Celex 32018R2067 en TXT

L 334/94 EN Official Journal of the European Union 31.12.
2018
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/2067

of 19 December 2018
on the verification of data and on the accreditation of verifiers pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC
of the European Parliament and of the Council
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing
a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (1),
and in particular the third paragraph of Article 15 and the second paragraph of Article 10a thereof,
Whereas:
(1) This Regulation should enter into force as a matter of urgency to take account of the First Edition of the Internat
ional Standards and Recommended Practices on Environmental Protection — Carbon Offsetting and Reduction
Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) (Annex 16, Volume IV to the Chicago Convention) adopted by the
ICAO Council at the tenth meeting of its 214th session on 27 June 2018, that are intended to apply from 2019.
(2) An overall framework of rules for the accreditation of verifiers is necessary to ensure that the verification of
operator's or aircraft operator's reports in the framework of the Union's greenhouse gas emission allowance
trading system, to be submitted in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 (2), is
carried out by verifiers that possess the technical competence to perform the entrusted task in an independent
and impartial manner and in conformity with the requirements and principles set out in this Regulation.
(3) Experience in the application of Commission Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 (3) has shown the need to improve,
clarify and simplify the accreditation and verification rules to further promote harmonisation and enhance the
efficiency of the system. A number of amendments therefore need to be made to Regulation (EU) No 600/2012.
In the interests of clarity, that Regulation should be replaced.
(4) Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) establishes a general framework to
facilitate the free movement of services and service providers in the Union while maintaining a high quality of
service. Union harmonisation of the rules for accreditation and verification relating to the Union's emissions
trading system should contribute to a competitive market for verifiers while ensuring transparency and
information for operators and aircraft operators.
(5) When implementing Article 15 of Directive 2003/87/EC, it is necessary to ensure a synergy between the compre
hensive framework for accreditation established by Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and
of the Council (5) and related provisions of Decision No 768/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the
Council (6) on one hand, and the specific features of the Union's greenhouse gas emission trading system and
requirements that are essential for the effective implementation of Directive 2003/87/EC on the other hand.
Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 should continue to apply to those aspects of accreditation of verifiers which are
not dealt with by this Regulation. In particular, it should be ensured that where, due to the internal practices of
(1) OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32.

