Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

2017 June - Unit 1 Report

The document reports on an examination for an international A-level physics qualification. It summarizes candidate performance on each question, with some questions answered better than others. In particular, data analysis and practical skills proved challenging for many candidates.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

2017 June - Unit 1 Report

The document reports on an examination for an international A-level physics qualification. It summarizes candidate performance on each question, with some questions answered better than others. In particular, data analysis and practical skills proved challenging for many candidates.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

INTERNATIONAL

A-LEVEL
PHYSICS
(9630) Paper 1
Report on the examination
June 2017

Copyright © 2017 Oxford International AQA Examinations and its licensors. All rights reserved.
INTERNATIONAL A‐LEVEL PHYSICS (9630) Paper 1 Report on the examination

GENERAL
Most of the paper was accessible to the majority of candidates. There were some very strong
performances but there were also candidates that struggled to come to terms with the demands of the
paper.
Question 11 proved to be the most challenging part of the paper. Candidates seemed uncomfortable
with data analysis and anything that touched on ideas associated with practical skills. Candidates
seemed to be uncertain wherever assessment objectives AO3 and AO4 were assessed in the paper. In
particular, the assessment of errors and uncertainties was not well understood. It may be helpful to draw
candidates’ attention to the section of the specification dealing with Practical Assessment. This outlines
the skills that they should have and indicates that they will be assessed in the written papers.
Candidates tended to be successful with direct, single stage calculations but struggled with multi-stage
calculations where guidance was limited. The stronger candidates tended to be much better organised in
their setting out of mathematical work.
Weaker candidates had problems with the extraction of information from graphs. In particular they need
to look for units on axes and to be prepared to deal appropriately with powers of ten incorporated within
units. When questions were directly aimed at candidates’ knowledge of SI units weaknesses were also
revealed.
The other area that proved to be difficult was in the writing of clear, unambiguous and detailed
explanations. There were not many opportunities for extended explanations but candidates do need to
develop the skills of identifying the point of the question and checking that each relevant aspect of a
situation has been dealt with in their answer.

QUESTION 1
This question was answered well with all candidates gaining at least one mark. The most common
mistake was to identify weight as a scalar quantity or energy as a vector.

QUESTION 2
02.1 was well done by most. Those who gained only one mark tended to forget to specify that it is the
perpendicular distance that is important in finding the moment of a force about a point. 02.2 was less
well done. Most knew that they had to multiply force by distance moved but candidates struggled to find
the appropriate distance. The legitimate alternative of multiplying torque by angle turned through was not
seen at all.

QUESTION 3
This question was not well done. The majority of candidates were very uncertain about how to find the
components of a force and did not seem to appreciate the conditions for equilibrium.

QUESTION 4
All candidates got this question at least partly correct with many getting full marks. Most knew the
products of decay and made a good attempt at getting all of the details of the proton and nucleon
numbers correct. Candidates were expected to stipulate that it was an antineutrino that was produced.
However, on another occasion, it may be expected that they further identify the particle as an electron
antineutrino.

QUESTION 5
This was poorly done. Many candidates seemed not to recognise the GW h as a unit and, if they did,
were not able to say that it was a unit of energy.

Copyright © 2017 Oxford International AQA Examinations and its licensors. All rights reserved. 2
INTERNATIONAL A‐LEVEL PHYSICS (9630) Paper 1 Report on the examination

QUESTION 6
Most candidates made some progress with this question. The most common errors in 06.1 were powers
of ten errors. The majority did the potential energy calculation correctly in 06.2 and 06.3 was well done
by many. However, in 06.3 some failed to rearrange the efficiency equation correctly and others made
errors in converting units, particularly hours into seconds. 06.4 was poorly done as most candidates
were unspecific in their answers. As a general rule, candidates should be advised to say where and how
energy is wasted. For example, “friction” would attract no marks but “work done against friction in the
turbine” would be regarded as correct.

QUESTION 7
Most of this question was done well by the majority of candidates. Only 07.3 presented real problems. As
in question 3, candidates were not good at dealing with components of vectors. In 07.4, the effects of air
resistance on the horizontal and vertical distances travelled by the projectile were well described.

