775-300 PRL AccuLite CLIA Rev 5
775-300 PRL AccuLite CLIA Rev 5
775-300 PRL AccuLite CLIA Rev 5
Reagent (fill)
5. If test kits are altered, such as by mixing parts of different kits, TABLE 4
80000 which could produce false test results, or if results are Mean Least Square Correlation C) 1 plate 2 plates
Method
incorrectly interpreted, Monobind shall have no liability. (x) Regression Analysis Coefficient
RLU
60000
6. If computer controlled data reduction is used to interpret the Monobind 18.5 y = -1.63+1.01(x) 0.978 D) 1 (20ml) 1 (20ml)
40000 results of the test, it is imperative that the predicted values for Reference 19.4
E) 1 (7ml) 2 (7ml)
20000 Patient the calibrators fall within 10% of the assigned concentrations.
7. Patients receiving preparations of mouse monoclonal Only slight amounts of bias between this procedure and the F) 1 (7ml) 2 (7ml)
0 antibodies for diagnosis or therapy may contain human anti- reference method are indicated by the closeness of the mean
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
mouse antibodies (HAMA) and may show either falsely values. The least square regression equation and correlation
elevated or depressed values when assayed. coefficient indicates excellent method agreement.
PRL Values in ng/ml
8. Pregnancy, lactation, and the administration of oral
contraceptives can cause an increase in the level of prolactin. 14.4 Specificity
11.0 Q.C. PARAMETERS The cross-reactivity PRL AccuLite® CLIA test system to selected
9. Drugs such as morphine, reserpine and the psychotropic drugs
substances was evaluated by adding the interfering substance to
In order for the assay results to be considered valid the increase prolactin secretion.5,6,7
a serum matrix at various concentrations. The cross-reactivity was
following criteria should be met: 10. Since prolactin hormone concentration is dependent upon
calculated by deriving a ratio between dose of interfering
1. The Dose Response Curve should be within established diverse factors other than pituitary homeostasis, the
substance to dose of prolactin hormone needed to produce the
parameters. determination alone is not sufficient to assess clinical status.
same light intensity.
2. Four out of six quality control pools should be within the
established ranges. 13.0 EXPECTED RANGES OF VALUES
Substance Cross Concentration
A study of an apparent normal adult population was undertaken to Reactivity
12.0 RISK ANALYSIS Prolactin Hormone (PRL) 1.0000 --
determine expected values for the PRL AccuLite® CLIA test
system. The expected values (95% confidence intervals) are Luteinizing Hormone (LH) < 0.0001 1000ng/ml
The MSDS and Risk Analysis Form for this product is available on Follitropin (FSH) < 0.0001 1000ng/ml
request from Monobind Inc. presented in Table 1.
TABLE I Chorionic gonadotropin (CG) < 0.0001 1000ng/ml
Expected Values for the PRL AccuLite® CLIA (in ng/ml) Thyrotropin (TSH) < 0.0001 1000ng/ml
12.1 Assay Performance Growth Hormone (GH) < 0.0001 1000ng/ml
1. It is important that the time of reaction in each well is held Women
constant to achieve reproducible results. Adult (Number = 70) 1.2-19.5
Postmenopausal (Number = 10) 1.5-18.5 15.0 REFERENCES
2. Pipetting of samples should not extend beyond ten (10)
minutes to avoid assay drift. Men
1. Maddox, P.R., Jones, D.L., Mansel, R.E., Acta Endocrinol,
3. Highly lipemic, hemolyzed or grossly contaminated Adult (Number = 50) 1.8-17.0
125, 621 (1991).
specimen(s) should not be used. 2. Gonzales, E.R., JAMA 242, 401 (1979).
4. If more than one (1) plate is used, it is recommended to repeat It is important to keep in mind that establishment of a range of
values which can be expected to be found by a given method for a 3. Tolis, G., Hosp. Pract. 15, 85 (1980).
the dose response curve. 4. Balagura, S., Frantz, A.G., Houseplan, E.M., J Neurosurg 51,
5. The addition of signal reagent initiates a kinetic reaction, population of "normal"-persons is dependent upon a multiplicity of
factors: the specificity of the method, the population tested and 42 (1979).
therefore the signal reagent(s) should be added in the same 5. Friesen, H., Hwang, P., Ann Rev Med, 24, 251 (1973).
sequence to eliminate any time-deviation during reaction. the precision of the method in the hands of the analyst. For these
reasons each laboratory should depend upon the range of 6. Frantz, A. G., N Eng J Med, 298, 201 (1978).