(2) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 of 19 December 2018 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas
emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulation (EU)
No 601/2012 (see page 1 of this Official Journal).
3
( ) Commission Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the verification of greenhouse gas emission reports and tonne-kilometre
reports and the accreditation of verifiers pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 181,
12.7.2012, p. 1).
4
( ) Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market
(OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 36).
(5) Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accredita
tion and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008,
p. 30).
(6) Decision No 768/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on a common framework for the marketing of
products, and repealing Council Decision 93/465/EEC (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 82).
31.12.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 334/95
a Member State, an alternative procedure to accreditation, namely, the certification of verifiers that are natural
persons, is carried out by a national authority appointed by that Member State in accordance with Regulation
(EC) No 765/2008, the Member State concerned shall provide documentary evidence that such authority meets
a level of credibility similar to national accreditation bodies that have successfully undergone peer evaluation
organised by the body recognised under Article 14 of that Regulation.
(6) Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) provides for an independent
and neutral accreditation or licensing system for environmental verifiers. For reasons of coherence and to reduce
the administrative burden imposed on the Member States and economic operators, it is appropriate to take
account of synergies between that and this Regulation.
(7) The system of verification and accreditation should avoid any unnecessary duplication of procedures and organ
isations established pursuant to other Union legal instruments that would result in an increased burden for
Member States or economic operators. Therefore, it is appropriate to draw on best practices resulting from the
application of harmonised standards adopted by the European Committee for Standardisation on the basis of
a request made by the Commission in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European
Parliament and of the Council (2), such as the harmonised standard concerning general requirements for accredita
tion bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies, and the harmonised standard concerning requirements for
greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies for use in accreditation or other forms of recognition, the
references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, as well as Document
EA-6/03 and other technical documents developed by the European cooperation for accreditation or by other
bodies.
(8) When establishing harmonised rules for the verification of operator's or aircraft operator's reports and the accred
itation of verifiers, it is necessary to ensure that the burden imposed on operators emitting a lower amount of
carbon dioxide (CO2) per year, on aircraft operators considered small emitters within the meaning of
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, as well as on the available resources of the Member States is not
disproportionate to the aims pursued.
(9) To make best use of synergies and given the importance of verification of data used for the update of ex ante
benchmarks and the determination of free allocation to installations, it is appropriate to include rules for
verification of baseline data reports and new entrant data reports which are required by Commission Delegated
Regulation …/… of 19 December 2018 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation
of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the
Council (3) into the harmonised rules for verification and accreditation of verifiers.
(10) Article 27 of Directive 2003/87/EC allows Member States to exclude small installations, subject to equivalent
measures, from the Union's greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system provided that the conditions
contained in that Article are met. Article 27a of Directive 2003/87/EC allows Member States to exclude
installation emitting less than 2 500 tonnes, from the Union's greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system
provided that the conditions contained in that Article are met. This Regulation should not apply directly to those
installations excluded pursuant to Article 27 or 27a of Directive 2003/87/EC unless the Member State decides
that this Regulation should apply.
(11) In accordance with the principles of Annex V to Directive 2003/87/EC, the verifier should carry out a site visit to
check the boundaries of the respective installation or aircraft operator, to assess the operation of measuring
devices and monitoring systems, to conduct interviews and to carry out other activities. The verifier's site visit
should be waived only under specific conditions.
(12) In accordance with the principles of Annex V to Directive 2003/87/EC, the verifier should apply a risk-based
approach with the aim of reaching a verification opinion providing reasonable assurance that the total emissions
or tonne-kilometres are not materially misstated and the report can be verified as satisfactory. The level of
assurance should relate to the depth and detail of verification activities carried out during the verification and the
(1) Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation by
organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), repealing Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 and Commission
Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC (OJ L 342, 22.12.2009, p. 1).
(2) Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European standardisation,
amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC,
2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council
Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 12).
(3) Not yet published in the Official Journal.
L 334/96 EN Official Journal of the European Union 31.12.2018
wording of the verification opinion statement. If the findings and information obtained during the verification
process so require, the verifier should be obliged to adjust one or more activities in the verification process to
meet the requirements for achieving reasonable assurance.
(13) To avoid entanglement between the role of the competent authority and the verifier, the responsibilities of
a verifier when carrying out verification should be clearly defined. The verifier should take the monitoring plan
approved by the competent authority as a reference point and assess whether this plan and the procedures
described in this plan have been implemented correctly. Where the verifier identifies non-compliance with
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, it should be the responsibility of the verifier to report this non-
compliance issue in the verification report.
(14) Full understanding of the activities of an operator or an aircraft operator is necessary for the performance of an
effective verification of an operator's or aircraft operator's report. A verifier should only perform the requested
verification activities after it has ascertained following a preliminary assessment that it is competent to do so. In
the pursuit of a high-quality level of verification activities, harmonised rules should be developed for
a preliminary assessment to determine whether a verifier is competent, independent and impartial to carry out
the requested verification activities in accordance with the rules and principles set out in this Regulation.
(15) Provision of relevant information between the operator or the aircraft operator and the verifier is essential in all
facets of the verification process, in particular in the pre-contractual phase, in the performance of a strategic
analysis by the verifier and throughout the verification. It is necessary to establish a set of harmonised
requirements that should govern this provision of information between the operator or aircraft operator and the
verifier at all times.
(16) All verification activities in the verification process are interconnected and should be concluded with the issuance
of a verification report by the verifier containing a verification statement that is commensurate with the outcome
of the verification assessment. Harmonised requirements for the verification reports and the performance of the
verification activities should be established to ensure that verification reports and verification activities in the
Member States meet the same standards.
(17) Analysing the susceptibility of reported data to misstatements that could be material is an essential part of the
verification process and determines how the verification activities should be carried out by the verifier. Every
element in the verification process shall therefore be strongly linked to the outcome of the analysis of these risks
of misstatements.
(18) Specific provision should be made for the verification of the report of aircraft operators and that of operators of
sites, which are subject to Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).
(19) Correct and effective reporting of greenhouse gas emissions by the operator or the aircraft operator is essential
for the implementation of Directive 2003/87/EC. To ensure the proper functioning of the monitoring and
reporting process, continuous improvement of the operator or aircraft operator's performance should be part of
the verification activities performed by the verifier.
(20) Verification activities and the issuance of verification reports should only be carried out by verifiers and their
personnel that are competent. Verifiers should establish and continuously improve internal processes that ensure
that all personnel involved in the verification activities are competent to perform the tasks entrusted to them. The
criteria for determining whether a verifier is competent should be the same in all Member States and should be
verifiable, objective and transparent.
(21) The national accreditation body established pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 should be empowered to
accredit and issue an authoritative statement concerning the competence of a verifier to perform the verification
activities pursuant to this Regulation, adopt administrative measures and carry out the surveillance of verifiers.
(22) Templates and specific file formats to be used by verifiers promote harmonisation between Member States and
avoid differences in approaches. Verifiers should use templates or specific file formats developed by the
Commission. Where a Member State has developed national templates or file format specifications, these should
contain at least the same content as the templates developed by the Commission to ensure harmonised
approaches.
(1) Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide
and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC,
2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 114).
(23) A Member State that does not consider it economically meaningful or sustainable to establish a national accredit
ation body or to carry out accreditation activities should have recourse to the national accreditation body of
another Member State. Only national accreditation bodies that have undergone a successful peer evaluation
organised by the body recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 should be permitted to
perform the accreditation activities pursuant to this Regulation.
(24) National accreditation bodies that demonstrate conformity with this Regulation and that have already successfully
undergone peer evaluation organised by the body recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 765/2008
should be presumed to fulfil the procedural requirements imposed on national accreditation bodies such as
requirements on the structure of a national accreditation body, setting up a competence process, setting up the
necessary procedures and management system and arrangements to safeguard the confidentiality of information
obtained and should be exempted from undergoing a new peer evaluation following the entry into force of this
Regulation. In accordance with Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), environ
mental information contained in verified operator's or aircraft operator's reports held by the public authorities
should be made public to ensure transparency, subject to certain confidentiality requirements.
(25) Effective cooperation between national accreditation bodies, or where applicable other national authorities, and
competent authorities is essential for the proper functioning of the greenhouse gas emission allowance system
and the supervision on the quality of verification. For reasons of transparency, it is necessary to ensure that the
national accreditation bodies, or where applicable, other national authorities, and competent authorities establish
effective means of information exchange. Information exchanges between competent authorities and between
competent authorities and national accreditation bodies or other national authorities should be governed by the
strictest guarantees of confidentiality and professional secrecy and be handled in accordance with applicable
national and Union law.
(26) This Regulation includes improvements to accreditation and verification that partly take into account the First
Edition of the International Standards and Recommended Practices on Environmental Protection — Carbon
Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) (Annex 16, Volume IV to the Chicago
Convention) adopted by the ICAO Council at the tenth meeting of its 214th session on 27 June 2018. The
Regulation on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC is
also being amended to take account of the First Edition of the International Standards and Recommended
Practices, and these two instruments are being complemented by a Delegated Act pursuant to Article 28c of
Directive 2003/87/EC.
(27) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Climate Change
Committee,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
CHAPTER I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1
Subject matter
This Regulation lays down provisions for the verification of reports submitted pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC and for
the accreditation and supervision of verifiers.
This Regulation also specifies, without prejudice to Regulation (EC) No 765/2008, provisions for the mutual recognition
of verifiers and peer evaluation of national accreditation bodies pursuant to Article 15 of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Article 2
Scope
This Regulation shall apply to the verification of greenhouse gas emissions and tonne-kilometre data occurring from
1 January 2019, reported pursuant to Article 14 of Directive 2003/87/EC, and to the verification of data relevant for
the update of ex ante benchmarks and for the determination of free allocation to installations.
(1) Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information
and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC (OJ L 41, 14.2.2003, p. 26).
Article 3
Definitions
For the purposes of this Regulation, in addition to the definitions laid down in Article 3 of Directive 2003/87/EC and
Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) ‘detection risk’ means the risk that the verifier does not detect a material misstatement;
(2) ‘accreditation’ means attestation by a national accreditation body that a verifier meets the requirements set by
harmonised standards, within the meaning of point 9 of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008, and
requirements set out in this Regulation to carry out the verification of an operator's or aircraft operator's report
pursuant to this Regulation;
(3) ‘verifier’ means a legal person or another legal entity carrying out verification activities pursuant to this Regulation
and accredited by a national accreditation body pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 and this Regulation or
a natural person otherwise authorised, without prejudice to Article 5(2) of that Regulation, at the time
a verification report is issued;
(4) ‘verification’ means the activities carried out by a verifier to issue a verification report pursuant to this Regulation;
(5) ‘misstatement’ means an omission, misrepresentation or error in the operator's or aircraft operator's reported data,
not considering the uncertainty permissible under Article 12(1)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066.
(6) ‘material misstatement’ means a misstatement that, in the opinion of the verifier, individually or when aggregated
with other misstatements, exceeds the materiality level or could affect the treatment of the operator's or aircraft
operator's report by the competent authority;
(7) ‘operator's or aircraft operator's report’ means the annual emission report to be submitted by the operator or
aircraft operator pursuant to Article 14(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC, the tonne-kilometre report to be submitted by
the aircraft operator for the purposes of applying for the allocation of allowances pursuant to Articles 3e and 3f of
that Directive, the baseline data report submitted by the operator pursuant to Article 4(2) of Delegated Regulation
(EU) …/… or the data report submitted by the operator pursuant to Article 5(2) of that Regulation;
(8) ‘scope of accreditation’ means activities referred to in Annex I for which accreditation is sought or has been
granted;
(9) ‘competence’ means the ability to apply knowledge and skills to carry out an activity;
(10) ‘materiality level’ means the quantitative threshold or cut-off point above which misstatements, individually or
when aggregated with other misstatements, are considered material by the verifier;
(11) ‘control system’ means the operator's or aircraft operator's risk assessment and entire set of control activities,
including the continuous management thereof, that an operator or aircraft operator has established, documented,
implemented and maintained pursuant to Article 59 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or pursuant to
Article 11 of Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…, as appropriate;
(12) ‘control activities’ means any acts carried out or measures implemented by the operator or aircraft operator to
mitigate inherent risks;
(13) ‘non-conformity’ means one of the following:
(a) for the purposes of verifying an operator's emission report, any act or omission of an act by the operator that
is contrary to the greenhouse gas emissions permit and the requirements in the monitoring plan approved by
the competent authority;
(b) for the purposes of verifying an aircraft operator's emission or tonne-kilometre report, any act or omission of
an act by the aircraft operator that is contrary to the requirements in the monitoring plan approved by the
competent authority;
(c) for the purposes of verifying the baseline data report submitted by the operator pursuant to Article 4(2)(a) of
Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… or the new entrant data report submitted by the operator pursuant to
Article 5(2) of that Regulation any act or omission of an act by the operator that is contrary to the
requirements in the monitoring methodology plan;
(d) for the purposes of accreditation pursuant to Chapter IV, any act or omission of an act by the verifier that is
contrary to the requirements of this Regulation;
(14) ‘site’ means, for the purposes of verifying the emission or tonne-kilometre report of an aircraft operator, the
locations where the monitoring process is defined and managed, including the locations where relevant data and
information are controlled and stored;
(15) ‘control environment’ means the environment in which the internal control system functions and the overall
actions of an operator's or aircraft operator's management to ensure awareness of this internal control system;
(16) ‘inherent risk’ means the susceptibility of a parameter in the operator's or aircraft operator's report to misstatements
that could be material, individually or when aggregated with other misstatements, before taking into consideration
the effect of any related control activities;
(17) ‘control risk’ means the susceptibility of a parameter in the operator's or aircraft operator's report to misstatements
that could be material, individually or when aggregated with other misstatements, and that will not be prevented or
detected and corrected on a timely basis by the control system;
(18) ‘verification risk’ means the risk, being a function of inherent risk, control risk and detection risk, that the verifier
expresses an inappropriate verification opinion when the operator's or aircraft operator's report is not free of
material misstatements;
(19) ‘reasonable assurance’ means a high but not absolute level of assurance, expressed positively in the verification
opinion, as to whether the operator's or aircraft operator's report subject to verification is free from material
misstatement;
(20) ‘analytical procedures’ means the analysis of fluctuations and trends in the data including an analysis of the
relationships that are inconsistent with other relevant information or that deviate from predicted amounts;
(21) ‘internal verification documentation’ means all internal documentation that a verifier has compiled to record all
documentary evidence and justification of activities that are carried out for the verification of an operator's or
aircraft operator's report;
(22) ‘EU ETS lead auditor’ means an EU ETS auditor in charge of directing and supervising the verification team, who is
responsible for performing and reporting on the verification of an operator's or aircraft operator's report;
(23) ‘EU ETS auditor’ means an individual member of a verification team responsible for conducting a verification of an
operator's or aircraft operator's report other than the EU ETS lead auditor;
(24) ‘technical expert’ means a person who provides detailed knowledge and expertise on a specific subject matter
needed for the performance of verification activities for the purposes of Chapter III and for the performance of ac
creditation activities for the purposes of Chapter V;
(25) ‘level of assurance’ means the degree of assurance the verifier provides on the verification report based on the
objective of reducing the verification risk according to the circumstances of the verification engagement;
(26) ‘assessor’ means a person assigned by a national accreditation body to perform individually or as part of an
assessment team an assessment of a verifier pursuant to this Regulation;
(27) ‘lead assessor’ means an assessor who is given the overall responsibility for assessing a verifier pursuant to this
Regulation;
(28) ‘baseline data report’ means a report submitted by an operator pursuant to Article 4(2) of Delegated Regulation
(EU) …/…;
(29) ‘new entrant data report’ means a report submitted by an operator pursuant to Article 5(2) of Delegated Regulation
(EU) …/….
Article 4
Presumption of conformity
Where a verifier demonstrates its conformity with the criteria laid down in the relevant harmonised standards as defined
in point (9) of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008, or parts thereof, the references of which have been published
in the Official Journal of the European Union, it shall be presumed to comply with the requirements set out in Chapters II
and III of this Regulation in so far as the applicable harmonised standards cover those requirements.
Article 5
General framework for accreditation
Where no specific provisions concerning the composition of the national accreditation bodies or the activities and
requirements linked to accreditation are laid down in this Regulation, the relevant provisions of Regulation (EC)
No 765/2008 shall apply.
CHAPTER II
VERIFICATION
Article 6
Reliability of verification
A verified emissions report, baseline data report or new entrant data report shall be reliable for users. It shall represent
faithfully that, which it either purports to represent or may reasonably be expected to represent.
The process of verifying operator's or aircraft operator's report shall be an effective and reliable tool in support of
quality assurance and quality control procedures, providing information upon which an operator or aircraft operator can
act to improve performance in monitoring and reporting emissions or data relevant for free allocation.
Article 7
General obligations of the verifier
1. The verifier shall carry out the verification and the activities required by this Chapter with the aim of providing
a verification report that concludes with reasonable assurance that the operator's or aircraft operator's report is free
from material misstatements.
2. The verifier shall plan and perform the verification with an attitude of professional scepticism, recognising that
circumstances may exist that cause the information in the operator's or aircraft operator's report to contain material
misstatements.
3. The verifier must carry out verification in the public interest, and be independent of the operator or aircraft
operator and the competent authorities responsible for Directive 2003/87/EC.
4. During the verification, the verifier shall assess whether:
(a) the operator's or aircraft operator's report is complete and meets the requirements laid down in Annex X to
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or in Annex IV to Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…, as appropriate;
(b) the operator or aircraft operator has acted in compliance with the requirements of the greenhouse gas emissions
permit and the monitoring plan approved by the competent authority, where the verification of an operator's
emission report is concerned, and with the requirements of the monitoring plan approved by the competent
authority, where the verification of an aircraft operator's emission or tonne-kilometre report is concerned;
(c) where the verification of an operator's baseline data report or new entrant data report is concerned, the operator has
acted in conformance with the requirements of the monitoring methodology plan pursuant to Article 8 of Delegated
Regulation (EU) …/… approved by the competent authority;
(d) the data in the operator's or aircraft operator's report are free from material misstatements;
(e) information can be provided in support of the operator's or aircraft operator's data flow activities, control system
and associated procedures to improve the performance of their monitoring and reporting.
By way of derogation from point (c), the verifier shall assess whether the operator's monitoring methodology plan is in
compliance with the requirements of Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… where the monitoring methodology plan is not
subject to approval of the competent authority prior to submission of the baseline data report. If the verifier discovers
that a monitoring methodology plan does not comply with Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…, the operator shall modify
the monitoring methodology plan so that it complies with that Regulation.
For the purpose of point (d) of this paragraph, the verifier shall obtain clear and objective evidence from the operator or
aircraft operator to support the reported aggregated emissions, tonne-kilometres or data relevant for free allocation
taking into account all other information provided in the operator's or aircraft operator's report.
5. If the verifier discovers that an operator or an aircraft operator is not complying with Implementing Regulation
(EU) 2018/2066 or with Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…, that irregularity shall be included in the verification report
even if the monitoring plan or monitoring methodology plan concerned, as appropriate, has been approved by the
competent authority.
6. If the monitoring plan has not been approved by the competent authority pursuant to Article 12 of Implementing
Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, is incomplete or if significant modifications referred to in Article 15(3) or (4) of that
Implementing Regulation have been made during the reporting period which have not been accordingly approved by
the competent authority, the verifier shall advise the operator or aircraft operator to obtain the necessary approval from
the competent authority.
If the monitoring methodology plan is subject to the approval of the competent authority prior to submission of the
baseline data report pursuant to Article 8(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… and the monitoring methodology plan
has not been approved or is incomplete, or where significant modifications referred to in Article 9(5) of that Regulation
have been made which have not been approved by the competent authority, the verifier shall advise the operator to
obtain the necessary approval from the competent authority.
Following the approval by the competent authority, the verifier shall continue, repeat or adapt the verification activities
accordingly.
If the approval has not been obtained before the issue of the verification report, the verifier shall report this in the
verification report.
Article 8
Pre-contractual obligations
1. Before accepting a verification engagement, a verifier shall obtain a proper understanding of the operator or
aircraft operator and assess whether it can undertake the verification. For this purpose the verifier shall at least:
(a) evaluate the risks involved to undertake the verification of the operator's or aircraft operator's report in accordance
with this Regulation;
(b) undertake a review of the information supplied by the operator or aircraft operator to determine the scope of the
verification;
(c) assess whether the engagement falls within the scope of its accreditation;
(d) assess whether it has the competence, personnel and resources required to select a verification team capable of
dealing with the complexity of the installation or the aircraft operator's activities and fleet as well as whether it is
capable of successfully completing the verification activities within the timeframe required;
(e) assess whether it is capable of ensuring that the potential verification team at its disposal holds all the competence,
and persons required to carry out verification activities for that specific operator or aircraft operator;
(f) determine, for each verification engagement requested, the time allocation needed to properly carry out the
verification.
2. The operator or aircraft operator shall provide the verifier with all relevant information that enables the verifier to
carry out the activities referred to in paragraph 1.
Article 9
Time allocation
1. When determining the time allocation for a verification engagement referred to in Article 8(1)(f), the verifier shall
at least take into account:
(a) the complexity of the installation or the aircraft operator's activities and fleet;
(b) the level of information and the complexity of the monitoring plan approved by the competent authority or the
monitoring methodology plan, as appropriate;
(c) the required materiality level;
(d) the complexity and completeness of the data flow activities and the control system of the operator or aircraft
operator;
(e) the location of information and data related to greenhouse gas emissions, tonne-kilometre data or data relevant for
free allocation.
2. The verifier shall ensure that the verification contract provides for the possibility for time to be charged in addition
to the time agreed in the contract, where such additional time is found to be needed for the strategic analysis, risk
analysis or other verification activities. The situations where the additional time may be needed shall include at least the
following:
(a) during the verification where the data flow activities, control activities or logistics of the operator or aircraft
operator seem to be more complex than initially anticipated;
(b) where misstatements, non-conformities, insufficient data or errors in the data sets are identified by the verifier
during the verification.
3. The verifier shall record the time allocated in the internal verification documentation.
Article 10
Information from an operator or aircraft operator
1. Before the strategic analysis and at other points of time during the verification, the operator or aircraft operator
shall provide the verifier with all of the following:
(a) the operator's greenhouse gas emissions permit, if this concerns the verification of an operator's emission report;
(b) the latest version of the operator's or aircraft operator's monitoring plan as well as any other relevant versions of
the monitoring plan approved by the competent authority, including evidence of the approval;
(c) the latest version of the operator's monitoring methodology plan as well as any other relevant versions of the
monitoring methodology plan, including, where applicable, evidence of the approval;
(d) a description of the operator's or aircraft operator's data flow activities;
(e) the operator's or aircraft operator's risk assessment referred to in Article 59(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU)
2018/2066 or Article 11(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…, as appropriate, and an outline of the overall
control system;
(f) where applicable, the simplified uncertainty assessment referred to in Article 7(2)(c) of Delegated Regulation (EU)
…/…;
(g) the procedures mentioned in the monitoring plan as approved by the competent authority or the monitoring
methodology plan, including procedures for data flow activities and control activities;
(h) the operator's or aircraft operator's annual emission, tonne-kilometre report, baseline data report or new entrant
data report, as appropriate;
(i) the baseline data reports of previous allocation periods for earlier allocation phases and annual activity level reports
of the previous years submitted to the competent authority for the purpose of Article 10a(21) of Directive
2003/87/EC, if applicable;
(j) where applicable, the operator's sampling plan referred to in Article 33 of Implementing Regulation (EU)
