PDF Datastream
PDF Datastream
PDF Datastream
DOI 10.1007/s00382-013-1713-0
123
G. Holland, C. L. Bruyère
simulations with and without anthropogenic forcing this paper are robust to the details of the derivation of the
(Fig. 1) indicates that the net anthropogenic climate forc- ACCI, for example by replacing the anthropogenic simu-
ing—including cooling as well as warming agents—was lations with the observed temperatures. Some earlier
indistinguishable from natural variability until the mid- warming is seen in the more recent CCSM4 simulation
twentieth century (Meehl et al. 2004, 2007, 2012; IPCC (Community Climate System Model, Figs. 1b, 2a), which is
2007). The ensembles of model simulations with and considered to be due to the lack of an indirect effect for
without anthropogenic emissions closely track each other sulfates in the model (Meehl et al. 2012). We also examined
and the observed global surface temperature until around defining ACCI from ensemble information, including tak-
1970. After then, the anthropogenic simulations continue to ing the ensemble extremes and other combinations. Our
track the observed global warming, but those with only conclusions are robust to all of these approaches.
natural forcing indicate a cooling trend back to nineteenth The ACCI data in Fig. 2a indicate that consideration of
century temperature levels. This change has been attributed the impact of anthropogenic climate change should be
to reductions in emissions of sulfate aerosols, which limited to the last four decades. This is quite different to a
counteracted the warming component due to greenhouse number of other studies that have assumed an essentially
gases before 1960 (Meehl et al. 2004, 2012; Mann and linear warming over the past 100 years or so [see, e.g.
Emanuel 2006; Thompson et al. 2010). Knutson et al. (2010) for hurricane implications]. If
We therefore define an ACCI by the difference between greenhouse gases alone are considered then an extended
the model simulations with and without anthropogenic period of nearly linear warming is justified, but anthropo-
gases. When applied to the ensemble means from Fig. 1a, genic impacts on the climate also arise from a range of
the ACCI is essentially zero until around 1960 (Fig. 2a), other contributors that have counteracted the pure green-
after which an exponential change to a quasi-linear increase house gas warming until recently [see Meehl et al. (2012)
of around 0.35 C per decade commenced. The results in for a detailed discussion].
123
Recent intense hurricane
For the global hurricane analysis we choose to focus on 2010) but there remain issues with the approaches used to
the slightly shorter period from 1975 to 2010, as this is a convert from the satellite pattern code to a surface wind
reasonably homogeneous period of global satellite data; speed.
going back to 1960 does not affect our conclusions. CMIP5 These issues are particularly evident in the western
(Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5) data were not North Pacific, where there are four different archival cen-
available at the analysis time, so to enable use of the full ters: the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC), the Hong
tropical cyclone record, we use the CMIP3 ACCI up to Kong Observatory (HKO), the Shanghai Typhoon Institute
2000 and extend this to 2010 using the annual changes in (STI) and the WMO Regional Specialized Meteorological
CCSM4. A test using linear extrapolation of the CMIP3 Center, Tokyo (RSMC). Maximum winds for each of these
data to 2010 produced essentially the same results. archives are based on: 1-min mean at JTWC, 10-min mean
Figure 2b compares the ACCI with the observed annual at HKO and RSMC, and 2-min mean at STI. Furthermore,
tropical (30 north and south) sea surface temperature (SST) aircraft reconnaissance provided a substantial basis for
anomalies relative to the mean for 1975–2010 from the intensity estimates until 1988 after which the Dvorak
merged Hadley Centre and NOAA’s optimum interpolation technique became the major approach. Varying approaches
(OI) SST data set (Hurrell et al. 2008). They track each other to converting the Dvorak analysis to intensity has resulted
closely with the ACCI explaining [50 % of the observed in a divergence of intensity trends amongst the centers,
tropical SST variance (p \ 0.01). Note that the slope in with the JTWC data containing an increasing intensity
Fig. 2b is \1, since the ACCI values have an additional trend and the HKO and RSMC a decreasing one (Wu et al.
