Revelations and Disclosures: The Photographic Projects of Dawoud Bey and Wendy Ewald The two distinctive and remarkable projects brought together in this exhibit - Dawoud Bey's 20" x 24" Polaroid studio portraits and the black-and -white works by Wendy Ewald and her young students - differ enormously in their styles, their methodologies and their formal properties. Yet, in terms of their content, they have much in common - and , to a considerable extent, spring from related motives and a shared set of ideas and beliefs. We have today in photography a vital, ongoing debate concerning the authenticity , value and politics of representation that emerges from within a particu lar community or culture versus representation that's generated - and, too often , authorized and imposed - from without. Though I believe its origins can be traced directly to discussions that began in tl1e late 1960s conceming photography by and of African-Americans, this debate is nowadays not restricted to that specific issue, nor even to image1y more broad ly involving peop le of color. It is, appropriately , a challenge to the fundamental misconception tl1at photography itself can be considered a value-free , transparent medium , Dawoud Bey, Earl, 1996, Polacolor ER photographs , 60" x 69",courtesy David Beitzel Galle1y, New York and that its presumed neutrality somehow transfers itself to those who employ some photographer. Consequently, we have by court portraits of European royalty. combination of tl1e tools, materials and now several decades ' wotth of active investi- As images, these po1traits are necessarily processes that compr ise this technology. gation of these possibilities, exemplified by made in the studio; this camera is not trans- From its inception and ever since , the two projects whose results are swveyed portable and is almost impossible to operate photography has been used by tl1e members here . out-of-doors. Hence all environmental data of all cultures into which its practice has is eliminated. Ratl1er than replacing tl1at witl1 been introduced as a medium for cultural Consider, in this light, the color ponraiture props or elaborate settings , as do so many self-description. Yet, until the 1970s, the of Dawoud Bey. Bey has chosen in recent who've used this camera system , Bey restricts image1y of tl1e world 's many cultures that years to work with Polaroid materials and himself to his subjects and whatever they predominated in the mass media of the "first tools tl1at add significant elements to the reveal and disclose tl1rough body language , world " (which, of course, permeates the traditional genr e of transactional studio facial expression , clothing and personal entire globe) was made, almost invariably, portraiture. After exposure and the usual ornament. A rich but altogetl1er unpedantic by Caucasian photographers of European minute's wait, Polaroid 20" x 24" film - like sociology results from this method of inquiry, descent, ratl1er than by members of the com- its much smaller older sibling , the more which creates a self-presentational context munities under scrutiny. However marvelous familiar SX-70 - provides a negativeless , tl1at's the photographic version of what tl1e tl1e resulting image1y, and however well- direct-positive one-of-a-kind print , analogous late Erving Goffman called "tl1e theatrical intended towards , knowledgeable about and to a DaguetTeotype. Unlike standard film, frame." sympatl1etic to its subjects their makers may this process permits both photographer and This methodo logy premises itself on trust; have become , these obse1vations lacked tl1e subject to view and evaluate the results it requires tl1e photographer 's willingness to insight and attunement to cultural specifics immediately , and in dialogue. Says Bey, share the power of representation, so that his and nuances that only full membership "It makes for a more balanced relationship. " interpretation of the subjects finds a counter- brings. They also emblematized an unh ealthy o otl1er photographi c system is capable balance in tl1e subjects ' vision of themselves. and largely unexamined concentration of of such minute description of such a wealth There is nothing casual about these pictures , power over the depiction of others. of detail. Their color adds yet another layer and nothing surreptitious; those who have Fortunately, by the 1960s we already had of important data to these pictures ' function. chosen to accept Bey's scrutiny , and ours, several in1portant examples of long-tem1 And their size achieves just the opposite of compose tl1emselves willingly for these por- attention to cultures from within (the lifetime tl1e jewel-like Daguerreotype 's effect: rather traits, presenting themselves self-consciously project of Roy DeCarava stands as only one tl1an