2018/2066 as approved by the competent authority;
(k) if the monitoring plan was modified during the reporting period, a record of all those modifications in accordance
with Article 16(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066;
(l) where applicable, the report referred to in Article 69(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066;
(m) the verification report from the previous year or the previous baseline period, as appropriate, if the verifier did not
carry out the verification for that particular operator or aircraft operator the previous year or baseline period, as
appropriate;
(n) all relevant correspondence with the competent authority, in particular information related to the notification of
modifications of the monitoring plan or monitoring methodology plan, as appropriate;
(o) information on databases and data sources used for monitoring and reporting purposes, including those from
Eurocontrol or another relevant organisation;
(p) where the verification concerns the emission report of an installation carrying out the geological storage of
greenhouse gases in a storage site permitted under Directive 2009/31/EC, the monitoring plan required by that
Directive and the reports required by Article 14 of that Directive, covering at least the reporting period of the
emissions report to be verified;
(q) where applicable, the approval of the competent authority for not carrying out site visits for installations pursuant
to Article 31(1);
(r) the operator's evidence demonstrating compliance with the uncertainty thresholds for the tiers laid down in the
monitoring plan;
(s) any other relevant information necessary for planning and carrying out the verification.
2. Before the verifier issues the verification report, the operator or aircraft operator shall provide it with the final
authorised and internally validated operator's or aircraft operator's report.
Article 11
Strategic analysis
1. At the beginning of the verification the verifier shall assess the likely nature, scale and complexity of the
verification tasks by carrying out a strategic analysis of all activities relevant to the installation or the aircraft operator.
2. For the purposes of understanding the activities carried out by the installation or the aircraft operator, the verifier
shall collect and review the information needed to assess that the verification team is sufficiently competent to carry out
the verification, to determine that the time allocation indicated in the contract has been set correctly and to ensure that
it is able to conduct the necessary risk analysis. The information shall include at least:
(a) the information referred to in Article 10(1);
(b) the required materiality level;
(c) the information obtained from the verification in previous years, if the verifier is carrying out the verification for the
same operator or aircraft operator.
3. When reviewing the information referred to in paragraph 2, the verifier shall at least assess the following:
(a) for the purposes of the verification of the operator's emission report, the category of the installation referred to in
Article 19 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 and the activities carried out at that installation;
(b) for the purposes of the verification of the aircraft operator's emission or tonne- kilometre report, the size and nature
of the aircraft operator, the distribution of information in different locations as well as the number and type of
flights;
(c) the monitoring plan approved by the competent authority or monitoring methodology plan, as appropriate, as well
as the specifics of the monitoring methodology laid down in that monitoring plan or the monitoring methodology
plan as appropriate;
(d) the nature, scale and complexity of emission sources and source streams as well as the equipment and processes that
have resulted in emissions, tonne-kilometre data or data relevant for free allocation, including the measurement
equipment described in the monitoring plan or monitoring methodology plan as appropriate, the origin and
application of calculation factors and other primary data sources;
(e) the data flow activities, the control system and the control environment.
4. When carrying out the strategic analysis, the verifier shall check the following:
(a) whether the monitoring plan or monitoring methodology plan, as appropriate, presented to it is the most recent
version and, where required, approved by the competent authority;
(b) whether there have been any modifications of the monitoring plan during the reporting period or of the monitoring
methodology plan during the baseline period, as appropriate;
(c) where applicable, whether the modifications referred to in point (b) have been notified to the competent authority
pursuant to Article 15(1) or Article 23 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or approved by the competent
authority in accordance with Article 15(2) of that Implementing Regulation.
(d) where applicable, whether the modifications referred to in point (b) have been notified to the competent authority
pursuant to Article 9(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… or approved by the competent authority in accordance
with Article 9(4) of that Regulation.
Article 12
Risk analysis
1. The verifier shall identify and analyse the following elements to design, plan and implement an effective
verification:
(a) the inherent risks;
(b) the control activities;
(c) where control activities referred to in point (b) have been implemented, the control risks concerning the effectiveness
of those control activities.
2. When identifying and analysing the elements referred to in paragraph 1, the verifier shall at least consider:
(a) the findings from the strategic analysis referred to in Article 11(1);
(b) the information referred to in Article 10(1) and Article 11(2)(c);
(c) the materiality level referred to in Article 11(2)(b).
3. If the verifier determines that the operator or aircraft operator has failed to identify the relevant inherent risks and
control risks in its risk assessment, the verifier shall inform the operator or aircraft operator thereof.
4. Where appropriate according to the information obtained during the verification, the verifier shall revise the risk
analysis and modify or repeat the verification activities to be performed.
Article 13
Verification plan
1. The verifier shall draft a verification plan commensurate with the information obtained and the risks identified
during the strategic analysis and the risk analysis, and including at least:
(a) a verification programme describing the nature and scope of the verification activities as well as the time and
manner in which these activities are to be carried out;
(b) a test plan setting out the scope and methods of testing the control activities as well as the procedures for control
activities;
(c) a data sampling plan setting out the scope and methods of data sampling related to data points underlying the
aggregated emissions in the operator or aircraft operator's emission report, the aggregated tonne-kilometre data in
the aircraft operator's tonne-kilometre report or the aggregated data relevant for free allocation in the operator's
baseline data report or new entrant data report.
2. The verifier shall set up the test plan referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 in a manner that allows it to
determine the extent to which the relevant control activities may be relied on for the purposes of assessing compliance
with the requirements mentioned in Article 7(4)(b), (c), (d) or the second subparagraph of Article 7(4).
When determining the sampling size and sampling activities for testing the control activities, the verifier shall consider
the following elements:
(a) the inherent risks;
(b) the control environment;
(c) the relevant control activities;
(d) the requirement to deliver a verification opinion with reasonable assurance.
3. When determining the sampling size and sampling activities for sampling the data referred to in point (c) of
paragraph 1, the verifier shall consider the following elements:
(a) the inherent risks and control risks;
(b) the results of the analytical procedures;
(c) the requirement to deliver a verification opinion with reasonable assurance;
(d) the materiality level;
(e) the materiality of the contribution of an individual data element for the overall data set.
4. The verifier shall set up and implement the verification plan such that the verification risk is reduced to an
acceptable level to obtain reasonable assurance that the operator's or aircraft operator's report is free from material
misstatements.
5. The verifier shall update the risk analysis and the verification plan, and adapt the verification activities during the
verification when it finds additional risks that need to be reduced or when there is less actual risk than initially expected.
Article 14
Verification activities
The verifier shall implement the verification plan and, based on the risk analysis, the verifier shall check the implemen
tation of the monitoring plan as approved by the competent authority or monitoring methodology plan, as appropriate.
To that end, the verifier shall at least carry out substantive testing consisting of analytical procedures, data verification
and checking the monitoring methodology and check the following:
(a) the data flow activities and the systems used in the data flow, including information technology systems;
(b) whether the control activities of the operator or aircraft operator are appropriately documented, implemented,
maintained and effective to mitigate the inherent risks;
(c) whether the procedures listed in the monitoring plan or monitoring methodology plan, as appropriate, are effective
to mitigate the inherent risks and control risks and whether the procedures are implemented, sufficiently
documented and properly maintained.
For the purposes of point (a) of the second paragraph, the verifier shall track the data flow following the sequence and
interaction of the data flow activities from primary source data to the compilation of the operator's or aircraft operator's
report.
Article 15
Analytical procedures
1. The verifier shall use analytical procedures to assess the plausibility and completeness of data where the inherent
risk, the control risk and the aptness of the operator's or aircraft operator's control activities show the need for such
analytical procedures.
2. In carrying out the analytical procedures referred to in paragraph 1, the verifier shall assess reported data to
identify potential risk areas and to subsequently validate and tailor the planned verification activities. The verifier shall at
least:
(a) assess the plausibility of fluctuations and trends over time or between comparable items;
(b) identify immediate outliers, unexpected data and data gaps.
3. In applying the analytical procedures referred to in paragraph 1, the verifier shall perform the following
procedures:
(a) preliminary analytical procedures on aggregated data before carrying out the activities referred to in Article 14 in
order to understand the nature, complexity and relevance of the reported data;
(b) substantive analytical procedures on the aggregated data and the data points underlying these data for the purposes
of identifying potential structural errors and immediate outliers;
(c) final analytical procedures on the aggregated data to ensure that all errors identified during the verification process
have been resolved correctly.
4. Where the verifier identifies outliers, fluctuations, trends, data gaps or data that are inconsistent with other
relevant information or that differ significantly from expected amounts or ratios, the verifier shall obtain explanations
from the operator or aircraft operator supported by additional relevant evidence.
Based on the explanations and additional evidence provided, the verifier shall assess the impact on the verification plan
and the verification activities to be performed.
Article 16
Data verification
1. The verifier shall verify the data in the operator's or aircraft operator's report by applying detailed testing of the
data, including by tracing the data back to the primary data source, cross-checking data with external data sources,
performing reconciliations, checking thresholds regarding appropriate data and carrying out recalculations.
2. As part of the data verification referred to in paragraph 1 and taking into account the approved monitoring plan
or monitoring methodology plan, as appropriate, including the procedures described in that plan, the verifier shall
check:
(a) for the purposes of verifying an operator's emission report, the boundaries of an installation;
(b) for the purposes of verifying an operator's baseline data report or new entrant data report, the boundaries of an
installation and its sub-installations;
(c) for the purposes of verifying an operator's emission report, baseline data report or new entrant data report, the
completeness of source streams and emission sources as described in the monitoring plan approved by the
competent authority or monitoring methodology plan, as appropriate;
(d) for the purposes of verifying an aircraft operator's emission report and tonne-kilometre report, the completeness of
flights covered by an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC for which the aircraft operator is
responsible as well as the completeness of emission data and tonne-kilometre data respectively;
(e) for the purposes of verifying an aircraft operator's emission report and tonne-kilometre report, the consistency
between reported data and mass and balance documentation;
(f) for the purposes of verifying an aircraft operator's emission report, the consistency between aggregated fuel
consumption and data on fuel purchased or otherwise supplied to the aircraft performing the aviation activity;
(g) the consistency of the aggregated reported data in an operator's or aircraft operator's report with primary source
data;
(h) where an operator applies a measurement-based methodology referred to in Article 21(1) of Implementing
Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, the measured values using the results of the calculations performed by the operator in
accordance with Article 46 of that Implementing Regulation;
(i) the reliability and accuracy of the data.
3. For the purposes of checking the completeness of flights referred to in point (d) of paragraph 2, the verifier shall
use an aircraft operator's air traffic data, including data collected from Eurocontrol or other relevant organisations which
can process air traffic information such as that available to Eurocontrol.
Article 17
Verification of the correct application of the monitoring methodology
1. The verifier shall check the correct application and implementation of the monitoring methodology as approved
by the competent authority in the monitoring plan including specific details of that monitoring methodology.
2. For the purposes of verifying the operator's emission report, the verifier shall check the correct application and
implementation of the sampling plan referred to in Article 33 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, as
approved by the competent authority.
3. For the purposes of verifying the operator's baseline data report or new entrant data report, the verifier shall check
whether the methodology for collecting and monitoring data defined in the monitoring methodology plan is applied in
the correct way, including:
(a) whether all data on emissions, inputs, outputs and energy flows are attributed correctly to the sub-installations in
line with the system boundaries as referred to in Annex I to Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…;
(b) whether data are complete and whether data gaps or double counting have occurred;
(c) whether activity levels for product benchmarks are based on a correct application of the product definitions listed in
Annex I to Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…;
(d) whether activity levels for the heat benchmark sub-installations, the district heating sub-installation, the fuel
benchmark sub-installations and the process emissions sub-installations have been correctly attributed according to
the products produced and pursuant to delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 10b(5) of Directive 2003/87/EC.
4. Where transferred CO2 is subtracted in accordance with Article 49 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066
or transferred N2O is not counted in accordance with Article 50 of that Regulation and the CO2 or N2O transferred is
measured by both the transferring and receiving installation, the verifier shall check whether differences between the
measured values at both installations can be explained by the uncertainty of the measurement systems and whether the
correct arithmetic average of the measured values has been used in the emission reports of both installations.
Where the differences between the measured values at both installations cannot be explained by the uncertainty of the
measurement systems, the verifier shall check whether adjustments were made to align the differences between the
measured values, whether those adjustments were conservative and whether the competent authority has granted
approval for those adjustments.
5. Where operators are required, pursuant to Article 12(3) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012, to include
further elements in the monitoring plan that are relevant for meeting the requirements of Article 24(1) of Commission
Decision 2011/278/EU (1), the verifier shall check the correct application and implementation of the procedures referred
to in Article 12(3) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012. In doing so, the verifier shall also check whether
information on any planned or actual changes to the capacity, activity level and operation of an installation have been
submitted by the operator to the competent authority by 31 December of the reporting period.
(1) Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of
emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 130,
17.5.2011, p. 1).
Article 18
Verification of methods applied for missing data
1. Where methods laid down in the monitoring plan as approved by the competent authority have been used to
complete missing data pursuant to Article 66 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, the verifier shall check
whether the methods used were appropriate for the specific situation and whether they have been applied correctly.
If the operator or aircraft operator has obtained an approval by the competent authority to use other methods than
those referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 66 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066,
the verifier shall check whether the approved approach has been applied correctly and appropriately documented.
Where an operator or an aircraft operator is not able to obtain such approval in time, the verifier shall check whether
the approach used by the operator or aircraft operator to complete the missing data ensures that the emissions are not
underestimated and that this approach does not lead to material misstatements.
2. The verifier shall check the effectiveness of the control activities implemented by the operator or aircraft operator
to prevent missing data referred to in Article 66 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 from occurring.
3. Where data gaps in baseline data reports or new entrant data reports have occurred, the verifier shall check
whether methods are laid down in the monitoring methodology plan to deal with data gaps pursuant to Article 12
Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…, whether those methods were appropriate for the specific situation and whether they
have been applied correctly.
Where no applicable data gap method is laid down in the monitoring methodology plan, the verifier shall check
whether the approach used by the operator to compensate for the missing data is based on reasonable evidence and
ensures that the data required by Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… are not underestimated or overestimated.
Article 19
Uncertainty assessment
1. Where Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 requires the operator to demonstrate compliance with the
uncertainty thresholds for activity data and calculation factors, the verifier shall confirm the validity of the information
used to calculate the uncertainty levels as set out in the approved monitoring plan.
2. Where an operator applies a monitoring methodology not based on tiers, as referred to in Article 22 of
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, the verifier shall check the following:
(a) whether an assessment and quantification of the uncertainty has been carried out by the operator demonstrating
that the required overall uncertainty threshold for the annual level of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to point (c)
of Article 22 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 has been met;
(b) the validity of the information used for the assessment and quantification of the uncertainty;
(c) whether the overall approach used for the assessment and the quantification of the uncertainty is in accordance with
point (b) of Article 22 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066;
(d) whether evidence is provided that the conditions for the monitoring methodology referred to in point (a) of
Article 22 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 have been met.
3. Where Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… requires the operator to carry out a simplified uncertainty assessment, the
verifier shall confirm the validity of the information used for that assessment.
Article 20
Sampling
1. When checking the conformance of control activities and procedures referred to in points (b) and (c) of Article 14
or when performing the checks referred to in Articles 15 and 16, the verifier may use sampling methods specific to an
installation or aircraft operator provided that, based on the risk analysis, sampling is justified.
2. Where the verifier identifies a non-conformity or a misstatement in the course of sampling, it shall request the
operator or aircraft operator to explain the main causes of the non-conformity or the misstatement in order to assess
the impact of the non-conformity or misstatement on the reported data. Based on the outcome of that assessment, the
verifier shall determine whether additional verification activities are needed, whether the sampling size needs to be
increased, and which part of the data population has to be corrected by the operator or aircraft operator.
3. The verifier shall document the outcome of the checks referred to in Articles 14 to 17, including the details of
additional samples, in the internal verification documentation.
Article 21
Site visits
1. At one or more appropriate times during the verification process, the verifier shall conduct a site visit in order to
assess the operation of measuring devices and monitoring systems, to conduct interviews, to carry out the activities
required by this Chapter as well as to gather sufficient information and evidence enabling it to conclude whether the
operator's or aircraft operator's report is free from material misstatements.
2. The operator or aircraft operator shall provide the verifier access to its sites.
3. For the purposes of verifying the operator's emission report, the verifier shall also use a site visit to assess the
boundaries of the installation as well as the completeness of source streams and emission sources.
4. For the purposes of verifying the operator's baseline data report or new entrant data report, the verifier shall also
use a site visit to assess the boundaries of the installation and its sub-installations as well as the completeness of source
streams, emission sources and technical connections.
5. For the purposes of verifying the operator's emission report, baseline data report or new entrant data report, the
verifier shall decide, based on the risk analysis, whether visits to additional locations are needed, including where
relevant parts of data flow activities and control activities are carried out in other locations such as company
headquarters and other off-site offices.
Article 22
Addressing misstatements, non-conformities and non-compliance
1. If the verifier identifies misstatements, non-conformities or non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU)
2018/2066 or Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…, as appropriate, during the verification, it shall inform the operator or
aircraft operator thereof on a timely basis and request relevant corrections.
The operator or aircraft operator shall correct any communicated misstatements or non-conformities.
Where a non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… has been
identified, the operator or aircraft operator shall notify the competent authority and correct the non-compliance as
appropriate without undue delay.
2. The verifier shall document and mark as resolved in the internal verification documentation all misstatements,
non-conformities or non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or Delegated Regulation (EU)
…/… that have been corrected by the operator or aircraft operator during the verification.
3. If the operator or aircraft operator does not correct the misstatements or non-conformities communicated to them
by the verifier in accordance with paragraph 1 before the verifier issues the verification report, the verifier shall request
the operator or aircraft operator to explain the main causes of the non-conformity or misstatement in order to assess
the impact of the non-conformities or misstatements on the reported data.
The verifier shall determine whether the uncorrected misstatements, individually or when aggregated with other
misstatements, have a material effect on the total reported emissions, tonne-kilometre data or data relevant for free
allocation. In assessing the materiality of misstatements the verifier shall consider the size and nature of the
misstatement as well as the particular circumstances of their occurrence.
The verifier shall assess whether the uncorrected non-conformity, individually or when combined with other non-confor
mities, has an impact on the reported data and whether this leads to material misstatement.
If the operator or aircraft operator does not correct the non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066
or Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… in accordance with paragraph 1 before the verifier issues the verification report, the
verifier shall assess whether the uncorrected non-compliance has an impact on the reported data and whether this leads
to material misstatement.
The verifier may consider misstatements as material even if those misstatements, individually or when aggregated with
other misstatements, are below the materiality level set out in Article 23, where such consideration is justified by the
size and nature of the misstatements and the particular circumstances of their occurrence.
Article 23
Materiality level
1. For the purposes of verifying emission reports, the materiality level shall be 5 % of the total reported emissions in
the reporting period which is subject to verification, for any of the following:
(a) category A installations referred to in Article 19(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 and category B
installations referred to in Article 19(2)(b) of that Implementing Regulation;
(b) aircraft operators with annual emissions equal to or less than 500 kilotonnes of fossil CO2.
2. For the purposes of verifying emissions reports the materiality level shall be 2 % of the total reported emissions in
the reporting period which is subject to verification, for any of the following:
(a) category C installations referred to in Article 19(2)(c) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066;
(b) aircraft operators with annual emissions of more than 500 kilotonnes of fossil CO2.
3. For the purposes of verifying tonne-kilometre reports of aircraft operators, the materiality level shall be 5 % of the
total reported tonne-kilometre data in the reporting period which is subject to verification.
4. For the purposes of verifying baseline data report or new entrant data reports, the materiality level shall be 5 % of
the total reported value of the following:
(a) the installation's total emissions, where the data relate to emissions;
(b) the sum of imports and production of net measurable heat, if relevant, where the data relate to measurable heat
data;
(c) the sum of the amounts of waste gases imported and produced within the installation, if relevant;
(d) the activity level of each relevant product benchmark sub-installation individually.
Article 24
Concluding on the findings of verification
When completing the verification and considering the information obtained during the verification, the verifier shall:
(a) check the final data from the operator or aircraft operator, including data that have been adjusted based upon
information obtained during the verification;
(b) review the operator's or aircraft operator's reasons for any differences between the final data and data previously
provided;
(c) review the outcome of the assessment to determine whether the monitoring plan approved by the competent
authority or monitoring methodology plan, as appropriate, including the procedures described in that plan, has been
implemented correctly;
(d) assess whether the verification risk is at an acceptably low level to obtain reasonable assurance;
(e) ensure that sufficient evidence has been gathered to be able to give a verification opinion with reasonable assurance
that the report is free from material misstatements;
(f) ensure that the verification process is fully documented in the internal verification documentation and that a final
judgment in the verification report can be given.
Article 25
Independent review
1. The verifier shall submit the internal verification documentation and the verification report to an independent
reviewer prior to the issuance of the verification report.
2. The independent reviewer shall not have carried out any verification activities that are subject to their review.
3. The scope of the independent review shall encompass the complete verification process described in this Chapter
and recorded in the internal verification documentation.
The independent reviewer shall perform the review so as to ensure that the verification process is conducted in
accordance with this Regulation, that the procedures for verification activities referred to in Article 41 have been
correctly carried out, and that due professional care and judgment has been applied.
The independent reviewer shall also assess whether the evidence gathered is sufficient to enable the verifier to issue
a verification report with reasonable assurance.
4. Where circumstances occur which may cause changes in the verification report after the review, the independent
reviewer shall also review those changes and the evidence thereof.
5. The verifier shall properly authorise a person to authenticate the verification report based upon the conclusions of
the independent reviewer and the evidence in the internal verification documentation.
Article 26
Internal verification documentation
1. The verifier shall prepare and compile internal verification documentation containing at least:
(a) the results of the verification activities performed;
(b) the strategic analysis, risk analysis and verification plan;
(c) sufficient information to support the verification opinion, including justifications for judgments made on whether or
not the misstatements identified have material effect on the reported emissions, tonne-kilometre data or data
relevant for free allocation.
2. The internal verification documentation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be drafted in such a manner that the
independent reviewer referred to in Article 25 and the national accreditation body can assess whether the verification
has been performed in accordance with this Regulation.
After authentication of the verification report pursuant to Article 25(5), the verifier shall include results of the
independent review in the internal verification documentation.
3. The verifier shall, upon request, provide the competent authority access to the internal verification documentation
to facilitate an evaluation of the verification by the competent authority.
Article 27
Verification report
1. Based on the information collected during the verification, the verifier shall issue a verification report to the
operator or aircraft operator on each emission report, tonne-kilometre report, baseline data report or new entrant data
report that was subject to verification. The verification report shall include at least one of the following findings:
(a) the report is verified as satisfactory;
(b) the operator's or aircraft operator's report contains material misstatements that were not corrected before issuing the
verification report;
(c) the scope of verification is too limited pursuant to Article 28 and the verifier could not obtain sufficient evidence to
issue a verification opinion with reasonable assurance that the report is free from material misstatements;
(d) non-conformities, individually or combined with other non-conformities, provide insufficient clarity and prevent the
verifier from stating with reasonable assurance that the operator's or aircraft operator's report is free from material
misstatements;
(e) where the monitoring methodology plan is not subject to the approval of the competent authority, non-compliance
with Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… provide insufficient clarity and prevent the verifier from stating with
reasonable assurance that the baseline data report or new entrant data report is free from material misstatements.
For the purposes of point (a) of the first subparagraph, the operator's or aircraft operator's report may be verified as
satisfactory only where the operator's or aircraft operator's report is free from material misstatements.
2. The operator or aircraft operator shall submit the verification report to the competent authority together with the
operator's or aircraft operator's report concerned.
3. The verification report shall at least contain the following elements:

(a) the name of the operator or aircraft operator that was subject to verification;
(b) the objectives of the verification;
(c) the scope of the verification;
(d) a reference to the operator's or aircraft operator's report that has been verified;
(e) the criteria used to verify the operator's or aircraft operator's report, including the permit, where applicable, and
versions of the monitoring plan approved by the competent authority or monitoring methodology plan, as
appropriate, as well as the period of validity for each plan;
(f) in the case of verification of the baseline report required for allocation for the period 2021-2025, and the
competent authority has not required the monitoring methodology plan to be approved, confirmation that the
verifier has checked the monitoring methodology plan and that this plan is compliant with Delegated Regulation
(EU) …/…;
(g) where it concerns the verification of the operator's or aircraft operator's emission report, aggregated emissions or
tonne-kilometres per activity referred to in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC and per installation or aircraft
operator;
(h) where it concerns the verification of the baseline data report or new entrant data report, aggregated annual verified
data for each year in the baseline period for each sub-installation for the annual activity level and the emissions
attributed to the sub-installation;
(i) the reporting period or baseline period subject to verification;
(j) the responsibilities of the operator or aircraft operator, the competent authority and the verifier;
(k) the verification opinion statement;
(l) a description of any identified misstatements and non-conformities that were not corrected before the issuance of
the verification report;
(m) the dates on which site visits were carried out and by whom;
(n) information on whether any site visits were waived as well as the reasons for waiving these site visits;
(o) any issues of non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…,
which have become apparent during the verification;
(p) if approval by the competent authority cannot be obtained in time for the method used to complete the data gap
pursuant to the last subparagraph of Article 18(1), a confirmation whether the method used is conservative and
whether it does or does not lead to material misstatements;
(q) a statement if the method used to complete any data gap pursuant to Article 12 of Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…
leads to material misstatements;
(r) where the verifier has observed changes to the capacity, activity level and operation of the installation, which might
have an impact on the installation's allocation of emission allowances and which have not been reported to the
competent authority by 31 December of the reporting period in accordance with Article 24(1) of Commission
Decision 2011/278/EU, a description of those changes and related remarks;
(s) recommendations for improvements, where applicable;
(t) the names of the EU ETS lead auditor, the independent reviewer and, where applicable, the EU ETS auditor and the
technical expert that were involved in the verification of the operator's or aircraft operator's report;
(u) the date and signature by an authorised person on behalf of the verifier, including his name.
4. The verifier shall describe the misstatements, non-conformities and non-compliance with Implementing Regulation
(EU) 2018/2066 or Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…, in sufficient detail in the verification report to allow the operator
or aircraft operator as well as the competent authority to understand the following:
(a) the size and nature of the misstatement, non-conformity or non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU)
2018/2066 or Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…;
(b) why the misstatement has material effect, or not;
(c) to which element of the operator's or aircraft operator's report the misstatement refers, or to what element of the
monitoring plan or the monitoring methodology plan the non-conformity refers;
(d) to which Article in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… the non-com
pliance relates.
5. For the purposes of verifying emission reports or tonne-kilometre reports, if a Member State requires the verifier
to submit information on the verification process in addition to the elements described in paragraph 3 and that
information is not necessary to understand the verification opinion, the operator or aircraft operator may, for efficiency
reasons, submit that additional information to the competent authority separately from the verification report at an
alternative date, but no later than 15 May of the same year.
Article 28
Limitation of scope
The verifier may conclude that the scope of the verification referred to in Article 27(1)(c) is too limited in any of the
following situations:
(a) data are missing that prevent a verifier from obtaining the evidence required to reduce the verification risk to the
level needed to obtain reasonable level of assurance;
(b) the monitoring plan is not approved by the competent authority;
(c) the monitoring plan or monitoring methodology plan, as appropriate, does not provide sufficient scope or clarity to
conclude on the verification;
(d) the operator or aircraft operator has failed to make sufficient information available to enable the verifier to carry out
the verification;
(e) where Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… or the Member State required approval of the monitoring methodology plan
by the competent authority prior to submission of the baseline data report and that plan has not been approved by
the competent authority before the start of verification.
Article 29
Addressing outstanding non-material non-conformities
1. The verifier shall assess whether the operator or aircraft operator has corrected the non-conformities indicated in
the verification report related to the previous monitoring period according to the requirements on the operator referred
to in Article 69(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, where relevant.
If the operator or aircraft operator has not corrected those non-conformities pursuant to Article 69(4) of Implementing
Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, the verifier shall consider whether the omission increases or may increase the risk of
misstatements.
The verifier shall report in the verification report whether those non-conformities have been resolved by the operator or
aircraft operator.
2. The verifier shall record in the internal verification documentation details of when and how identified non-confor
mities are resolved by the operator or aircraft operator during the verification.
Article 30
Improvement of the monitoring and reporting process
1. Where the verifier has identified areas for improvement in the operator's or aircraft operator's performance related
to points (a) to (e) of this paragraph, it shall include in the verification report recommendations for improvement related
to the operator's or aircraft operator's performance on those points:
(a) the operator's or aircraft operator's risk assessment;
(b) the development, documentation, implementation and maintenance of data flow activities and control activities as
well as the evaluation of the control system;
(c) the development, documentation, implementation and maintenance of procedures for data flow activities and
control activities as well as other procedures that an operator or aircraft operator has to establish pursuant to
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or Article 11(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) …/…;
(d) the monitoring and reporting of emissions or tonne kilometres, including in relation to achieving higher tiers,
reducing risks and enhancing efficiency in the monitoring and reporting;
(e) the monitoring and reporting of data for baseline data reports and new entrant reports.
2. During verification following a year in which recommendations for improvement were made in a verification
report, the verifier shall check whether the operator or aircraft operator has implemented those recommendations for
improvement and the manner in which this has been done.
Where the operator or aircraft operator has not implemented those recommendations or has not implemented them
correctly, the verifier shall assess the impact this has on the risk of misstatements and non-conformities.
Article 31
Simplified verification for installations
1. By way of derogation from Article 21(1), the verifier may decide, subject to the approval by a competent authority
in accordance with the second subparagraph of this Article, not to carry out site visits to installations. This decision
shall be based on the outcome of the risk analysis and after determining that all relevant data can be remotely accessed
by the verifier and that the conditions for not carrying out site visits are met. The verifier shall inform the operator
thereof without undue delay.
The operator shall submit an application to the competent authority requesting the competent authority to approve the
verifier's decision not to carry out the site visit.
On an application submitted by the operator concerned, the competent authority shall decide whether to approve the
verifier's decision not to carry out the site visit, taking into consideration all of the following elements:
(a) the information provided by the verifier on the outcome of the risk analysis;
(b) information that the relevant data can be remotely accessed;
(c) evidence that the requirements laid down in paragraph 3 are not applicable to the installation;
(d) evidence that the conditions for not carrying out the site visits are met.
2. The approval of the competent authority referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article is not required for not carrying
out site visits of installations with low emissions referred to in Article 47(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU)
2018/2066.
3. The verifier shall always carry out site visits in the following situations:
(a) when an operator's emission report is verified for the first time by the verifier;
(b) if a verifier has not carried out a site visit in two reporting periods immediately preceding the current reporting
period;
(c) if, during the reporting period, there have been significant modifications of the monitoring plan including those
referred to in Article 15(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066;
(d) if an operator's baseline data report or new entrant data report is verified.
4. Point c of paragraph 3 is not applicable where, during the reporting period, there have been only modifications of
the default value for a calculation factor as referred to in Article 15(3)(h) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066.
Article 32
Conditions for not carrying out site visits
The conditions for not carrying out site visits referred to in Article 31(1) are any of the following:
(1) the verification concerns a category A installation referred to in Article 19(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU)
2018/2066 or a category B installation referred to in Article 19(2)(b) of that Implementing Regulation whereby:
(a) the installation has only one source stream as referred to in Article 19(3)(c) of Implementing Regulation (EU)
2018/2066 which is natural gas, or one or more de minimis source streams which aggregated do not exceed the
threshold for de minimis source streams laid down in Article 19 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066;
(b) the natural gas is monitored through fiscal metering which is subject to an appropriate legal regime for the
control of fiscal meters and meets the required uncertainty levels related to the applicable tier;
(c) only default values for the calculation factors of natural gas are applied;
(2) the verification concerns a category A installation referred to in Article 19(2)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU)
2018/2066 or a category B installation referred to in Article 19(2)(b) of that Implementing Regulation whereby:
(a) the installation has only one source stream which is a fuel without process emissions, and that fuel is either
a solid fuel directly combusted in the installation without intermediate storage, or a liquid or gaseous fuel for
which there may be intermediate storage;
(b) the activity data related to the source stream is monitored by using one of the following methods:
(i) fiscal metering method which is subject to an appropriate legal regime for the control of fiscal meters and
meets the required uncertainty levels related to the applicable tier;
(ii) method based solely on invoice data taking into account stock changes if relevant;
(c) only default values for calculation factors are applied;
(d) the competent authority has allowed the installation to use a simplified monitoring plan in accordance with
Article 13 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066;
(3) the verification concerns an installation with low emissions as referred to in Article 47(2) of Implementing
Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 and paragraphs (a) to (c) of point 2 are applicable.
(4) the verification concerns an installation located on an unmanned site whereby:
(a) telemetered data from the unmanned site is sent directly to another location where all data is processed,
managed and stored;
(b) the same person is responsible for all data management and recording for the site;
(c) the meters have already been inspected on site by the operator or a laboratory in accordance with Article 60 of
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 and a signed document or date-stamped photographic evidence
provided by the operator demonstrates that no metering or operational changes have occurred at the installation
since that inspection;
(5) the verification concerns an installation located on a remote or inaccessible site, in particular an off-shore
installation, whereby:
(a) there is a high level of centralisation of data collected from that site and transmitted directly to another location
where all the data is processed, managed and stored with good quality assurance;
(b) the meters have already been inspected on site by the operator or a laboratory in accordance with Article 60 of
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 and a signed document or date-stamped photographic evidence
provided by the operator demonstrates that no metering or operational changes have occurred at the installation
since that inspection.
Point (2) may also be applied if, in addition to the source stream as referred to in point (a) of that point, the installation
uses one or more de minimis source streams which aggregated do not exceed the threshold for de minimis source streams
laid down in Article 19 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066.
Article 33
Simplified verification for aircraft operators
1. By way of derogation from Article 21(1) of this Regulation, a verifier may decide not to carry out a site visit of
a small emitter referred to in Article 55(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 if the verifier has concluded,
based on its risk analysis, that all relevant data can be remotely accessed by the verifier.
2. Where an aircraft operator uses the simplified tools referred to in Article 55(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU)
2018/2066 to determine the fuel consumption and the reported data has been generated using those tools indepen
dently from any input from the aircraft operator, the verifier may, based on its risk analysis, decide not to carry out the
checks referred to in Articles 14 and 16, Article 17(1) and (2) and Article 18 of this Regulation.
Article 34
Simplified verification plans
Where a verifier uses a simplified verification plan, the verifier shall keep a record of justifications for using such plans
in the internal verification documentation, including evidence that the conditions for using simplified verification plans
have been met.
CHAPTER III
REQUIREMENTS FOR VERIFIERS
Article 35
Sectoral scopes of accreditation
The verifier shall only issue a verification report to an operator or aircraft operator that performs an activity that is
covered by the scope of the activity referred to in Annex I for which the verifier has been granted accreditation
according to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 and this Regulation.
Article 36
Continued competence process
1. The verifier shall establish, document, implement and maintain a competence process to ensure that all personnel
entrusted with verification activities are competent for the tasks that are allocated to them.
2. As part of the competence process referred to in paragraph 1, the verifier shall at least determine, document,
implement and maintain the following:
(a) general competence criteria for all personnel undertaking verification activities;
(b) specific competence criteria for each function within the verifier undertaking verification activities, in particular for
the EU ETS auditor, EU ETS lead auditor, independent reviewer and technical expert;
(c) a method to ensure the continued competence and regular evaluation of the performance of all personnel that
undertake verification activities;
(d) a process for ensuring ongoing training of the personnel undertaking verification activities;
(e) a process for assessing whether the verification engagement falls within the scope of the verifier's accreditation, and
whether the verifier has the competence, personnel and resources required to select the verification team and
successfully complete the verification activities within the timeframe required.
The competence criteria referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph shall be specific for each scope of accreditation
in which these persons are carrying out verification activities.
In evaluating the competence of the personnel pursuant to point (c) of the first subparagraph, the verifier shall assess
that competence against the competence criteria referred to in points (a) and (b).
The process referred to in point (e) of the first subparagraph shall also include a process for assessing whether the
verification team holds all the competence and persons required to carry out verification activities for a specific operator
or aircraft operator.
The verifier shall develop general and specific competence criteria which are in conformity with the criteria laid down in
Article 37(4) and Articles 38, 39 and 40.
3. The verifier shall regularly monitor the performance of all personnel that undertake verification activities to
confirm the continued competence of that personnel.
4. The verifier shall regularly review the competence process referred to in paragraph 1 to ensure that:
(a) the competence criteria referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 are developed in
accordance with the competence requirements under this Regulation;
(b) all issues that may be identified related to the setting of the general and specific competence criteria pursuant to
points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 are addressed;
(c) all the requirements in the competence process are updated and maintained as appropriate.
5. The verifier shall have a system for recording the results of the activities carried out in the competence process
referred to in paragraph 1.
6. A sufficiently competent evaluator shall assess the competence and performance of an EU ETS auditor and EU ETS
lead auditor.
The competent evaluator shall monitor those auditors during the verification of the operator's or aircraft operator's
report on the site of the installation or aircraft operator as appropriate, to determine whether they meet the competence
criteria.
7. If a member of personnel fails to demonstrate that the competence criteria for a specific task allocated to that
member have been fully met, the verifier shall identify and organise additional training or supervised work experience.
The verifier shall monitor that member until the member demonstrates to the verifier that the member meets the
competence criteria.
Article 37
Verification teams
1. For each particular verification engagement, the verifier shall assemble a verification team capable of performing
the verification activities referred to in Chapter II.
2. The verification team shall at least consist of an EU ETS lead auditor, and, where the verifier's conclusions during
the assessment referred to in Article 8(1)(e) and the strategic analysis so require, a suitable number of EU ETS auditors
and technical experts.
3. For the independent review of the verification activities related to a particular verification engagement, the verifier
shall appoint an independent reviewer who shall not be part of the verification team.
4. Each team member shall:

(a) have a clear understanding of their individual role in the verification process;
(b) be able to communicate effectively in the language necessary to perform their specific tasks.
5. The verification team shall include at least one person with the technical competence and understanding required
to assess the specific technical monitoring and reporting aspects related to the activities referred to in Annex I that are
carried out by the installation or aircraft operator. The verification team shall also include one person who is able to
communicate in the language required for the verification of an operator's or aircraft operator's report in the Member
State where the verifier is carrying out that verification.
Where the verifier is carrying out verification of baseline data reports and new entrant data reports the verification team
shall include in addition at least one person with the technical competence and understanding required to assess the
specific technical aspects regarding the collection, monitoring and reporting of data relevant for free allocation.
6. Where the verification team consists of one person, this person shall meet all the competence requirements for the
EU ETS auditor and EU ETS lead auditor and meet the requirements laid down in paragraphs 4 and 5.
Article 38
Competence requirements for EU ETS auditors and EU ETS lead auditors
1. An EU ETS auditor shall have the competence to perform the verification. To this end, the EU ETS auditor shall
have at least:
(a) knowledge of Directive 2003/87/EC, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, Regulation (EU) …/… in the case of
verification of the baseline data report or new entrant data report, this Regulation, relevant standards, and other
relevant legislation, applicable guidelines, as well as relevant guidelines and legislation issued by the Member State in
which the verifier is carrying out a verification;
(b) knowledge and experience of data and information auditing, including:

