Proof Testing Whitepaper v1.0
Proof Testing Whitepaper v1.0
Proof Testing Whitepaper v1.0
straightpoint
WHITEPAPER
SUPPORT INFORMATION
PROOF TESTING
Abstract
This article looks at the practicalities of proof testing, whilst identifying areas for
improvement and providing a more effective and proportionate approach to equipment
inspection. It also discusses ways to increase traceability without making the process
more onerous.
It was written upon completion of an extensive research programme related to the launch
of new software, Proof Test plus (or SW-PTP), that adds speed, accuracy and breadth to
data recording and certification related to non-destructive load verification or proof load
testing. However, this white paper is not exclusively related to that technology or the
Radiolink plus load cells, load shackles or compression load cells that gather data for it.
CONTENTS
What is a proof test ………………………………………………………………………… iii
LOLER places emphasis on the experience of a competent person, who makes an informed decision as to
what is appropriate based on their training. They determine if a proof test is necessary or helpful to assess a
piece of lifting equipment.
A proof test is usually expressed as a percentage of the working load limit (WLL) that equipment is designed
to withstand.
The exact requirements of proof testing and the extent of each test can vary depending on standards,
equipment or industries involved, as well as individual requirements from customers or as part of
manufacturers’ own quality controls.
Lifting equipment manufacturers may carry out proof tests routinely or as a batch test in line with their own
QA/QC procedures, but for goods for sale in the EU a minimum requirements is that of the Machinery
Directive.
The Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC section 4.1.2.3 addresses the static and dynamic tests that must be
performed on all lifting machinery ready to be put into service. These tests help satisfy the ‘fitness for
purpose’ requirement of lifting machinery or lifting accessories discussed in section 4.1.3.
The Directive also states (line 20) that for certain types of machinery having a higher risk factor, a stricter
certification procedure is desirable. A few examples of additional certification standards that may require
load testing include:
BS EN 14439: references proof of strength and stability of cranes, including out of service stability to
account for wind loading.
EN12079 and DNV2.7‐1 standards set minimum criteria for design, material, production and testing
of containers used in offshore applications, with specific guidance on proof testing.
Maritime industries ‐ Proof load testing is required for almost all lifting appliances and loose lifting
gear in order to obtain Lloyds register certification. Other verification bodies such as Det Norske
Veritas (DNV) and Bureau Veritas have similar requirements for lifting gear.
A few examples of standards that may require load tests to be performed on lifting equipment and
accessories include:
Again, in mission critical industries, additional tests may be required. NASA for example specifies the
occasions and frequency of proof load tests and periodic load tests to be performed on lifting devices and
equipment (LDE’s) in its NASA‐STD‐8719.9 technical standard on lifting.
A load cell allows the test to be accurately measured and recorded. In safety critical industries the
requirement to document test procedures and results has never been greater as users of lifting equipment
call for more traceability and audit trails.
Ask oneself, how does a user know the crane is structurally and mechanically sound without imposing a
proof load on the machine? How do they check that the winch brake can hold the required line pull? How
can they check that the boom hoist clutch is not slipping or the hydraulic lock valves or cylinder seals are
not passing oil, without imposing the maximum load they are expected to carry?
To achieve the same level of assurance of no failures at capacity without a proof test would require an even
deeper inspection schedule to compensate. The machine may need to be stripped down and inspected
piece by piece, perhaps with non‐destructive testing (NDT) being carried out on individual parts. Specific
service intervals would need to be introduced to ensure regular replacement of parts based on hours in use
and number of cycles.
According to Safety Assessment Federation (SAFed) figures, the five million equipment examinations
conducted by its member companies each year identify a significant number of safety‐related defects of up
to 5% depending on equipment type. With this level of detection, a reduction in the scope or periodicity of
examination is not advisable without alternative risk control measures.
As the UK’s Health & Safety Executive (HSE) states, routine load testing isn’t a requirement. In a document
titled, ‘Thorough examinations and inspections of lifting equipment’, it says, ‘Most lifting equipment does
not need routine testing as part of the thorough examination—in fact some overload tests can cause
damage to lifting equipment. Where testing is deemed necessary, it may not need be undertaken at every
thorough examination. The need for, and nature of, testing should be based on an assessment of risk—
taking account of information from the manufacturer and other relevant information—as determined by
the competent person.’
Straightpoint manufactures a variety of equipment that can be used for proof testing. As referenced at the
outset, its Proof Test plus (or SW‐PTP) software records data gathered by a Radiolink plus load cell, load
shackle or compression load cell. It then creates a pass or fail certificate that includes test data and graphs
charting data from the load versus time throughout a test.
Information can be printed out directly as a PDF report, electronically transmitted or fed to an information
centre in the cloud. It is important that there is traceability of proof test certification and that the load cell
that did the test was accurate and calibrated. Where a load test is deemed beneficial the aim of Proof Test
plus is to make that process more efficient.