The Current Issues of Operation Management and
The Current Issues of Operation Management and
The Current Issues of Operation Management and
Operation management
1
The Current issues of operation management
Introduction:
Organizational issues can be a challenge for some companies to overcome
as they try to improve and manage their daily operations. The first step to
resolving organizational issues is to acknowledge that there is a problem and
identify the source. It takes time to determine where issues are coming from
and create the appropriate solutions for each problem, but this is a necessary
step for any organization that wants to grow and thrive in a healthy manner.
1- Role specification:
Role specification means hiring the most qualified person for a job and
assigning work to the most appropriate employee. A lack of quality role
specification can disrupt workflows, reduce efficiency and decrease
communication between team members. Role specification issues can occur
because:
● Managers may show biased behavior towards or against particular
individuals.
● A hiring manager doesn't take the time to interview a candidate
thoroughly.
● Leadership may not understand their team's capabilities and particular
strengths.
2
● Nepotism can sometimes lead to an unqualified new hire.
To overcome this organizational challenge, it's important that managers learn
about the skills and interests of their team members so they can assign work
to the most qualified member or train members on how to succeed. It's also
essential that managers conduct a thorough hiring process for new
candidates to hire people that suit company openings. They may enlist the
help of recruiters who are more adept at finding qualified candidates for
specific roles.
3- Innovation:
Innovation is how companies develop new ideas and expand their products
and services. An organization that is innovative opens itself up to new
opportunities, integrates updated technology tools and becomes an industry
leader. Organizations experience low innovation and grow stagnant because:
● They have a company culture that stifles employee creativity.
● The company uses outdated business practices that don't facilitate
innovation.
You can encourage innovation in your organization organizations by listening
to the ideas of your team members and creating a culture where they feel
comfortable being able to openly and freely express their ideas. It's also
helpful to thoroughly analyze current business practices and make necessary
changes so new ideas and innovations can easily integrate into the
company's processes.
3
The best decisions are based on the data. Period. Operations managers can
always learn from data: the campaigns they run…the channels they use in
their marketing… their sales strategy. Data is not just raw numbers; it’s about
telling a compelling story. It’sa good idea to use a digital workplace that
allows you to build dashboards with the data you have. These dashboards
often help turn a table of numbers into insight – highlighting the things that
matter most like customer satisfaction, engagement, and retention.
6- Safety:
You cannot run an unsafe business. Unfortunately, there are more fatal
injuries in the warehousing industry than in others. Many companies fail to
consider the ethical considerations of hazardous risks in operation, even when
they know they can potentially cause injury to workers.
Many warehouses also fail the OSHA legal compliance requirements of risk
and hazards. Through OSHA, the government prescribes business
responsibilities, including the following warehouse safety rules:
Lack of compliance can lead to fines, closure, or public shame resulting from
the OSHA inspection report. That’s a black eye on your business. You also
4
risk having employees with lost morale because nobody wants to work at a
risky place.
5
entrepreneurial mindset, the organization will under-produce. You have to
have a team that is both in the business and on the business. Failure to
develop key competencies and behaviors.
In our work with organizations, we commonly encounter a lot of hardworking
people who have good intentions. However, despite their experience in the
industry, their technical talent, and the subject-matter expertise that many
leaders bring to the table, creating a high-performance organization is often
still out of reach.
Nearly everyone we meet, including senior leaders, has at least one (and in
some cases, multiple leadership weaknesses. Sometimes leaders are aware
of their behavioral shortcomings; in other cases, they are blind to their
leadership deficits. People inside the organization are often afraid to candidly
say what they think, and helping enormously successful leaders with their
Achilles heels can be tricky.
9- Lack of awareness:
Building a solid organization takes hard work and a keen awareness of the
culture and environment that exists in a business. Most executives are very
busy people; a lot of things vie for their attention. Market conditions can
change fast in a VUCA (velocity, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity)
6
world and demand huge portions of a leader's time. We affectionately call this
the "task magnet."
Unfortunately, while they're busy focusing on their many necessary
operational distractions, many managers take their eye off the teamwork ball.
This means that communication suffers and leaders get preoccupied and fail
to recognize people, celebrate progress, build the talent pipeline, or invest
time reviewing processes, practices, and better ways of working across
functions. People then become disengaged, feel marginalized, and lose focus
and commitment.
