1 - Sample Assignment Group
1 - Sample Assignment Group
1 - Sample Assignment Group
RHB VS MAYBANK
PREPARED BY:
NAME STUDENT ID
MUHAMAD HAFIZUL AIMAN 2019848164
BIN MAT HUSSAIN
DAYANA AQILAH QUA BINTI 2019148119
AHMAD SHADIDUL QUA
SITI ASIAH BINTI ZAKARIA 2019585407
INTAN NOR DALILA BINTI
BADEROL HISSAM 2019185853
MAZWIN BINTI MD YUSOP 2019564651
TABLE OF CONTENT
NO TITTLE PAGE
1 Executive Summary 1
2 Introduction Of The Company 2
I. Industry Analysis 3–6
II. Strategy Analysis 7–8
3 Financial Analysis
I. Cash Flow Analysis 9 – 13
II. Fsa Tools (choose either or: common size or year 14 – 17
to year change or index)
III.Financial Ratios Analysis: Analyze and interpret the 18 – 25
selected ratios
4 Conclusion: by identifying the strength and weakness 26 – 27
5 Recommendation 28
This report to compare the financial operations and performance of Maybank and
RHB Bank Berhad from 2016 to 2020. The industry analysis, strategy analysis,
comparison analysis, common size analysis, financial ratios analysis, and cash flow
analysis will all be covered in this study.
In the analysis, We will compare the strategy and industry of Maybank and RHB
Bank Berhad from 2016 to 2020, and after completing a comparative analysis on a year-
to-year basis and using a common size analysis, we will evaluate the strengths and weak-
nesses based on the analysis.
The goal of creating this report is to get involved in financial analysis using
financial statements and other resources. Financial Statement Analysis (FSA) is a method
of analyzing financial statements in order to make sound business decisions. Financial
Statement Analysis converts a few raw financial data points from financial statements
into usable information that can be used to make decisions.
The goal is to learn about the company's performance and which company
outperforms the others. To begin, in order to understand the company's performance,
some analysis must be performed, including industry analysis, strategy analysis,
comparative analysis, common size analysis, financial ratios analysis, and cash flow
analysis. The next goal is to determine which company outperforms the others. The
ability to perform financial analysis aims to increase a company's profitability. The firm's
ability to generate income and sustain growth over the long and short term. In addition to
satisfying current debts, the firm's ability to sustain positive cash flow.
1
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
2.0 INTRODUCTION
MAYBANK
2
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
I. INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
3
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
4
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
5
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
6
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
7
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
8
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
Adjustments for:
Allowance for credit losses on loans, advances and financing 1,019,203 546,792 441,823 514,421 663,910
Allowance for credit losses on other financial assets 4,042 -319 935 0 0
Intangible assets:
- Gain on modification -4 0 0 0 0
Net unrealised loss on revaluation of financial assets at FVTPL and derivatives 32,586 14,809 -31,670 -25,783 -1,491
Dividend income from financial assets at FVOCI -4,404 -9,566 -2,656 -6,515 -5,481
Interest income from financial assets at FVTPL, financial assets at FVOCI and
-1,615,174 -1,632,200 -1,410,046 -1,325,812 -1,289,256
financial investments at amortised cost
Operating profit before working capital changes 1,215,457 1,155,410 1,675,024 1,530,694 735,312
