Block-2 - Awareness Responsibility & Compliance
Block-2 - Awareness Responsibility & Compliance
Block-2 - Awareness Responsibility & Compliance
THE PEOPLE'S
UNIVERSITY Environmental Law
Indira Gandhi National Open University
School of Interdisciplinary and and Management
Trans-disciplinary Studies
AWARENESS RESPONSIBILITY
AND COMPLIANCE 2
MEV-003
Environmental Law
and Management
Indira Gandhi National Open University
School of Interdisciplinary and
Trans-disciplinary Studies
Block
2
AWARENESS, RESPONSIBILITY AND
COMPLIANCE
UNIT 1
Social and Civil Society Movements In India 5
UNIT 2
Environmental Ethics 18
UNIT 3
Biosafety 29
UNIT 4
Corporate Sector and Environment 46
PROGRAMME DESIGN AND EXPERT COMMITTEE
Dr. (Ms.) Shyamala Mani Dr. Rachna Agarwal Dr. Sushmitha Baskar Dr. Deeksha Dave
Professor, National Institute of School of Vocational Education Environmental Studies Environmental Studies, School
Urban Affairs (NIUA) India Habitat and Training, Indira Gandhi School of Interdisciplinary and of Interdisciplinary and Trans-
Centre New Delhi National Open University, New Trans-disciplinary Studies disciplinary Studies,
Delhi Indira Gandhi National Open Indira Gandhi National Open
Prof. R. Baskar University, New Delhi University, New Delhi
Department of Environmental Prof. Daizy R Batish
Science & Engineering, Guru Department of Botany, Panjab Prof. Ruchika Kuba Dr. Shubhangi Vaidya
Jambheshwar University of University, Chandigarh School of Health Sciences, Indira School of Interdisciplinary and
Science & Technology, Hisar Gandhi National Open University, Trans-disciplinary Studies, Indira
Haryana Prof. M. Krishnan New Delhi Gandhi National Open University
Vice Chancellor, Madurai Kamraj New Delhi
Prof. H.J. Shiva Prasad University, Madurai, Tamil Nadu Prof. Nandini Sinha Kapur
Professor of Civil Engineering School of Interdisciplinary and Dr. Y.S.C. Khuman
College of Technology, G.B. Pant Dr. Chirashree Ghosh Trans-disciplinary Studies, School of Interdisciplinary and
University of Agriculture & Technology Department of Environmental Indira Gandhi National Open Trans-disciplinary Studies, Indira
Pant Nagar, Uttarakhand Studies, University of Delhi, University, New Delhi Gandhi National Open University
New Delhi New Delhi
Dr. T.K. Joshi Dr. Shachi Shah
Director, Occupational & Mr. Ravi Agarwal Environmental Studies, Dr. Sadananda Sahoo
Environmental Programme, Centre Director, Toxic Link, Jangpura School of Interdisciplinary and School of Interdisciplinary and
for Occupational & Environmental Extension, New Delhi Trans-disciplinary Studies Trans-disciplinary Studies, Indira
Health, Maulana Azad Medical Indira Gandhi National Open Gandhi National Open University
Prof. Jaswant Sokhi New Delhi
College, New Delhi School of Sciences, Indira Gandhi University, New Delhi
Prof. Nilima Srivastava National Open University, Dr. V. Venkat Ramanan
School of Gender and Development New Delhi Environmental Studies
Studies, Indira Gandhi National Dr. B. Rupini School of Interdisciplinary and
Open University, New Delhi Environmental Studies, School Trans-disciplinary Studies
of Interdisciplinary and Trans- Indira Gandhi National Open
Prof. S.K. Yadav University, New Delhi
School of Agriculture disciplinary Studies, Indira Gandhi
Indira Gandhi National Open National Open University,
University, New Delhi New Delhi
PROGRAMME COORDINATORS
Dr. B. Rupini, Environmental Studies, School of Dr. Sushmitha Baskar Prof. Ruchika Kuba
Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies, Environmental Studies, School of School of Health Sciences,
Indira Gandhi National Open University, Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies, Indira Gandhi National Open
New Delhi Indira Gandhi National Open University, University, New Delhi
New Delhi
FORMAT EDITORS
Dr. B. Rupini Dr. Sushmitha Baskar
Environmental Studies, School of Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies, School of Interdisciplinary and Trans-
and Trans-disciplinary Studies, Indira Gandhi disciplinary Studies, Indira Gandhi National Open University,
National Open University, New Delhi New Delhi
Secretarial/Technical Assistance: Ms. Sonali, SOITS, IGNOU, New Delhi; Mr. Vikram, SOITS, IGNOU. New Delhi
PRINT PRODUCTION
Mr. S. Burman Mr. Y. N. Sharma Mr. Sudhir
Deputy Registrar (P), IGNOU, New Delhi Asst. Registrar (P), IGNOU, New Delhi Section Officer (P) IGNOU, New Delhi
February, 2019
Indira Gandhi National Open University, 2019
ISBN: 987-93-88498-86-9
All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any form, by mimeograph or any other means, without permission in writing from the
Copyright holder.