7
Operation and sales
INTRODUCTION:
In many businesses like retail, packaged goods, pharmaceutical, industrial
sectors etc, we have dissatisfied customers, high inventories, cash flow
problems, missed annual business targets, imbalances in demand and supply
and other issues which keep cropping up at regular intervals putting lot of
stress on the organizational system due to VUCA markets.
It is a known fact that when demand surpasses supply, manufacturing may
fail to provide the required volume and consequently, customer service may
be affected. Alternatively, when supply exceeds demand, inventories could
increase resulting in cut in production, plant shut downs and lay-offs reducing
the competitiveness of the organizations.
The above two scenarios could be avoided if a proper balance between
demand and supply is planned and an advance warning system is put in
place to avoid the imbalance (Vollmann et al, 2005).
As organizations have to match supply with sales orders, the term S&OP has
come into use to refer to that process that helps organizations to keep
demand and supply in balance. The premise of S&OP is that customer
service and inventory are 'resultants' and to effectively manage them the
drivers- demand and supply, have to be managed to have competitive
advantage.
8
EVOLUTION OF S&OP:
A typical manufacturing cycle is initiated by production planning activity with
master production scheduling (MPS) providing a plan for manufacturing of
components and sub-assemblies that go into a final product. MPS, in turn, is
based on both forecasts as well as actual orders received from customers.
With increase in variety and volumes, information technology was used to
capture the required input parts that form the finished product. This
information system was called as material resources planning (MRP). Il was
an effective method for arriving at dependency demand with major advantage
seen in terms of reducing inventories and thus saving invisible costs which
ultimately impacted the product cost (Buffa & Sarin, 1990) As production
volumes, mix and complexities increased to match customer demands, MRP
evolved into manufacturing resource planning (MRPII), a system that tied the
basic MRP system to the firm's financial system and also to other core
supporting processes (Krajewiski et al, 2008). However, it failed to achieve
performance improvements in demand management due to more emphasis
on supply side of business and less integration of sales, marketing,
manufacturing and management functions (Ling and Palmatier, 1987). It is
also believed that conceptually, S&OP evolved from aggregate production
planning (APP) in the early 1950s to MRP II in the mid - 1980's (Thome et al,
2011).
It is reported that S&OP was created in the late 1980's by Dick Ling when
MRP II was in vogue and was seen as a driver whose principal focus was to
make MRPII to work. At that time S&0P was a breakthrough concept, as it
forced sales, marketing and manufacturing to agree once a month to 'one set
of numbers' for sales, production and inventory (Ling and Coldrick, 2009).
Further, Calderon (2006) observed that supply plans without reasonably good
demand plan was futile and that S&OP viewed both these aspects of
business in a seamless way.
The principal focus of S&OP during the 1980's and 1990's was how to get a
good operational foundation in place to evaluate demand and to ensure that
sufficient resources are in place across the business to meet the same
Wallace and Stahl (2008) clarified further that the coordination between the
sales planning and production planning has morphed into S&OP with both
working together to achieve required output and opined that it is a lubricant
9
between different partners in supply chain that makes it to function
harmoniously with minimum supply chain disruption.
10
The bi-directional arrows signify the iteration process indicating that, if S&OP
cannot be developed to satisfy the objectives of the ABP, the same (ABP)
needs to be adjusted accordingly. Similarly, if a viable MPS cannot be
developed, S&OP would need suitable adjustment.
Milliken (2007) and Lapide (2004) identify S&OP as a cross functional process
for collaborative decision making.
It has a 'Planning Horizon' of 15 to 18 months with the longer period being
considered for implementation of capacity expansions, if need arises (Wallace
and Stahl, 2008 and Thome et al, 2012).
As regards company-wide planning, it is done on highly aggregated basis and
at S&OP levels, it is planned at family, sub-family and model level. Finally, at
the level of manufacturing and execution, it is done meticulously at SKU level.
It is to be noted that, the four fundamentals of S&OP are demand, supply,
volume and mix. Volume is concerned with how much to make of the product
families, whereas, mix determines which individual products to make for
which customer.
PROCESS OF SCOP:
S&OP is considered as a set of management practices or as a bundle of
interrelated management practices within the firm and supply chain.
Justifiably, it is a complex construct which can be measured as a
management and planning process covering frequency of meetings, trust and
confidence of designated participants, agenda, etc (Thomé et al 2012).
S&OP comprises series of steps with monthly meetings involving designated
and empowered participants from functional departments. Regular
monitoring and evaluation of results is done with the help of information
technology (Lapide 2004, Grimson and Pyke 2007).
