Materials PDF
Materials PDF
Materials PDF
1. THE STORES DEPARTMENT WOULD FIRST REQUEST THE MATERIALS USING A PURCHASE REQUISITION FORM
2. THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT WOULD THEN SOURCE A SUITABLE SUPPLIER FOR THE MATERIALS
3. THE PURCHASING TEAM WOULD THEN ORDER THE GOODS FROM THE EXTERNAL SUPPLIER USING A PURCHASE ORDER
4. ONCE THE WAREHOUSE HAS RECEIVED THE GOODS, THEY WILL CONFIRM DELIVERY OF GOODS RECEIVED.
5. FINALLY , THE FINANCE TEAM WOULD PROCESS THE PAYMENT FOR THE MATERIALS USING AN INVOICE .
Inventory Discrepancies
Any difference between book inventory (the stores ledger) and monitoring inventory (a
physical stocktake) should be inves gated.
A company must also ensure that it has adequate controls in place to minimise differences
between physical inventory counts and book inventory. These differences are known as
discrepancies.
Inventory checks may reveal discrepancies between how much of an item is in inventory and
the amount shown in the inventory records.
The quantity of goods delivered differs from what is All inventory should be counted as it is
shown on the delivery note. received and signed off.
The actual quantity of inventory issued to production Inventory issued to production should be
differs from that shown in the records. carefully counted and signed off.
Production returned excess inventory without any All movements of inventory should be
documentation. recorded.
Inventory is damaged or obsolete and thrown away Damaged or obsolete items should be
without being documented. recorded
FIFO AND LIFO
FIFO assumes that the inventory purchased LIFO assumes that the inventory purchased
first is sold first. first is sold last.
Materials in stock at the end of a period are Materials in stock at the end of a period are
valued using the most recent prices paid to valued using the oldest unit prices paid to
suppliers. suppliers.
FIFO LIFO
Closing
inventory valued
at Latest prices Oldest price
PRACTICE QUESTION
Compute the value of issues and closing inventory for May using FIFO and LIFO.
Weighted Average Methods (CWA and PWA)
CWA PRACTICE QUESTION
PWA PRACTICE QUESTION
Total purchase cost for the period = Units purchased in the period × Unit
purchase price
Purchase cost
Ordering cost for the period = Number of orders in period ×Cost per order
Ordering cost
Holding cost for the period = Average inventory held for the period × holding cost
per unit for the period
Holding cost
Deteriora on
Reduction in inventory value due to degradation in its qualities.
Eg: fresh produce degrades rapidly after harvesting and would be unusable after a few days unless kept
fresh with refrigeration or further processing.
Obsolete and deteriorating inventory would eventually be discarded and written off
PRACTICE QUESTION
Computer Co uses 20,000 units of computer parts each year, and each unit costs $20. It
orders 5,000 units every time it places an order, and it costs $1,400 to place an order.
Computer Co holds an average level of inventory of 2,500 units. The holding cost is 10% of
the value of the average inventory held.
Calculate Computer Co’s costs of total inventory cost for the year, including
purchase, holding, and ordering costs
Holding cost
Holding cost = 10% × value of the average inventory held
Average inventory held = 2,500
Value of average inventory held = 2,500 × $20 = $50,000
Holding cost = 10% × $50,000 = $5,000
It costs Computer Co $5,000 to hold the stock of computer parts for a year.
Ordering cost
Number of orders in a year = Demand / Order quantity
Number of orders in a year = 20,000 / 5,000 = 4 orders in a year
Computer Co will place 4 orders in a year, and each order will cost $1,400 per order.
Total ordering costs for the year = 4 × $1,400 = $5,600
Just-in-Time
Holding inventory incurs expenses. It must be stored, financed, secured, and kept in good condi on.
Ordering 'just-in- me' (only when produc on is ready to use the materials) minimises inventory holding
costs.
• Produc on should only make as many units as can be sold.
• There will be no inventory of raw materials or finished goods.
• Smaller, more frequent deliveries are required at short no ce.