Further information on the IGNOU courses may be obtained from the University’s office at Maidan Garhi, New Delhi or the official website of IGNOU
at www.ignou.ac.in
Printed and published on behalf of IGNOU, New Delhi by Registrar, MPDD, IGNOU, New Delhi.
Laser Typeset by Rajshree Computers, V-166A, Bhagwati Vihar, (Near Sec. 2, Dwarka), New Delhi
Printed at:
BLOCK 2 INTRODUCTION
Block 2 is Awareness, Responsibility and Compliance. This block consists of
4 units.
Unit 1 discussed about Social and Civil Society Movement in India. It introduces
you the social and civil society movements in environment. It pronounced The
Bishnoi Movement as one of the earliest Environmental movement which
concerned for Environmental Protection, ensures improvement in the living
conditions of the desert community in Rajasthan. How Colonial India witnessed
forest policies, tribal land displacement and deprivation of livelihood of Adivasi
was depicted. It elaborated the environmental movements of contemporary India
like Chipko Movement, Narmada Bachao Andolan movements to protest against
destruction of natural resources conservation.
Unit 2 highlighted the Environmental Ethics relates to our moral obligation
towards the environment. There are several approaches to environmental ethics
viz., anthropocentricism, biocentrism and ecocentrism. Due to increasing
apprehensions regarding environment and the growing awareness about the
impact of human activities, there is a growing realization that environmental ethics
has enormous scope. The environment is not something which we can remove
oneself from. Human beings have started realizing that they have a right to
healthy and safe environment. The unit explained the meaning of environmental
ethic, environmental justice and the role of indigenous knowledge in protecting
our ancient wisdom on environment. When a person realizes his environmental
obligations he is able to think how an action or an event affects the entire range
of environmental settings. For example, climate change which affects the world
in various different ways. Further, the lifestyle of a person also impacts the
environment and the future generations must be taken care of while consuming
the limited resources present on the earth. The unit explains that it is not just
the numbers but the ways of living of population which has a role in deteriorating
the environment of a particular place.
Unit 3 we have studied about biosafety. Biological hazards differ from all other
kinds of hazards in the that the biological agents can grow and multiply in the
host organism causing diseases. The pathogenic microbes are a cause of concern
for the human health, plant and animal health. They have the potential to cause
diseases with tremendous economic and environmental consequences. The
chapter details about containment, the biosafety levels and biosafety cabinets
used. The unit also introduces the learner to GMOs and LMOs, their benefits
and concerns and the biosafety guidelines.
Unit 4 You have studied about the influence of business organizations and their
operations on environment and its various functions. Traditional business models
focused on wealth creation by today there is a growing realization that natural
resources are the base of every business. Now-a-days, not only the corporate
sector but the consumers are also vigilant about their ecological footprint and
are keen to go for green buying and eco-friendly purchases. Despite the hype
over green consumerism, it is still at a beginner stage and not yet in a position
to influence the society and make the people environmentally responsible.
However, in many cases there is a lack of will to purchase the green products.
Only a handful of the consumers go out of their way to make green choices.
The unit also explained the environmental dimension of corporate social
responsibility.
Awareness, Responsibility
and Compliance
4
UNIT 1 SOCIAL AND CIVIL SOCIETY
MOVEMENTS IN INDIA
Structure
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Objectives
1.2 Ecology and History in Ancient India.
1.3 Early Environmental Movement in India: The Bishnoi Movement in
Medieval Western Rajasthan.
1.4 Bishnoi Philosophy of Conservation of Vegetation and Movement for
Environmental Protection.
1.5 Colonial India: Forest Policies, Tribal Land Displacement and
Deprivation of Livelihood of the Adivasis.