11
profitability
5. Getting plan agreement
As S&OP became more global and companies settled in to the process of
bringing teams together, according to the AMR Research report, the big
challenge changed from coordination of global teams in 2007 to the need for
data quality and timeliness. Data was pulled from disparate systems at
different times and often delivered differing results from an overload of
Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. Instead of one version of the truth,
organizations have been faced with conflicting opinions of fact.
The right tools in place help ensure data quality and drive towards
determining a feasible plan where consensus can be reached by all attending
departments. There are many tools available today to gather and prepare the
information and model the multiple scenarios that are needed for an effective
and efficient S&OP process. The more thorough the preparation, the more
efficient and effective the meeting will be and the better the resulting plan.
The second most identified challenge was using the plan in daily operations.
The natural tendency is to attend to the "squeaky wheel." The change in
thought process has to be towards the activity that provides the greatest
impact towards reaching corporate goals. S&OP helps develop a plan and set
priorities to maintain this focus.
Another challenge that has appeared in many research studies is the
integration with finance and understanding the role of finance in S&OP.
In an increasingly cost conscious environment, integrating finance into the
equation is gaining importance. While a shift, it also follows with recent data
from AMR Research? that shows more than 60 percent of supply chain
executives now report directly to a member of the C-suite. Excluding finance
in the process can cause S&OP to lack support of the executive team and
whither on the vine.
Another key reason to have finance involved is the concept of shared metrics.
Without visibility of the financial impact of decisions made during S&OP, it is
difficult to fully understand the impact of sourcing, inventory, postponement,
and other pivotal business strategies. (The concept and impact of metrics on
the S&OP process will be discussed in more detail later in this paper.)
S&OP is a process that by nature unites all key constituents to a single goal.
Senior level executives responsible for sales, marketing,
materials/procurement, manufacturing, transportation, and finance meet to
12
consider the needs and constraints of each of their respective areas in light of
overall company objectives, and agree on an operating plan for the next
month, quarter and year. This process is repeated each month as the plan is
updated and extended.
The key word here is agree. The S&OP process is one of compromise. The
best performance in inventory control, that is, the lowest inventory level, will
not yield the highest customer service. High customer service is expensive.
The most efficient production will likely increase inventory and may not
coordinate with sales shipment objectives.
Dealing with these trade-offs is at the heart of the
S&OP process
in order to balance sound business decisions to construct the best overall
plan, the S&OP team must have accurate, reliable information - the current
status, future conditions, constraints, and concerns about demand,
production, inventory, procurement, and finance. They must also know how
changes and decisions in one area impact performance in others. And, they
need the flexibility to evaluate multiple business scenarios - optimistic,
pessimistic and realistic. Without this information, executives must rely on
experience, intuition and risk assessment.
These challenges are not insurmountable; in fact, the following five steps can
make your planning process impactful and effective.
The steps:
13
tools that utilize history will not work effectively for NPIs. To overcome these
challenges, more advanced techniques must be employed.
Companies that have been successful in managing NPIs utilize advanced
techniques such as attribute-based forecasting which generates demand
profiles for new products based on existing product demand tied to
identifiable attributes such as style, color, season, material type, etc. A
well-designed attribute-based forecasting system will continually monitor
demand signals, quickly recognize any deviation from the forecast, and adjust
the assumptions and forecast to match the actual demand signals.
In addition, attribute-based forecasting techniques can be used for product
retirements. When retiring a product, the history for that product is no longer
a reasonable indicator to predict a retirement demand profile. Attribute-based
forecasting is a preferred method to predict how fast or slow the product will
sell during the retirement phase by looking at how products with similar
attributes have been previously retired.
Having solid forecasts for NPIs and retirements is an essential first step in
preparing for the S&OP meeting.
Demand Sensing:
14
A forecast is never 100 percent accurate.
Realizing this, management will formulate plans that recognize expected
forecast error and compensate accordingly. Nevertheless, it is important to
monitor forecast accuracy on a continuous basis. As real demand occurs, it
can be captured and compared to the forecast. Early detection of differences
and trends will help avoid shortages / over-production and can be used to
adjust the forecast to bring it closer to actual demand. This should be
completed on a regular basis, even in between scheduled updates.
Multiple demand signals can assist in sensing changes in demand patterns.
For example, orders, shipments and POS can be used in combination to
show if changes occur. The most detailed and up-to-date demand signal is
POS since it provides true consumer purchasing activity. Anything further
upstream does not indicate how much of the product actually sold; it simply
provides details on what is still in the customer supply chain.
