Volume 12, Issue 4, April 2023

Impact Factor: 8.423

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJIRSET)

|e-ISSN: 2319-8753, p-ISSN: 2347-6710| www.ijirset.com | Impact Factor: 8.423| A Monthly Peer Reviewed & Referred Journal |

|| Volume 12, Issue 4, April 2023 ||

| DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2023.1204136 |

Fake Account Detection using Machine

Learning Techniques
Prof.V.G.Bharane, Momin Aayman Rafik, Pathan Nafisa Sharif, Suryavanshi Priyanka Dattatray
Department of Computer Engineering, S.B.Patil College of Engineering, Indapur, India

ABSTRACT—The online social networks are a very large growth in the world today, but the attacks are more
common, including one of the attacks is the attack of Twitter in this spammer spreading several malicious tweets that
can take the form of links or hash tags in the website and online services, which are too harmful for real users. To
prevent these attacks, training tweets are added and, moreover, these problems are solved by extracting 12 lightweight
functions, like the age of the account, no. of followers, no. to follow, no. of tweets, no. of re-tweets, etc. For the
transmission of spam detection from tweets, the discretization of a function is important for the performance of spam
detection. There is a great truth in the system that includes a total of 600 public tweets based on the URL-based security
tool. Spam detection primarily creates the classification model that includes binary classification and can also be solved
using the automatic learning algorithm. Machine learning algorithms such as the Naïve Bayesian classifier or the vector
support machine classifier have informed the behavior of the models. The system reported the impact of data-related
factors, such as the relationship between spam and non-spam, the size of training data and data sampling, and detection
performance. The implemented system function is the detection of simple and variable tweets of spam over time. The
system shows how spam detection is a major challenge and bridges the gap between performance appraisals and
focuses primarily on data, features and patterns to identify the real user and inform the user of spam when providing the
valuable response binary. The contribution work is to detect the tweets of spam in real time, because the new tweets
come in the form of sequences and use the updated training data set.

KEYWORDS-Machine Learning, Parallel Computing, Spam Detection, Scalability, Twitter

I. INTRODUCTION

Online social networking sites like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and some online social networking companies have
become extremely popular in recent years. People spend a lot of time in OSN making friends with people they are
familiar with or interested in. Twitter, founded in 2006, has become one of the most popular microblogging service
sites. Around 200 million users create around 400 million new tweets a day for spam growth. Twitter spam, known as
unsolicited tweets containing malicious links that the non-stop victims to external sites containing the spread of
malware, spreading malicious links, etc., hit not only more legitimate users, but also the whole platform Consider the
example because during the election of the Australian Prime Minister in 2013, a notice confirming that his Twitter
account had been hacked. Many of his followers have received direct spam messages containing malicious links. The
ability to order useful information is essential for the academic and industrial world to discover hidden ideas and
predict trends on Twitter. However, spam generates a lot of noise on Twitter. To detect spam automatically, researchers
applied machine learning algorithms to make spam detection a classification problem. Ordering a tweet broadcast
instead of a Twitter user as spam or non-spam is more realistic in the real world.

II. PROPOSED SYSTEM

 The collection of tweets with respect to trending topics on Twitter. After storing the tweets in a particular file
format, the tweets are subsequently analyzed.

 Labelling of spam is performed to check through all datasets that are available to detect the malignant URL.

 Feature extraction separates the characteristics construct based on the language model that uses language as a tool
and helps in determining whether the tweets are fake or not.

IJIRSET©2023 | An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | 3370

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJIRSET)

|e-ISSN: 2319-8753, p-ISSN: 2347-6710| www.ijirset.com | Impact Factor: 8.423| A Monthly Peer Reviewed & Referred Journal |

|| Volume 12, Issue 4, April 2023 ||

| DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2023.1204136 |
 The classification of data set is performed by shortlisting the set of tweets that is described by the set of features
provided to the classifier to instruct the model and to acquire the knowledge for spam detection.

 The spam detection uses the classification technique to accept tweets as the input and classify the spam and non-
spammer.