component arising from the net cooling in the natural forcing 2006; Song et al. 2010).
simulations (Fig. 1) compared to the observations. Wu and Zhao (2012) examined these discrepancies
Focusing on the relationship with ACCI from 1975 using the Emanuel (2008) statistical-dynamical downscal-
removes much of the hurricane analysis difficulty that has ing technique. They found an increasing intensity trend that
been experienced with issues such as changing observing also is supported by observed relationships with SST and
systems and analysis approaches prior to 1975 (e.g. vertical shear, and is in broad agreement with the observed
Landsea et al. 2006; Knutson et al. 2010; Holland and increasing tendency for equatorial developments and
Webster 2007). The approach of using a global index also longer time spent in favorable conditions. This lends sup-
is consistent with the findings of Grinsted et al. (2012), port to the JTWC archive, though the Wu and Zhao trends
who showed that North Atlantic landfalling hurricane were less than those for JTWC.
variations are more closely related to global mean SST than Based on this analysis, we adopt the following proce-
they are to local SST or climate indices. We shall show that dure for assessing hurricane trends:
using a shorter period of record is not a concern as the
• Except for the western North Pacific, we use the
signal is large and significant.
IBTrACS data without change. IBTrACS has been
converted to a uniform 10-min mean wind definition
3 Global tropical cyclone changes (Knapp et al. 2010). For the western North Pacific, we
use the JTWC data set without correction aside from
3.1 Data conversion to 10-min mean.
• To help minimize uncertainties, including the intensity
The tropical cyclone analysis is based on the global definition variations, we bin all hurricanes into the
IBTrACS data set (Knapp et al. 2010). A homogeneous Saffir–Simpson category ranges (Simpson and Rielh
satellite reanalysis by Kossin et al. (2007) found close 1981). This is for consistency with other studies. The
agreement of the archived intensities in the North Atlantic Saffir–Simpson ranges are not constant, varying
and western North Pacific, but there were inconsistencies slightly from one category to another, but a check
for more intense storms in the other regions. We utilize the using fixed-width bins found no notable differences.
recent update to this analysis (Kossin 2012) as an inde- Even though the Cat 4–5 interval has no explicit upper
pendent check on the IBTrACS results. bound, it is effectively bounded by available energy as
Archived intensities are somewhat of a hodge-podge of defined by the potential intensity (Emanuel 1987) and is
different approaches and definitions. Even at the most basic approximately the same width as Cat 1–2.
level, the definition of wind speed varies considerably • All variance numbers use the 5-years smoothed annual
around the globe, with 1, 10, 3 and even 2-min averaging time series to remove ENSO type variability. These
periods in use (Harper et al. 2008). Some homogenization include contributions from both trend and multi-year
is provided by the universal use of the Dvorak satellite variance. The p values are calculated from the raw
interpretation technique (Velden et al. 2006; Knaff et al. annual data to ensure no serial correlation.
123
G. Holland, C. L. Bruyère
123
Recent intense hurricane
123
G. Holland, C. L. Bruyère
3.4.1 Analysis issues hurricanes for both current and future climate. They found
a significant increase at a factor of 2–7 in ‘Katrina-like’
One possible trend error arises from the universal use of the hurricanes for each 1 C increase in global SST associated
Dvorak technique. There may have been a consistent with global warming.
change in analysis practice and/or satellite data that led to Hurricanes in proximity to land have better observa-
increasing analysis of intense systems over the time period tions than those well out to sea and provide another check
(Knaff et al. 2010). We check this potential impact by to the quality of the overall results. The global landfall
using the objective satellite-based reanalysis undertaken by results (as defined in Sect. 3.1) contain the same overall
Kossin et al. (2007). As shown in Fig. 6 and Table 1, the trends (Fig. 7) as were found for the entire data set in
homogenized data of Kossin (2012) clearly contain a Fig. 4a. Cat 4–5 proportions are lower than those for the
similar signal, though at a reduced trend compared to global hurricane data, an expected result since high
IBTrACS. The weaker trend may be attributed to two intensities are only maintained for a relatively short period
factors: the automated Dvorak analysis used by Kossin may of the overall cyclone lifetime and could easily be missed
underestimate the most intense storms, or there may be an by the similarly short period spent within landfall range.