Deposits and placements with banks and other financial institutions -4,098,229 -2,257,107 284,460 -1,636,510 142,239
Deposits and placements of banks and other financial institutions 5,635,585 1,606,605 -5,024,427 -143,922 3,288,763
Obligations on securities sold under repurchase agreements 995,764 651,676 1,532,470 -1,127,084 -2,018,989
Recourse obligation on loans sold to Cagamas -1,265,757 -1,730,120 1,266,271 -1,009,205 593,915
9
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
Net cash generated from operating activities 3,218,462 2,632,137 4,084,433 -4,773,496 2,996,845
Net purchase of financial assets at FVOCI and financial investments at amortised cost -1,689,715 -4,551,513 -2,861,030 2,484,657 -698,341
Intangible assets:
Dividend income received from financial assets at FVOCI 4,404 9,566 2,656 6,515 5,481
Net cash generated from/(used in) investing activities 241,860 -3,158,350 -2,118,341 4,416,652 -3,240,089
Proceeds from issuance of senior debt securities 300,000 1,255,580 0 -2,173,766 2,242,600
Dividends paid to equity holders of the Bank -741,858 -1,022,562 -701,758 -481,205 -200,502
Net cash used in financing activities -936,550 -2,804,011 -712,603 -4,325,183 4,395,192
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 2,523,772 -3,330,224 1,253,489 -4,682,027 4,151,948
- at the beginning of the financial year 5,502,893 8,855,326 7,570,207 12,430,270 8,213,683
- at the end of the financial year 7,905,636 5,502,893 8,855,326 7,614,663 12,430,270
- Cash and short term funds 7,905,636 5,502,893 8,855,326 7,614,663 12,430,270
10
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 101,097 116,073 160,150 186,605 188,540
Depreciation of right-of-use assets 113,197 108,371 - - -
Amortisation of computer software 56,520 49,533 76,737 99,177 128,718
Amortisation of customer relationship - - - - -
Amortisation of agency force - - - - -
Finance costs on lease liabilities 13,550 16,186 - - -
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment (17,279) (2,203) (61,117) (62,415) (15,242)
Gain on sale and leaseback transaction - (1,540) - - -
Loss/(gain) on disposal of foreclosed properties - - - (300) -
Net loss on disposal of subsidiaries - 113,470 - (101) -
Net (gain)/loss on disposal/change in structure of deemed
3,275 (7,751) 27,902 - -
controlled structured entities
Change in financial assets purchased under resale agreements (3,552,385) (7,533,752) 3,870,219 (5,420,390) 5,277,695
Change in financial investments portfolio (4,644,481) (974,502) (6,169,931) (18,554,411) (829,580)
11
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
Change in deposits and placements from financial institutions (16,634,420) (1,586,212) 15,295,613 7,788,424 (8,047,979)
Change in obligations on financial assets sold under
8,629,273 7,026,730 16,076,986 2,231,365 (1,540,624)
repurchase agreements
Change in financial liabilities at fair value through profit or
(22,772) (1,235,253) (247,182) 820,794 2,875,070
loss
Change in bills and acceptances payable (21,045) (133,305) (772,017) 384,205 (113,611)
Change in other liabilities (1,401,543) 457,196 (8,724,334) 4,528,798 (1,595,494)
Change in reinsurance/retakaful assets and other insurance
- - - - -
receivables
Change in insurance/takaful contract liabilities and other
- - - - -
insurance payables
Cash generated from/(used in) operating activities 5,220,751 (23,013,199) 15,949,476 3,682,173 502,520
Taxes and zakat paid (870,990) (1,210,565) (1,408,184) (954,525) (621,212)
Net cash generated from/(used in) operating activities 4,349,761 (24,223,764) 14,541,292 2,727,648 (118,692)
Purchase of shares in deemed controlled structured entities (12,557) (62,010) (873) (480,341) -
