Fanaroff and Martin's Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: Diseases of The Fetus and Infant, 10e (Current Therapy in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine) - 2-Volume Set. 10th Edition. ISBN 1455756172, 978-1455756179
Fanaroff and Martin's Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: Diseases of The Fetus and Infant, 10e (Current Therapy in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine) - 2-Volume Set. 10th Edition. ISBN 1455756172, 978-1455756179
Fanaroff and Martin's Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: Diseases of The Fetus and Infant, 10e (Current Therapy in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine) - 2-Volume Set. 10th Edition. ISBN 1455756172, 978-1455756179
Visit the link below to download the full version of this book:
https://cheaptodownload.com/product/fanaroff-and-martins-neonatal-perinatal-medi
cine-diseases-of-the-fetus-and-infant-10e-current-therapy-in-neonatal-perinatal-
medicine-2-volume-set-10th-edition-full-pdf-docx-download/
1600 John F. Kennedy Blvd.
Ste 1800
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2899
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by
any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage
and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek
permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies, and our arrangements
with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency can be
found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the
Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience
broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical
treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in
evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In
using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of
others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
With respect to any drug or pharmaceutical products identified, readers are advised to check
the most current information provided (i) on procedures featured or (ii) by the manufacturer of
each product to be administered, to verify the recommended dose or formula, the method and
duration of administration, and contraindications. It is the responsibility of practitioners, relying
on their own experience and knowledge of their patients, to make diagnoses, to determine dosages
and the best treatment for each individual patient, and to take all appropriate safety precautions.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors
assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products
liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products,
instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
Fanaroff and Martin’s neonatal-perinatal medicine : diseases of the fetus and infant / [edited by]
Richard J. Martin, Avroy A. Fanaroff, Michele C. Walsh.—10th edition.
p. ; cm.
Neonatal-perinatal medicine
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-4557-5617-9 (2 v. set : hardcover : alk. paper)
I. Martin, Richard J. (Richard John), 1946-, editor. II. Fanaroff, Avroy A., editor. III. Walsh,
Michele C., editor. IV. Title: Neonatal-perinatal medicine.
[DNLM: 1. Fetal Diseases. 2. Infant, Newborn, Diseases. 3. Perinatal Care. 4. Pregnancy
Complications. WS 420]
RJ254
618.92’01–dc23
2014023366
Printed in China
v
vi CONTRIBUTORS
Nancy E. Judge, MD
Associate Professor, Obstetrics, Gynecology, and
Women’s Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine,
Yeshiva University, New York, New York
Perinatal Imaging
x CONTRIBUTORS
Timothy E. Lotze, MD
Associate Professor, Pediatrics and Neurology, Section
of Child Neurology, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor
College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
Hypotonia and Neuromuscular Disease in the Neonate
CONTRIBUTORS xi
Geoffrey Miller, MA, MB, BCh, MPhil, MD, FRCP, Faruk H. Örge, MD, FAAO, FAAP
FRACP William R. and Margaret E. Althans Chair and
Professor, Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology, Professor, Director, Center for Pediatric
Yale University School of Medicine; Co-Director, Ophthalmology and Adult Strabismus, Rainbow
Pediatric MDA Clinic, Yale–New Haven Hospital, Babies and Children’s Hospital; Vice Chair of Clinical
New Haven, Connecticut Affairs, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual
Hypotonia and Neuromuscular Disease in the Neonate Sciences, University Hospitals Eye Institute;
Fellowship Program Director and Associate Professor,
Anna L. Mitchell, MD, PhD Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine,
Assistant Professor, Genetics and Pediatrics, Center for Cleveland, Ohio
Human Genetics, Case Western Reserve University, Examination and Common Problems of the Neonatal Eye
Cleveland, Ohio
Congenital Anomalies; Genetic and Environmental Todd D. Otteson, MD, MPH
Contributions to Congenital Heart Disease Division Chief, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Case Medical
Center, University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and
Richard Molteni, MD, FAAP Children’s Hospital; Associate Professor,
Emeritus Professor of Pediatrics, University of Otolaryngology, Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve
Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
Intermittent Consultant, Joint Commission Resources Upper Airway Lesions in the Neonate
and Joint Commission International, Oakbrook,
Illinois
Coding and Reimbursement: Principles and Practices
xii CONTRIBUTORS
The foundation for successful outcomes in neonatal-peri- reached its tenth edition. With the combination of print
natal medicine has been the ability to apply knowledge and electronic journals, the effort to stay current in a
of the fundamental pathophysiology of the various neo- single subspecialty remains a daunting task. To facilitate
natal disorders to safe interventions. Molecular, biologic, this, Elsevier, our publisher, has migrated the existing
and technologic advances have facilitated the diagnosis, Web-based Student Consult and Expert Consult plat-
monitoring, and therapy of these complex disorders. forms to a new platform hosted by Inkling.com. Inkling
Advances at the bench have been translated to the bedside, is a pioneer in interactive cloud publishing and reimaging
and survival statistics reveal slow but steady improve- of books, including medical texts. The combination of an
ments. Nonetheless, although the survival rates may give extensive library of expert content with their ability to
reason to rejoice, the high early morbidity and persistent truly bring that content alive paves an exciting path
neurodevelopmental problems remain cause for concern. forward for the distribution of medical knowledge.
