Chloroperoxidase: Isolation and Properties of The Crystalline Glycoprotein
Chloroperoxidase: Isolation and Properties of The Crystalline Glycoprotein
Chloroperoxidase: Isolation and Properties of The Crystalline Glycoprotein
~ OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Vol. 241, No. 8, Issue of April 25, 1966
Printed in U.S.A.
Chloroperoxidase
I. ISOLATION AND PROPERTIES OF THE CRYSTALLINE GLYCOPROTEIN*
1763
Performic acid oxidation was performed by the method de- concentrated material from two 15-liter cultures was dialyzed
scribed by Him (7). against three 40-liter changes of deionized water. This dialysis
Materials-Hydrogen peroxide was purchased from Barium step and all subsequent steps in the purification were carried
and Chemicals, Inc., and was standardized periodically by the out at 4” unless otherwise indicated. The dialyzed material
oxidation of iodide to iodine catalyzed by molybdate and sub- was then freeze-dried, and the resulting powder was stored at
sequent titration of the iodine formed with sodium arsenite. -20”.
DEAE-Sephadex was supplied by Pharmacia. The dialysis Ethanol Fructionation-The freeze-dried powder obtained
tubing supplied by LKB for use with their ultrafilter was used from two 15-liter cultures (approximately 40 g) was dissolved in
directly. Dialysis tubing obtained from Visking Division, approximately 400 ml of distilled water and dialyzed overnight
Union Carbide, was heated to 60” for 3 hours in 1 rnhf EDTA against 4 liters of distilled water. Ethanol (precooled to -10”)
and 1% sodium bicarbonate and washed twice at 60” for 3 hours was then added to this preparation with vigorous stirring in a
with glass-distilled water before use. Monochlorodimedon was -10” ice-salt bath until an ethanol concentration of 45% was
prepared from dimedon by chlorination with sodium hypo- reached (82 ml of absolute ethanol per 100 ml of the preparation).
chlorite (4). After stirring for 15 min, the preparation was centrifuged at
-10” for 15 min at 15,000 x g, and the black precipitate was
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE discarded. Ethanol was then added to the supernatant until a
Growth of Mold and Preparation of Crude Enzyme-The strain concentration of 65% (v/v) was reached (104 ml of absolute
of C. fumago used in these experiments was that previously used ethanol per 100 ml of the original preparation). This prepara-
by Shaw, Beckwith, and Hager (8). Stock cultures of C. fumqo tion was then allowed to stir slowly in the salt bath until the
were maintained at 4” on oatmeal agar slants (8). Inoculum precipitate coagulated on the bottom of the beaker. The super-
was grown for 7 to 9 days as a surface mat on Difco malt ex- natant was then completely drained off and discarded. The
tract agar slants prepared in 32-0~ prescription bottles. The resulting gelatinous brown precipitate was redissolved in approxi-
surface mat from three bottles of inoculum was used to inoculate mately 30 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, and stored at
30 liters of a modified Czapek-Dox medium. The surface mats -20”. Normally, two batches of ethanol-fractionated material
were aseptically removed from the inoculum bottles, transferred would be pooled at this point for further purification steps.
to a sterile Waring Blendor jar containing approximately 500 Column Chromatography on DEAE-Sephadex-Approximately
ml of modified Czapek-Dox medium, and homogenized for 30 25 g of DEAE-Sephadex A-50 were first swollen in water and
set on the Blendor. The homogenate was equally divided and washed with 500 ml of 0.5 N hydrochloric acid, then with 500 ml
used to inoculate two 5-gallon Pyrex bottles. Each 5-gallon of 0.5 N sodium hydroxide, and finally was thoroughly washed
bottle contained 15 liters of growth medium. The growth with water. The Sephadex was then neutralized with phosphoric
medium was the modified Czapek-Dox medium described by acid to pH 6.0 and equilibrated with 0.1 M phosphate buffer,
Clutterbuck et al. (9) for the growth of C. fumago further modi- pH 6.0, by stirring in a 2-liter beaker with several changes of the
fied by a supplement of 3.3 g of Difco yeast extract per liter. buffer. The equilibrated resin was then packed in a 3.7-cm
The mold was grown under submerged conditions at 20-23” diameter column to a height of 13 cm. Two pooled batches
with stirring and vigorous aeration until the enzyme level in the obtained from the 45 to 65% ethanol fractionation step (appros-
medium had reached at least 5 units per ml (approximately 6 imately 60 ml) were adsorbed to the column, and the column
to 7 days). The mold mycelium was then filtered off on a 33-cm was washed with 1 column volume of 0.1 M phosphate buffer,
stainless steel Buchner funnel. pH 6.0. Chloroperoxidase was then eluted from the column
The filtrate containing the enzyme was then concentrated with a linear ionic strength gradient prepared by placing 350
approximately lo-fold with a vacuum laboratory evaporator ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, in the mixing chamber and
supplied by Precision Scientific Company. Care was taken 350 ml of 0.2 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, in the reservoir. Frac-
during the evaporation to keep the temperature below 45”. The tions of 9 ml each were collected. A typical elution diagram is
shown in Fig. 1. The first peaks of chloroperoxidase activity
were artifacts which were probably introduced by the elevated
1’ temperature during concentration of the medium since they were
seen in preparations which had not been exposed to this treat-
ment. Those fractions in the last peak with specific activities
of 860 and higher were combined and dialyzed against 0.01 RI
phosphate buffer, pH 5.0.