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment 18,058 5,922 62,729 85,377 17,526
Proceeds from disposal of a subsidiary 169,521 - - - -
Proceeds from disposal of deemed controlled structured
184,033 40,068 - - -
entities
Proceeds from disposal of deemed controlled entities - - 140,188 - -
12
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents 5,930,305 (18,595,261) 636,361 2,733,245 (1,330,383)
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January 21,934,867 40,682,109 39,306,384 38,217,233 38,619,149
Effects of foreign exchange rate changes 37,379 (151,981) 717,484 (1,644,094) 928,467
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December 27,902,551 21,934,867 40,660,229 39,306,384 38,217,233
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December 27,902,551 21,934,867 40,660,229 39,306,384 38,217,233
13
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
Interest income 6,930,514 -13.83% 8,042,465 1.10% 7,954,609 4.78% 7,592,080 -0.44% 7,625,537 -0.31% 7,649,604
Interest expense -3,143,823 -28.29% -4,384,157 4.05% -4,213,342 3.28% -4,079,559 -4.51% -4,272,147 -0.88% -4,310,068
Net interest income 3,786,691 3.51% 3,658,308 -2.22% 3,741,267 6.51% 3,512,521 4.75% 3,353,390 0.41% 3,339,536
Other operating income 1,750,090 52.13% 1,150,372 31.81% 872,745 -1.33% 884,471 -3.57% 917,224 -0.18% 918,900
Income from Islamic Banking business 1,614,464 45532.11% 3,538 536.33% 556 -9366.67% -6 0 - - -
Net income 5,382,282 11.85% 4,812,218 4.28% 4,614,568 5.01% 4,394,223 2.89% 4,270,614 0.29% 4,258,436
Other operating expenses -2,290,393 -2.85% -2,357,650 6.87% -2,206,020 6.42% -2,072,904 1.65% -2,039,165 -17.40% -2,468,761
Operating profit before allowances 3,091,889 25.96% 2,454,568 1.91% 2,408,548 3.76% 2,321,319 4.03% 2,231,449 24.68% 1,789,675
Allowance for credit losses on financial assets -806,291 206.19% -263,334 52.37% -172,831 -63.39% -472,076 -27.89% -654,693 172.03% -240,668
Profit before taxation and zakat 2,233,098 1.91% 2,191,234 -1.99% 2,235,717 20.90% 1,849,243 17.28% 1,576,756 1.16% 1,558,642
Taxation and zakat -433,493 -20.06% -542,240 -9.85% -601,474 45.05% -414,674 18.12% -351,073 -18.23% -429,362
Profit from continuing operations 1,799,605 9.13% 1,648,994 - - - - - - -
Net profit for the financial year 1,799,605 9.13% 1,648,994 0.90% 1,634,243 13.92% 1,434,569 17.04% 1,225,683 8.54% 1,129,280
Deposits and placements with banks and other financial institutions 18,288,761 34.68% 13,578,966 23.55% 10,990,797 -2.52% 11,275,105 16.95% 9,641,121 -1.44% 9,782,274
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss (8FVTPL9) 2,285,301 -9.68% 2,530,288 33.75% 1,891,771 128.47% 828,006 -24.44% 1,095,862 80.71% 606,428
Obligations on securities sold under repurchase agreements 4,740,494 25.66% 3,772,623 20.90% 3,120,449 96.50% 1,587,979 -41.55% 2,716,656 -42.63% 4,735,645
Bills and acceptances payable 174,838 -14.93% 205,528 -16.98% 247,552 -13.67% 286,751 0.15% 286,318 -40.60% 482,056
Clients9 and brokers9 balances
General insurance contract liabilities
Other liabilities 2,287,372 28.44% 1,780,860 -14.47% 2,082,123 32.32% 1,573,546 -9.33% 1,735,520 29.37% 1,341,504
Derivative liabilities 1,979,142 71.34% 1,155,074 3.11% 1,120,287 -55.44% 2,513,980 -31.53% 3,671,822 22.49% 2,997,719
Recourse obligation on loans sold to Cagamas Berhad (8Cagamas9) - - 1,265,757 -57.75% 2,995,877 73.21% 1,729,606 -36.85% 2,738,811 27.69% 2,144,896
Provision for taxation and zakat - - - - - - - - - - -
Deferred tax liabilities 152,111 11.26% 136,711 - - - 14,467 - - - -
Lease liabilities 77,356 -9.28% 85,267 - - - - - - - -
Borrowings 201,101 -76.06% 840,177 -14.43% 981,849 0.39% 978,068 39.99% 698,651 21.35% 575,718
14