1.6 Routine Revolts by Tribes of Forests.
1.7 Forest Act of 1865, 1878, 1972 and 1935. The Case-study of Bastar in
Pre-independence and Post-policing of Forest Land and Increasing Rural
Taxation.
1.8 Van Mahotsava is Independent India: The National Forest Policies of
1952 and 1988.
1.9 Environmental Movements in Contemporary India: Chipko Movement,
Narmada Bachao, Andolan and Appiko.
1.10 Let Us Sum Up
1.11 Key Words
1.12 References and Suggested Further Readings
1.13 Answers to Check Your Progress
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Archaeological history and anthropological evidences clearly indicate that
human civilization shaped the contours of natural environment throughout the
centuries. From pre-historic times to the colonial times, society and state shaped
the contours of natural environment for the economic growth and sustainability
of a growing India civilization and state-societies. In this introduction, here
we are not arguing against or in favor of agricultural expansion versus
environmental movements. Here is a brief historical narrative of the causative
factors for the emergence of social and civil movements for conservation of
natural environment.
1.1 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you should be able to:
define the social and civil society movements in Environment; 5
Awareness, Responsibility
and Compliance describe a brief history of movement for conservation of natural
environment; and
explain about environmental activities in contemporary India.
This part of this chapter contains four major sections. In the first two the general
history of tribal revolts in colonial and then post-colonial India are discussed.
In the final two, broad trends within the kingdom of Bastar, again in the colonial
and post-colonial periods are listed.
State control, which was a critical feature of the 1878 Forest Act, also facilitated
the development of scientific forestry. Dietrich Brandis was the first Inspector
General of Forests, and is considered the founder of modern forestry; indeed,
he is often paid tribute as the ‘Father of Indian Forestry’ (Chaturvedi, 1998).
Brandis was a botanist from Bonn University, and Germany was considered
the leading European country in forest management in colonial times. One of
the first tasks undertaken by the newly-formed Forest Department was to survey
and map the forests of India. Forests were demarcated so that working plans
could be formulated (Sagreiya, 1967).
11
Awareness, Responsibility
and Compliance According to the 1878 Forest Act, three types of forest were to be designated;
Reserved, protected, and village. Reserved forests were supposed to be the
most commercially valuable and amenable to sustained exploitation. Overall
state control of reserved forests was sought, which meant relinquishment, or
transferral of other claims and rights, limited access was granted. Legally,
channels to contest the reservation of forests existed, though rural communities
had little experience with legal procedures. Protected forests were similarly
state controlled, but some concessions were granted, conditional to the
reservation of commercial tree species, when they became valuable. Protected
forests could also be closed to fuel wood collection and grazing, whenever it
was considered necessary. As timber demand for empire increased, the state
had granted limited control itself to be inadequate, thus many protected forests
were re-designated as reserved forests. The act also provided for a third
designation of forests in its constitution, village forests, which according to
Gadgil and Guha (1992), was not under the control of the colonial government
over most of India. The area of forest appropriated by the state in 1878 was
14,000 square miles, which had increased to 81,400 and 3300 square miles,
for reserved and protected forests respectively, by 1900 (Stebbing, 1922). In
east era India, state appropriation of forest land let to the dispossession of
adivasi communities’ ancestral land. In the Singhbum District of Bihar, large-
scale encroachment by the Forest Department in the late nineteenth century
displaced the Ho tribe from their villages in an attempt to demarcate a reserve
forest. The reservation was criticized leading to conflict between the Ho and
Forest Department which escalated into a ‘tree war’, one that still periodically
erupts (Corbridge and Jewitt, 1997).
The Forest Acts, passed by the colonial administration in 1865 (Indian Forest
Act), 1927 and 1935 resulted in military, strategic and administrative control
of tribal and forests criminal tribe Act of 1871 was yet another important step
towards absolute control of tribal habitat and their resources.
Gandhi Ji situated his views of conservation of natural environmental in the
context of urbanization, factor system and nebulous industrialization. For the
ideal India lived in an ideal village in natural setting. India witnessed two
national forest policies in post-independent India: The National Forest Policy
of 1952 and the National Forest Policy of 1988.
Eventually, the dam reservoir started filling up in 2004, and on 31 July 2004
he was finally evacuated to a new accommodation at Koti, a little hillock,
along the Bhagirathi where he lives today, continues his environment work.