Such problems include bronchopulmonary dysplasia, Owners of the book will enjoy easy searches, a consistent
nosocomial infections, necrotizing enterocolitis, hypoxic- structure, rich media, social and community features, and
ischemic encephalopathy, cerebral palsy, and the inability seamless electronic access from any device.
to sustain the intrauterine rate of growth when infants are For this tenth edition, we have added several new
born prematurely. These problems need to be solved in sections and authors, notably expanding our interna-
addition to the complex, ever-expanding genetic disor- tional contributors and hence providing a truly global
ders and birth defects that now loom as the major prob- perspective. Many sections have been completely reorga-
lems in the neonatal intensive care unit and as the leading nized, and a large number of chapters have been rewrit-
causes of neonatal mortality. ten or updated. Our accomplished authors and careful
The field of neonatal-perinatal medicine has transi- editing continue to focus on the biologic basis of devel-
tioned from anecdotal medicine to evidence-based medi- opmental disorders and the evidence basis for their
cine. The problem is that evidence-based medicine management.
predicts outcomes for groups but not individuals. The This book would not exist without the remarkable
next frontier, individualized or personalized medicine, clinical and intellectual environment that constitutes
requires application of the human genome project to the Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital in Cleveland.
individual patient. That frontier is rapidly approaching On a daily basis, we gain knowledge from our faculty
with the acquisition and application of new knowledge colleagues and fellows and wisdom from our nursing
and technology. The translation of bench research to staff, who are so committed to their young patients. Once
bedside innovation is proceeding smoothly, as is the again, we have been blessed with an in-house editor,
understanding of the underlying mechanisms of many Bonnie Siner, to whom we cannot adequately express
disorders. Advances in genetics have provided insight into our thanks. She is the glue behind the binding in the
the etiology of many disorders, and many previously book and has worked tirelessly with Elsevier staff
mysterious diseases can now be attributed to single gene members to bring this project to fruition. Elsevier has
defects or mitochondrial disorders accompanied by cel- once again provided the resources to accomplish this
lular energy failure. We have addressed and incorporated mammoth task.
these advances into the body of the text.
Presenting the current status of the field of neonatal- Richard J. Martin
perinatal medicine, even in a two-volume textbook, has
become extremely challenging. It is a tribute to the con- Avroy A. Fanaroff
tributors to Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine that this text has Michele C. Walsh
xvii
1 Growth Of Neonatal-Perinatal
Medicine: A Historical Perspective
TONSE N. K. RAJU
We trust we have been forgiven for coining the words, “neonatology” and “neonatologist.” We
do not recall ever having seen them in print. The one designates the art and science of
diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the newborn infant, the other the physician whose
primary concern lies in the specialty. … We are not advocating now that a new subspecialty
be lopped from pediatrics … yet such a subdivision … [has] as much merit as does pediatric
hematology.