6. Failure to remove adhering solution adequately in the 7. Parkes, D.N., J. Med. 301, 873. (1979)
aspiration or decantation wash step(s) may result in poor expected values established by the Manufacturer only until an
8. Kao, P.C., Jiang, N.C. and Abboud, C.F., ‘Radioimmunoassay
replication and spurious results. in-house range can be determined by the analysts using the
method with a population indigenous to the area in which the of human homologous prolactin in serum with commercially
7. Use components from the same lot. No intermixing of reagents available reagents’ Clin Chem. 23, 1563-1568. (1977)
from different batches. laboratory is located.
9. Haus, E., Lakatua, D.J., Halberg, F., Halberg, E., Cornelissen,
8. Patient specimens with abnormally high prolactin levels can G., Sackett, L.L et.al: ’Chronobiological studies of plasma
cause a hook effect, that is, paradoxical low results. If this is 14.0 PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
prolactin in women in Kyushu, Japan and Minnesota, USA.’
suspected, dilute the specimen 1/100 with ‘0’ calibrator; J.Clin.Endocrinol Metab, 51, 632-640. (1980)
reassay (multiply the result by 100). However, values as high 14.1 Precision
The within and between assay precision of the PRL AccuLite® 10. Christensen, J.M., Poulsen, O.M. and Anglov, T, ”Method,
as 3000ng/ml have been found to absorb greater than the evaluation, quality control, and extreme quality assurance
value of the highest calibrator CLIA test system were determined by analyses on three different
levels of control sera. The number, mean value, standard systems of analytical procedures”; in: Seiler HG, Seigel, H
9. Accurate and precise pipetting, as well as following the exact Eds. Handbook on Metals in Clinical and Analytical Chemistry.
time and temperature requirements prescribed are essential. deviation (σ) and coefficient of variation for each of these control
New York: Marcel Dekker 45-61 (1994).
Any deviation from Monobind’s IFU may yield inaccurate sera are presented in Table 2 and Table 3.
11. Phillips, G.B: ’Relationship between serum levels of
results. dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, androstenedione and sex
10. All applicable national standards, regulations and laws, TABLE 2
Within Assay Precision (Values in ng/ml) hormone in men and women.’ Eur.J.Endocrinol 134, 201-206.
including, but not limited to, good laboratory procedures, must (1996)
be strictly followed to ensure compliance and proper device Sample N X σ C.V.
12. Touitou Y., Carayon, A., Reinberg, A., Bogdan, A., Beck, H.,
usage. Level 1 20 5.4 0.23 4.3%
’Differences in seasonal rhythmicity of plasma prolactin in
11. It is important to calibrate all the equipment e.g. Pipettes, Level 2 20 18.4 0.67 3.6%
elderly human subjects; Detection in women but not in men’, J
Readers, Washers and/or the automated instruments used Level 3 20 40.8 2.78 6.8%
Endocrinol, 96, 65-71 (1983).
with this device, and to perform routine preventative 13. Costonga, J., Janson PCW, Hermans, J., Van Wersch, JWJ
maintenance. TABLE 3
and Bombacher PJ.: ’Short term and long term intra-individual
12. Risk Analysis- as required by CE Mark IVD Directive 98/79/EC Between Assay Precision* (Values in ng/ml)
variations and critical differences of clinical laboratory
- for this and other devices, made by Monobind, can be Sample N X σ C.V.
parameters’, J.Clin.Chem.& Clin.Biochem, 985, 23, 7-16.
requested via email from Monobind@monobind.com. Level 1 20 5.8 0.57 9.8% 14. John R., McDowell, IFW, Scanton. MF and Ellis, AR.:
Level 2 20 19.8 1.73 8.8% ’Macroprolactin reactivities in prolactin assays: an issue for
12.2 Interpretation Level 3 20 43.8 2.97 6.8% clinical laboratories and equipment manufacturers”, Clin
1. Measurements and interpretation of results must be *As measured in ten experiments in duplicate.
performed by a skilled individual or trained professional. Chem, 46, 884-885 (2000).
15. Lindstedt, G., ‘Endogenous antibodies against prolactin – a
2. Laboratory results alone are only one aspect for determining 14.2 Sensitivity
patient care and should not be the sole basis for therapy, “new” cause of hyperprolactinemia”, Eur. J. Endo 130, 439-42
The sensitivity (detection limit) was ascertained by determining
(1994).
particularly if the results conflict with other determinants. the variability of the 0ng/ml serum calibrator and using the 2σ