artificial analysis trend in the archived data. The slope of the Cat 4–5 trend for this land-proximity
On a regional basis, Wu and Zhao (2012) applied the subset is *27 % per C, essentially the same as the
Emanuel (2008) dynamical downscaling approach to *29 % per C from the Kossin (2012) homogenized
reanalysis data for the western North Pacific and found a satellite data in Fig. 6a.
significant increase in the frequency of Cat 4–5 hurricanes General agreement with Fig. 7 is found for landfall in
(Table 1) that is similar to that in Fig. 4b after taking each ocean basin except the North Indian Ocean and the
proportions, but at around half the rate. Grinsted et al. western North Pacific. The landfall rarity of intense North
(2012) used a homogeneous index of storm surge on the US Indian Ocean hurricanes means the data are too noisy for
coast to examine potential changes in landfalling analysis. For the western North Pacific the trend is very
weak and slightly negative, which we attribute to a general
eastward and equatorward movement of the main genesis
location in recent decades (Wu and Zhao 2012). This
promotes the development of a higher proportion of intense
hurricanes, but also means that fewer of them will make
landfall.
Weinkle et al. (2012) examined the global number of
hurricanes that actually make landfall in each of the Saffir–
Simpson categories. The proportion of Cat 4–5 at landfall
to all landfall hurricanes in their data set has increased with
ACCI at a rate of *21 % per C (p \ 0.01) since 1975.
This study leads us to the following observational con-
clusions. Over the past few decades there has been an
observed *40 % per C trend relative to the ACCI in the
proportion of IBTrACS Cat 4–5 hurricanes (p \ 0.01) and
a compensating decrease in Cat 1–2 proportions. Com-
parison with the Kossin (2012) homogenized satellite data
and with global sets of tropical cyclones in proximity to
land indicates that changing analysis and observing prac-
tices may have contributed 10–15 % of the IBTrACS trend.
This leaves a real trend in the proportion of Cat 4–5 hur-
ricanes of 25–30 % per C that is directly attributed to
anthropogenic warming as defined by the ACCI. This is in
agreement with that derived from other studies (Table 1).
If annual mean tropical SST is used instead of the ACCI,
the trend in proportion of Cat 4–5 hurricanes after adjusting
Fig. 6 Relationship between: a anthropogenic change and annual Cat for analysis errors is *40 % per C SST warming (see
4–5 hurricane proportions from Kossin (2012) reanalysis; b compar-
Fig. 2b and associated discussion). These represent an
ison of IBTrACS (abscissa) and Kossin Cat 4–5 proportions. A 5-year
running mean smoothing has been used and all variances have increase of more than double in the proportion of intense
p \ 0.01 (using unsmoothed data) hurricanes, which is in agreement with, but less than, the
123
Recent intense hurricane
Table 1 Comparison of the observed changes in the proportion of Cat 4–5 hurricanes per C of global warming compared with those derived
from the indicated sources
Method When Source Increase in proportion per C global warming (%)
Fig. 7 Relationship of anthropogenic change to annual proportions of There is a possibility that some of the observed trend arises
Cat 1–2 and Cat 4–5 hurricanes in proximity to land. A 5-year running
mean smoothing has been used, thin solid lines indicate linear trends, from internal tropical cyclone variability that has aliased
and all variances have p \ 0.01 (using unsmoothed data) into the 35-year period used here. However, we consider
that a substantial contamination from internal variability is
2–7 times increase found in Katrina-like storms by Grin- highly unlikely. By using global mean temperatures in the
sted et al. (2012) for the North Atlantic. development of the ACCI, we have explicitly excluded all
but external forcing factors from this aspect of the analysis.
