Economics
Economics
Economics
2019-20
On an indifference map, higher indifference curve represents a higher level of satisfaction than
any lower indifference curve. So, a consumer always tries to remain at the highest possible
indifference curve, subject to his budget constraint.
Conditions of Consumer’s Equilibrium:
The consumer’s equilibrium under the indifference curve theory must meet the following two
conditions:
Let the two goods be X and Y. The first condition for consumer’s equilibrium is that
MRSXY = PX/PY
a. If MRSXY > PX/PY, it means that the consumer is willing to pay more for X than the price
prevailing in the market. As a result, the consumer buys more of X. As a result, MRS falls till it
becomes equal to the ratio of prices and the equilibrium is established.
b. If MRSXY < PX/PY, it means that the consumer is willing to pay less for X than the price
prevailing in the market. It induces the consumer to buys less of X and more of Y. As a result,
MRS rises till it becomes equal to the ratio of prices and the equilibrium is establish
The second condition for consumer’s equilibrium is that MRS must be diminishing at the point
of equilibrium, i.e. the indifference curve must be convex to the origin at the point of
equilibrium. Unless MRS continuously falls, the equilibrium cannot be established.
All other points on the budget line to the left or right of point ‘E’ will lie on lower indifference
curves and thus indicate a lower level of satisfaction. As budget line can be tangent to one and
only one indifference curve, consumer maximizes his satisfaction at point E, when both the
conditions of consumer’s equilibrium are satisfied:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
At tangency point E, the absolute value of the slope of the indifference curve (MRS between X
and Y) and that of the budget line (price ratio) are same. Equilibrium cannot be established at
any other point as MRSXY > PX/PY at all points to the left of point E and MRSXY < PX/PY at all
points to the right of point E. So, equilibrium is established at point E, when MRSXY = PX/PY.
The second condition is also satisfied at point E as MRS is diminishing at point E, i.e. IC2 is
convex to the origin at point E.
In the above analysis of the consumer’s equilibrium it was assumed that the income of the
consumer remains constant, given the prices of the goods X and Y. Given the tastes and
preferences of the consumer and the prices of the two goods, if the income of the consumer
changes, the effect it will have on his purchases is known as the income Effect.
If the income of the consumer increases his budget line will shift upward to the right, parallel to
the original budget line. On the contrary, a fall in his income will shift the budget line inward to
the left. The budget lines are parallel to each other because relative prices remain unchanged.
In Figure 12.14 when the budget line is PQ, the equilibrium point is R where it touches the
indifference curve I1. If now the income of the consumer increases, PQ will move to the right as
the budget line P1, I1, and the new equilibrium point is S where it touches the indifference curve
I2. As income increases further, PQ becomes the budget line with T as its equilibrium point.
The locus of these equilibrium points R, S and T traces out a curve which is called the income-
consumption curve (ICC). The ICC curve shows the income effect of changes in consumer’s
income on the purchases of the two goods, given their relative prices.
Normally, when the income of the consumer increases, he purchases larger quantities of two
goods. In Figure 12.14 he buys RA of Y and OA of X at the equilibrium point R on the budget
line PQ. As his income increases, he buys SB of Y and OB of X at the equilibrium point S on P1,
Q1, budget line and still more of the two goods TC of Y and ОС of X, on the budget line P2Q2.
Usually, the income consumption curve slopes upwards to the right as shown in Figure 12.14.
But an income-consumption curve can have any shape provided it does not intersect an
indifference curve more than once. We can have five types of income consumption curves. The
first type is explained above in Figure 12.14 where the ICC curve has a positive slope throughout
its range. Here the income effect is also positive and both X and Y are normal goods.
The second type of ICC curve may have a positive slope in the beginning but become and stay
horizontal beyond a certain point when the income of the consumer continues to increase. In
Figure 12.15 (A) the ICC curve slopes upwards with the increase in income upto the equilibrium
point R at the budget line P1Q1 on the indifference cure I2. Beyond this point it becomes
horizontal which signifies that the consumer has reached the saturation point with regard to the
consumption of good Y. He buys the same amount of Y (RA) as before despite further increases
in his income. It often happens in the case of a necessity (like salt) whose demand remains the
same even when the income of the consumer continues to increase further. Here Y is a necessity.
