Reflective Writing Exercise - Ally 100
Reflective Writing Exercise - Ally 100
Reflective Writing Exercise - Ally 100
Exercise 1
Identify the sentence that details the main incident being reflected on in this
paragraph.
Specific tasks were shared out amongst members of my team. Initially, however, the
tasks were not seen as equally difficult by all team members. Cooperation between
group members was at risk because of this perception of unfairness. Social
interdependence theory recognises a type of group interaction called ‘positive
interdependence’, meaning cooperation (Johnson and Johnson,1993, cited by
Maughan and Webb, 2001). Many studies (Brodie, 2008; Somerville & Keeling,
2004; Revans, 1998) have demonstrated that “cooperative learning experiences
encourage higher achievement” (Maughan and Webb, 2001 p.46). Ultimately, our
group achieved a successful outcome, but to improve the process, we perhaps
needed a chairperson to help encourage cooperation when tasks were being shared
out. Briggs (2005) argues that the role of a chairperson is desirable as it keeps
discussions focused and allows for a fairer distribution of tasks. In future group work,
on the course and at work, I would probably suggest this.
Exercise 3
Read the extract below and identify language used to a) highlight personal
experience; b) show supporting literature; c) suggest future improvement
In a placement during my second year when I was working on a surgical ward, I was
working under the supervision of my mentor, caring for a seventy-two year old
gentleman, Mr Khan (pseudonym), who had undergone abdominal surgery. I
removed the dressing under my mentor's supervision, using a non-touch procedure,
and cleaned the wound, as requested by the doctor. My mentor was called to
another patient at this point, so at her request I stayed with Mr Khan while we waited
Exercise 1
Main incident sentence: This led me to reflect on the methods I was using to gather
sources and identify that if I was not always getting my research right then it was
possible that other members of the group might also be misguided in their research
strategies.
Notice that the writer only writes about the important incident. It is important that you
avoid writing about events that are irrelevant to the main incident. Focus on how this
experience has changed you as a person /your practice.
Exercise 2
Interpretation: Initially, however, the tasks were not seen as equally difficult by all
team members. Cooperation between group members was at risk because of this
perception of unfairness. Social interdependence theory recognises a type of group
interaction called ‘positive interdependence’, meaning cooperation (Johnson and
Johnson, 1993, cited by Maughan and Webb, 2001). Many studies (Brodie, 2008;
Somerville & Keeling, 2004; Revans, 1998) have demonstrated that “cooperative
learning experiences encourage higher achievement” (Maughan and Webb, 2001
p.46).
Outcome: Ultimately, our group achieved a successful outcome, but to improve the
process, we perhaps needed a chairperson to help encourage cooperation when
tasks were being shared out. Briggs (2005) argues that the role of a chairperson is
desirable as it keeps discussions focused and allows for a fairer distribution of tasks.
In future group work, on the course and at work, I would probably suggest this.
Exercise 3
Show supporting literature: The Royal College of Nursing (2005) states that hand
hygiene is the single most important activity for reducing cross-infection, and points
out that many health care professionals do not decontaminate their hands as
often as they should. Recent guidance published by the Department of Health (2007)
highlights the possibility of staff transmitting infections via uniforms, and the need to
review policies on staff dress. The Nursing and Midwifery Council Code of
Professional Conduct (2015, section 3) go further and state that in order to minimise
the risk to patients and clients a nurse must confront poor practices and take the role
of advocate.
Suggest future improvement: Looking back on this incident, I can see that I should
have acted sooner, and that I should have ensured that the doctor washed her
hands before examining Mr Khan. I can now see that my inaction in this incident put
Notice that the first person, ‘I’ is used to give details of events and insights. In
reflective writing, a formal writing style is still required. Supporting evidence can be
used to justify why you did something a particular way, why you think you have
encountered a particular problem (like the writer in this extract) or why you might do
something differently next time. It is essential to demonstrate critical analysis as it
allows you to make meaning of the experience you are presenting. In addition, you
will need to check your lecturer on the number of references you should include and
the type of literature you should use e.g., books, journals etc.
References
Nursing and Midwifery Council (2015) The NMC Code for Professional Conduct:
Standards for conduct, Performance and Ethics London: Nursing and Midwifery
Council
The University of Plymouth (2016) Wrasse writing for assignments e-library Available
at: https://wrasse.plymouth.ac.uk/ (Accessed 8 November 2016).
Further information