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
Share capital 6,994,103 0.00% 6,994,103 0.00% 6,994,103 0.00% 6,994,103 74.41% 4,010,045 15.88% 3,460,585
Reserves 14,798,422 7.58% 13,755,120 11.75% 12,308,675 -1.00% 12,433,450 -13.45% 14,366,279 26.18% 11,385,585
Non-controlling interests (8NCI9) - - - - - -
TOTAL EQUITY 21,792,525 5.03% 20,749,223 7.49% 19,302,778 -0.64% 19,427,553 5.72% 18,376,324 23.78% 14,846,170
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 195,633,741 5.37% 185,662,506 2.55% 181,043,287 1.81% 177,830,003 -7.24% 191,716,120 5.92% 181,000,966
15
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
Interest income 12,959,184 -19.62% 16,121,944 -7.70% 17,467,504 8.49% 16,099,945 6.79% 15,076,353 2.20% 14,751,535
Interest expense -5,308,438 -36.37% -8,342,819 -3.70% -8,663,559 18.57% -7,306,999 5.54% -6,923,742 7.79% -6,423,163
Net interest income 7,650,746 -1.65% 7,779,125 -11.64% 8,803,945 0.13% 8,792,946 7.85% 8,152,611 -2.11% 8,328,372
Dividends from subsidiaries and associates 2,640,114 -27.63% 3,648,227 52.40% 2,393,819 24.67% 1,920,144 -20.01% 2,400,457 56.48% 1,534,033
Other operating income 4,161,005 7.36% 3,875,737 -5.44% 4,098,618 11.34% 3,681,248 -9.36% 4,061,557 19.82% 3,389,635
Net operating income 14,451,865 -5.56% 15,303,089 0.04% 15,296,382 6.27% 14,394,338 -1.51% 14,614,625 10.28% 13,252,040
Overhead expenses -4,784,188 -4.71% -5020585 -13.52% -5,805,711 -1.28% -5880703 10.13% -5339639 -5.16% -5,629,901
Operating profit before impairment losses 9,667,677 -5.98% 10,282,504 8.34% 9,490,671 11.48% 8,513,635 -8.21% 9,274,986 21.68% 7,622,139
Allowances for impairment losses on loans, advances,
-2,558,275 36.42% -1875343 156.96% -729,811 -37.26% -1,163,238 -34.94% -1787868 164.20% -676,715
financing and other debts, net
(Allowances for)/writeback of impairment losses on
-149,466 -1345.86% 11997 -164.94% -18474 -933.29% 2,217 -101.59% -139851 -457.57% 39,111
financial investments, net
Allowances for impairment losses on other financial
-30,926 719.23% -3775 -162.50% 6,040 - - - - - -
assets, net
Profit before taxation and zakat 6,929,010 -17.66% 8,415,383 -3.81% 8,748,426 18.98% 7,352,614 0.07% 7,347,267 5.19% 6,984,535
Taxation and zakat -963,883 -15.16% -1,136,083 -21.14% -1,440,615 17.15% -1,229,739 33.00% -924,623 -19.62% -1,150,248
Net profit for the financial year 6,422,644 10.08% 5,834,287 -20.16% 7,307,811 19.35% 6,122,875 -4.67% 6,422,644 10.08% 5,834,287
LIABILITIES
Deposits from customers 250,025,335 2.99% 242,757,617 -4.86% 255,160,315 -22.43% 328,938,600 -2.16% 336,186,752 1.68% 330,626,519
Deposits and placements of banks and other financial
34,720,115 -32.39% 51,354,535 -3.00% 52,940,747 40.63% 37,645,134 26.09% 29,856,710 -21.23% 37,904,688
institutions
Obligations on securities sold under repurchase
36,922,305 30.50% 28,293,032 33.04% 21,266,302 309.81% 5,189,316 75.44% 2,957,951 -34.25% 4,498,574
agreements
16
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
EQUITY
Share capital 48,280,355 0.00% 48,280,355 3.28% 46,747,442 5.64% 44,250,380 334.12% 10,193,200 4.42% 9,761,751
Share premium - - - - - - - - 28,878,703 11.50% 25,900,476
Shares held-in-trust - - - - - - -183,438 46.39% -125,309 4.65% -119,745
Reserves 7,176,806 9.40% 6,560,000 47.75% 4,440,063 -3.76% 4,613,371 -66.08% 13,601,206 6.07% 12,823,263
Retained profits 16,809,095 - 15,223,022 - 14,401,762 - 13,572,235 204.53% 4,456,832 37.02% 3,252,638
TOTAL EQUITY 72,266,256 3.14% 70,063,377 6.82% 65,589,267 5.36% 62,252,548 9.21% 57,004,632 10.43% 51,618,383
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 476,303,646 2.57% 464,360,346 1.70% 456,613,298 -10.41% 509,666,821 2.74% 496,062,610 0.75% 492,390,953
17