Architecture

Algorithm flowchart

IJIRSET©2023 | An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | 3371

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJIRSET)

|e-ISSN: 2319-8753, p-ISSN: 2347-6710| www.ijirset.com | Impact Factor: 8.423| A Monthly Peer Reviewed & Referred Journal |

|| Volume 12, Issue 4, April 2023 ||

| DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2023.1204136 |

DFD Diagram
Level 0

IJIRSET©2023 | An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | 3372

 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJIRSET)

|e-ISSN: 2319-8753, p-ISSN: 2347-6710| www.ijirset.com | Impact Factor: 8.423| A Monthly Peer Reviewed & Referred Journal |

|| Volume 12, Issue 4, April 2023 ||

| DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2023.1204136 |
Level 1

III. ADVANTAGES

 To categories the Spammers and Non-spammers.

 To work on a performance evaluation such as Precision, Recall, F-measure.
 To categorize the tag based tweets and link based tweets.
 To try to improve detection accuracy using deep learning algorithms.

IV. APPLICATION

 Social Media Application

 Spam Detection Applications

V. CONCLUSION

In this Project, System found that classifiers ability to detect Twitter spam reduced when in a near real-world scenario
since the imbalanced data brings bias. System also identified that Feature discretization was an important preprocess to
ML-based spam detection. Second, increasing training data only cannot bring more benefits to detect Twitter spam
after a certain number of training samples. System should try to bring more discriminative features or better model to
further improve spam detection rate.

REFERENCES

[1] Q. Cao, M. Sirivianos, X. Yang, and T. Pregueiro, “Aiding the detection of fake accounts in large scale social
online services,” in Proc. Symp. Netw. Syst. Des. Implement. (NSDI), 2012, pp. 197–210.
[2] G. Stringhini, C. Kruegel, and G. Vigna, “Detecting spammers on social networks,” in Proc. 26th Annu. Comput.
Sec. Appl. Conf., 2010, pp. 1–9.

IJIRSET©2023 | An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | 3373

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJIRSET)

|e-ISSN: 2319-8753, p-ISSN: 2347-6710| www.ijirset.com | Impact Factor: 8.423| A Monthly Peer Reviewed & Referred Journal |

|| Volume 12, Issue 4, April 2023 ||

| DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2023.1204136 |
[3] J. Song, S. Lee, and J. Kim, “Spam filtering in Twitter using sender receiver relationship,” in Proc. 14th Int. Conf.
Recent Adv. Intrusion Detection, 2011, pp. 301–317.
[4] K. Lee, J. Caverlee, and S. Webb, “Uncovering social spammers: social honeypots + machine learning,” in Proc.
33rd Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res.Develop. Inf. Retrieval, 2010, pp. 435–442.
[5] Nathan Aston, Jacob Liddle and Wei Hu*, “Twitter Sentiment in Data Streams with Perceptron,” in Journal of
Computer and Communications, 2014, Vol-2 No-11.
[6] K. Thomas, C. Grier, D. Song, and V. Paxson, “Suspended accounts in retrospect: An analysis of Twitter spam,” in
Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Conf. Internet Meas., 2011, pp. 243–258.
[7] K. Thomas, C. Grier, J. Ma, V. Paxson, and D. Song, “Design and evaluation of a real-time URL spam filtering
service,” in Proc. IEEE Symp. Sec. Privacy, 2011, pp. 447–462.
[8] X. Jin, C. X. Lin, J. Luo, and J. Han, “Socialspamguard: A data mining based spam detection system for social
media networks,” PVLDB, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1458–1461, 2011.
[9] S. Ghosh et al., “Understanding and combating link farming in the Twitter social network,” in Proc. 21st Int. Conf.
World Wide Web, 2012, pp. 61–70.
[10] H. Costa, F. Benevenuto, and L. H. C. Merschmann, “Detecting tip spam in location-based social networks,” in
Proc. 28th Annu. ACM Symp. Appl. Comput., 2013, pp. 724–729.

IJIRSET©2023 | An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | 3374

8.423