For purchase parts and raw materials, many companies have established
close collaborative relationships with their suppliers to pass actual usage
data upstream for POS-like timeliness.
Recent analyst firm surveys have shown manufacturing executives cite a
strong need for improved forecasts and more timely demand sensing to
provide more visibility to supply chain and manufacturing teams into real
demand to provide field sales people or brokers with a better ability to resolve
out-of-stocks and capitalize on selling opportunities as well as improve stock
positions, especially on promotions. Demand sensing also enhances the
ability to differentiate the demand for individual products within product lines
or groupings. Not all products sell at the same rate; inventory position and
policy must recognize these differences to be able to provide optimum
availability and avoid stock-outs and/or oversupply.
Demand Shaping:
Often, company management and the S80P team take the approach that
demand variability is a given; and the challenge is to understand it and act in
the most effective way possible. That is true to a certain extent, but demand
can be influenced and driven to meet the company's objectives.
Through proactive measures, you can shape demand to meet company
goals.
Many companies are engaged in demand shaping; however, most do so
disconnected from the overall operational plan. It is crucial for a company's
15
on-going profitability and growth to make demand shaping an integral part of
the S&OP process.
For example, if one plant has available capacity, it might be prudent to
develop a promotion plan to drive demand to fill up that plant's capacity.
Promotional activities in support of a new product launch are frequent
demand shaping techniques.
Advertising, pricing actions, coupons, and incentives to salespeople, dealers
or retailers are all examples of demand shaping activities.
Any demand shaping plan must be developed in conjunction with the
forecast. As demand is changed the forecast must be adjusted accordingly or
you will create a major ripple throughout your supply chain. There's an
iterative loop implied here:
• Initial forecasts and plans reveal an opportunity where increased demand
would improve results
Demand shaping activities and expected results are proposed
• Forecast changes reflect the expected changes in demand
• The full planning process reveals the resulting changes in sales, inventory,
production, logistics, customer service, and profit
Inherent in the demand review is balancing the demand plan against the
company's overall financial objectives. It is critical the demand plan and the
alternatives presented at the executive S&OP meeting are created to meet
service level, inventory, production, and profitability objectives.
16
Inventory Optimization:
Inventory is one of the largest investments that a company will make and is
the primary determinant of customer service. It is therefore appropriate that
inventory policy and specific inventory positioning decisions be key
outcomes of the S&OP process.
Where to keep product across the supply chain including raw material,
work-in-progress (WIP) and finished goods helps optimize the financial
investment in inventory.
The primary purpose of finished goods inventory is to meet expected
short-term demand while components and raw materials provide for the
needs of manufacturing to meet future demand.
The right amount of the right inventory in the right place at the right time
helps prevent lost sales though this must be balanced with the cost and risk
of holding too much inventory as that will place a strain on cash flow. To
balance this, many companies optimize for each location, product, and
channel within overall company objectives such as total inventory investment
and customer service requirements.
The best way to set inventory plans and policies is to thoroughly analyze and
understand the relationships between various stocking decisions, service
levels, and inventory investments for each category of goods, channel, and
customer or customer group. This is where the most difficult decisions are
evaluated. The sales team wants the ability to ship any product every day
which requires a higher inventory level to improve fill rates and avoid
stock-outs. Procurement and finance, on the other hand, want less inventory
to reduce costs and improve cash flow. Production wants more components
and raw materials to reduce the risk of manufacturing disruptions due to
shortages and wants to match production schedules with efficiency,
regardless of demand. The heart of the S&OP process focuses on balancing
these trade-offs to develop the plan that best satisfies the needs of the
company as an entire organization, not just a silo within the company.
To optimize inventory, supply chain leaders run simulations that explore the
dynamics of the demand/inventory to availability/service level relationship.
They also review and identify the ideal stage, raw, WIP and finished, for each
product in inventory, and the proper placement of inventory in the distribution
network. Simulation allows a choice of methods including minimize inventory,
service objectives, minimize short shipments, and various order quantity
17
options including economic order quantity (EOQ), inventory turns, 'x' days of
supplv. capacity-limited EOQ, etc. Additionally, these leaders consider the
redeployment of inventory, moving of excess inventory from one warehouse
or distribution center (DC) to another
DC instead of making more product.