—A. J. Schaffer, 196074
The terms neonatology and neonatologist were not in general Medicinal chemistry (later called biochemistry) and
use 50 years ago. In the preface to the first edition of his classic physiology gained popularity and acceptance
monograph Diseases of the Newborn, Dr. Alexander Schaf- toward the end of the nineteenth century, inaugurating
fer christened the new specialty and its practitioners, studies on biochemical and physiologic problems in the
asking our “forgiveness” for doing so. An apology was not fetus and newborn. Some leading scientists in the early
needed because time has proved him to be immensely twentieth century making fundamental contributions
prophetic. In 1975, the first Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine and training scores of scientists from around world
subspecialty examination was offered by the American included Barcroft8,34 and his mentee Dawes in England
Board of Pediatrics, and 355 were certified as the country’s (gas exchange and nutritional transfer across the placenta
first neonatologists. After the 2012 certifying examina- and oxygen carrying in fetal and adult hemoglobin);
tion, 5552 individuals have been certified by the Board Ylppö in Finland (neonatal nutrition, jaundice, and ther-
as neonatologists. This phenomenal growth has been moregulation); Lind in Sweden (circulatory physiology);
matched by an increasing fund of knowledge. Today a Smith in Boston81 (fetal and neonatal respiratory physiol-
cursory search using the subject heading “newborn” in ogy); DeLee in Chicago26,27 (leading researcher on incu-
the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed database yields bators and in high-risk obstetric topics, he also founded
nearly 60,000 citations.59 Thus, at the beginning of the the first US “incubator station” at the Chicago Lying-in
twenty-first century, neonatology stands tall and strong as Hospital); Day in New York (temperature regulation, reti-
a specialty, carving a unique niche, bridging obstetrics nopathy of prematurity, and jaundice); and Gordon38
with pediatrics and intensive care with primary care. in Denver (nutrition). Although no formal curriculum
Although the formal naming of our specialty appears existed, all these centers offered rigorous training in peri-
to be recent, its roots extend into the nineteenth century, natal physiology and clinical medicine Smith once said,
when systematic and organized care for premature infants “If you were interested in babies and liked Boston, I was
began in earnest. This chapter traces the origins and the only wheel in town!”60 Table 1-1 highlights some
growth of modern perinatal and neonatal medicine, with milestones in perinatal medicine.
a brief perspective on its promises and failures. The reader
may consult scholarly monographs and review articles on
specific topics for in-depth analyses.6,7,24,31,78,79 The High-Risk Fetus and
Perinatal Obstetrics
Perinatal Pioneers Because so many deaths occurred in early infancy in times
Many scientists played strategic roles in developing the past, many cultures adopted remarkably innovative
basic concepts in neonatal-perinatal medicine that helped methods to deal with such tragedies. According to a
to formalize the scientific basis for neonatal clinical care. Jewish tradition, full, year-long mourning is not required
Their work and teachings inspired generations of further for infants who die before 30 days of age.40 In some Asian
researchers advancing the field. For brevity’s sake, only a ethnic groups, infant-naming ceremonies are held only
few are shown in Figure 1-1. after several months, until which time the infant is simply
2
1 • Growth Of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: A Historical Perspective 3
A B C D
E F G H
Figure 1-1 Pioneers in perinatal and neonatal physiology and medicine. A, Joseph Barcroft. B, Arvo Ylppö. C, John Lind. D, William Liley.
E, Joseph DeLee. F, Richard Day. G, Clement Smith. H, Harry Gordon. (A, From Barcroft J. Research on pre-natal life, vol 1, Oxford, 1977, Blackwell
Scientific, courtesy of Blackwell Scientific; B-D, F-H, From Smith GF, Vidyasagar D, editors: Historical review and recent advances in neonatal and perinatal
medicine: neonatal medicine, vol 1, Evansville, IN, 1984, Ross Publication, pp ix [B], xix [C], xxii [D], xvi [F], xii [G], xiv [H], courtesy of Mead Johnson
Nutritional; E, Courtesy of Mrs. Nancy DeLee Frank, Chicago.)
ECG, Electrocardiogram.
See references 2, 41, 43, 61, 82 for primary citations.