(i) data and information auditing methodologies, including the application of the materiality level and assessing the
materiality of misstatements;
(ii) analysing inherent risks and control risks;
(iii) sampling techniques in relation to data sampling and checking the control activities;
(iv) assessing data and information systems, IT systems, data flow activities, control activities, control systems and
procedures for control activities.
(c) the ability to perform the activities related to the verification of an operator's or aircraft operator's report as required
by Chapter II;
(d) knowledge of and experience in the sector specific technical monitoring and reporting aspects that are relevant for
the scope of activities referred to in Annex I in which the EU ETS auditor is carrying out verification.
2. An EU ETS lead auditor shall meet the competence requirements for an EU ETS auditor and shall have
demonstrated competence to lead a verification team and to be responsible for carrying out the verification activities in
accordance with this Regulation.
Article 39
Competence requirements for independent reviewers
1. The independent reviewer shall have the appropriate authority to review the draft verification report and internal
verification documentation pursuant to Article 25.
2. The independent reviewer shall meet the competence requirements of an EU ETS lead auditor referred to in
Article 38(2).
3. The independent reviewer shall have the necessary competence to analyse the information provided to confirm the
completeness and integrity of the information, to challenge missing or contradictory information as well as to check
data trails for the purposes of assessing whether the internal verification documentation is complete and provides
sufficient information to support the draft verification report.
Article 40
Use of technical experts
1. When carrying out verification activities, a verifier may use technical experts to provide detailed knowledge and
expertise on a specific subject matter needed to support the EU ETS auditor and EU ETS lead auditor in carrying out
their verification activities.
2. Where the independent reviewer does not have the competence to assess a particular issue in the review process,
the verifier shall request the support of a technical expert.
3. The technical expert shall have the competence and expertise required to support the EU ETS auditor and EU ETS
lead auditor, or the independent reviewer, where necessary, effectively on the subject matter for which their knowledge
and expertise is requested. In addition, the technical expert shall have a sufficient understanding of the issues described
in points (a), (b) and (c) of Article 38(1).
4. The technical expert shall undertake specified tasks under the direction and full responsibility of the EU ETS lead
auditor of the verification team in which the technical expert is operating or the independent reviewer.
Article 41
Procedures for verification activities
1. A verifier shall establish, document, implement and maintain one or more procedures for verification activities as
described in Chapter II, and the procedures and processes required by Annex II. When establishing and implementing
these procedures and processes the verifier shall carry out the activities in accordance with the harmonised standard
referred to in Annex II.
2. A verifier shall design, document, implement and maintain a quality management system to ensure consistent
development, implementation, improvement and review of the procedures and processes referred to in paragraph 1 in
accordance with the harmonised standard referred to in Annex II.
Article 42
Records and communication
1. A verifier shall keep records, including records on the competence and impartiality of personnel, to demonstrate
compliance with this Regulation.
2. A verifier shall on a regular basis make information available to the operator or aircraft operator and other
relevant parties in accordance with the harmonised standard referred to in Annex II.
3. A verifier shall safeguard the confidentiality of information obtained during the verification in accordance with the
harmonised standard referred to in Annex II.
Article 43
Impartiality and independence
1. A verifier shall be independent from an operator or aircraft operator and impartial in carrying out its verification
activities.
To ensure independence and impartiality, the verifier and any part of the same legal entity shall not be an operator or
aircraft operator, the owner of an operator or aircraft operator or owned by them, nor shall the verifier have relations
with the operator or aircraft operator that could affect its independence and impartiality. The verifier shall also be
independent from bodies that trade emission allowances under the greenhouse gas emission allowances trading system
established pursuant to Article 19 of Directive 2003/87/EC.
2. A verifier shall be organised in a manner that safeguards its objectivity, independence and impartiality. For the
purposes of this Regulation, the relevant requirements laid down in the harmonised standard referred to in Annex II
shall apply.
3. A verifier shall not carry out verification activities for an operator or aircraft operator that poses an unacceptable
risk to its impartiality or that creates a conflict of interest for it. The verifier shall not use personnel or contracted
persons in the verification of an operator's or aircraft operator's report that involves an actual or potential conflict of
interest. The verifier shall also ensure that the activities of personnel or organisations do not affect the confidentiality,
objectivity, independence and impartiality of the verification.
An unacceptable risk to impartiality or a conflict of interest referred to in the first sentence of the first subparagraph
shall be considered to have arisen in particular in either of the following cases:
(a) where a verifier or any part of the same legal entity provides consulting services to develop part of the monitoring
and reporting process that is described in the monitoring plan approved by the competent authority or in the
monitoring methodology plan, as applicable, including the development of the monitoring methodology, the
drafting of the operator's or aircraft operator's report and the drafting of the monitoring plan or monitoring
methodology plan;
(b) where a verifier or any part of the same legal entity provides technical assistance to develop or maintain the system
implemented to monitor and report emissions, tonne-kilometre data or data relevant for free allocation.
4. A conflict of interest for a verifier in the relations between it and an operator or an aircraft operator shall be
considered to have arisen in particular in either of the following cases:
(a) where the relationship between the verifier and the operator or aircraft operator is based on common ownership,
common governance, common management or personnel, shared resources, common finances and common
contracts or marketing;
(b) where the operator or aircraft operator has received consulting services referred to in point (a) of paragraph 3 or
technical assistance referred to in point (b) of that paragraph from a consultancy body, technical assistance body or
another organisation having relations with the verifier and threatening the impartiality of the verifier.
For the purposes of point (b) of the first subparagraph, the verifier's impartiality shall be considered compromised
where the relations between the verifier and the consultancy body, technical assistance body or the other organisation is
based on common ownership, common governance, common management or personnel, shared resources, common
finances, common contracts or marketing and common payment of sales commission or other inducement for the
referral of new clients.
5. A verifier shall not outsource the independent review or the issuance of the verification report. For the purposes
of this Regulation, when outsourcing other verification activities, the verifier shall meet the relevant requirements laid
down in the harmonised standard referred to in Annex II.
However, contracting individuals to carry out verification activities shall not constitute outsourcing for the purposes of
the first subparagraph if the verifier, when contracting those persons, meets the relevant requirements in the harmonised
standard referred to in Annex II.
6. A verifier shall establish, document, implement and maintain a process to ensure continuous impartiality and
independence of the verifier, parts of the same legal entity as the verifier, other organisations referred to in paragraph 4,
and of all personnel and contracted persons involved in the verification. That process shall include a mechanism to
safeguard the impartiality and independence of the verifier and shall meet the relevant requirements laid down in the
harmonised standard referred to in Annex II.
7. If the EU ETS lead auditor undertakes six annual verifications for a given aircraft operator, then the EU ETS lead
auditor shall take a three consecutive year break from providing verification services to that same aircraft operator. The
six years maximum period includes any greenhouse gas verifications performed for the aircraft operator starting after
the entry into force of this regulation.
CHAPTER IV
ACCREDITATION
Article 44
Accreditation
A verifier issuing a verification report to an operator or an aircraft operator shall be accredited for the scope of activities
referred to in Annex I for which the verifier is carrying out the verification of an operator's or aircraft operator's report.
For the purpose of verifying baseline data reports or new entrant data reports, a verifier issuing a verification report to
an operator shall in addition be accredited for activity group No 98 referred to in Annex I.
Article 45
Objectives of accreditation
During the accreditation process and the monitoring of accredited verifiers, each national accreditation body shall assess
whether the verifier and its personnel undertaking verification activities:
(a) have the competence to carry out the verification of operator's or aircraft operator's reports in accordance with this
Regulation;
(b) are performing the verification of operator's or aircraft operator's reports in accordance with this Regulation;
(c) meet the requirements referred to in Chapter III.
Article 46
Request for accreditation
1. Any legal person or other legal entity may request accreditation pursuant to Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC)
No 765/2008 and the provisions of this Chapter.
The request shall contain the information required on the basis of the harmonised standard referred to in Annex III.
2. In addition to the information referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, an applicant shall also, prior to the
commencement of the assessment pursuant to Article 45, make available to the national accreditation body the
following:
(a) all information requested by the national accreditation body;
(b) procedures and information concerning processes referred to in Article 41(1) and the information on the quality
management system referred to in Article 41(2);
(c) the competence criteria referred to in Article 36(2)(a) and (b), the results of the competence process referred to in
Article 36 as well as other relevant documentation on the competence of all personnel involved in verification
activities;
(d) information on the process for ensuring continuous impartiality and independence referred to in Article 43(6),
including relevant records on the impartiality and independence of the applicant and its personnel;
(e) information on the technical experts and key personnel involved in the verification of operator's or aircraft
operator's reports;
(f) the system and process for ensuring appropriate internal verification documentation;
(g) other relevant records referred to in Article 42(1).
Article 47
Preparation for assessment
1. When preparing the assessment referred to in Article 45, each national accreditation body shall take into account
the complexity of the scope for which the applicant requests accreditation as well as the complexity of the quality
management system referred to in Article 41(2), the procedures and information on processes referred to in
Article 41(1) and the geographical areas in which the applicant is carrying out or planning to carry out verification.
2. For the purposes of this Regulation, the national accreditation body shall meet the minimum requirements set out
in the harmonised standard referred to in Annex III.
Article 48
Assessment
1. The assessment team referred to in Article 58 shall carry out at least the following activities for the purposes of
making the assessment referred to in Article 45:
(a) a review of all relevant documents and records referred to in Article 46;
(b) a visit of the premises of the applicant to review a representative sample of the internal verification documentation
and to assess the implementation of the applicant's quality management system and the procedures or processes
referred to in Article 41;
(c) witnessing of a representative part of the requested scope for accreditation and the performance and competence of
a representative number of the applicant's staff involved in the verification of the operator's or aircraft operator's
report to ensure that the staff are operating in accordance with this Regulation.
In carrying out those activities, the assessment team shall meet the requirements set out in the harmonised standard
referred to in Annex III.
2. The assessment team shall report the findings and non-conformities to the applicant in accordance with the
requirements set out in the harmonised standard referred to in Annex III and shall request the applicant to respond to
the reported findings and non-conformities in accordance with those provisions.
3. An applicant shall take corrective action to address any non-conformities reported pursuant to paragraph 2 and
indicate in applicant's response to the reported findings and non-conformities of the assessment team what actions are
taken or are planned to be taken within a time set by the national accreditation body to resolve any identified non-
conformities.
4. The national accreditation body shall review the responses of the applicant to the findings and non-conformities
submitted pursuant to paragraph 3.
Where the national accreditation body finds the response of the applicant to be insufficient or ineffective, it shall request
further information or action from the applicant. The national accreditation body may also request evidence of the
effective implementation of actions taken or carry out a follow-up assessment to assess the effective implementation of
the corrective actions.
Article 49
Decision on accreditation and accreditation certificate
1. The national accreditation body shall take into account the requirements laid down in the harmonised standard
referred to in Annex III when preparing and taking the decision on whether to grant, extend or renew the accreditation
of an applicant.
2. Where the national accreditation body has decided to grant, extend or renew the accreditation of an applicant, it
shall issue an accreditation certificate to that effect.
The accreditation certificate shall at least contain the information required on the basis of the harmonised standard
referred to in Annex III.
The accreditation certificate shall be valid for a period not exceeding five years after the date on which the national ac
creditation body has issued that certificate.
Article 50
Surveillance
1. The national accreditation body shall carry out an annual surveillance of each verifier to which it has issued an ac
creditation certificate.
The surveillance shall at least comprise the following:

(a) a visit to the premises of the verifier with a view to carrying out the activities referred to Article 48(1)(b);
(b) witnessing the performance and competence of a representative number of the verifier's staff in accordance with
Article 48(1)(c).
2. The national accreditation body shall carry out the first surveillance of a verifier in accordance with paragraph 1
no later than 12 months after the date on which the accreditation certificate has been issued to that verifier.
3. The national accreditation body shall prepare its plan for the surveillance of each verifier in a manner that allows
for representative samples of the scope of accreditation to be assessed, in accordance with the requirements laid down in
the harmonised standard referred to in Annex III.
4. Based on the results of the surveillance referred to in paragraph 1, the national accreditation body shall decide
whether to confirm the continuation of accreditation.
5. Where a verifier carries out a verification in another Member State, the national accreditation body that has
accredited the verifier may request the national accreditation body of the Member State where the verification is
performed to carry out surveillance activities on its behalf and under its responsibility.
Article 51
Reassessment
1. Before the expiry of the accreditation certificate, the national accreditation body shall carry out a reassessment of
the verifier to which the national accreditation body has issued an accreditation certificate to determine whether the
validity of that accreditation certificate may be extended.
2. The national accreditation body shall prepare its plan for the reassessment of each verifier in a manner that allows
representative samples of the scope of accreditation to be assessed. In planning and carrying out the reassessment, the
national accreditation body shall meet the requirements laid down in the harmonised standard referred to in Annex III.
Article 52
Extraordinary assessment
1. The national accreditation body may conduct an extraordinary assessment of the verifier at any time to ensure that
the verifier meets the requirements of this Regulation.
2. For the purposes of enabling the national accreditation body to assess the need for an extraordinary assessment,
the verifier shall inform the national accreditation body forthwith of any significant changes relevant to its accreditation
concerning any aspect of its status or operation. Significant changes shall include those changes mentioned in the
harmonised standard referred to in Annex III.
Article 53
Extension of scope
The national accreditation body shall, in response to an application by a verifier for an extension of the scope of
a granted accreditation, undertake the necessary activities to determine whether the verifier meets the requirements of
Article 45 for the requested extension of the scope of its accreditation.
Article 54
Administrative measures
1. The national accreditation body may suspend, withdraw or reduce an accreditation of a verifier if the verifier does
not meet the requirements of this Regulation.
The national accreditation body shall suspend, withdraw or reduce an accreditation of a verifier if the verifier so
requests.
The national accreditation body shall establish, document, implement and maintain a procedure for the suspension of
the accreditation, the withdrawal of the accreditation and the reduction of the scope of accreditation.
2. The national accreditation body shall suspend an accreditation, or restrict the scope of an accreditation in any of
the following cases:
(a) the verifier has committed a serious breach of the requirements of this Regulation;
(b) the verifier has persistently and repeatedly failed to meet the requirements of this Regulation;
(c) the verifier has breached other specific terms and conditions of the national accreditation body.
3. The national accreditation body shall withdraw the accreditation in the following cases:
(a) the verifier has failed to remedy the grounds for a decision to suspend the accreditation certificate;
(b) a member of the top management of the verifier or a verifier's staff involved in verification activities under this
Regulation has been found guilty of fraud;
(c) the verifier has intentionally provided false information or concealed information.
4. The decision of a national accreditation body to suspend, withdraw or reduce the scope of the accreditation in
accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be subject to appeal.
Member States shall establish procedures for the resolution of those appeals.
5. The decision of a national accreditation body to suspend, withdraw or reduce the scope of the accreditation shall
take effect upon its notification to the verifier.
The national accreditation body shall terminate the suspension of an accreditation certificate where it has received
satisfactory information and is confident that the verifier meets the requirements of this Regulation.
CHAPTER V
REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING ACCREDITATION BODIES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF ETS VERIFIERS
Article 55
National accreditation body
1. The tasks related to accreditation pursuant to this Regulation shall be carried out by the national accreditation
bodies appointed pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.
2. Where a Member State decides to allow the certification of verifiers that are natural persons, under this Regulation
the tasks related to the certification of those verifiers shall be entrusted to a national authority other than the national
accreditation body appointed pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.
3. Where a Member State decides to use the option laid down in paragraph 2, it shall ensure that the national
authority concerned meets the requirements of this Regulation, including those laid down in Article 71 of this
Regulation, and provide the required documentary evidence in accordance with Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC)
No 765/2008.
4. A national accreditation body shall be a member of the body recognised under Article 14 of that Regulation (EC)
No 765/2008.
5. A national accreditation body shall be entrusted with the operation of accreditation as a public authority activity
and be granted formal recognition by the Member State, if accreditation is not operated directly by public authorities.
6. For the purposes of this Regulation, the national accreditation body shall carry out its functions in accordance
with the requirements set out in the harmonised standard referred to in Annex III.
Article 56
Cross-border accreditation
Where a Member State considers that it is economically not meaningful or sustainable to appoint a national accredita
tion body or to provide accreditation services within the meaning of Article 15 of Directive 2003/87/EC, that Member
State shall have recourse to a national accreditation body of another Member State.
The Member State concerned shall inform the Commission and the other Member States.
Article 57
Independence and impartiality
1. The national accreditation body shall be organised in a manner that guarantees its full independence from verifiers
it assesses and its impartiality in carrying out its accreditation activities.
2. For that purpose, the national accreditation body shall not offer or provide any activities or services provided by
a verifier, nor shall it provide consultancy services, own shares in or otherwise have a financial or managerial interest in
a verifier.
3. Without prejudice to Article 55(2), the structure, responsibilities and tasks of the national accreditation body shall
be clearly distinguished from those of the competent authority and those of other national authorities.
4. The national accreditation body shall take all final decisions pertaining to the accreditation of verifiers.
However, the national accreditation body may sub-contract certain activities, subject to the requirements set out in the
harmonised standard referred to in Annex III.
Article 58
Assessment team
1. The national accreditation body shall appoint an assessment team for each particular assessment.
2. An assessment team shall consist of a lead assessor and, where necessary, a suitable number of assessors or
technical experts for a specific scope of accreditation.
The assessment team shall include at least one person with the knowledge of the monitoring and reporting of
greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 that are relevant for the scope of ac
creditation and the competence and understanding required to assess the verification activities within the installation or
aircraft operator for that scope, and at least one person with the knowledge of relevant national legislation and
guidance.
Where the national accreditation body assesses the verifier's competence and performance for scope no 98 referred to in
Annex I of this Regulation, the assessment team shall include in addition at least one person with the knowledge of
collecting, monitoring and reporting data relevant for free allocation pursuant to Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… as
well as the competence and understanding required to assess the verification activities for that scope.
Article 59
Competence requirements for assessors
1. An assessor shall have the competence to carry out the activities required under Chapter IV when assessing the
verifier. To that end, the assessor shall:
(a) meet the requirements laid down in the harmonised standard pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 referred to
in Annex III;
(b) have knowledge of Directive 2003/87/EC, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, Delegated Regulation (EU)
…/… where the assessors assesses the verifier's competence and performance for scope no 98 referred to in Annex I
of this Regulation, this Regulation, relevant standards and other relevant legislation as well as applicable guidelines;
(c) have knowledge of data and information auditing referred to in Article 38(1)(b) of this Regulation obtained through
training or access to a person that has knowledge and experience of such data and information.
2. A lead assessor shall meet the competence requirements referred to in paragraph 1, have demonstrated
competence to lead an assessment team and be responsible for carrying out an assessment in accordance with this
Regulation.
3. Internal reviewers and persons taking the decisions on the granting, extending or renewing of an accreditation
shall, in addition to the competence requirements referred to in paragraph 1, have sufficient knowledge and experience
to evaluate the accreditation.
Article 60
Technical experts
1. The national accreditation body may include technical experts in the assessment team to provide detailed
knowledge and expertise on a specific subject matter needed to support the lead assessor or assessor in carrying out
assessment activities.
2. A technical expert shall have the competence required to support the lead assessor and assessor effectively on the
subject matter for which knowledge and expertise of such expert is requested. In addition, the technical expert shall:
(a) have knowledge of Directive 2003/87/EC, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, Delegated Regulation (EU)
…/… where the technical expert assesses the verifier's competence and performance for scope no 98 referred to in
Annex I of this Regulation, this Regulation, relevant standards, and other relevant legislation as well as applicable
guidelines;
(b) have a sufficient understanding of verification activities.
3. A technical expert shall undertake specified tasks under the direction and full responsibility of the lead assessor of
the assessment team concerned.
Article 61
Procedures
The national accreditation body shall comply with the requirements established pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EC)
No 765/2008.
Article 62
Complaints
Where the national accreditation body has received a complaint concerning the verifier from the competent authority,
the operator or aircraft operator, or other interested parties, the national accreditation body shall, within a reasonable
time but no later than three months from the date of its receipt:
(a) decide on the validity of the complaint;
(b) ensure that the verifier concerned is given the opportunity to submit its observations;
(c) take appropriate actions to address the complaint;
(d) record the complaint and action taken; and
(e) respond to the complainant.
Article 63
Records and documentation
1. The national accreditation body shall keep records on each person involved in the accreditation process. Those
records shall include records related to relevant qualifications, training, experience, impartiality and competence
necessary to demonstrate compliance with this Regulation.
2. The national accreditation body shall keep records of the verifier in line with the harmonised standard pursuant to
Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 referred to in Annex III.
Article 64
Access to information and confidentiality
1. The national accreditation body shall, on a regular basis, make publicly available and update information about the
national accreditation body and its accreditation activities.
2. The national accreditation body shall make, in accordance with point 4 of Article 8 of Regulation (EC)
No 765/2008, adequate arrangements to safeguard, as appropriate, the confidentiality of information obtained.
Article 65
Peer evaluation
1. National accreditation bodies shall subject themselves to a regular peer evaluation.
The peer evaluation shall be organised by the body recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.
2. The body recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 shall implement appropriate peer
evaluation criteria and an effective and independent peer evaluation process in order to assess whether:
(a) the national accreditation body that is subject to the peer evaluation has carried out the accreditation activities in
accordance with Chapter IV;
(b) the national accreditation body that is subject to the peer evaluation has met the requirements laid down in this
Chapter.
The criteria shall include competence requirements for peer evaluators and peer evaluation teams that are specific to the
system for greenhouse gas emission allowances trading established by Directive 2003/87/EC.
3. The body recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 shall publish and communicate the
outcome of the peer evaluation of a national accreditation body to the Commission, the national authorities responsible
for the national accreditation bodies in the Member States, and the competent authority of Member States or the focal
point referred to in Article 70(2).
4. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, where a national accreditation body has successfully undergone a peer
evaluation organised by the body recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 prior to the entry into
force of this Regulation, the national accreditation body shall be exempted from undergoing a new peer evaluation
following the entry into force of this Regulation if it can demonstrate conformity with this Regulation.
To that end, the national accreditation body concerned shall submit a request and the necessary documentation to the
body recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.
The body recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 shall decide whether the conditions for granting
an exemption have been met.
The exemption shall apply for a period not exceeding three years from the date of notification of the decision to the
national accreditation body.
5. The national authority entrusted, pursuant to Article 55(2), with the tasks related to the certification of verifiers
that are natural persons, pursuant to this Regulation shall meet a level of credibility equivalent to national accreditation
bodies that have successfully undergone peer evaluation.
To that end, the Member State concerned shall, immediately following its decisions authorising the national authority to
perform certification, provide the Commission and the other Member States with all relevant documentary evidence. No
national authority shall certify verifiers for the purposes of this Regulation before the Member State concerned provides
that documentary evidence.
The Member State concerned shall periodically review the functioning of the national authority to ensure that it
continues to meet the aforementioned level of credibility and shall inform the Commission thereof.
Article 66
Corrective action
1. Member States shall monitor their national accreditation bodies at regular intervals in order to ensure that they
fulfil the requirements of this Regulation on a continuing basis, taking into account the results of the peer evaluation
carried out in accordance with Article 65.
2. Where a national accreditation body does not meet the requirements or fails to fulfil its obligations as laid down in
this Regulation, the Member State concerned shall take appropriate corrective action or ensure that such corrective
action is taken, and shall inform the Commission thereof.
Article 67
Mutual recognition of verifiers
1. Member States shall recognise the equivalence of the services delivered by those national accreditation bodies that
have successfully undergone a peer evaluation. Member States shall accept the accreditation certificates of verifiers
accredited by those national accreditation bodies and respect the right of the verifiers to carry out verification for their
scope of accreditation.
2. Where a national accreditation body has not undergone the complete peer evaluation process, Member States shall
accept the accreditation certificates of verifiers accredited by that national accreditation body provided the body
recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 has started a peer evaluation for that national accreditation
body and it has not identified any non-compliance of the national accreditation body with this Regulation.
3. Where the certification of verifiers is carried out by a national authority referred to in Article 55(2), Member States
shall accept the certificate issued by such authority and respect the right of certified verifiers to carry out verification for
their scope of certification.
Article 68
Monitoring of services delivered
Where a Member State has established, in the course of an inspection carried out in accordance with Article 31(4) of
Directive 2006/123/EC, that a verifier is not complying with this Regulation, the competent authority or national ac
creditation body of that Member State shall inform the national accreditation body that has accredited the verifier.
The national accreditation body that has accredited the verifier shall consider the communication of that information as
a complaint within the meaning of Article 62 and shall take appropriate action and respond to the competent authority
or the national accreditation body in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 73(2).
Article 69
Electronic data exchange and use of automated systems
1. Member States may require verifiers to use electronic templates or specific file formats for verification reports in
accordance with Article 74(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or in accordance with Article 13 of
Delegated Regulation (EU) …/….
2. Standardised electronic templates or file format specifications may be made available for further types of communi
cation between the operator, aircraft operator, verifier, competent authority and national accreditation body in
accordance with Article 74(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066.
CHAPTER VI
INFORMATION EXCHANGE
Article 70
Information exchange and focal points
1. The Member State shall establish an effective exchange of appropriate information and effective cooperation
between their national accreditation body, or where applicable, the national authority entrusted with the certification of
verifiers, and the competent authority.
2. Where more than one competent authority is designated pursuant to Article 18 of Directive 2003/87/EC in
a Member State, the Member State shall authorise one of those competent authorities to be the focal point for the
exchange of information, for coordinating the cooperation referred to in paragraph 1, and for the activities referred to in
this Chapter.
Article 71
Accreditation work programme and management report
1. By 31 December of each year, the national accreditation body shall make available an accreditation work
programme to the competent authority of each Member State containing the list of verifiers accredited by that national
accreditation body and which have notified it pursuant to Article 77 that they intend to carry out verifications in those
Member States. The accreditation work programme shall at least contain the following information in relation to each
verifier:
(a) the anticipated time and place of the verification;
(b) information on activities that the national accreditation body has planned for that verifier, in particular surveillance
and reassessment activities;
(c) dates of anticipated witnessing audits to be performed by the national accreditation body to assess the verifier,
including the address and contact details of operators or aircraft operators that will be visited during the witness
audit;
(d) information on whether the national accreditation body has requested the national accreditation body from the
Member State in which the verifier is performing the verification to carry out surveillance activities.
Where changes occur in the information referred to in the first subparagraph, the national accreditation body shall
submit to the competent authority an updated work programme by 31 January of each year.
2. Following the submission of the accreditation work programme in accordance with paragraph 1, the competent
authority shall provide the national accreditation body with any relevant information, including any relevant national
legislation or guidelines.
3. By 1 June of each year, the national accreditation body shall make available a management report to the
competent authority. The management report shall at least contain the following information in relation to each verifier
that has been accredited by that national accreditation body:
(a) accreditation details of verifiers that were newly accredited by that national accreditation body, including the scope
of accreditation for these verifiers
(b) any changes to the scope of accreditation for these verifiers;
(c) summarised results of surveillance and reassessment activities carried out by the national accreditation body;
(d) summarised results of extraordinary assessments that have taken place, including reasons for initiating such extraor
dinary assessments;
(e) any complaints filed against the verifier since the last management report and the actions taken by the national ac
creditation body;
(f) details of action taken by the national accreditation body in response to the information that is shared by the
competent authority, unless the national accreditation body has considered the information as a complaint within
the meaning of Article 62.
Article 72
Information exchange on administrative measures
If the national accreditation body has imposed administrative measures on the verifier pursuant to Article 54 or if
a suspension of the accreditation has been terminated or a decision on appeal has reversed the decision of a national ac
creditation body to impose administrative measures referred to in Article 54, the national accreditation body shall
inform the following parties:
(a) the competent authority of the Member State where the verifier is accredited;
(b) the competent authority and the national accreditation body of each Member State where the verifier is carrying out
verifications.
Article 73
Information exchange by the competent authority
1. The competent authority of the Member State where the verifier is carrying out the verification shall annually
communicate to the national accreditation body which has accredited that verifier at least the following:
(a) relevant results from checking the operator's and aircraft operator's report and the verification reports, in particular
of any identified non-compliance of that verifier with this Regulation;
(b) results from the inspection of the operator or aircraft operator where those results are relevant for the national ac
creditation body concerning the verifier's accreditation and surveillance or where those results include any identified
non-compliance of that verifier with this Regulation;
(c) results from the evaluation of the internal verification documentation of that verifier where the competent authority
has evaluated the internal verification documentation pursuant to Article 26(3);
(d) complaints received by the competent authority concerning that verifier.
2. Where the information referred to in paragraph 1 provides evidence that the competent authority has identified
non-compliance of the verifier with this Regulation, the national accreditation body shall consider the communication
of that information as a complaint by the competent authority concerning that verifier within the meaning of
Article 62.
The national accreditation body shall take appropriate action to address such information and respond to the competent
authority within a reasonable time, but no later than three months from the date of its receipt. The national accredita
tion body shall inform the competent authority in its response of the action taken by it and, where relevant, the adminis
trative measures imposed on the verifier.
Article 74
Information exchange on surveillance
1. Where the national accreditation body of the Member State in which a verifier is performing a verification has
been requested, pursuant to Article 50(5), to carry out surveillance activities, that national accreditation body shall
report its findings to the national accreditation body that has accredited the verifier, unless otherwise agreed between
both national accreditation bodies.
2. The national accreditation body that has accredited the verifier shall take the findings referred to in paragraph 1
into account when assessing whether the verifier meets the requirements of this Regulation.
3. Where the findings referred to in paragraph 1 show evidence that the verifier is not complying with this
Regulation, the national accreditation body that has accredited the verifier shall take appropriate action pursuant to this
Regulation and shall inform the national accreditation body that has carried out surveillance activities on:
(a) what action has been taken by the national accreditation body that has accredited the verifier;
(b) where appropriate, how the findings were resolved by the verifier;
(c) where relevant, what administrative measures have been imposed on the verifier.
Article 75
Information exchange with a Member State where the verifier is established
Where a verifier has been granted accreditation by a national accreditation body in a Member State other than the
Member State in which the verifier is established, the accreditation work programme and the management report
referred to in Article 71, as well as the information referred to in Article 72, shall also be provided to the competent
authority of the Member State in which the verifier is established.
Article 76
Databases of accredited verifiers
1. National accreditation bodies, or where applicable national authorities referred to in Article 55(2), shall set up and
manage a database and allow access to that database to other national accreditation bodies, national authorities,
verifiers, operators, aircraft operators and competent authorities.
The body recognised under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 shall facilitate and harmonise access to the
databases to enable efficient and cost-effective communication between national accreditation bodies, national
authorities, verifiers, operators, aircraft operators and competent authorities, and may reconcile those databases into
a single and centralised database.
2. The database referred to in paragraph 1 shall contain at least the following information:
(a) the name and address of each verifier accredited by that national accreditation body;
(b) the Member States in which the verifier is carrying out verification;
(c) each verifier's scope of accreditation;
(d) the date on which the accreditation was granted and the expiry date of the accreditation;
(e) any information on administrative measures that have been imposed on the verifier.
The information shall be publicly available.
Article 77
Notification by verifiers
1. For the purposes of enabling the national accreditation body to draft the accreditation work programme and the
management report referred to in Article 71, a verifier shall by 15 November of each year send the following
information to the national accreditation body that has accredited that verifier:
(a) the planned time and place of the verifications that the verifier is scheduled to perform;
(b) the address and contact details of the operators or aircraft operators whose emissions, tonne-kilometre reports,
baseline data reports or new entrant data reports are subject to its verification;
(c) the names of the members of the verification team and the scope of the accreditation under which the operator's or
aircraft operator's activity falls.
2. Where changes occur in the information referred to in paragraph 1, the verifier shall notify those changes to the
accreditation body within a timeframe agreed with that national accreditation body.
CHAPTER VII
FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 78
Repeal of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 and transitional provisions
1. Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 is repealed with effect from 1 January 2019 or the date of entry into force of this
Regulation, whichever is the later.
References to the repealed Regulation shall be construed as references to this Regulation and read in accordance with the
correlation table in Annex IV.
2. The provisions of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 shall continue to apply to verification of emissions and, where
applicable, activity data occurring prior to 1 January 2019.
Article 79
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European
Union.
It shall apply from 1 January 2019 or the date of entry into force of this Regulation, whichever is the later.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 December 2018.
For the Commission