• A few dedicated suppliers deliver defect-free components just
in me when the parts are demanded on the produc on line.
However, this increases the risk of “stock-out”, where no inventory is available for produc on or sales.
To mitigate this risk, companies build robust, integrated relationships with their suppliers or diversify their
sources of supply.
Order Size
For example, it is often cheaper for organisations to buy materials in bulk (suppliers may offer a discount
on large orders). However, this can make holding costs more expensive, as there are more goods to store,
and they could become damaged or obsolete over time.
Stockout Costs
Another problem is the potential cost of running out of materials. If an organisation holds too much
inventory, it will have higher holding costs than it needs to. On the other hand, if it maintains too little
inventory, there is a risk of running out, known as a stockout.
Stockout costs include:
Loss of sales during the stockout period
Loss of reputation
Customers switching to competitor products and continuing to buy from competitors in the future
Cost of production stoppages (machinery and workers are idle)
Extra ordering costs for urgent orders.
The following data relate to Material P, which is held in the stores of LBR Co.
Minimum daily usage 450 units
Maximum daily usage 800 units
Minimum lead time 5 days
Maximum lead time 10 days.
Daily demand for Material P is constant.
Calculate the reorder level for Material P.
Answer:
The reorder level may be used to calculate some other control levels for inventory.
Maximum inventory level = reorder level + reorder quantity − (minimum usage × minimum lead time)
Minimum inventory level = reorder level − (average usage × average lead time)
PRACTICE QUESTION FOR INVENTORY CONTROL LEVEL
The following information is available for a decorative component used in a cabinet design at Furniture Co:
Reorder Level
The level of inventory at which more should be ordered. This is to ensure there is enough inventory to supply
maximum production.
Reorder level
= 1,300 × 15
= 19,500
Minimum Level
The inventory level indicates a high risk of stockout. Often used as the buffer inventory level.
Minimum level
= 19,500 − (1,000 × 10)
= 9,500
Maximum Level
The maximum level warns that inventory holding is too high and more expensive than necessary.
Maximum level = Reorder level + Reorder quantity − (Minimum usage × Minimum lead time)
Maximum level
= 19,500 + 20,000 − (800 × 5)
= 35,500
Average Level
The inventory level is midway between minimum and maximum levels.
Average level
= 9.500 + (20,000 / 2)
= 9,500 + 10,000
= 19,500
1. Reorder level
= Maximum usage × Maximum lead time
= 280 × 10
= 2,800
2. Minimum Level
= Reorder level − (average usage × average lead time)
= 2,800 − (200 × 9)
= 1,000
3. Maximum level
= Reorder level + Reorder quantity − (Minimum usage × Minimum lead time)
= 2,800 + 3,000 − (150 × 8)
= 4,600
4. Average level
= Minimum level + (reorder quantity / 2)
= 1,000 + (3,000 / 2)
= 1,000 + 1,500
= 2,500
There is a balance between the costs and benefits of ordering large amounts of inventory and
holding inventory:
Inventory holding costs rise as the level of inventory rises, so
ordering smaller amounts from suppliers each me will reduce
holding costs
Ordering costs rise as the number of orders rises, so placing fewer
but larger orders would reduce order costs
When annual demand is 10,000 and when we order a batch of 50, it will takes 200 no of orders. So rather
than ordering batch of 50 when we order a batch of 250 it will only take 40 no of orders, Hence the
ordering cost decreases as the no of orders reduces
Same as holding few units incurs less holding cost and as the level of inventory increases the holding cost
also increases.
Economic order theory finds the optimal balance between ordering costs (which increase with more
orders) and holding costs (which increase when more inventory is held due to large order sizes).
The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is the level of stock that minimises the total inventory holding
costs and ordering costs.
The EOQ can be estimated using a graph that shows the holding costs, ordering costs and total costs at
different activity levels. The estimated EOQ is the point at which the holding and ordering costs are equal.
Variable Description
EOQ = 100
Q2 A car manufacturer sells 75,000 cars a year. Each vehicle needs five tyres. The cost of placing
one order for tyres is $10. The cost of holding a tyre in inventory for one year is $25.
