(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS

UNIT-1
Sustainable Development:

Introduction to sustainable development

Sustainable development is an approach to economic planning that attempts to foster
economic growth while preserving the quality of the environment for future generations.
Despite its enormous popularity in the last two decades of the 20th century, the concept of
sustainable development proved difficult to apply in many cases, primarily because the
results of long-term sustainability analyses depend on the particular resources focused upon.
For example, a forest that will provide a sustained yield of timber in perpetuity may not
support native bird populations, and a mineral deposit that will eventually be exhausted may
nevertheless support more or less sustainable communities.

Economy-Environment inter-linkages
Environment and economy are like two wheels of a bike that need to be driven
together for the growth of a nation. Many renowned economists believe that a better
environment helps a lot in strengthening the economy of the country. However both
Environment and economy are equally important for a nation and also they are
Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.
(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
2

interdependent. As the environment is the primary source of major resources needed by

industries that contribute to a nation’s economy. While on the other hand, a country with a
better climatic region and less environmental pollution is more likely to attract foreign direct
investment that can easily boost the economy of a nation.
Many industrialists claim that it is difficult to preserve the environment while
developing nations and thus many nations are now moving towards sustainable development.
So that a nation keeps on developing without harming the environment. The first and
foremost steps that can be taken by a nation to shift towards a green economy is to reduce the
usage of fossil fuels and shift towards green fuels thus reducing the emission of harmful
gases in the atmosphere. So, taking a step further many nations have started promoting E-
vehicles so that it doesn’t affect the economy and also helps in bringing down the pollution
level of a nation.
The environment provides lots of free natural resources to the economy like fossil
fuels, ores, minerals, light, air, water, etc. While in return the economy of a country invests a
lot in conserving the environment by finding substitutes for natural resources.
Meaning of sustainable development
Sustainable development can be defined as an approach to the economic development
of a country without compromising with the quality of the environment for future
generations. In the name of economic development, the price of environmental damage is
paid in the form of land degradation, soil erosion, air and water pollution, deforestation, etc.
This damage may surpass the advantages of having more quality output of goods and
services.

Sustainable Development Goals

 To promote the kind of development that minimises environmental problems.
 To meet the needs of the existing generation without compromising with the quality
of the environment for future generations.
Achieving Sustainable Development
Sustainable development can be achieved if we follow the following points:
 It can be achieved by restricting human activities.
 Technological development should be input effective and not input utilising.
 The rate of consumption should not surpass the rate of salvation.
 For renewable resources, the rate of consumption should not surpass the rate of
production of renewable substitutes.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
3

 All types of pollution should be minimised.

 It can be achieved by sensible use of natural resources.
Examples of Sustainable Development
 Wind energy
 Solar energy
 Crop rotation
 Sustainable construction
 Efficient water fixtures
 Green space
 Sustainable forestry

Limits to growth
(1) Population explosion
(2) Rise in economic activity
(3) Rapid industrialization
(4) Urbanisation
(5) Deforestation
(6) Increased use of insecticides, pesticides, and chemical fertilizers.
The Environmental Kuznets Curve
The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) is a hypothesized relationship between
various indicators of environmental degradation and per capita income. In the early stages of
economic growth, pollution emissions increase and environmental quality declines, but
beyond some level of per capita income (which will vary for different indicators) the trend
reverses, so that at high income levels, economic growth leads to environmental
improvement. This implies that environmental impacts or emissions per capita are an inverted
U-shaped function of per capita income. Fig. 1 shows an example of an estimated EKC. The
EKC is named after Simon Kuznets who proposed that income inequality first rises and then
falls as economic development proceeds.
The EKC has been the dominant approach among economists to modeling ambient
pollution concentrations and aggregate emissions since Grossman and Krueger (1991)
introduced it.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
4

The sustainability debate

1. Environmental protection issues

 How can climate change be mitigated?
 Do we need bans to protect the climate?
 Should single-use plastic be banned altogether?
2. Animal welfare issues
 Is it morally acceptable to eat animals?
 Do animals have feelings, just like we humans do?
 Should Animal testing be banned?
 Why do we humans consume animal foods?