The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
ANNEX I
Scope of accreditation for verifiers
The scope of accreditation of verifiers shall be indicated in the accreditation certificate using the following groups of
activities pursuant to Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC and other activities pursuant to Articles 10a and 24 of Directive
2003/87/EC. Those provisions shall equally apply to verifiers certified by a national authority in accordance with
Article 55(2) of this Regulation.
Activity Group
Scopes of Accreditation
No.
1a Combustion of fuels in installations, where only commercial standard fuels as defined in Commission
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 are used, or where natural gas is used in category A or B in
stallations.
1b Combustion of fuels in installations, without restrictions
2 Refining of mineral oil
3 — Production of coke
— Metal ore (including sulphide ore) roasting or sintering, including pelletisation
— Production of pig iron or steel (primary or secondary fusion) including continuous casting
4 — Production or processing of ferrous metals (including ferro-alloys)

— Production of secondary aluminium
— Production or processing of non-ferrous metals, including production of alloys
5 Production of primary aluminium (CO2 and PFC emissions)
6 — Production of cement clinker

— Production of lime or calcination of dolomite or magnesite
— Manufacture of glass including glass fibre
— Manufacture of ceramic products by firing
— Manufacture of mineral wool insulation material
— Drying or calcination of gypsum or production of plaster boards and other gypsum products
7 — Production of pulp from timber or other fibrous materials

— Production of paper or cardboard
8 — Production of carbon black

— Production of ammonia
— Production of bulk organic chemicals by cracking, reforming, partial or full oxidation or by similar
processes
— Production of hydrogen (H2) and synthesis gas by reforming or partial oxidation
— Production of soda ash (Na2CO3) and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3)
9 — Production of nitric acid (CO2 and N2O emissions)

— Production of adipic acid (CO2 and N2O emissions)
— Production of glyoxal and glyoxylic acid (CO2 and N2O emissions)
10 — Capture of greenhouse gases from installations covered by Directive 2003/87/EC for the purpose
of transport and geological storage in a storage site permitted under Directive 2009/31/EC
— Transport of greenhouse gases by pipelines for geological storage in a storage site permitted under
Directive 2009/31/EC
Activity Group
Scopes of Accreditation
No.
11 Geological storage of greenhouse gases in a storage site permitted under Directive 2009/31/EC
12 Aviation activities (emissions and tonne-kilometre data)
98 Other activities pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC
99 Other activities, included by a Member State pursuant to Article 24 of Directive 2003/87/EC, to be

specified in detail in the accreditation certificate
ANNEX II
Requirements on verifiers
With respect to the requirements on verifiers, the harmonised standard pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/2008
concerning requirements for greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies for use in accreditation or other forms of
recognition, shall apply. In addition, the following procedures, processes and arrangements referred to in Article 41(1),
shall apply:
(a) a process and policy for communication with the operator or aircraft operator and other relevant parties;
(b) adequate arrangements to safeguard the confidentiality of information obtained;
(c) a process for dealing with appeals;
(d) a process for dealing with complaints (including indicative timescale);
(e) a process for issuing a revised verification report where an error in the verification report or operator's or aircraft
operator's report has been identified after the verifier has submitted the verification report to the operator or aircraft
operator for onwards submission to the competent authority;
(f) a procedure or process for outsourcing verification activities to other organisations.

ANNEX III
Minimum requirements of the accreditation process and requirements on accreditation bodies
With respect to the minimum requirements for accreditation, and the requirements for accreditation bodies, the
harmonised standard pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 concerning general requirements for accreditation
bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies shall apply.
ANNEX IV
Correlation table
Commission Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 This Regulation
Article 1 to 31 Article 1 to 31
— Article 32
Article 32 to 78 Article 33 to 79
Annex I to III Annex I to III
— Annex IV

Celex 32018R2067 en TXT

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Celex 32018R2067 en TXT

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Celex 32018R2067 en TXT

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

L 334/94 EN Official Journal of the European Union 31.12.

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/2067

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

(1) OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

(13) ‘non-conformity’ means one of the following:

General framework for accreditation

General obligations of the verifier

4. During the verification, the verifier shall assess whether:

Information from an operator or aircraft operator

(i) the reliability and accuracy of the data.

Verification of the correct application of the monitoring methodology

Verification of methods applied for missing data

Addressing misstatements, non-conformities and non-compliance

Concluding on the findings of verification

Internal verification documentation

3. The verification report shall at least contain the following elements:

Addressing outstanding non-material non-conformities

Improvement of the monitoring and reporting process

Simplified verification for installations

(b) information that the relevant data can be remotely accessed;

Conditions for not carrying out site visits

(c) only default values for calculation factors are applied;

(4) the verification concerns an installation located on an unmanned site whereby:

Simplified verification for aircraft operators

Simplified verification plans

Sectoral scopes of accreditation

Continued competence process

4. Each team member shall:

Competence requirements for EU ETS auditors and EU ETS lead auditors

(b) knowledge and experience of data and information auditing, including:

Competence requirements for independent reviewers

Use of technical experts

Procedures for verification activities

Records and communication

Impartiality and independence

Request for accreditation

The surveillance shall at least comprise the following:

National accreditation body

Independence and impartiality

Competence requirements for assessors

Information exchange and focal points

Accreditation work programme and management report

Information exchange on administrative measures

Information exchange by the competent authority

(d) complaints received by the competent authority concerning that verifier.

Information exchange on surveillance

Information exchange with a Member State where the verifier is established

Databases of accredited verifiers

Repeal of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 and transitional provisions

Entry into force

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2018.

For the Commission

Scope of accreditation for verifiers

1b Combustion of fuels in installations, without restrictions

2 Refining of mineral oil

4 — Production or processing of ferrous metals (including ferro-alloys)