(1 17th)
(1 17th)
(1 17th)
To find ROE, we need to find total equity. Since TL & OE equals TA:
TA = TD + TE
TE = TA – TD
TE = $12,900,000 – 5,700,000
TE = $7,200,000
2.
Net income = Addition to RE + Dividends = $415,000 + 220,000 = $635,000
Earnings per share = NI/Shares = $635,000/170,000 = $3.74 per share
Dividends per share= Dividends/Shares = $220,000/170,000 = $1.29 per share
Book value per share= TE/Shares = $5,600,000/170,000 = $32.94 per share
Market-to-book ratio = Share price/BVPS = $65/$32.94 = 1.97 times
PE ratio = Share price/EPS = $65/$3.74 = 17.40 times
Sales per share= Sales/Shares= $7,450,000/170,000 = $43.82
P/S ratio = Share price/Sales per share = $65/$43.82 = 1.48 times
3.The average time to pay suppliers is the days’ sales in payables, so:
The company left its bills to suppliers outstanding for 82.74 days on average. A large value
for this ratio could imply that either (1) the company is having liquidity problems, making it
difficult to pay off its short-term obligations, or (2) that the company has successfully
negotiated lenient credit terms from its suppliers.
4.
This is a multistep problem involving several ratios. The ratios given are all part of the DuPont
Identity. The only DuPont Identity ratio not given is the profit margin. If we know the profit
margin, we can find the net income since sales are given. So, we begin with the DuPont
Identity:
PM = [(ROE)(TA)]/[(1 + D/E)(S)]
PM = [(.11)($2,974)]/[(1 + .57)($6,183)]
PM = .0337
Now that we have the profit margin, we can use this number and the given sales figure to
solve for net income:
PM = .0337 = NI/S
NI = .0337($6,183)
Net income = $208.37
5.
The solution requires substituting two ratios into a third ratio. Rearranging Debt/Total assets:
Firm A Firm B
D/TA = .65 D/TA = .45
(TA – E)/TA = .65 (TA – E)/TA = .45
(TA/TA) – (E/TA) = .65 (TA/TA) – (E/TA) = .45
1 – (E/TA) = .65 1 – (E/TA) = .45
E/TA = .35 E/TA = .55
E = .35(TA) E = .55(TA)
CHAPTER 3 C-3
Since ROE = Net income/Equity, we can substitute the above equations into the ROE
formula, which yields:
Profitability ratios:
Profit margin = Net income/Sales
Profit margin = $62,235/$506,454 = .1229, or 12.29%
Case Solution
RATIO ANALYSIS AT S&S AIR
1. The calculations for the ratios listed are:
2. Boeing is probably not a good aspirant company. Even though both companies manufacture
airplanes, S&S Air manufactures small airplanes, while Boeing manufactures large, commercial
aircraft. These are two different markets. Additionally, Boeing is heavily involved in the defense
industry, as well as Boeing Capital, which finances airplanes.
Bombardier is a Canadian company that builds business jets, short-range airliners and fire-fighting
amphibious aircraft and also provides defense-related services. It is the third largest commercial
aircraft manufacturer in the world. Embraer is a Brazilian manufacturer that manufactures
commercial, military, and corporate airplanes. Additionally, the Brazilian government is a part
owner of the company. Bombardier and Embraer are probably not good aspirant companies because
of the diverse range of products and manufacture of larger aircraft.
Cirrus is the world's second largest manufacturer of single-engine, piston-powered aircraft. Its
SR22 is the world's best-selling plane in its class. The company is noted for its innovative small
aircraft and is a good aspirant company.
Cessna is a well-known manufacturer of small airplanes. The company produces business jets,
freight- and passenger-hauling utility Caravans, personal and small-business single engine pistons.
It may be a good aspirant company, however, its products could be considered too broad and
diversified since S&S Air produces only small personal airplanes.
3. S&S is below the median industry ratios for the current and cash ratios. This implies the company
has less liquidity than the industry in general. However, both ratios are above the lower quartile, so
there are companies in the industry with lower liquidity ratios than S&S Air. The company may
have more predictable cash flows, or more access to short-term borrowing. If you created an
inventory to current liabilities ratio, S&S Air would have a ratio that is lower than the industry
median. The current ratio is below the industry median, while the quick ratio is above the industry
median. This implies that S&S Air has less inventory to current liabilities than the industry median.
S&S Air has less inventory than the industry median, but more accounts receivable than the
industry since the cash ratio is lower than the industry median.
The turnover ratios are all higher than the industry median; in fact, all three turnover ratios are
above the upper quartile. This may mean that S&S Air is more efficient than the industry. The
deposit on orders may be the reason that the receivables turnover is much larger than the upper
quartile.
The financial leverage ratios are generally below the industry median, but above the lower quartile.
S&S Air generally has less debt than comparable companies, but still within the normal range.
The profit margin is below the industry median, however, not dramatically lower. The ROE is
higher than the industry median, due in large part to the company’s high total asset turnover.
Overall, S&S Air’s performance seems good, although the liquidity ratios indicate that a closer look
may be needed in this area.
CHAPTER 3 C-7
Below is a list of possible reasons it may be good or bad that each ratio is higher or lower than the
industry. Note that the list is not exhaustive, but merely one possible explanation for each ratio.