Figure 12.15 (B) shows a vertical income consumption curve when the consumption of good X
reaches the saturation level R on the part of the consumer. He has no inclination to increase its
purchases despite further increases in his income. He continues to purchase OA of it even at
higher income levels. Thus X is a necessity here.
The last two types of income consumption curves relate to inferior goods. The demand of
inferior goods falls, when the income of the consumer increases beyond a certain level, and he
replaces them by superior substitutes. He may replace coarse grains by wheat or rice, and coarse
cloth by a fine variety. In Figure 12.15 (C), good Y is inferior and X is a superior or luxury good.
Upto point R the ICC curve has- a positive slope and beyond that it is negatively inclined. The
consumer’s purchases of Y fall with the increase in his income. Similarly in Figure 12.15 (D),
good X is shown as inferior and Y is a superior good beyond the equilibrium point R when the
ICC curve turns back upon itself. In both these cases the income effect is negative beyond point
R on the income-consumption curve ICC.
The different types of income-consumption curves are also shown in Figure 12.16 where: (1)
ICC1 Alternative Method, has a positive slope and relates to normal goods; (2) IСС2 is horizontal
from point A, X is a normal good while Y is a necessity of which the consumer does not want to
have more than the usual quantity as his income increases further: (3) IСС3 is vertical from A, К
is a normal good here and X is satiated necessity; (4) ICC4 is negatively inclined downwards, Y
becomes an inferior good form A onwards and X is a superior good; and (5) ICC5 shows X as an
inferior good.
The substitution effect relates to the change in the quantity demanded resulting from a change in
the price of good due to the substitution of relatively cheaper good for a dearer one, while
keeping the price of the other good and real income and tastes of the consumer as constant. Prof.
Hicks has explained the substitution effect independent of the income effect through
compensating variation in income. “The substitution effect is the increase in the quantity bought
as the price of the commodity falls, after adjusting income so as to keep the real purchasing
power of the consumer the same as before. This adjustment in income is called compensating
variations and is shown graphically by a parallel shift of the new budget line until it become
tangent to the initial indifference curve.”
Thus on the basis of the methods of compensating variation, the substitution effect measure the
effect of change in the relative price of a good with real income constant. The increase in the real
income of the consumer as a result of fall in the price of, say good X, is so withdrawn that he is
neither better off nor worse off than before.
The substitution effect is explained in Figure 12.17 where the original budget line is PQ with
equilibrium at point R on the indifference curve I1. At R, the consumer is buying OB of X and
BR of Y. Suppose the price of X falls so that his new budget line is PQ1. With the fall in the
price of X, the real income of the consumer increases. To make the compensating variation in
income or to keep the consumer’s real income constant, take away the increase in his income
equal to PM of good Y or Q1N of good X so that his budget line PQ1 shifts to the left as MN and
is parallel to it.
At the same time, MN is tangent to the original indifference curve l1 but at point H where the
consumer buys OD of X and DH of Y. Thus PM of Y or Q1N of X represents the compensating
variation in income, as shown by the line MN being tangent to the curve I1 at point H. Now the
consumer substitutes X for Y and moves from point R to H or the horizontal distance from В to
D. This movement is called the substitution effect. The substitution affect is always negative
because when the price of a good falls (or rises), more (or less) of it would be purchased, the real
income of the consumer and price of the other good remaining constant. In other words, the
relation between price and quantity demanded being inverse, the substitution effect is negative.
The price effect indicates the way the consumer’s purchases of good X change, when its price
changes, A given his income, tastes and preferences and the price of good Y. This is shown in
Figure 12.18. Suppose the price of X falls. The budget line PQ will extend further out to the right
as PQ1, showing that the consumer will buy more X than before as X has become cheaper. The
budget line PQ2 shows a further fall in the price of X. Any rise in the price of X will be
represented by the budget line being drawn inward to the left of the original budget line towards
the origin.
If we regard PQ2, as the original budget line, a two time rise in the price of X will lead to the
shifting of the budget line to PQ1, and PQ2. Each of the budget lines fanning out from P is a
tangent to an indifference curve I1, I2, and I3 at R, S and T respectively. The curve PCC
connecting the locus of these equilibrium points is called the price- consumption curve. The
price-consumption curve indicates the price effect of a change in the price of X on the
consumer’s purchases of the two goods X and Y, given his income, tastes, preferences and the
price of good Y.