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
MAYBANK
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
RATIO
RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000)
Current Ratio =
39,374,378 / 47,327,872 / 50,355,285 / 52,097,020 / 57,690,218 /
Current Asset / Current
332,288,293 329,415,599 338,487,335 378,641,153 372,687,329
Liability
0.12x 0.14x 0.15x 0.14x 0.15x
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
RATIO
RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000)
Average Collection Period =
(24,106,030 / (19,040,534 / (26,945,152 / (30,714,527/ 360) (38,350,931 /
(Sales / 360) / Avg Acc
360) / 24,361,776 360) / 26,928,900 360) / 26,680,896 / 24,841,318 360) / 26,592,229
Receivable
0.0027x 0.0020x 0.0028x 0.0034x 0.0040x
The Current Ratio (CR) is used to measures a company’s ability to pay short-term obligation or those
due within one year. The current ratio is calculated simply by dividing current assets by current liabilities.
Based on the table shows, the current ratio for RHB & MAYBANK is less than 1, meaning that, it is not
a good performance from the year 2016 to year 2020. But for RHB, as show at table, on 2020 the ration
was increase better than ratio for MAYBANK. The different of ration between both bank is below than
0.5x.
Current Assets of the bank increased to RM26,446,314.00 in year 2020 from RM23,541,987.00 in year
2016. Meanwhile, the percentage of current liabilities with the bank increased in the year 2020 for RHB
meanwhile for MAYBANK is in year 2016.
Overall, it can be said that, in year 2017 to 2020 has a good performance for RHB meanwhile for MAYBANK,
there is some decrease number for year 2017 to 2020 . Meaning that, only RHB Bank is capable of paying its
short-term obligations. The higher the ratio is, the more capable they are of paying off debt.
18
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
The Average Collection Period (ACP) ratio measures the average number of days clients take to pay
their bills, indicating the effectiveness of the business’s credit and collection policies. This ratio is most
important for Bank, it is because Bank generate much of their income through interest-generating loans
and rely heavily on receivables for their cash flows. The average collection period ratio is calculated by
dividing the average account receivables by total sales and divided the number of days in the time period.
Based on the table shows, the ACP for RHB in year 2017 to 2018 the times for average collection period
has been decreased from 41.28x to 35.48x, but in year 2019 to 2020, the ACP was extremely increase to
75.25x to 79.69x and it was considered as improvement . Besides that for MAYBANK, in year 2017
until 2019 the ACP was decrease but have a bit improvement at year 2020 which is ACP was 0.0027x.
Overall, it can be said that, in year 2019 to 2020 shows the good performance in term of collection period
for both bank. It is because we can say that the Bank has efficient and effective on collecting payments
from its customers to cover its expenditures because has lowest average collection period
19
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
MAYBANK
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
RATIO
RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000)
Debt Ratio = 33,134,255 / 32,645,025 / 23,441,160 / 27,106,442 / 28,927,427 /
Total Debt / Total Asset 476,303,646 464,360,346 456,613,298 509,666,821 496,062,610
6.96% 7.03% 5.13% 5.32% 5.83%
The Debt Ratio (DR) is a financial ratio that measures the extent of a company’s leverage. The debt ratio
is calculated by dividing the total debt by the total assets, expressed as percentage.