3. Nutrition questions
 Why should we regional and seasonal feed?
 Is the plant-based diet the diet of the future?
 Will we soon be eating only artificial meat?
 What if the whole world vegan would be?
4. Society questions

 Should the subject "Sustainability & Environmental Protection" be introduced at

school?
 Are women disadvantaged in our society?
 What impact would it have on our society if we stopped killing animals?

5. Mobility issues
 Are car-free cities the future?
 Will we only drive electrically in the future?
 Do we need a speed limit on the highway?
6. Tourism issues
 Can Tourism sustainable be?
 How can the Mass tourism regulate?
7. Consumption questions
 Should free online deliveries be banned?
 Does a ban on firecrackers and New Year's Eve rockets make sense?
 Should throwing away food be banned?
Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.
(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
5

Issues of energy and the economics of energy

Issues of energy

The Economics Of Energy

Nonrenewable energy

Nonrenewable energy resources include coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear energy.
Once these resources are used up, they cannot be replaced, which is a major problem for
humanity as we are currently dependent on them to supply most of our energy needs.

SCARCITY
Nonrenewable energy resources include coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear energy.
Once these resources are used up, they cannot be replaced, which is a major problem for
humanity as we are currently dependent on them to supply most of our energy needs.

Optimal Resources

Renewable energy is energy derived from natural sources that are replenished at a
higher rate than they are consumed. Sunlight and wind, for example, are such sources that are
constantly being replenished.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
6

Backstop Technology

A backstop technology provides resources at a constant marginal cost for an

indefinitely long time. Heal's formal model of a backstop technology supposed that output is
produced by capital and resources.

Property Research

Externalities

Externalities pose fundamental economic policy problems when individuals,

households, and firms do not internalize the indirect costs of or the benefits from their
economic transactions. The resulting wedges between social and private costs or returns lead
to inefficient market outcomes.

The Conversion Of Uncertainty

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
7

UNIT II

Environmental Degradation:

Economic significance
The basic theory underpinning environmental economics is that environmental
amenities (or environmental goods) have economic value and there are costs to economic
growth that are not accounted for in more traditional models.

Environmental goods include things like access to clean water, clean air, the survival
of wildlife, and the general climate. Although it is hard to put a price tag on environmental
goods, there may be a high cost when they are lost.
Destruction or overuse of environmental goods, like pollution and other kinds of
environmental degradation, can represent a form of market failure because it imposes
negative externalities. Environmental economists analyze the costs and benefits of specific
economic policies that seek to correct such problems, and they may run theoretical tests or
studies on the possible consequences of these policies.
Causes Of Environmental Degradation

The Concepts Of Policy Failure, Externality And Market Failure

Policy Failure

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
8

Externality

Market Failure

Economic Analysis Of Environmental Degradation

Environmental degradation is a result of the dynamic inter play of socio-economic,
institutional and technological activities. Environmental changes may be driven by many
factors including economic growth, population growth, urbanization, intensification of
agriculture, rising energy use and transportation. Poverty still remains a problem at the root of
several environmental problems.
1. Social Factors
 Population:
Population is an important source of development, yet it is a major
source of environmental degradation when it exceeds the threshhold limits
of the support systems.
 Poverty:
Poverty is said to be both cause and effect of environmental
degradation. The circular link between poverty and environment is an
extremely complex phenomenon. Inequality may foster unsustainability
Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.
(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
9

because the poor, who rely on natural resources more than the rich, deplete
natural resources faster as they have no real prospects of gaining access to
other types of resources.
 Urbanisation:
Lack of opportunities for gainful employment in villages and the
ecological stresses is leading to an ever increasing movement of poor
families to towns.
2. Economic Factors
 To a large extent, environmental degradation is the result of market failure.
 The level and pattern of economic development also affect the nature of
environmental problems.
 Transport activities have a wide variety of effects on the environment such
as air pollution, noise from road traffic and oil spills from marine shipping.
 Direct impacts of agricultural development on the environment arise from
farming activities which contribute to soil erosion, land salination and loss
of nutrients.
3. Institutional Factors
 The Ministry of Environment & Forests (MOEF) in the Government is
responsible for protection, conservation and development of environment.
 The weakness of the existing system because of mis-co ordination between
both central and the state.
Equi –marginal principle
The equi-marginal principle states that a consumer will be maximizing his total utility
when he allocates his fixed money income in such a way that the utility derived from the last
unit of money spent on each good is equal.
Example:

Equi-marginal principle is applied in the allocation of the resource in the way of

production. Example a farmer is having different four agricultural farms like
1. Paddy
2. Mangoes
3. Sugar cane
4. Corns.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
10

The above four agricultural farms are in the total 80 acres, each farm in the 20 acres,
all together 80 acres. The farmer is having limited 80 employees with him for employing in
the four farms for production. In general, 80 employees are divided and employed for four
farms evenly as each farm will be allotted with 20 employees. However, in reality there is no
need to allot 20 employees for each farm, because mango farm need less number of
employees, whereas paddy farm needs more number of employees. Sugarcane and corn farms
require average number of employees. Like shown below

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
11

UNIT - III
Economics of Pollution:
Economics of Pollution
 Pollution is an example of a negative externality. Economic production can cause
environmental damage. This tradeoff arises for all countries, whether high-income or
low-income, and whether their economies are market-oriented or command-oriented.
 An externality, sometimes called a spillover, occurs when an exchange between a
buyer and seller has an impact on a third party who is not part of the exchange.
Externalities can be positive or negative.
 Market failure is when the market does not allocate resources on its own efficiently in
a way that balances social costs and benefits; externalities are one example of a
market failure.
 Social costs are costs that include both the private costs incurred by firms and also
additional external costs incurred by third parties outside the production process.
Economics Of Optimal Pollution, Regulation, Monitoring And Enforcement

 The economics of optimal pollution, regulation, monitoring, and enforcement involve

balancing the costs and benefits of different pollution control policies to achieve an
optimal level of pollution. Pollution can have negative externalities, such as health
effects or environmental damage, which can lead to social costs. Therefore, the goal is
to find the most efficient way to control pollution while minimizing the total costs of
doing so.
 One approach to achieving optimal pollution control is through the use of regulations.
Regulations can take different forms, such as emissions standards or technology
mandates, and aim to reduce pollution by requiring firms to meet certain
environmental standards. The costs of compliance with regulations can vary
depending on the nature of the regulation and the technologies available to firms.
 Another approach is through market-based instruments, such as pollution taxes or
tradable permits. Pollution taxes impose a price on each unit of pollution emitted,
while tradable permits allocate a limited number of permits that firms can trade
among themselves. Both approaches create incentives for firms to reduce their
pollution, but they differ in their implementation and potential impacts on the
economy.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
12

 Monitoring and enforcement are critical components of any pollution control policy.
Monitoring ensures that firms comply with environmental regulations or market-
based instruments, while enforcement ensures that there are consequences for non-
compliance. The costs of monitoring and enforcement can be significant, but they are
necessary to ensure that pollution control policies are effective.
 Ultimately, the choice of pollution control policy depends on a variety of factors,
including the nature of the pollution problem, the technologies available to reduce
pollution, and the political and social context in which policies are implemented. An
optimal pollution control policy should balance the costs and benefits of different
approaches to achieve the most efficient and effective pollution control outcome.
Managing Pollution Using Existing Markets: Bargaining Solutions

 One approach to managing pollution using existing markets is to use bargaining

solutions. In this approach, polluters negotiate with each other to reach a mutually
beneficial agreement on how to reduce pollution. Bargaining solutions are often used
in situations where there are a relatively small number of polluters who are
responsible for a large share of the pollution.
 One common bargaining solution is the Coase theorem, which states that if
transaction costs are low and property rights are well-defined, then bargaining
between polluters can lead to an efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation
of property rights. In other words, as long as property rights are clearly defined and
transaction costs are low, the parties involved can negotiate a solution that is mutually
beneficial.
 For example, suppose there are two factories that are both polluting a nearby river.
One factory could agree to reduce its pollution in exchange for a payment from the
other factory. If the payment is large enough, the factory that is reducing its pollution
will be better off financially, while the factory that continues to pollute will face
fewer regulatory costs.
 Bargaining solutions can be used in conjunction with other market-based
mechanisms, such as emissions trading. In an emissions trading system, polluters are
given a fixed number of emissions allowances that they can trade with other polluters.
This creates a market for pollution, and polluters can negotiate with each other to buy
or sell emissions allowances.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
13