What is the EOQ?
Q3 A manufacturing company has an EOQ of 1,000 for Component A. It uses 15,000 of these
components a year. The minimum inventory level is 4,000. The cost of holding one component
in inventory for a year is $0.60.
What is the total cost of holding inventory for the component for a year?
Q4 A company uses 65,000 units of raw material each year. It places orders in batches of 1,500,
which is its EOQ. The minimum inventory level is 2,000. The cost of holding one unit in inventory
for a year is $0.25.
What is the total cost of holding inventory for the component for a year?
Key Point
Steps to Approach
STEP 1: Calculate total inventory costs using EOQ
STEP 2: Calculate total inventory costs using discounted order quan ty
STEP 3: Compare total inventory costs of EOQ and discounted order quan ty
CONCLUTIONS:
If EOQ costs > discounted order quan ty costs, it is cost-effec ve to accept the
discount offered by the supplier.
If EOQ costs < discounted order quan ty costs, it is cost-effec ve to order using EOQ
Example
Glass Co uses sand in its production process at a rate of 200,000 units per year. Its supplier, Sand Co,
has offered a discount of 5% if the company buys their sand in batches of 500 units at a time. The
company has accepted the discount. Each unit of sand costs $40 before the discount.
It costs $5 to hold one unit of sand for a year and $200 to place an order for sand.
Calculate the total inventory cost for the year of taking up the discount.
Answer:
Total purchase costs
200,000 × 0.95 × $40 = $7,600,000 per year
The 0.95 value calculates the purchase costs with a 5% discount (100% − 5% = 95% = 0.95).
When a batch is produced, it usually requires a machine to be set up for that production batch.
This is called a MACHINE SET-UP COST. Therefore, the more batches produced, the higher the
machine set-up costs.
The number of items in a batch will also affect holding costs.
o Larger batch sizes will produce more items that must be held in stores. Holding
costs will therefore be higher with larger batch sizes.
o Smaller batch sizes will produce fewer items that require storage space before being
sold. This results in lower average stock levels and lower holding costs
Example
Glass Co produces glass in batches. Production is at a rate of 1,000 units each week, and the
factory is open for 50 weeks a year. The weekly demand for glass is 800 units. Setting up the
machine for a production run costs $4,500 for each batch. The cost of holding one unit of glass in
stock for one year is $15.
Calculate the economic batch quantity for Glass Co.
Answer:
Co = $4,500
D = Annual demand rate = weekly demand rate × number of weeks
D= 800 × 50 = 40,000
Ch is the cost of holding one unit of glass for one year, which is $15 (this is the same as in the EOQ
model)
Ch = $15
R = Annual production rate = weekly production rate × number of weeks
R = 1,000 × 50 = 50,000
R = 50,000
Applying the EBQ formula;
EBQ = 10,954
Example
A figure for ‘R’ must be calculated if it is not given. ‘R’ is the annual production rate and is not in
the EOQ equation.
Summary
Companies hold stock to ensure sufficient supply to meet customer demand and prevent
production delays. They will need to manage the costs of inventory.
o Purchase cost
o Ordering cost
o Holding cost
Another problem is the potential cost of running out of materials. If an organisation holds too
much inventory, it will have higher holding costs than it needs to. On the other hand, if it
maintains too little inventory, there is a risk of running out, known as a stockout.
When the reorder level is reached, it signals that it is time for a company to place a new order
with its suppliers.
The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is the level of stock that minimises the total inventory
holding costs and ordering costs.
Compare total inventory costs for EOQ and the discounted order quantity:
o If EOQ costs > discounted order quantity costs, it is cost-effective to accept the
discount offered by the supplier.
o If EOQ costs < discounted order quantity costs, it is cost-effective to order using EOQ.
Batch costing involves producing a specific quantity of a product at a time (batches). Companies
that use batch costing will use Economic Batch Quantity (or EBQ) calculations to decide how
many items should be produced in each batch.