To take this a step further, you can include planned events such as pricing
actions, sales incentives, advertising changes, and competitive actions when
running the simulations. Simulations and proper planning through
collaboration can help make sure there is sufficient inventory and logistics
capability to cover any changes in demand driven by these events.
Operations Planning:
The bottom line is about shipping product - when, where and how much. The
challenge is to develop a supply plan that profitably meets company
objectives. When developing a supply plan, manufacturing must take into
account multiple considerations including:
Do not exceed a pre-set level of production on certain products during a
specific period, or overall production during a given time, whether expressed
in units, pounds, hours, or some other indirect measurement
• Do not exceed the availability of certain components
• Do not exceed production capabilities; no overtime
• Minimize inventory build-up to accommodate high-demand periods (this
often conflicts with the previous point)
• Do not exceed a certain level of inventory at one, several, or all distribution
centers) or do not exceed a certain inventory value or volume at a location, a
group of locations or overall
• Maintain 99% service for certain customers and 95% for the rest, or
different service levels for various products, product lines, channels, or
regions
• Minimize less-than-truckload (LTL) shipments;
minimize overall transportation costs;
eliminate premium freight; or only use owned or contracted transportation
resources
The only way to intelligently make this kind of complex decision is to have the
information available along with the ability to explore the impact of various
factors through simulation.
18
The ability to see the interaction among the various factors is the key to
ensuring the supply team is effectively utilizing available resources.
The supply team will analyze the findings of the various scenarios, and
perhaps suggest alternative strategies that can be modeled to test their
effectiveness.
Collaboration is essential at this stage. It is important to discuss alternative
scenarios with the affected partners and ensure that critical parts and
resources can be made available in sufficient supply to support any plan that
the company might want to enact. It is also appropriate to discuss any
significant changes in demand or distribution expectations with the affected
sales people to get their concurrence that the expectations are realistic and
uncover any possible snags in the plan they might be able to identify based
on their knowledge of the customers and the markets.
19
Besides reviewing best case and alternative demand and supply scenarios, it
is imperative that executives assess risks to their supply chain.
Risks include:
• Quality issues
• Supplier failure
• Demand spikes
• Demand disruptions
• Obsolescence
• Strikes - internal and with external suppliers
Understanding the impact from these and other risks and having contingency
plans in place is paramount for any company. Having the supporting
information from the demand, supply and financial teams makes this an
informed decision as opposed to a 'shooting from the hip' decision.
Between meetings, department heads and managers carry out instructions,
and keep a close eve on current activities and events in order to detect any
deviation from what was outlined in the plan and bring that information to the
attention of the appropriate individuals as quickly as possible.
Corrective actions can bring the situation back in line or, if that isn't possible,
the plan may have to be revised with the new constraints in force.
Simulation becomes a key tool once again in responding to deviations from
the plan; alternative responses can be tested for the S&OP team to consider
in revising the plan.
A Plan Goes into Action
Sales, inventory and operations planning come together in the form of a
monthly meeting between the executives responsible for sales, marketing
inventory, procurement, production, and finance.
At the executive S&OP meeting, the challenging decisions are made as to
how the company's resources will be applied to meet company objectives,
including customer service and profitability, within the constraints and
capabilities available. Typically, a one-year plan is advanced, with
successively more detailed quarterly and monthly plans. Once the plan is set
at the monthly meeting, the group does not need to meet again until the next
month unless there is a significant deviation from the plan that must be
addressed immediately.
Because the primary business of the executive
S&OP meeting is to compare and balance trade-offs between the various
competing objectives this information must be made available to the team
20
before and during the meeting. Proper preparation can make the S&OP
meeting efficient and effective. This planning involves the need to model
several scenarios and understand the impact each has to the company. It is
easy and more comfortable to provide the model that everyone wants to see;
however, understanding how deviations in supply or demand can lead to
more reliable roadmaps and growth, and improved bottom line results.
BENEFITS OF S&OP:
a) Increased forecast accuracy.
b) Increased sales revenue.
c)Increased on time delivery.
d) Inventory reduction.
e) Safety stock reduction.
f)Increased productivity.
CONCLUSION:
The disciplined stage-wise approach is the backbone of S&OP. The
consensus decision by various functional heads coupled with longer horizon
plan of 15 to18 months along with management involvement makes S&OP
framework a very successful tool to balance supply with demand, thus,
providing competitive advantage to the organization in terms of increased
revenue and productivity, reduced inventory, improvement in on-time delivery
leading to enhanced customer service and sustained growth of the
organization.
21