 In summary, bargaining solutions can be an effective way to manage pollution using

existing markets. By negotiating with each other, polluters can reach a mutually
beneficial agreement on how to reduce pollution. This approach can be particularly
useful in situations where there are a relatively small number of polluters who are
responsible for a large share of the pollution.
Managing Pollution Through Market Intervention: Taxes, Subsidies And Permits
Market intervention through taxes, subsidies, and permits is a popular approach to
managing pollution. This approach aims to create economic incentives for businesses and
individuals to reduce their environmental impact. Here's a breakdown of how each of these
interventions can be used:
1. Taxes: A pollution tax, also known as a Pigouvian tax, is a tax levied on a company or
individual based on the amount of pollution they generate. The goal of the tax is to
internalize the negative externality of pollution by making it more expensive for
businesses to pollute. This incentivizes them to find ways to reduce their emissions in
order to avoid paying the tax.
2. Subsidies: Environmental subsidies are financial incentives provided by the
government to encourage businesses and individuals to adopt environmentally
friendly practices. For example, a government could provide a subsidy for businesses
that invest in renewable energy or for consumers who buy electric vehicles. By
providing these subsidies, the government aims to make environmentally friendly
alternatives more attractive and financially viable.
3. Permits: A cap-and-trade system involves the government setting a limit, or cap, on
the total amount of pollution that can be generated within a particular industry or
region. Companies are then given permits that allow them to emit a certain amount of
pollution. If a company emits less pollution than their allotted permits, they can sell
their excess permits to companies that need them. This creates a market for pollution
permits, which incentivizes companies to reduce their emissions in order to save
money on permits.
Overall, market intervention through taxes, subsidies, and permits can be an effective way
to manage pollution. By creating economic incentives to reduce pollution, businesses and
individuals are more likely to take action to reduce their environmental impact. However, the
success of these interventions depends on their design and implementation, and they should
be accompanied by other measures such as regulations and public education to achieve
lasting change.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
14

UNIT IV
Cost – Benefit Analysis:
Economic Value Of Environmental Resources And Environmental Damage
The economic value of environmental resources refers to the benefits that people derive
from natural resources and ecosystems, such as clean air and water, fertile soil, biodiversity,
and recreational opportunities. These benefits are often categorized as either use values or
non-use values.
Use values refer to the direct economic benefits that people receive from environmental
resources. For example, forests can provide timber and non-timber forest products, while
wetlands can help to reduce flood damage and provide habitat for fish and wildlife that
support commercial and recreational fishing.
Non-use values refer to the indirect benefits that people derive from environmental
resources, even if they never use them directly. For example, people may place a value on
knowing that endangered species are protected, even if they never see or interact with those
species themselves.
On the other hand, environmental damage refers to the costs associated with the
degradation or destruction of natural resources and ecosystems. Environmental damage can
result from pollution, deforestation, habitat destruction, and other forms of human activity
that degrade the quality of the environment.
The economic cost of environmental damage can be significant, as it can lead to health
problems, reduced productivity, and decreased quality of life for individuals and
communities. In addition, environmental damage can have a negative impact on businesses
and industries that rely on natural resources, such as tourism, agriculture, and fishing.
Overall, understanding the economic value of environmental resources and the costs of
environmental damage is important for making informed decisions about how to manage
natural resources and promote sustainable development. By taking into account the economic
value of environmental resources, policymakers can make better-informed decisions about
how to balance economic development with environmental protection.
Concept of Total Economic Value