Based on the table above shows, the Debt Ratio for RHB has been decreased in year 2016 to 0.36% from
0.10% in year 2020. Meanwhile in year 2017 and 2018 the percentage only different 0.01% by 0.55% on
2017 to 0.54% on 2018%. It can be indicated that the debt ratio for Bank is considered lower risk it is
because the debt ratio is less than 100%. For MAYBANK, debt ration quite higher than RHB but still
under control. The higher debt ratio is on 2019 to 7.03 % but decrease on 2020 which is 6.96%.
Overall, it can be said that, in year 2020 shows the good performance in term of financial risk of a company
for both bank. It is because have the lowest ratio percentage among the other years. In year 2020, RHB
have the highest percentage in total assets compared to other years which is 195,633,741 while
MAYBANK have the highest total assets on year 2017 which is 509,666,821.
The Time Interest Earned (TIE) ratio is a measure of a company’s ability to meet its debt obligations
based on its current income. The formula for a company’s TIE number is earnings before interest and
taxes (EBIT) divided by the total interest payable on bonds and other debt.
20
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
Based on the table above shows, the Time Interest Earned (TIE) for RHB has been increased in year 2016
to -0.37x from 0.71x in year 2020. For MAYBANK, the Time Interest Earned (TIE) was increase also in
year 2016 to -1.06x from -1.31x in year 2020. Even though the figure is increased, but for measured the
company either has a good performance or not, the time earned interest ratio must greater than 2.5x. If the
company have a times interest earned ratio is less than 2.5x are indicate credit risk.
Overall, it can be said that, in these 5 years shows the risky performance in term of credit risk. It is because
have the lowest ratio, meaning that the times earned interest is less than 2.5x. From this situation, it can
be shows that the Bank has more interest expenses than earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) for these
5 years.
21
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
MAYBANK
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
RATIO
RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000)
Cash Turn-over = 24,361,776 / 26,928,900 / 26,68,896 / 24,841,318 / 26,592,229 /
Sales / Cash & Equivalent 24,106,030 19,040,534 26,945,152 30,714,527 38,350,931
1.01x 1.41x 0.99x 0.81x 0.69x
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
RATIO
RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000)
Fixed Asset Turn-over = 24361776 / 26928900 / 26680896 / 24841318 / 26592229 /
Sales / Avg Fixed Asset 1753566 1813675 1747483 2048951 2179497
13.89x 14.85x 15.27x 12.12x 12.20x
The cash turnover ratio (CTO) is used to determine the efficiency of the company in using and spent
their cash during the reporting period to generate revenues. The formula to calculate this ratio is sales
divided with average cash and equivalents.
Based on the table above, the CTO ratio for RHB & MAYBANK showing the positive trends throughout
the year from 2016 to year 2020 because it was increase. The ratio increased in year 2017 compared to
year 2016. Operating revenue for MAYBANK was decrease to RM 24,841,318 in 2017 from RM
26,592,229.00 in year 2016 by 15.06%, followed by 7.41% in 2018, 0.93% in 2019 and more decreased
by -9.53% in year 2020.
In summary, both bank CTO ratio is considered as good especially in year 2020 for RHB and 2019 for
MAYBANK as the ratio is the highest which is 0.22x & 1.41x compared to other years. The increasing in
the 2020 for RHB and 2019 for MAYBANK percentage showing that the bank taking the shortest time to
refresh their cash position using their operating revenue. The efficiency of the CTO ratio also can be
proved that certain years for example in year 2020, the total assets is increase compared to year 2019 and
the operating revenue is decreasing as the expenses is increasing.
22
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
The Fixed Assets Turnover (FATO) is used to determine the efficiency of the company to generate sales
from the fixed assets that the company hold. The formula to calculate the FATO ratio is sales divided with
average fixed assets.