Narmada Bachao Andolan is one of the most powerful mass movements, which
started in 1985 against the construction of huge dam on the Narmada River.
Narmada is the India’s largest west flowing river, which supports a large number
of people with unique culture and tradition ranging from the indigenous (tribal)
people inhabited in the jungles here to the large number of village folk. The
proposed Sardar Sarovar Dam and Narmada Sagar will displace more than
250,000 people. The struggle is over the resettlement or the rehabilitation of
these people. The two proposals are already under construction, supported by
US$550 million loan by the World Bank. There are plans to build over 3000
big and small dams along the river.
It is multi crore project that will generate a big revenue for the government.
The supporters are of the view that it will produce 1450 MW of electricity and
pure drinking water to 40 million people covering thousand of villages and
towns. Some of the dams have been already been completed such as Tawa and
Bargi Dams. But it is environmentally not suitable say this hydro project will
devastate human lives and bio diversity by destroying thousands of acres of
forests and agricultural land. On the other hand it will deprive thousands of
people of their livelihood. They believe that the water and energy could be
provided to the people through alternative technological means that would be
ecologically beneficial.
14
Led by one of the well-know environmentalists Medha Patkar, it has now been Social and Civil Society
Movements In India
turned into the International protest, gaining support from NGO’S all around
the globe. Protestors are agitating the issue through the mass media, hunger
strikes, massive marches and rallies and the through the on screen of several
documentary films. Protests have been protesting peacefully, but peaceful they
been harassed, arrested and beaten up by the police several times. The Narmada
Bachao Andolan has been pressurizing the World Bank to withdraw its loan
from the project through media.
Appiko Movement in Karnataka
Vandana Shiva, has pointed out that the people’s struggle against commercial
forest policy has been significant in the region of Uttara Kannada. The
destruction of tropical natural forests has caused irreversible changes in the
ecosystem of the forests. The desiccation of mixed species denied people’s
access to biomass for fodder, fertilizer and other resource. ‘The clear felling of
natural forests has led to severe soil erosion and drying up of perennial water
resources. Moved by the destruction of essential ecological processes, the youth
of Salkani village in Sirsi launched a Chipko movement, which was locally
known as “Appiko Chaluvali”. They embraced the trees which were to be
felled by contractors of the forest depart-ment’ (quoting article shared by Puja
Mondal, Appiko Movement in India: useful notes).
The protest within the forest continued for 38 days and finally the felling orders
were withdrawn. The success of this agitation spread to other places and the
movement has now been launched in eight areas covering the entire Sirsi forest
division in Uttara Kannada and Shimoga districts.
Check Your Progress 1
Note: a) Write your answer in about 50 words.
b) Check your progress with possible answers given at the end of the
unit.
1. Give an introductory note to the human intervention and civilization
activities in changing the natural land-scope through the centuries.
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
2. How did the Bishnoi Philosophy conserve the natural resource of the Thar
Desert?
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
3. How did British Colonialism interface with the livelihood of the tribal
and forest communities?
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
15
..............................................................................................................
Awareness, Responsibility
and Compliance 4. Give a brief outline of the National Forest Policy of 1952 and the National
Forest Policy of 1988 with reference to Van Mahotsava in India.
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
2.0 INTRODUCTION
Man has always tried to build a mutual relationship with nature in spite of the
fact during the course of evolution, the environment has been altered. Human
beings have satisfied their needs taking the resources from the planet and
altogether making attempts to renew those resources. Today also we need to
understand the value of precious natural resources and unique nature’s services
and functions. Therefore it is our responsibility to see that the planet remains
habitable not only for us but for the other living organisms as well. This notion
has given rise to the concept of environmental ethics. It is the moral
responsibility of the individuals to act according to his knowledge and
capabilities for the welfare of the society and communities. Therefore ethics
play an important role in our society. Individuals who are committed to protect
the earth are making significant changes in their lifestyles so as to reduce their
personal impact. In this unit you will learn more about environmental ethics
and several principles pertaining to it. The importance of indigenous knowledge
and essentials of development practices are also discussed in this unit.
2.1 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you will be able to
Define environmental ethics;
18
explain the principles of environmental ethics;
justify safe environment as a human right; and Environmental Ethics
Climate Justice
The term climate justice denotes a term to consider global warming as an
ethical and political issue, rather than one treating it as environmental or
physical issue. We have been discussing climate change as an
environmental issue with focus on emissions, rising temperatures and
melting ice and so on so forth but in all these discussions we missed out a
very important component i.e. the people. Climate justice thus recognises
the human dimension of climate change and helps us to understand the
challenges faced by the communities most vulnerable to climate change.
