Comer Somatoform
Comer Somatoform
Comer Somatoform
AP Photo/Lefteris Pitarakis
the ceiling above. Her action was part of a
protest to end shark finning—the practice of
cutting off a shark’s fin and throwing its still-
living body back into the sea so that the fins
can be used in the production of shark fin soup
(a food delicacy) and other goods.
table: 10-4
people who are familiar with an illness will more readily adopt its physical symp-
toms. In fact, studies find that many sufferers develop their bodily symptoms after
they or their close relatives or friends have had similar medical problems (Marshall
et al., 2007).
Clearly, the behavioral focus on the role of rewards is similar to the psychody-
namic notion of secondary gain. The key difference is that psychodynamic theorists
view the gains as indeed secondary—that is, as gains that come only after underly-
ing conflicts produce the disorders. Behaviorists view them as the primary cause of
the development of the disorders.
Like the psychodynamic explanation, the behavioral view of conversion and
somatic symptom disorders has received little research support. Even clinical case
reports only occasionally support this position. In many cases the pain and upset
that surround the disorders seem to outweigh any rewards the symptoms might
bring.
The Cognitive View Some cognitive theorists propose that conversion and
somatic symptom disorders are forms of communication, providing a means for
people to express emotions that would otherwise be difficult to convey (Hallquist
et al., 2010; Koh et al., 2005). Like their psychodynamic colleagues, these theorists
hold that the emotions of people with the disorders are being converted into physi-
cal symptoms. They suggest, however, that the purpose of the conversion is not to
defend against anxiety but to communicate extreme feelings—anger, fear, depres-
sion, guilt, jealousy—in a “physical language” that is familiar and comfortable for
the person with the disorder.
According to this view, people who find it particularly hard to recognize or ex-
DS M -5 CONTROVE RSY press their emotions are candidates for conversion and somatic symptom disorders.
Overreactions to Medical Illnesses? So are those who “know” the language of physical symptoms through firsthand ex-
According to DSM-5, even people perience with a genuine physical ailment. Because children are less able to express
whose physical symptoms are caused their emotions verbally, they are particularly likely to develop physical symptoms
by significant medical problems may as a form of communication (Shaw et al., 2010). Like the other explanations, this
qualify for a diagnosis of somatic cognitive view has not been widely tested or supported by research.
symptom disorder if they are overly
anxious or upset by their medical prob-
lems. Critics worry that many patients
The Multicultural View Most Western clinicians believe that it is inappro-
who are understandably upset by the priate to produce or focus excessively on somatic symptoms in response to personal
development of cancer, heart disease, distress (Shaw et al., 2010; So, 2008; Escobar, 2004). That is, in part, why conversion
or other serious diseases will incor- and somatic symptom disorders are included in DSM-5. Some theorists believe,
rectly receive a diagnosis of somatic
symptom disorder.
however, that this position reflects a Western bias—a bias that sees somatic reactions
as an inferior way of dealing with emotions (Moldavsky, 2004; Fábrega, 1990).
Disorders Featuring Somatic Symptoms : 329
In fact, the transformation of personal distress into somatic complaints is the norm BETWEEN THE LINES
in many non-Western cultures (Draguns, 2006; Kleinman, 1987). In such cultures,
Diagnostic Confusion
the formation of such complaints is viewed as a socially and medically correct—and
less stigmatizing—reaction to life’s stressors. Studies have found very high rates of Many medical problems with vague or
confusing symptoms—multiple sclerosis,
stress-caused bodily symptoms in non-Western medical settings throughout the hyperparathyroidism, lupus, and chronic
world, including those in China, Japan, and Arab countries (Matsumoto & Juang, fatigue syndrome are examples—
2008). People throughout Latin America seem to display the most somatic reactions frequently have been misdiagnosed as
(Escobar, 2004, 1995; Escobar et al., 1998, 1992). Even within the United States, conversion or somatic symptom disor-
der. In the past, whiplash was regularly
Hispanic Americans display more somatic reactions in the face of stress than do misdiagnosed in this way (Shaw et al.,
other populations. 2010; Ferrari, 2006; N
emecek, 1996).
The lesson to be learned from such multicultural findings is not that somatic
reactions to stress are superior to psychological ones or vice versa, but rather, once
again, that both bodily and psychological reactions to life events are often influ-
enced by one’s culture. Overlooking this point can lead to knee-jerk mislabels or
misdiagnoses.