Column Chromatography on Calcium Phosphate Gel-Cellulose-
Calcium phosphate gel columns were prepared by mixing 100 ml
of a 30 mg per ml suspension of calcium phosphate gel, prepared
as described by Swingle and Tiselius (lo), with 250 ml of a 10%
(w/v) suspension of coarse Whatman cellulose powder in 0.01 M
phosphate buffer, pH 5.0. This suspension was packed in a column
3.8 cm in diameter. The dialyzed DEAE-cellulose column frac-
tions were adsorbed on the calcium phosphate gel column and
TUBE NUMBER
eluted with a gradient consisting of 350 ml of 0.01 M phosphate
FIG. 1. Chromatography of chloroperoxidase on DEAE-Sepha- buffer, pH 5.0, in the mixing chamber and 350 ml of 0.2 M phos-
dex. The chloroperoxidase activity (---) and the protein c( n- phate buffer, pH 5.0, in the reservoir. All fractions having a
centration (- - -) are plotted as functions of the eluate volur e.
Each tube contained 9 ml. specific activity of 1200 or higher were combined.
Issue of April 25, 1966 D. R. Morris and L. P. Hager 1765
3.0 DISCUSSION
of chloroperoxide places it apart from horseradish and Japanese 9. CLUTTERBUCK, P. W., MUKHOPADHYAY, S. L., OXFORD, A. E.,
radish peroxide in terms of catalytic activity. We have tested AND RAISTRICK, H.; Biochem. J., 34. 664 (1940).
10. SWINGLE. S. M.. AND TISELIUS. A.. Biochem. J.. 43.171 (1951).
horseradish peroxidase under a variety of conditions and cannot 11. DEEB, S.‘S., AND HAGER, L. P.,‘J. biol. Chem., i39,‘1024 (1964j.
detect the chlorination or bromination activity which is char- 12. URNES, P., Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1963.
acteristic of chloroperoxidase (4). Therefore, there must be a 13. HAMADA, K., OKAZAKI, T., SHUKUYA, R., AND KAZIRO, K.,
basic difference in the constitution of the active sites of these J. Biochem., 52,374 (1962).
14. PARTRIDGE, S: M., Biochem. J., 42, 238 (1948).
peroxidases. 15. TREVELYAN. W. E.. PROCTER. D. P.. AND HARRISON. J. S..
Nature, 166, 444 (1950). ’ ’
REFERENCES 16. SOMOGYI, M., J. BioZ. Chem., 196, 19 (1952).
17. COHN, E. J., AND EDSALL, J. T., Proteins, amino acids and
1. SHAW, P. D., AND HAGER, L P., J. Biol. Chem., 234, 2565 peptides, Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, 1943.
(1959). 18. GREENWOOD, C. T., Advan. Carbohydrate Chem., 7, 289 (1952).
2. SHAW, P. D., AND HAGER, L. P., J. Am. Chem. Sot., 81, 6527 19. YPHANTIS, D. A., Biochemistry, 3, 297 (1964).
(1959). 20. VAN HOLDE, K. E., AND BALDWIN, R. L., J. Phys. Chem., 62,
3. SHAW, P. D., AND HAGER, L. P., J. Biol. Chem., 236, 1626 734 (1958).
(1961). 21. THEORELL, H., AND AKESON, A., Arkiv. Kemi. Mineral. Geol.,
4. HAGER, L. P., MORRIS, D. R., BROWN, F. S., AND EBERWEIN, 16A, 1 (1943).
H., J. Biol. Chem., 241, 1769 (1966). 22. MORITA, Y., AND KAMEDA, K., Mem. Research Inst. Food Sci.
5. LOWRY, 0. H., ROSEBROUGH, N. J., FARR, A. L., AND RANDALL, Kyoto Univ., 14, 49 (1958).
R. J.. J. Biol. Ch,em.. 193, 265 (1951). 23. MORITA, Y., AND KAMEDA, K., Bull. Agr. Chem. Sot. Japan,
6. MOORE: S., SPACXMAN,‘D. H., AND S&IN, W. H., Anal. Chem., 23, 28 (1959).
30, 1185 (1958). 24. CECIL, RI, AND OGSTON, A. G., Biochem. J., 49,105 (1951).
7. HIRS, C. H. W., J. Biol. Chem., 219, 611 (1956). 25. MORITA. Y.. AND KAMEDA. K.. Mem. Research Inst. Food Sci.
8. SHAW, P. D., BECKWITH, J. R., AND HAGER, L. P., J. Biol. Kyoto’U&., 12, 14 (195$. ’
Chem., 234, 2560 (1959). 26. KEILIN, D., AND HARTREE, E. F., Biochem. J., 49,88 (1951).