miniaturizing their subjects , it monu- to the light and the lens , returning tl1e gaze . notable instance). Those effo1ts - in tl1eir mentalizes them - especially when , in many The portrayals here emerge as much from obvious value , as well as in their compara- cases , Bey maximizes the scale of tl1ese tl1eir deliberate choice as from Bey's tive infrequency - served to spark in a works by combining two or more 20" x 24" perceptiveness. younger cohort both the debate referred to prints to describe his subjects. The dimen- "I am mindful tl1at portraiture has been above and a sudden, dramatic increase in sions of tl1e consequent pieces , and the a way for a select group of people - the experiments intended to rectify some of the density of description emb edded in them , gentrified class - to perpetuate tl1eir [own] entrenched in1balances between subject and make tl1em equivalent to the Renaissance images ," Bey wrote awhile back. "Museums all over the world are filled with portraits that moneyed people were able to commis- sion of themselves ... I like to bring the same attention to ordinary people ... and I particularly like to give this attention to black people, as a people whose in1ages have been stereotyped and ridiculed extensive ly in this country ... My photographs allow the subjects to direct their unflinching gaze at the viewer, if only in facsimile." Needless to say, they also permit Bey to direct his ow n unflinching gaze at them. To fill the walls of a quasi-sacral space such as a galle1y or museum with such collaborative representations of those the dominant culture spends such effort to marginalize and "disappear, " revealing them life-size or larger to the viewer for careful scrutiny, allowing them (even "if only in fac- simile") to initiate and return that prolonged gaze, is a form of understated empowerment of the subjects and - in the deepest sense of the word - an enco urageme nt of the viewer. It proposes that such an encounter has mutually beneficial consequences, and that the logical next step - engag ing with each other face to face, in the flesh - contains nothing to fear on either side so long as those involved are willing to see each other as fully human and take each other seriously. That such equa lizing introductions still need to be made may be reason for sorrow; but that someone like Bey is both eager and able to effect them, and that Bey's Janet Stallard, I took a picture ofmyseif with the statue in the backyard, Kentucky, 1977, collaborators remain willing to risk taking silver ge latin print, 8" x 10", courtesy James Danziger Gallery, New York the initiative, is sure ly cause for hope.
For more than a centwy now , cameras
and many of the photographic processes have been available to children . For at least the past three decades , assorted photogra- phers and educators have actively explored what children could accomplish in this medium and what we cou ld learn - about children, about the worlds they inhabit , about photography itself - from their efforts. Wendy Ewald's exempla 1y efforts over the past two decades need to be und erstood in that context; but they also demand to be acknow ledged as one of the earliest conunenced of these teaching ventures, and by now probably the longest-running of them all. Technica lly speaking, this is bare-bones photography, made with cheap Instamatic cameras coupled with black-and-white film. Yet the results resonate in a space rich with intimacy and ripe with dreams , somewhere between the quotidian revelations of the family album and the more deliberated, imaginative works of such contemporary figures as Enunet Gowin, Nancy Rexroth, Ralph Eugene Meatyard, Duane Michals: photographers who have combined the Freddy Childers, Seif-po11raitwith the picture of my biggest brothe1; Everett, who killed himself when he consistent add ress to issues of persona l and came back from Vietnam, Kentucky, 1976 , silver gelatin print, 9!h" x 11'W', cowtesy Jam es Danziger even private life with an economy of means Galle1y, New York partn ers in mese experiments continu e tl1ei..r involvement in me medium as tl1ei.rlives evolve, their relation to me world of lens- based visual conm1unication has been altered drastically by tl1ei..rencount er witl1 tl1e basic too l on which all me visual mass media are predicated . And mey, in turn , have subtly but inexo rably shifted the ways in which tl1ey and tl1eir cultures are to be und erstoo d. In me long run , me effects of mis complex dialogue cannot help but benefit all concerned. And me immediate results - tl1e perceptive, emotional, frank and un self- conscious disclosures and revelations contain ed in these image-text works, the intricate pleasures tl1ey offer to me eye and heart at once - constitute an invaluable gift to the present and tl1e future.