QUESTION 8
08.1 was done quite well by most candidates although some made errors in extracting data from the
graph. Candidates should be advised to check the units on axes. Most made some progress with
calculating the force in 08.2 but arithmetic errors were common. 08.3 was very well done by a significant
minority of candidates but was not attempted by quite a few. The majority knew that they could use the
principle of conservation of momentum or an alternative method involving finding the acceleration of Q
from the graph and using the their force from 08.2. 08.4 was not well done. Again, a significant number
did not attempt the part and only a minority realised that they should audit the kinetic energies before
and after the collision in order to determine whether or not the collision was elastic.

QUESTION 9
As a whole this question was well done but weaker candidates had a tendency to omit relevant detail. In
09.1 candidates were expected to comment on the mass and the charge of a positron. It was considered
that a statement that the charge was positive was insufficient. In 09.2 candidates tended to know about
annihilation but some did not realise or think it worth stating that two gamma ray photons were produced
in the process. When candidates made an attempt at 09.3 they were usually successful but a surprising
number seemed unable to deal with the idea of half lives.

QUESTION 10
Candidates found 10.1 to be very difficult. Few mentioned Newton’s first law or the idea of inertia and
many had difficulty in expressing their ideas cogently. Parts 10.2 and 10.3 were well done by the
majority.

QUESTION 11
Candidates found the data analysis in this question to be very difficult. In particular, they seemed
unfamiliar with how to deal with errors and uncertainties. Centres and candidates may find advice in the
practical handbook. Candidates were presented with a set of data in 11.1 and expected to find the
percentage uncertainty. Few realised that the absolute uncertainty may be estimated as half of the range
of the data set and that one could find the percentage uncertainty by comparing the half range with the
mean of the data set. In 11.2 many had some idea of why the time was constant for all values of h but
often failed to present full explanations. They should have mentioned that the horizontal components of
velocity were not dependent on each other and that the vertical distance and the acceleration due to
gravity were both constants. Their difficulties with this carried over into part 11.3. Part 11.4 was generally
done correctly. Once again, few candidate had clear ideas about uncertainties in 11.5. Candidates do
need to know that the percentage uncertainty in, for example, speed, may determined by adding the
percentage uncertainties of distance and time. In 11.6 candidates were asked to describe how to avoid
errors in a particular measurement. In this case checking that one point was vertically below another was

Copyright © 2017 Oxford International AQA Examinations and its licensors. All rights reserved. 3
INTERNATIONAL A‐LEVEL PHYSICS (9630) Paper 1 Report on the examination

important. Among other simple practical techniques, candidates are expected to be familiar with how to
ensure that something is vertical by using a plumbline or set-square.

Section C: Multiple Choice Questions


Candidate’s overall performance in the multiple choice questions correlated strongly with their
performance in the rest of the paper. Questions relating to mechanics and properties of solids were
found to be difficult compared with questions on particles, radiation and radioactivity. Questions 15, 18
and 24 were found to be particularly difficult whereas questions 13, 22 and 25 were answered
successfully by the great majority of candidates. It was noticeable that the more successful candidates
made more annotations to their scripts in the multiple choice section – doing some calculations or
formalising their thought processes. Conversely, weaker candidates often simply selected one of the
available answers.

Copyright © 2017 Oxford International AQA Examinations and its licensors. All rights reserved. 4
INTERNATIONAL A‐LEVEL PHYSICS (9630) Paper 1 Report on the examination

GET HELP AND SUPPORT


Visit our website for information, guidance, support and resources at oxfordaqaexams.org.uk

OXFORD INTERNATIONAL AQA EXAMINATIONS


LINACRE HOUSE, JORDAN HILL, OXFORD, OX2 8TA
UNITED KINGDOM

enquiries@oxfordaqaexams.org.uk
oxfordaqaexams.org.uk

Permission to reproduce all copyright material has been applied for. In some cases, efforts to contact copyright-holders may have been
unsuccessful and Oxford International AQA Examinations will be happy to rectify any omissions of acknowledgements. If you have any
queries please contact the Copyright Team, AQA, Stag Hill House, Guildford, GU2 7XJ.

Copyright © 2017 Oxford International AQA Examinations and its licensors. All rights reserved.

You might also like