Sakthivel V Rdo 545503
Sakthivel V Rdo 545503
Sakthivel V Rdo 545503
1386 of 2021
DATED: 05.06.2024
CORAM:
2. The Tahsildar,
Muthur Road,
Modakurichi-638 104.
3. V.Eswaramoorthy
4. Rajeshwari
5. Saroja
6. Prema
7. Kathirvel
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/8
W.P. No.1386 of 2021
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by
certificate issued by the second respondent and remitted back for fresh
enquiry.
the son of the said Varanavasi. The Ramasamy had married one
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/8
W.P. No.1386 of 2021
Sethupathi in the year 1999. The said Ramasamy and his wife died
leaving behind their sole legal heir i.e., Kottravel Sethupathi. Thereafter,
legal heirs of the first class as per the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The
said Kottravel Sethupathi had two biological sisters and one brother.
Mr.Ramasamy, ties with his biological family have been legally severed
adoptive family. The said Ramasamy had one brother and one sister
namely Varanavasi and Lakshiammal. The said Varanavasi had two sons
and the said Lakshmiammal had two daughters who are class II legal
Therefore, they had applied for legal heirship certificate before the 2nd
respondent. After due enquiry, the second respondent issued legal heir
appeal before the 1st respondent. The first respondent by an order dated
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3/8
W.P. No.1386 of 2021
31.12.2020 set aside the legal heir ship certificate issued by the second
respondent and further directed the second respondent for fresh disposal
Sethupathi at the age of 1 1/2 years by Ramasamy and his wife Sivakami
in the year 1999 and adoption deed was registered vide document
No.1021 of 1999 and as such after the demise of adopted son his siblings
are included as legal heirs in the legal heirship certificate. Therefore, the
legal heir ship certificate issued by the second respondent was set aside.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner rightly pointed out that in
Act, 1956, on the date on which the adoption is made, all the ties of the
child in the family of his or her birth shall be deemed to have been
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4/8
W.P. No.1386 of 2021
Thus, it is made clear that on the date of adoption the ties of the
family.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
5/8
W.P. No.1386 of 2021
family. Once the said Kottravel Sethupathi had become the son of the
Ramasamy and Sivakami, his birth shall be deemed to have been severed.
The learned counsel for the petitioner also relied upon the Judgement in
Mad 380. The relevant portion of the said order is extracted hereunder:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
6/8
W.P. No.1386 of 2021
of the adopted family, all the ties of the child are replaced in the adoptive
1956 and the order passed by the first respondent dated 31.12.2020 is
liable to be set aside. Therefore, the order passed by the first respondent
05.06.2024
Index: Yes/No
Internet: Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
gvn
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
7/8
W.P. No.1386 of 2021
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
gvn
To
2. The Tahsildar,
Muthur Road,
Modakurichi-638 104.
05.06.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
8/8