The people who are affected are generally the ones who contribute least
towards climate change. This injustice can be corrected by taking suitable
measures like achieving zero carbon economy and providing equal rights
of development to all.
There are three primary theories regarding environmental ethics. They are as
follows:
Anthropocentrism: Anthropocentrism view opines that human comfort and
happiness is the overall environmental responsibility. It argues that human
beings are the most important entities of the universe and so the assumption
here is that human beings can utilize and exploit the environment for their
interests and making their lives better. Therefore, environment is crucial to
their existence and hence it is the duty of human beings to protect the nature
and must ensure the sustainability and longevity of human life on this planet.
The anthropocentric view is considered to be responsible for causing global
warming, pollution, water scarcity, loss of biodiversity and many other
problems.
Biocentrism: Biocentrism believes that all forms of life are equal and according
to Natural rights, they have an inherent right to exist. It is an ethical point of
view and applies to all living things. Roots of biocentric ethics lies in our
ancient culture and religions. Worshipping of animals and protection of trees
has been extensively described in our traditions and historical accounts.
However, there are numerous challenges in practising biocentrism. It is too
demanding and even eating meat or even vegetables come under violation of
this approach. For this, some propose that distinction between basic and non
basic interests must be clearly made. For example, hunting of animals is
unethical but killing animals in self defence is considered appropriate.
Ecocentrism: Another approach to environmental responsibility is called
ecocentrism. It believes that environment must be protected considering moral
aspects and not because human beings are deriving some profit out of it. It is a
nature centred system of values unlike anthropocentricism which is basically
human centred. It differs from biocentrism in the sense that the abiotic
components of environment are also considered important under it. It believes
environment as a whole and humans have moral responsibility of protecting it.
Sacred Groves
India has a long tradition of conservation of natural resources by associating
local deities with them. Such areas which are preserved and where
unlawful activities are restricted are known as sacred groves. The size of
sacred groves varies from few trees to dense forests. Ancient communities
used to live near forests and rivers. Hence were considered pious. Any
harm to these resources was considered an act against God’s wish. Cutting
of trees and hunting of animals is strictly prohibited in these areas. By
this biodiversity conservation was carried out. Today also, there are various
places demarcated as sacred groves. It is considered as a biodiversity
conservation measure. These are sustainable measures adopted by local
communities. However, in today’s times, the sacred groves are on decline
due to deforestation and urbanization. Further, there is also a change in
the social beliefs of the people.
28
UNIT 3 BIOSAFETY
Structure
3.0 Introduction
3.1 Objectives
3.2 Containment
3.2.1 Types of Containment
3.2.2 Elements of Containment
3.3 BiosafetyLevels
3.4 Biological Safety Cabinets
3.5 GMOs and LMOs
3.5.1 Benefits and Controversies of GMOs & LMOs
3.5.2 Environmental, Human Health, Ethical and Socio-economic Concerns
3.5.3 Limitations of the Regulatory System in India
3.6 BiosafetyGuidelines
3.6.1 Rules For The Manufacture, Use, Import, Export & Storage of Hazardous
Microorganisms/ Genetically Engineered Organisms or Cells, 1989
3.6.2 The Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC)
3.6.3 The Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM)
3.6.4 Status of Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) in India
3.6.5 Codex Alimentarius Commission
3.6.6 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
3.6.7 World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreements
3.0 INTRODUCTION
Microbes can be harmless, beneficial or harmful pathogens. Some non-pathogenic
micro-organisms have been used in biotechnologyto produce enzymes, biofertilizers
in agriculture, probiotics, used in bioremediation or for fermentation in food production
and technology. The infectious or pathogenic microbes are a cause of concern for
the human health, plant and animal health. Theyhave the potential to cause diseases
with tremendous economic and environmental consequences. Further, viruses are
also a concern for environmental and human health.
