Proposal Guideliness 2023
Proposal Guideliness 2023
Proposal Guideliness 2023
Each student should, in consultation with his/her project supervisor, draft and gradually refine
a project proposal.
Each student should study the current situation (literature review, state of the art) in a
computer science or IT research area(s). The student should [in the process] clearly identify a
problem/gap in the computer science or IT research area(s).
The student should propose a novel idea that falls under a certain computer science or IT
research area(s) that has the potential to address the aforementioned problem/gap. The
student should describe the research methodology that will be followed in order to fully
develop the proposed idea and to demonstrate that the proposed idea is superior to SOA
and/or complements SOA.
The student will first present the proposal to the department for approval.
In the process of carrying out the actual project, the student should:
Continual and regular feedback will be expected from each student in the entire process of
the project.
Each student has a responsibility to submit both the project report and the corresponding
working software prototype/product (also on the same CD).
Page 1 of 5
Each student has a responsibility to give presentations at scheduled times during the phases of
the project and also as the student submits the project report and the corresponding working
software prototype/product.
Title Page
Title:
The research title should be descriptive, short and SMART. It should reflect the content of
the problem. Generally, the title should have a maximum of 15 words or 120 characters.
Preliminary Pages
• Declaration
• Dedication
• Acknowledgement
• Table of Contents
• List of Tables
• List of Figures
• List of Appendices
• List of abbreviations and symbols (if any)
• Abstract
Abstract
Not exceeding 200 words should state the problem investigated, aims/scope, outline the
methods used and summarize the expected outputs and impacts.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Describes the state of knowledge, research questions, aims of the work and the context in
which the work appears.
1.1. Background
1.2. Statement of the Problem
1.3. Justification or importance of the project
1.4. Hypotheses or Research Questions (minimum 3; maximum 5).
Page 2 of 5
1.5. Objectives
1.5.1. Broad Objective
1.5.2. Specific objectives (should be related to the hypotheses or research questions)
1.6. Scope of study
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter gives the reader an orientation to the research problem by referencing to
previous concepts and researches in the area of interest, i.e., the literature review should
encompass:
• Theoretical and empirical literature.
• Broad to specific literature.
• Existing information and methods used in the past to study the problem. This should
include a review of previous work carried out in the area of study and elsewhere,
which is relevant to the study.
• Problems and their magnitude.
• Gaps in knowledge.
• Approach: what is intended to be done to ameliorate the problems or gaps
identified? The references to literature should be limited to information that is
essential to the reader’s orientation. Most readers do not need long literature
reviews, especially of old references if newer ones are available.
CHAPTER THREE
This chapter should be sectioned as per the stated specific objectives. The purpose of the
chapter is to give enough details so that a competent researcher can easily repeat the research.
It is an explanation of the various strategies intended to be deployed in solving the problem
and may involve the following:
• Research design: (survey)
• Conceptual framework
• Data Collection methods and techniques
CHAPTER FOUR
Page 3 of 5
• A more elaborate (40%) network for information transactions.
REFERENCES
Only literature that is available should be cited. Material not available through libraries, such
as personal communications or unpublished data, should be given in the text as parenthetical
matters. The source of data and date should be included (e.g., Kenneth, C. L.,
Communication Systems, 2011). Where possible only significant, published references
should be cited (preferably more accessible sources of such publications).
In general, references in the text can be cited as follows. For a single author: either Waweru
(2000) or (Thuku, 2000). For two authors: either Oloo and Wanjiku (2011) or (Oloo and
Wanjiku, 2011). For more than two authors: either Waweru et al. (2010) or (Waweru et al.,
2010). For two or more articles by the same author(s) in the same year, designate them as
follows: Juma (2009a, b) or Juma et al. (2009a, b).
Page 4 of 5
APPENDICES
Page 5 of 5