Garson 2000
Garson 2000
Garson 2000
2015
Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ at UNIV OF ULSTER AT COLERAINE on May 14, 2015
2016 Circulation April 25, 2000
This proposal also eliminates preapproval requirements. plan, 4 potential sources of revenue could more than cover the
Using ACC/American Heart Association and other evidence- costs; some are more palatable than others. These include the
based guidelines as models (or even using the plan’s own following:
“best practice” protocols), each plan would embed its own
guidelines in patients’ electronic records. Instant feedback 1. Federal and state governments already pay $23.5 billion
would be available. for non-Medicaid services to the uninsured.
Payments to plans would also be simplified. Plans would 2. Even a two-thirds reduction in bad debt and charity care
receive from the regional agencies severity-adjusted premi- (currently spent on the uninsured) would save $17
ums representing the median costs for patients with specific billion.
conditions, as automatically downloaded from the electronic 3. Insurance premiums paid by employers with more than
medical record. “True-up” adjustments would be made each 10 employees that currently do not provide health care
quarter for new patients and patients no longer in the plan. could fund $43.9 billion.
4. Automation, elimination of preapproval requirements,
Problem 5: Quality of Health Care Is not and other innovations could increase billing efficiency
by 50% and could save insurers $27.2 billion, hospitals
Consistently Measured, Reported, Understood, $17 billion, and physicians $6.9 billion.
or Used in Decision-Making
Principle 5: Quality Will Become Increasingly With the 2010 plan, patients would gain guaranteed cov-
Important; Emphasis on erage access, choice, and improved care; those with potential
Patient-Physician Relationship heart disease would particularly benefit from universal cov-
By 2010, patients will be able to create their own personal- erage because they would have access to preventive care.
ized report cards from the Internet; for those who cannot do Businesses could concentrate on business, not benefits. Even
it themselves, a new “quality interpreter” business—similar those contributing toward employees’ coverage for the first
to H & R Block—would flourish. time would benefit thanks to healthier employees. Insurers
In the next 10 years, outcomes for common conditions will would benefit by receiving payments that are based on the
be increasingly similar across plans. As a result, plans would severity of patients’ conditions. Physicians could spend time
compete on the basis of innovations in prevention and care. on patient care rather than administrative tasks.
More important, they will compete on physician-patient How do we get there? We can push for electronic medical
relationships. Quality would be a 2-way street: healthy
records, severity-adjusted premiums, and the collection of
behavior could win patients lower co-payments or premiums.
data for evidence-based medicine; we can also help our
patients recognize true quality. Most important, we can
Problem 6: Financing
acknowledge the need for change in the system. Unless
Principle 6: New Expense for Uninsured Paid by physicians get involved, we will have to live with the choices
Redirecting Current Revenue, New Revenue, and others make for us. We must do something.
Increased Efficiency For more information, visit the ACC Web site at
Guaranteeing basic health care for all will be expensive.
http://www.acc.org
Covering the uninsured would cost an estimated $88.6 billion
in today’s dollars.
Over the next 10 years, a number of possible ways of KEY WORDS: healthcare reform 䡲 healthcare system 䡲 health policy
paying for the uninsured will become apparent. In the 2010 䡲 future of healthcare 䡲 uninsured
Circulation. 2000;101:2015-2016
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.16.2015
Circulation is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231
Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
Print ISSN: 0009-7322. Online ISSN: 1524-4539
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the
World Wide Web at:
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/101/16/2015
Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published
in Circulation can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial
Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located,
click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about
this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document.