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
15

The concept of Total Economic Value (TEV) is a framework for evaluating the economic
value of natural resources and ecosystems, which takes into account both use and non-use
values. TEV is a way of assessing the economic benefits that people derive from
environmental resources, and the costs associated with the degradation or loss of those
resources.
TEV is typically divided into two categories:
1. Use values: These are the direct economic benefits that people receive from
natural resources and ecosystems, such as the production of food, timber, and
other goods, as well as the provision of recreational opportunities.
2. Non-use values: These are the indirect economic benefits that people receive from
environmental resources, such as the value placed on biodiversity and the
existence of endangered species.
TEV is a useful tool for decision-makers who need to weigh the economic benefits of
natural resource use against the costs of environmental degradation. For example, a TEV
analysis might be used to compare the economic value of logging a forest with the economic
value of preserving it for its recreational, ecological, and aesthetic values.
By taking into account both use and non-use values, TEV provides a more comprehensive
picture of the economic value of natural resources and ecosystems than traditional economic
analyses that focus solely on use values. This can help policymakers make more informed
decisions about how to manage natural resources in a sustainable and socially responsible
way, balancing economic development with environmental protection.
Alternative approaches to valuation
While the Total Economic Value (TEV) approach is a useful tool for evaluating the
economic value of natural resources and ecosystems, it has some limitations. For example, it
can be difficult to accurately measure non-use values, and the values assigned to natural
resources may not reflect their cultural, spiritual, or ecological significance to local
communities.
As a result, there are alternative approaches to valuation that can provide a more nuanced
and comprehensive understanding of the value of natural resources and ecosystems. Some of
these approaches include:
1. Ecological economics: This is an interdisciplinary field of study that seeks to
integrate economic, social, and ecological considerations in the analysis of
environmental issues. Ecological economics emphasizes the importance of

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
16

recognizing the biophysical limits of the planet and the need to develop economic
systems that are more equitable and sustainable.
2. Deliberative valuation: This approach involves engaging stakeholders in a
process of dialogue and deliberation to develop a shared understanding of the
value of natural resources and ecosystems. Deliberative valuation seeks to
incorporate the perspectives of local communities, indigenous peoples, and other
stakeholders who may have a different understanding of the value of natural
resources than mainstream economic models.
3. Biocultural valuation: This approach recognizes the interconnectedness of
cultural and ecological diversity and seeks to value natural resources and
ecosystems based on their cultural significance as well as their ecological
function. Biocultural valuation emphasizes the importance of local knowledge and
traditional ecological knowledge in the management of natural resources and
ecosystems.
Overall, these alternative approaches to valuation can provide a more nuanced and
holistic understanding of the value of natural resources and ecosystems, and can help to
promote more sustainable and socially responsible management of natural resources.
Cost-Benefit Analysis And Discounting
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a method used to evaluate the economic efficiency of a
project or policy by comparing the expected costs and benefits of different alternatives. The
objective of CBA is to determine whether the benefits of a project or policy outweigh its
costs.
One important consideration in CBA is the time frame over which costs and benefits will
be incurred. Since costs and benefits may occur at different points in time, it is necessary to
account for the time value of money through a process called discounting.
Discounting is the process of reducing the value of future costs and benefits to their
present value. This is necessary because money has a time value - that is, a dollar received in
the future is worth less than a dollar received today, due to factors such as inflation,
opportunity costs, and risk.
Discounting is typically done using a discount rate, which is a percentage that represents
the rate of return that could be earned if the money were invested elsewhere. The discount
rate reflects the time preference of society - that is, how much society values consumption
today versus consumption in the future.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
17

By discounting future costs and benefits, CBA allows for a comparison of costs and
benefits that occur at different points in time. This is important for making decisions about
projects or policies that have long-term consequences, such as infrastructure investments,
environmental regulations, or public health interventions.
However, there is ongoing debate about the appropriate discount rate to use in CBA, as
well as about the ethical implications of discounting future costs and benefits. Critics argue
that discounting can lead to decisions that prioritize short-term benefits over long-term risks,
and that it may not reflect the values of future generations who will be affected by current
decisions. As a result, some experts have proposed alternative methods for evaluating the
economic efficiency of projects or policies that take a longer-term perspective, such as
intergenerational discounting or sustainability analysis.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
18

UNIT V
Economics of biodiversity:
Economics Of Biodiversity Conservation
The economics of biodiversity conservation is an emerging field that seeks to
understand the economic benefits of preserving biodiversity and the costs of its loss.
Biodiversity is important for a variety of reasons, including its role in maintaining ecosystem
services such as pollination, nutrient cycling, and water purification. Biodiversity is also a
source of cultural, spiritual, and recreational value.

