Phenazopyridine
Phenazopyridine
Phenazopyridine
Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, PR China; and 3Longzhu Hospital of Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518026, PR China
686 Reproduction (photocopying) of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.
Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 46, September 2008
DB-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm i.d, 0.25 µm film the standard curve was prepared. Calibration curves were
thickness, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) was used. The inlet obtained from plasma samples spiked with various amounts of
temperature was maintained at 280°C. The oven temperature was PAP (5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 500 ng/mL) and 50 µL of
initially held at 140°C for 2 min, and then programmed to 280°C working IS solution was added for all quantitated samples to
at 10°C/min where it was held constant for 4 min. Helium was evaluate the linearity, precision (%CV, n = 5), and accuracy (the
used as carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 2.0 mL/min. The bio- bias between theoretical and actual concentrations).
logical samples were analyzed by GC–MS with the pulsed splitless The intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy were deter-
injection mode. 1 µL was injected for each assay. mined by analyzing spiked plasma samples containing 5, 20, 100,
The source and electrodes of the quadrupole mass filter were and 500 ng/mL of PAP from 5 analyses per day for 5 consecutive
both set to 200°C. Ionization was carried out in electron impact days, respectively. Recoveries of PAP and IS were calculated by
ionization (EI) mode at 70 eV. Detection was operated under comparing the peak areas of 5 extracted samples from plasma to
selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. The ions for base peak (m/z that of standards injected directly at the concentrations of 5, 20,
213 for PAP and m/z 283 for IS) were selected for quantitative 100, and 500 ng/mL with the mean peak area of standards and
assay under investigation. 5.3 µg/mL of IS.
Pharmacokinetic studies
PAP was given to healthy male volunteers after having
obtained their informed consents before enrolment to partici-
pate to the study. The clinical protocol was reviewed and
approved by the Ethics Committee of Xi’an Jiaotong University
Hospital, China. Eighteen healthy male volunteers aged from 21
to 28 and with body weight between 58 and 70 kg were included
in a randomized, single-dose, 2-period, 2-sequence, cross-over
Figure 2.Total ion current chromatogram of phenazopyridine and diazepam study with a 1-week washout period. The volunteers were non-
(A), mass-spectrogram of phenazopyridine (B), and mass-spectrogram of alcoholic, free from cardiac, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, and
diazepam (C).
hematological diseases, and also assessed by physical examina-
tion and following laboratory tests, had
complete blood count, hepatic function, and
Table I. Precision and Accuracy of the GC–MS Method for Determining PAP renal function tests. During each period, the
Concentration in Human Plasma Samples volunteers were admitted to the Clinical
Pharmacokinetic Laboratory, Xi’an Jiaotong
Intra-day (n = 5) Inter-day (n = 5)
Concentration University Hospital at 18:00 h and had an
added CF* Precision Accuracy CF Precision Accuracy evening meal before 20:00 h. After an
(ng/mL) (mean ± SD, ng/mL) (%) (%) (mean ± SD, ng/mL) (%) (%) overnight fasting, they received a single 200
mg PAP dose of each of the formulations of
5 5.160 ± 0.345 6.69 103.2 5.090 ± 0.279 5.48 101.8 test and reference drug at 07:00 h along
20 20.48 ± 0.444 2.17 102.4 19.90 ± 1.196 6.01 99.5
with 240 mL of water. They were then in the
100 94.50 ± 3.374 3.57 94.5 93.20 ± 2.488 2.67 93.2
500 499.0 ± 6.836 1.37 99.8 483.5 ± 5.995 1.24 96.7
seated position for at least 1 h and then
fasted for 2 h. A standard lunch and an
* CF = Concentration found. evening meal were provided at 4 and 10 h
after dosing. Blood samples (5 mL) were
687
Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 46, September 2008
withdrawn from antecuvital vein at 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, The GC–SIM chromatograms obtained for blank samples, PAP,
3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after and then transferred to vacutainer and IS are shown in Figure 3 as analyzed by GC–MS. The pres-
tubes and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min (4°C); the plasma ence of specific fragmentations, such as m/z of 213 and 283 are
samples obtained were stored at –20°C until analysis. The con- shown in Figure 2. It is obvious that the GC–SIM method sim-
centrations of total plasma of PAP were determined as the mean plifies the chromatogram very efficiently and provides a single
of duplicate samples. The maximal concentration (Cmax) and the peak for identification.
time for maximal concentration (Tmax) were determined by
visual inspection from each volunteer’s plasma concentra- Method validation and linearity of calibration curve
tion–time plots for PAP. The area under the plasma concentra- The peak area of PAP in human plasma was linear with respect
tion–time curve [AUC(0 – t)] was calculated by the linear to the analyte concentration over the range of (5–500 ng/mL).
trapezoidal method from 0 to 24 h. The AUC extrapolated to The mean linear regression equation of calibration for PAP was
infinity [AUC(0 – ∞)] was calculated as AUC(0 – t) + Ct/Ke, where Ct y = (0.03 ± 0.011) + (0.021 ± 0.001), r = 0.9992, n =7, where y
is the last measurable concentration and the elimination rate was the peak area of the analyte and x was the concentration of
constant (Ke) was obtained from the least square fitted terminal the analyte. LOQ was established as (0.3 ng/mL) for PAP with an
688
Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 46, September 2008
689