationhood and the fight for freedom and
independence.

Motivation Question

Have you ever heard the saying “the pen is mightier than
a sword”?
Does it hold to the present time?
Would you believe that once upon a time in
Philippine history, people were fighting for
their beliefs using words and their
writings?
How well do you know the reform and propaganda movement?

Discussion
The propaganda period (circa 1880-1895) is known to be the awakening
era during Spanish colonial rule. Because of the opening of Canal Suez in 1869,
Filipinos learned more about the world at large. International trade in the
Philippines became profitable which made some Filipino families richer. More
and more could afford to study locally and in Europe. Hence, during this time,
those who were educated gained the desire for freedom and improvement in
ScSc12n – Readings in Philippine History
Department of Liberal Arts and Behavioral Sciences
Visayas State University

their lives. More importantly, the unjust execution of GomBurZa in 1872 due to
the secularization movement became the turning point for reforms. The lack of
representation in the Spanish Cortes made Filipinos cry for justice and demand
human rights. People became discontented because they remained poor and
burdened with heavy taxes.
Together with liberal Spaniards, the propagandists raised their
demands for assimilation, good governance, and representation in the Cortés.
The newspaper La Solidaridad and the formation of masonic organizations
were the platforms of their reforms waged by the ilustrados. These
propagandists/reformists were composed of young Filipino students and
graduates who belonged to the Filipino intelligentsia. The most notable among
them were Dr. Jose P. Rizal, Marcelo H. del Pilar, and Graciano Lopez-Jaena,
among others. They preferred to stay in the foreign lands for they could freely
express their sentiments. In their campaign for reforms, the ilustrados
persevered to rectify the racist images claimed by Spanish writers about the
Philippines and its people (Teodora, 1999).
Interestingly, the propagandists, governors-general, monarchy, bishops,
and indios had the same common enemy—the friars. Those Spanish officers
who complained to the King of Spain regarding friars’ slavery of indios and
power in the Philippines over them were either assassinated or imprisoned,
e.g., Gov.-gen. Diego de Salcedo, Gov.-gen. Fernando Manuel de Bustamante,
etc. Meanwhile, Dr. Rizal even referred the friars “as myopic pygmies who,
assured of the present, to fail to project their vision into the future.” With all
their power and religious influence, the friars in the Philippines controlled the
Filipinos and Spanish officials ensuring their importance in the archipelago.
Hence, the condition during his time has no sense of nationalism due to a
chaotic society.
However, the reformers/propagandists believed in the power of words
and not the swords in achieving their purpose. A good example of anti-friar
writing was the work of Marcelo H. del Pilar, reprinted as Monastic Supremacy
in the Philippines (1958). This pamphlet condemned the friars for their corrupt
teachings which had resulted in a life of poverty and misery of the Filipinos. To
conceal his real identity from the Spaniards, he wrote under the pen name—
Plaridel. His work was hailed by Spanish liberals and former Spanish
administrators such as governor-general Emilio Terrero (1885-1888), director-
general of the Civil Administration, Benigno Quiroga, scholars like Miguel
Morayta and Ferdinand Blumentritt, and Dr. Jose Rizal. The latter called del
Pilar's work as one that had “no chaff; it is all grain.”
Marcelo H. del Pilar is considered as the greatest journalist of the
propaganda movement. He was born in Barrio Kupang, Bulacan on August 30,
1850. He studied at the College of San Jose and later at the University of Santo
Tomas where he finished law degree in 1850. Marcelo also founded the short-
lived Diariong Tagalog. He tried to arouse the consciousness of the Filipinos to
act as a unified people. Unlike Dr. Rizal, he used the Tagalog language in
fighting against abusive Spaniards. When they ordered his arrest, he left the
country for Spain in October 1888. He became the editor of La Solidaridad.
ScSc12n – Readings in Philippine History
Department of Liberal Arts and Behavioral Sciences
Visayas State University

Monastic Supremacy in the Philippines

The Catholic Church in the Philippines has two types of priests; secular
and regular priests. The secular priests did not belong to any religious order.
They were Filipinos who were just trained to run parishes under the supervision
of the bishops. On the other hand, regular priests belong to religious orders
such as Franciscans, Jesuits, etc. Their main task is to spread Christianity.
However, the friars believed that they answer to no one; not to the bishop, and
even not to the King of Spain who ruled in the Philippines. This means that friars
transgressed against the highest political and religious authorities of the
archipelago. According to del Pilar:
“Monasticism is cosmopolitan; it has no country; it is not Spanish;
and to support its ascendancy at the expense of the popular element
would be to subject to a very severe test the endurance of the Filipino
people.”
Nonetheless, Filipinos’ loyalty always belonged to the Spanish flag, e.g.,
Dutch threats, British threats, Chinese uprising. To refresh the fraternity
between Spain and the Philippines, Juan Luna painted the blood compact
between Legazpi and Sicatuna in1886. But of all these efforts and proofs of
loyalty, Spain had surrendered her sovereignty to the monastic orders. As a
result, the friars imposed their dominance on the government with their excuse
of eliminating the treachery of the Filipino people for over three centuries.

Prayers and Mockeries

MH del Pilar has greatly detested the friars who were taking the reins
of the country. In 1888, he published “Dasalan at Tocsohan” (Prayers and
Mockeries). It is a sarcastic and satirical presentation of the prayers taught by
the friars to the catholic Filipinos. Two of these include Amain Namin, a parody
of Ama Namin (Our Father), and Aba Guinoong Baria, a parody of Aba Guinoong
Maria (Hail Mary).

Amain Namin
Amain naming sumasaconvento ka,
sumpain ang ngalan mo,
malayo sa amin ang kasakiman mo,
quitlin ang liig mo dito sa lupa para nang sa langit.
Saulan mo cami ngayon nang aming kaning iyong inaraoarao
at patauanin mo cami sa iyong pagungal
para nang pag papataua mo kung cami'y nacucualtahan;
at huag mo kaming ipahintulot sa iyong manunukso
at iadya mo cami sa masama mong dila.
Amen.

Aba Guinoong Baria


Aba guinoong Baria
nakapupuno ka nang alcancia
ang Fraile'I sumasainyo
ScSc12n – Readings in Philippine History
Department of Liberal Arts and Behavioral Sciences
Visayas State University

bukod ka niyang pinagpala't pina higuit sa lahat,


pinagpala naman ang kaban mong mapasok.
Santa Baria Ina nang Deretsos,
ipanalangin mo caming huag anitan ngayon
at cami ipapatay.
Siya naua.

Death and Legacy

Del Pilar's difficulties increased when the money to support the


newspaper was exhausted and still, there was no sign of any immediate
response from the Spanish ruling class. He skipped many meals that made him
disillusioned. Before he died from Tuberculosis, he rejected the assimilationist
stand and began planning for an armed revolt. He vigorously affirmed:
“Insurrection is the last remedy, especially when the people have acquired the
belief that peaceful means to secure the remedies for evils prove futile.” This
idea inspired Andres Bonifacio's Katipunan, a secret revolutionary organization
after Dr. Rizal was arrested in 1892.

You might also like