There are several economic tools that can be used to promote biodiversity conservation,
including:

 Payments for ecosystem services (PES): These are payments made to landowners or
communities in exchange for maintaining or improving the ecological services
provided by their land. PES schemes can provide economic incentives for
conservation and can help to ensure that the costs of conservation are shared fairly
across society.

 Market-based instruments: These are economic tools such as taxes, subsidies, and
tradable permits that are designed to internalize the costs of environmental
degradation and incentivize environmentally-friendly behavior. Market-based
instruments can help to create a more level playing field for sustainable business
practices and can encourage innovation in biodiversity conservation.

 Valuation methods: Economic valuation methods, such as the Total Economic Value
(TEV) approach discussed earlier, can be used to quantify the economic benefits of
biodiversity conservation. Valuation can help to make the economic benefits of
conservation more visible and can support decision-making processes that take
biodiversity conservation into account.

Overall, the economics of biodiversity conservation emphasizes the importance of

recognizing the economic value of biodiversity and the costs of its loss. By incorporating
these economic considerations into conservation strategies, it is possible to develop more

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
19

effective and sustainable approaches to biodiversity conservation that promote both economic
and ecological well-being.
Valuing Individual Species And Diversity Of Species
Valuing individual species and diversity of species is an important aspect of the
economics of biodiversity conservation.
Valuing individual species involves assessing the economic and non-economic
benefits that a particular species provides. These benefits can include direct use values, such
as the value of a species as a source of food or medicine, as well as non-use values, such as
the value of a species for its cultural or spiritual significance. The value of a species may also
be assessed in terms of its contribution to ecosystem services, such as pollination, nutrient
cycling, and pest control. By valuing individual species, it is possible to develop targeted
conservation strategies that focus on the species that are most important for ecological and
economic well-being.
Valuing the diversity of species involves assessing the economic and non-economic
benefits of maintaining a diverse array of species within an ecosystem. Biodiversity is
important for maintaining ecosystem services and for promoting ecological resilience in the
face of environmental change. The value of biodiversity may also be assessed in terms of its
cultural and aesthetic value, as well as its potential for scientific discovery and innovation. By
valuing the diversity of species, it is possible to develop conservation strategies that prioritize
the maintenance of biodiversity as a whole.
There are a variety of economic tools and approaches that can be used to value
individual species and the diversity of species. These include economic valuation methods
such as the Total Economic Value (TEV) approach, as well as ecological modeling and other
tools that can help to assess the ecological importance of different species within an
ecosystem. By combining these tools and approaches, it is possible to develop more effective
and sustainable conservation strategies that take into account the economic and ecological
value of individual species and the diversity of species as a whole.
Policy Responses At National And International Levels
Biodiversity conservation is a global challenge that requires policy responses at both
national and international levels.
At the national level, governments can use a variety of policy tools to promote
biodiversity conservation, such as:

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
20

1. Protected areas: Governments can establish and manage protected areas,

such as national parks and nature reserves, to conserve ecosystems and
biodiversity.
2. Environmental regulations: Governments can establish regulations to protect
biodiversity and promote sustainable use of natural resources. These
regulations can include restrictions on land use, hunting and fishing
regulations, and requirements for environmental impact assessments.
3. Economic incentives: Governments can use economic incentives, such as
taxes, subsidies, and payments for ecosystem services, to encourage
landowners and businesses to conserve biodiversity.
4. Education and outreach: Governments can invest in education and outreach
programs to increase public awareness about the importance of biodiversity
and to encourage individual action to conserve biodiversity.
At the international level, there are several policy frameworks and agreements that
promote biodiversity conservation, including:
1. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD): This international treaty has
been ratified by almost all countries in the world and provides a framework for
the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.
2. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC):
Climate change is one of the major threats to biodiversity, and the UNFCCC
provides a framework for international cooperation to address climate change.
3. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna
and Flora (CITES): This treaty regulates the international trade in
endangered species to ensure that it does not threaten their survival.
4. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): The SDGs include a goal on
biodiversity conservation, which calls for the conservation, restoration, and
sustainable use of terrestrial and marine ecosystems.
In addition to these policy frameworks and agreements, there are also international
organizations and initiatives that promote biodiversity conservation, such as the World
Wildlife Fund (WWF), the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and the
Global Environment Facility (GEF).
Overall, policy responses at both national and international levels are essential for
promoting biodiversity conservation and ensuring the long-term sustainability of our natural
resources.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
21