4 PART 1 • THE FIELD OF NEONATAL-PERINATAL MEDICINE
called “it.” In India, an odd or coarse-sounding name is fourth infant is being handed to her for nursing. A divine
given to the first surviving infant after the death of a previ- figure in the background is blessing the newcomers.
ous sibling; this is aimed at deflecting evil spirits. In her Cesarean sections were seldom performed on living
book on the history of the Middle Ages, Tuchman notes women before the thirteenth century. Even subsequently,
that infants were seldom depicted in medieval artworks.89 the procedure was performed only as a final act of des-
When they were drawn (e.g., the infant Jesus), women in peration. Contrary to popular belief, Julius Caesar’s birth
the pictures looked away from the infant, ostensibly con- was not likely by cesarean section. Because Caesar’s
veying respect, but perhaps because of fearful aloofness. mother was alive during his reign, historians believe that
Since antiquity, the care of pregnant women has been she probably delivered him vaginally. The term cesarean
the purview of midwives, grandmothers, and experienced probably originated from lex caesarea, in turn from lex
female elders in the community. Wet nurses helped when regia, the “royal law” prohibiting burial of corpses of
mothers were unavailable or unwilling to nurse their pregnant women without removal of their fetuses.11,94 The
infants. Little or no assistance was needed for normal or procedure allowed for baptism (or a similar blessing) if
uncomplicated labor and delivery. For complicated deliv- the child was alive or burial otherwise. Infants surviving
eries, male physicians had to be summoned, but they the ordeal of cesarean birth were assumed to possess
could do little because many of them lacked expertise or special powers, as supposedly did Shakespeare’s Macduff—
interest in treating women. Disasters during labor and “not of a woman born,” but of a corpse, and able to slay
delivery were common, rendering this phase in their lives Macbeth.54
the most dreaded for women.43 In the early 1900s, unex- Soranus of Ephesus (circa 38-138 AD) influenced
pected intrapartum complications accounted for 50% to obstetric practice for 1400 years. His Gynecology can be
70% of all maternal deaths in England and Wales.17,56 regarded as the first formal “textbook” of perinatal medi-
Because the immediate concern during most high-risk cine. Initially extant, it was rediscovered in 1870 and
deliveries was to save the mother, sick newborns were not translated into English for the first time in 1956.88 Soranus
given substantial attention; their death rates remained wrote superbly about podalic version, obstructed labor,
very high. multiple gestations, fetal malformations, and numerous
Occasionally, happy outcomes of high-risk deliveries other maternal and fetal disorders. In an age of belief in
did occur. In one of the oldest works of art depicting labor magic and the occult, he insisted that midwives should
and delivery (Figure 1-2, A), a bearded man and his assis- be educated and free from superstitions. He forbade wet
tant are standing behind a woman in labor, holding devices nurses from drinking alcohol lest it render the infant
remarkably similar to the modern obstetric forceps. The “excessively sleepy.” His chapter, “How to Recognize the
midwife has delivered an evidently live infant. In Figure Newborn That Is Worth Rearing,” remains one of the
1-2, B, three infants from a set of quadruplets, nicely swad- earliest accounts on assessing viability of sick newborns—
dled, have been placed on the mother, as the unwrapped a topic of great concern even today.
B
Figure 1-2 High-risk deliveries. A, Marble relief of uncertain date depicting a high-risk delivery. The physician and his assistant in the background
are holding devices similar to modern obstetric forceps. A midwife has just helped deliver a live infant while two people are looking through the
window. B, Delivery of quadruplets. (From Graham H. Eternal Eve: the history of gynecology and obstetrics, New York, 1951, Doubleday, pp 68, 172.)
1 • Growth Of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: A Historical Perspective 5
A B
Figure 1-6 Foundling homes. A, Le Tour—revolving receptacle. Mother ringing a bell to notify those within that she is leaving her baby in the
foundling home (watercolor by Herman Vogel, France, 1889). B, Remorce (“Remorse”)—parents after placing their infant in a foundling home (engrav-
ing and etching by Alberto Maso Gilli, France, 1875). (A and B, Courtesy of the Museum of the History of Medicine, Academy of Medicine, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada; from Spaulding M, Welch P. Nurturing yesterday’s child: a portrayal of the Drake collection of pediatric history, Philadelphia, 1991, Decker,
p 110 [A] and p 119 [B].)