Pathogenicityis the capacityof certain microbial strains to cause disease. It represents
a form of versatility that enables certain microbes to replicate within a specific host
and damage host cells. The outcome of the infection is dependent on (a) the properties
of the pathogen (virulence, invasiveness, toxic or allergenic effects) and (b) on the
host’s immunity.Accordingly, the pathogens can be classified as two basic types: (i)
primarypathogens that cause disease amonghealthyindividuals, and (ii) opportunistic 29
Awareness, Responsibility
and Compliance pathogens that cause disease onlyin those individuals who are compromised in their
immunity. Some etiological agents have been extensively cultured and studied. The
consequences of working with such agents can cause lab-associated-infections. Such
infections have been documented as early as the 1890s. They are at higher risk for
infection with certain microbial agents such as: Mycobacterium
tuberculosis, Brucella, hepatitis B virus. Biological hazards differ from other
hazards in one major significant wayi.e., the biological agents can grow and multiply
in the host organism causing diseases. Some examples of etiological agents typically
used in research or biomedical laboratories include microbes like: bacteria, viruses,
fungi, protozoa and multi-cellular parasites.
(b) Mode of Transmission and Host Range of the Agent: These factors may
be influenced by the existing levels of immunity, densityand movement of the
host population; the presence of appropriate vectors and standards of
environmental hygiene.
The WHO also underlines that the conditions prevailing in the geographical area in
which the microbes are handled should be addressed while assessing the various
criteria for classification.Also, individual governments should also decide to prohibit
certain pathogens from being imported or handled other than for urgent diagnostic
purposes (quarantine organisms).
Biosafetyrefers to reduce and eliminate the potential risks arising from biotechnology
and its products. It has been defined as “the avoidance of risk to human health
and safety, and to the conservation of the environment, as a result of the use
for research and commerce of infectious or genetically modified organisms”.
30
The scientific disciplines that revolve around biosafetystudies include subjects like: Biosafety
molecular biology, microbiology, plant breeding, genetics, plant pathology, agronomy,
weed science, entomology, ecology, etc. Biological hazards include pathogenic
microbes, toxins, venoms, human blood, body fluids, cells, tissues, recombinant
deoxyribonucleic acid, and genetically modified agents.
3.1 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you should be able to:
3.2 CONTAINMENT
Biohazard control is the management of biological hazards through proper application
of engineered containment and administrative controls. Containment refers to a series
of safety measures and methods for managing infectious agents in the laboratory.
The purpose of containment is basically to help reduce or eliminate human and
environmental exposure to potentiallyharmful infectious agents.
This refers to the practices, safety equipment and facilities appropriate for work
with defined and characterized strains of viable microorganisms not known to cause
disease in healthy adult humans. The laboratory is separate and scientific work is
conducted on open bench tops using standard microbiological practices. In this
level, no special containment equipment or facilitydesign is required. The laboratory
personnel have specific training in the procedures conducted in the lab and are
supervised by a scientist with general training in microbiology or a related science.
Further, a biological safety cabinet is also not required for work involving these
microbial agents.
This refers to the practices, safety equipment and facilities used for working with
indigenous moderate-risk microbial agents that are associated with human disease.
It differs from biosafety level 1 in the following aspects. The lab staff should have
specific training in handling pathogenic agents. They are instructed by competent
scientists and access to the lab is limited when work is being conducted. Extreme
precautions are taken with infectious agents; and certain procedures are conducted
in biological safety cabinets.
This refers to the practices, safety equipment and facilities used for working with
indigenous agents with a potential for respiratorytransmission that maycause serious
and potentially lethal infection. The primary and secondary barriers are highly
necessary to protect personnel in the contagious area, the community, and the
environment from exposure to these potentiallyinfectious agents.AClass II biological
safety cabinet is required for work involving these agents.
This refers to the practices, safety equipment and facilities used for working with
dangerous infectious agents that pose a high risk of life threatening disease. The lab
staff have specialized skills and training in handling extremely hazardous infectious
agents and the use of primaryand secondarycontainments and the laboratorydesign
32 characteristics. The lab staffs are supervised bycompetent scientists who are trained
and experienced in working with these dangerous agents. Access to the laboratory Biosafety
is strictly controlled by the laboratory director. The facility is either in a separate
building or in a controlled area within a building, which is completely isolated from
all other areas of the building. A Class III biological safety cabinet is required for
work involving these agents.