Economics Of Climate Change

The economics of climate change refers to the study of the economic impacts and
responses to climate change. Climate change is a global challenge that affects a wide range of
economic sectors, including agriculture, forestry, fisheries, tourism, and infrastructure. It also
poses significant risks to human health, security, and well-being.
One of the main economic impacts of climate change is the cost of adaptation and
mitigation measures. Adaptation measures are actions taken to reduce the negative impacts of
climate change, such as building sea walls to protect against rising sea levels or changing
farming practices to cope with changing weather patterns. Mitigation measures, on the other
hand, are actions taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, such as investing in renewable
energy or improving energy efficiency. Both adaptation and mitigation measures require
significant investments, and the costs can be substantial.
Another economic impact of climate change is the loss of natural resources and
ecosystem services. Climate change can lead to the loss of biodiversity, ecosystem
degradation, and the loss of valuable natural resources such as water and forests. These losses
can have significant economic consequences, particularly for communities that rely on these
resources for their livelihoods.
In addition, climate change can have significant distributional impacts, with some
groups and regions being more vulnerable than others. For example, low-income
communities and developing countries may be disproportionately affected by the impacts of
climate change, as they may have fewer resources to adapt and may be more reliant on
climate-sensitive sectors such as agriculture.
There are several economic responses to climate change, including market-based
mechanisms such as carbon pricing, subsidies for renewable energy, and investments in
research and development. Carbon pricing involves putting a price on greenhouse gas
emissions through either a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade system, which can provide
incentives for businesses and individuals to reduce their emissions. Subsidies for renewable
energy can help to promote the development and deployment of clean energy technologies,
while investments in research and development can help to drive innovation and reduce the
costs of low-carbon technologies.
Overall, the economics of climate change is a complex and multifaceted area of study
that requires a comprehensive understanding of the economic impacts of climate change, the
costs and benefits of adaptation and mitigation measures, and the policy responses that can be
used to address the challenge of climate change.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.

(20A01605) ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS III-II EEE
22

STERN REPORT
The Stern Review, also known as the Stern Report, is a landmark study on the
economics of climate change. The report was commissioned by the UK government in 2005
and was led by economist Sir Nicholas Stern. It aimed to provide an economic analysis of the
costs and benefits of actions to mitigate climate change and adapt to its impacts.
The report concluded that the cost of inaction on climate change would far outweigh
the cost of taking action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It estimated that without action,
the global economy could lose up to 20% of its GDP by the end of the century. In contrast,
the cost of taking action to mitigate climate change was estimated to be around 1% of global
GDP.
The Stern Review also emphasized the urgency of taking action on climate change,
arguing that delay would only increase the cost of action in the future. It called for a rapid
transition to a low-carbon economy, with a focus on energy efficiency, renewable energy, and
other low-carbon technologies.
The report has had a significant impact on the global discussion on climate change
and has been widely cited by policymakers, economists, and environmental advocates. It has
been influential in shaping policy responses to climate change, including the development of
market-based mechanisms such as carbon pricing and the promotion of clean energy
technologies.
However, the Stern Review has also been criticized by some economists for its
assumptions and methodology, particularly around discount rates and the economic impacts
of climate change. Despite these criticisms, the report remains an important contribution to
the economics of climate change and has helped to elevate the issue to the top of the global
policy agenda.

Dr. K. CHITHAMBARAIAH SETTY., HOD, EEE EEE Dept, SJCET, Yemmiganur.