Based on the table above, the FATO for RHB shows that the ratio decrease in year 2017 to 0.31x from
0.46x in year 2016. Slightly dropped in year 2018 to 0.30x. Meanwhile for MAYBANK, the ratio decrease
also in year 2017 to 12.12x from 12.20x in year 2016. Slightly increase in year 2018 to 15.27x. Based on
the financial statement of both bank, the performances in year 2016 less efficient compared to year 2017.
In summary, RHB and MAYBANK FATO ratio consider as good especially in year 2020 and 2018
showing that the bank efficiently manages their fixed asset to generate revenue as both operating revenue
and fixed assets increased. For other years such as in year 2016, 2017 and 2019 the bank performance in
managing their FATO less efficient as they are selling their fixed assets to generate sales.
23
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
MAYBANK
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
RATIO
RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000) RM ('000)
ROA = 6,422,644 / 5,834,287 / 7,307,811 / 6,122,875 / 6,422,644 /
EAT / Avg Total Asset 476,303,646 464,360,346 456,613,298 509,666,821 496,062,610
1.35% 1.26% 1.60% 1.20% 1.29%
The Return on Assets (ROA) is used to determine how well the company operates to generate the profits
from their investments in assets. The formula to calculate this ratio is earning after tax divided with
average total assets.
Based on the table above, the ratio for RHB and MAYBANK in year 2016 is 0.64% for RHB and for
MAYBANK is 1.29%. However, the ROA dropped to 0.89% in year 2019 for RHB also dropped in year
2019 for MAYBANK which is 1.26%. However, in year 2020 the ratio increased for both bank The
performance of RHB and MAYBANK for ROA is at the same level as the changes not showing huge
differences throughout these 5 years performance and it still consider as good depends on the company,
the industry and the economic environment. Based on the table, 2020 showing the best performance as
the ratio percentage is the highest among the other years for RHB and for MAYBANK is for year 2018.
It shows that in 2020 & 2018, both bank more efficient and doing well in utilizing their resources to
generate profit.
In summary, the RHB and MAYBANK ROA is good throughout the 5 years from 2016 to year 2020 and
2020 and 2018 for RHB and MAYBANK being the best year for the bank.
24
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
The Return on Equity (ROE) is used to determine how well the company manage their capital that the
shareholders have invested. The formula to calculate this ratio is earning after tax divided with average
shareholder equity.
Based on the table above, the ratio for RHB increase in year 2020 is 25.73%, meanwhile for MAYBANK
it was decrease in year 2020 which is 13.30%.The best performance of RHB and MAYBANK on ROE is
in year 2016 as the ratio percentage is the highest compared to other years. However, it is does not mean
that the bank financial performance is bad even the ROE ratio is lower than year 2016 as the ratio is
affected by many factors such as economic environment and the industry.
In summary, the both bank ROE is good throughout the 5 years from 2016 to year 2020 and 2016 being
the best year for the bank.
25
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
CONCLUSION
Financial statement analysis is the process of reviewing and analyzing a company’s profile
financial statements to make better economics decisions to earn income in future. From the
analysis of financial statements, we ascertain its financial conditions and how its operated
during the periods for which analysis is conducted and what are the future trends in that
financial institute. These reports are used to give information to shareholders and used by
potential investors who want to know how the company is performing and decide whether to
invest or not. These statements include the income statement, balance sheet, statement of
cashflows, notes to accounts and a statement of changes in equity.
After calculating, analyzing, and interpreting the five (5) years financial reports of Maybank
Berhad and RHB Berhad, we have come to conclusion that in terms of liquidity it can be said
that in year 2017 to 2020 has a good performance for RHB Berhad meanwhile for Maybank
Berhad there is some decreased number for the year 2017 to the year 2020. Meaning that, RHB
Bank is capable of paying its short-term obligations.
Current assets of the RHB bank increased from RM 23,541,987.00 in year 2016 to RM
26,446,314.00 in year 2020. The percentage of current liability with the bank increased in the
year 2020 for RHB Berhad and year 2016 for Maybank Berhad. The higher the ratio is, the
more capable they are paying off debts.