Biosafety Level of Potential Examples of Techniques used Safety equipment Facilities required
infectious agents Infectious agents required (Primary (Secondary
Levels
barriers) barriers)
Not reported to Bacillus subtilis, Standard None Open benchtop, sink
1 cause disease in E.coli, Naegleria microbiological
humans gruberi practices
Dangerous / exotic
Ebola zaire, Sin Level 3 All procedures Level 3
4 agents that pose a plus:Clothing change plus:Separate
Nombre Virus, conducted in Class I
high risk of life
Rift Valley Fever before entry into lab or II BSCs in building or isolated
threatening Shower on exit All zone Exhaust
combination with
disease. Aerosol- material vacuum, and
full-body, air-
transmitted lab decontaminated on decontamination
supplied, positive-
infections or exit from lab systems Additional
pressure personnel
related agents requirements as
suit
with unknown risk outlined in Biosafety
of transmission in Microbiological
and Biomedical
Laboratories
33
Awareness, Responsibility
and Compliance Check Your Progress 1
Note: a) Write your answer in about 50 words.
b) Check your progress with possible answers given at the end of the unit.
1. Define biosafety.
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
2. Explain the various types of biological containment.
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
3. Describe the different biosafety levels.
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
The Cartagena Protocol was negotiated under the auspices of the Convention of
Biological Diversity (CBD) in 1992. The Protocol provides rules for safe transfer,
handlingand disposal ofLivingModified Organisms(LMOs) or GeneticallyModified
Organisms (GMOs).
41
Awareness, Responsibility
and Compliance
3.8 KEY WORDS
Biosafety : It is a term used to describe the efforts to substantially reduce and
eliminate the potential risks arising from biotechnology and its
products. It has been defined as “the avoidance of risk to human
health and safety, and to the conservation of the environment, as
a result of the use for research and commerce of infectious or
genetically modified organisms”.
HEPA : The HEPA filter is the heart of the biological safety cabinet. It is a
disposable dry filter consisting of borosilicate microfibers cast
into a thin sheet. HEPA: high efficiency Particulate air: Modern
“American-convention” HEPA: 99.99% at 0.3 microns.
LMO : Living modified organisms. LMO may be defined as ‘Any living
organism that possesses a novel combination of genetic material
obtained through the use of modern biotechnology’ (The Cartagena
Protocol on Biosafety 2000). The term living modified organism
(LMO) is considered to be functionally the same as genetically
modified organism (GMO) (Secretariat of the Convention on
Biological Diversity (CBD Secretariat) 2013).
GMO : A Genetically Modified Organism is an organism whose genetic
material has been altered using recombinant DNA technology.
44 Environmental Concerns
Health and Safety Concerns Biosafety
Ethical Concerns
Socioeconomic Concerns
3. Your answer should include the following points:
The concerns related to biological safety have led to the development
of guidelines and regulations in various countries for research, testing,
safe use and handling of genetically modified foods (GMOs) and
their products. India is one of the earliest countries to establish a
biosafety system for the regulation of GMOs. In India, the
Environment and Protection Act was enacted in 1986 by the Ministry
of Environment & Forests (MoEF) for the protection and
improvement of environment. Under this act, the ‘Rules for
Manufacture, Use/Import/ Export & Storage Of Hazardous Micro
Organisms/ Genetically Engineered Organisms or Cells, 1989’ were
notified by MoEF through Notification No. 621 in Official Gazette
of Govt. of India on December 5, 1989.
The existing biosafety guidelines.
45
Awareness, Responsibility
and Compliance
UNIT 4 CORPORATE SECTOR AND
ENVIRONMENT
Structure
4.0 Introduction
4.1 Objectives
4.2 How Businesses Relate to Natural Environment?
4.3 Green Business
4.3.1 Meaning and Definition
4.3.2 Measures of Green Business
4.0 INTRODUCTION
It is interesting to discuss the role of business in environmental protection.
Today we live in a world, where greenhouse gases keep releasing, air and
water pollution is worsening and we continue to loose ecosystems like forests,
mangroves and coral reefs. The changing environmental conditions are a result
of the reckless exploitation of earth’s resources by various sectors including
the business organizations. However, as you know there is growing awareness
regarding protection of the environment. Many organizations are also playing
their role in reducing their footprint. In daily life, we often come across the
initiatives like water and energy conservation, recycling, minimising waste
production, etc. which are taken up by several business organizations. For
example, Fevicol has come out with ecofriendly adhesive and similarly
Samsung is offering environmentally friendly monitors using LED monitor
technology.
In this unit, you will study more about the role of business organizations in
environmental protection. Let us first understand the inter relationship between
business activities and environment.
46
Corporate Sector and
4.1 OBJECTIVES Environment