1 • Growth Of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: A Historical Perspective 7
An Ingenious Contrivance,
the Couveuse, and Premature
Baby Stations
A popular story of the origin of modern incubator tech-
B
nology is that upon seeing the poultry section during a
casual visit to the Paris Zoo in 1878, Tarnier (1828-1897),
a renowned obstetrician, conceived the idea of “incuba-
Air Exit
tors” similar to the “brooding hen” or couveuse.6,7,22,24 He Glass Cover
asked an instrument maker, Martin, to construct similar
Sponge
equipment for infants. With a “thermo-syphon” method Bed
Air Entrance
to heat the outside with an alcohol lamp, Martin devised Filling
a sufficiently ventilated, 1 m3 double-walled metal cage, Funnel
spacious enough to hold two premature infants. The first
Bunsen Burner
Hot-Water Tank
couveuses were installed at the Paris Maternity Hospital in
1880. Tarnier’s efforts led to dramatic improvements in
survival rates for preterm infants.
Although a few others had developed incubators C
before Tarnier,7 it was he and his students, Budin (1846-
1907) and Auvard, who are largely responsible for insti- Figure 1-7 Early incubators. A, Rotch incubator, circa 1893. B, Holt
incubator. C, Schematics of the Holt incubator. (A, From Cone TE Jr.
tutionalizing preterm infant care. They placed several
History of American pediatrics, Boston, 1979, Little Brown, pp 57 and 58,
incubators side by side, promoting the concept of caring courtesy of Little Brown; B and C, From Holt LE. The diseases of infants
for groups of sick preterm infants in geographically sepa- and children, New York, 1897, Appleton, pp 12 and 13, courtesy of
rate regions within their hospital.6,7,86 Budin and Auvard Appleton.)
improved the original couveuse by replacing its walls with
glass and using simpler methods for heating. Their efforts
greatly influenced incubator technology during the first
half of the twentieth century in Europe and the United
Incubators, Baby Shows, and
States (Figure 1-7 and Table 1-2). Origins of Neonatal Intensive
In 1884, Tarnier made another important contribu-
tion; he invented a small, flexible rubber tube for intro-
Care Units
duction through the mouth into the stomach of preterm Almost two decades after its debut in France, incubator
infants. With this tube, he could drip milk directly into technology appeared in the United States, heralding orga-
the stomach. This method of nutritional support he nized newborn intensive care. As in France, it was an
called “gavage feeding.” Gavage feeding plus keeping obstetrician who spearheaded the movement. In 1898,
infants in relatively constant and warm temperatures had DeLee established the first “Premature Baby Incubator
a dramatic impact on improving survival rates.15,21 Tarnier Station” at the Sara Morris Hospital in Chicago. During
also recommended that the legal definition of viability the early 1900s, as academic obstetricians and pediatri-
should be 180 days of gestation, which was opposed by cians were organizing specialized care for premature
contemporary obstetricians, who thought that the concept infants, an interesting, if bizarre, set of events led to the
was “therapeutic nihilism.”7 Defining viability remains a era of “premature baby shows,” which began in Europe
highly emotional and contentious issue in contemporary and continued in the United States, lasting well into the
neonatal-perinatal practice. 1940s.6,7,78
8 PART 1 • THE FIELD OF NEONATAL-PERINATAL MEDICINE
Couney, a Budin associate of doubtful medical creden- a regimental approach to feeding, Hess and his head
tials, wished to popularize the French technology abroad nurse, Evelyn Lundeen (Figure 1-8), achieved spectacular
and show the value of “conserving” premature infants. survival rates.47,67 Hess also developed an incubator built
(This account has been doubted.7) Couney obtained six on the concept of a double-walled metallic “cage” with
incubators, probably from the French innovator Lion. warm water circulating between the walls. He used elec-
Initially, Couney wanted to exhibit only the incubators tric current for heating and devised a system to administer
as a technology of hope for saving infants. To add drama, free-flow oxygen (Figure 1-9). Only a few Hess incubators
however, he brought six preterm infants from Virchow’s are known to have survived to this day. Hess’s premature
maternity unit in Berlin and exhibited them inside the unit outlasted the DeLee Premature Station. In December
incubators at the 1896 Berlin Exposition. He coined a 2008, the Michael Reese Medical Center closed, however,
catchy phrase for the show—kinderbrutanstalt or “child declaring bankruptcy.