In 2019 and 2020, The Average Collection Reload (ACP) shows the good performance in term
of collection period for both banks. It was because the bank has efficient and effective on
collecting payments from its customers to cover its expenditures because has lowest Average
Collection Period (ACP).
For Capital Structure and Solvency, it can be said that in year 2020 shows the good
performance in term of financing risk of a company for both banks. It was because both banks
have the lowest ratio percentage among the years. RHB Bank have the highest percentage in
total assets for the year 2020 compared to other years which is RM 195,633,741.00 while,
Maybank Berhad have the highest total assets on year 2017 which is RM 509,666,821.00.
26
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
The Time Interest Rate Earned (TIE), RHB Bank has been increased in year 2016 compared to
year 2020 and it is also same goes to Maybank Berhad, the Time Interest Rate Earned (TIE)
was increased too. It can be said that in these five (5) years shows the risky performance in
term of credit risk because the lowest ratio, Time Interest Rate Earned (TIE) is less than 2.5
times.
For assets utilization and efficiency, the Cash Turnover Ratio has considered as good,
especially in year 2020 for RHB Bank and 2019 for Maybank Berhad as the ratio was the
highest which is 0.22 times and 1.41 times compared to other years. The increasing in year
2020 for RHB and 2019 for Maybank Berhad percentage shows that the bank taking the
shortest time to refresh their cash position using their operating revenue.
For profitability ratios, Return of Asset was good throughout the years of 2016 to year 2020
for Maybank Berhad and RHB Berhad and 2020 for Maybank Berhad and RHB Berhad being
the best year for bank.
As conclusion, the banks strength it has high liquidity that it can easily converted an asset or
security into ready cash without affecting its market price. Lastly, it has strong ability to
generate earnings relative to its revenue, operating costs, balance sheet assets, or shareholders
equity over time. the weakness is the banks has more interest expenses than earnings before
interest and taxes (EBIT) from these five (5) years.
27
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)
lOMoARcPSD|15285707
RECOMMENDATION
As well all know, the world experienced the COVID-19 pandemic, most businesses were
forced to closed and many were laid off. Banks are no exception and experienced a decline in
revenue, collection form loans as well as investments. However, banks must continue to
operate efficiently by maintain prudence in management of credit risk and asset quality while
preserving strong corporate governance and sound risk management practices. During
pandemic, it enhanced its information and communication technology infrastructure to
improve efficiency, resilience and provide better customer experience through digital banking
solutions under the new normal business environment. It must continue to explore ways to
further enhance its operational efficiency and overall productivity to maintain cost efficiency
while accelerating its digitalization efforts to cater to the needs of customers.
During Covid-19 pandemic, Maybank Berhad and RHB Berhad will need to continue to ensure
that the bank remains well-capitalized and well-funded to support its business and safeguard
the interest of stakeholders and they need to proactively manage any potential stress in asset
quality.
Maybank Berhad and RHB Berhad need to capitalize on its efficient customer service delivery
and extensive network of physical and digital channels, while sustaining its position as a one
of the market leaders in both domestic retail and consumer segments and continue to expand
its corporate lending business by leveraging on its strong franchise and relationship with
customers.
Maybank Berhad and RHB Berhad must committed to strengthen its regional presence, while
leveraging on its strong branding and prudent management practices, or long-term
sustainability, the banks will continue to enhance its service delivery standards and
infrastructure leveraging on the advancement of technology, to provide seamless delivery of
banking services across its multi-delivery channels.
Businesses in Malaysia are expected to operate more efficiently by stepping up efforts on cost
controls and balance sheet management. Similarly, banks in Malaysia especially Maybank
Berhad and RHB Berhad are likely to continue to enhance its operational efficiency, especially
during bouts of economic uncertainties.
28
Downloaded by NAYLI CARMIELA RASHIDI (2021195053@student.uitm.edu.my)