hatchery”—igniting the imagination of a public thirsty The story of development of incubators and their
for sensational scientific breakthroughs. impact on pediatrics is a tale of the success of technology
Couney’s Berlin exhibit was an astounding success. and that of the perils technology might beget (see later
One such show was at Great Britain’s Victorian Era section on relationship of improved incubator care and
Exhibition in 1897. The show was praised by Lancet in the retinopathy of prematurity [ROP] epidemic). In the
an editorial that recommended that large “incubator heroic age of the mechanical revolution, the notion that
stations” be established similar to fire stations, where machines could solve all human problems was all too
parents could borrow incubators.36 This was the origin of appealing. The incubator stands as the most enduring
the phrase “premature baby incubator stations,” which symbol of the spectacular success of modern intensive
became part of the medical lexicon. In a later editorial, care and (paradoxically) some of its failures.79,80
Lancet also criticized the “danger of making a public show
of incubator for babies.”37 Couney sailed to the United
States and, beginning in 1898, started premature infant Supportive Care and
exhibitions at many state fairs, traveling circuses, and
science expositions, and finally settled in New York City
Oxygen Therapy
to organize annual incubator baby shows in Coney In a single-page note in 1891, Bonnaire referred to Tar-
Island. The last infant show was held during the 1939- nier’s use of oxygen in treating “debilitated” premature
1940 season in Atlantic City.78 infants 2 years earlier14—this was the first published refer-
In 1914, Hess of Chicago started a Premature Infant ence to the administration of supplemental oxygen in
Station at the Sarah Morris Children’s Hospital (of premature infants for a purpose other than resuscitation.
the Michael Reese Medical Center). With great attention The use of oxygen in premature infants did not become
to environmental control and aseptic practices and routine, however, until the 1920s. Initially, a mixture of
1 • Growth Of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: A Historical Perspective 9
Figure 1-8 Hess and Lundeen medallions at the Michael Reese Hospital, Chicago. (Photo courtesy of Tonse N. K. Raju.)
Ventilatory Care:
“Extended Resuscitation”
The first mechanical instrument used for intermittent
positive pressure ventilation in newborns was the aero-
phore pulmonaire, a simple device developed by the French
obstetrician Gairal.65,66 It was a rubber bulb attached to a
J-shaped tube. By placing the bent end of the tube into
Figure 1-9 A Hess incubator on display at the Spertus Museum in
the infant’s upper airway, one could pump air into the
Chicago. (From the International Museum of Surgical Sciences, Chicago.)
lungs. Holt recommended its use for resuscitation in his
influential 1897 book.48
oxygen and carbon dioxide—instead of oxygen alone— Before starting mechanical ventilation, one needed to
was employed to treat asphyxia-induced narcosis. It was cannulate the airway, a task nearly impossible without a
argued that oxygen relieved hypoxia, whereas carbon laryngoscope and an endotracheal tube. Blundell (1790-
dioxide stimulated the respiratory center.85 Oxygen alone 1878), a Scottish obstetrician, was the first to use a
was reserved for “pure asphyxia” (whatever that meant). mechanical device for tracheal intubation in living new-
The advent of mobile oxygen tanks and their easy avail- borns.13,32 Introducing two fingers of his left hand over
ability in the mid-1940s enabled the use of oxygen for the infant’s tongue, he would feel the epiglottis and
resuscitation.51,53,79 then guide a silver pipe into the trachea with his right
The success of incubator care brought new and unex- hand. His tracheal pipe had a blunt distal end and
pected challenges.68 Innovative methods had to be devel- two side holes. By blowing air into the tube about 30
oped to feed the increasing number of premature infants times a minute until the heartbeat began, Blundell saved