3.4.2 Comparison with model simulations There could be an influence of 11-year sun cycles or
impulsive events such as volcanoes, but we suggest that the
The observed trend in Cat 4–5 hurricanes is consistent with period chosen is too long for these to have a cumulative
independent modeling studies. Oouchi et al. (2006) found a effect on the trend.
general increase in the most intense hurricanes and a For global hurricane proportions, we are aware of no
decrease in weaker ones for a time-slice simulation forced association with internal variability such as the Pacific Dec-
by current and future surface temperatures and greenhouse adal Oscillation or similar. Figure 4 contains potentially
gases; similar findings were made by Bengtsson et al. interesting short-period variability but as shown by the qua-
(2007). Bender et al. (2010) examined the potential climate dratic fit to the Cat 4–5 proportions the trend appears to be very
changes in North Atlantic hurricanes using two versions of close to linear as would be expected from a response to the
the GFDL hurricane model as a downscaling tool applied global warming trend. By using global data we also have
to tropical cyclones generated in the GFDL climate model. removed any potential issues from recent discussion over
The technique for the climate simulation was to use current whether relative or in situ SSTs are the driving influence in
climate boundary conditions (horizontal and surface) plus a specific ocean basins (Vecchi and Soden 2007). The consis-
constant change in thermodynamic parameters (Knutson tent regional Cat 4–5 relationship with global ACCI argues for
et al. 2007). Bender et al. (2010) found that for each C of the regional changes observed here being unaffected by rel-
global warming the proportion of Cat 4–5 hurricanes ative processes and thus due largely to global changes.
increased by *11 % and the proportion of Cat 1–2 hur- Further evidence for the lack of a contribution from
ricanes decreased by *7 %. internal variability is provided by the modeling results for
123
G. Holland, C. L. Bruyère
IBTrACS 1973–1977 12 19 31
Bender 1980–2007 22 11 33
et al.
(2010)
Done 1980–1994 16 15 31
et al.
(2012) Fig. 8 Evolving proportions of global tropical cyclone proportions
(relative to all hurricanes) binned into tropical storms (indicated by 0)
and the five Saffir–Simpson categories over the indicted decades
the North Atlantic in Table 2. Because of the experimental
configuration for these modeling studies, the simulated 1998). This leads to a suggested causal chain: global
changes contained no contribution from internal variability. warming provides conditions generally more conducive to
intensification through longer periods spent in favorable
3.4.4 Comparison with extreme value analysis conditions, with more rapid intensification rates (in
agreement with Kishtawal et al. 2012); the increased
The generally agreed expected increase in overall tropical intensification rate enables some weaker hurricanes to
cyclone intensity with global warming is around 5 % per reach higher intensities; the constraint to the maximum
C, or an increase of around 2–3 m s-1 (Emanuel 1987; intensity cap then results in a developing bimodal distri-
Henderson-Sellers et al. 1998; Knutson et al. 2010). It is bution with a secondary peak the Cat 4 level.
often assumed that this means negligible change in hur-
ricane extremes, but this can easily be shown to be 3.4.5 Where is the limit?
incorrect by fitting an extreme distribution to the tropical
cyclone PDF and examining the changes in extremes One curious feature of the observed changes has been their
resulting from small bulk changes. For example, by fitting quasi-linear nature (e.g. Fig. 4). Global Cat 4–5 hurricanes
a Weibull distribution to the current tropical cyclone PDF have increased in proportion from *20 % (a third of the
[see Done et al. (2012) for discussion on the method] it proportion of Cat 1–2) in the late 1970’s to be equal to Cat
can readily be shown that a change of 2–3 m s-1 in both 1–2 at *40 %. Obviously this linear increase cannot go on
the mean and standard deviation—similar to the resolution indefinitely as the proportion of Cat 4–5 hurricanes cannot
of the IBTrACS—produces a *20 % increase in the exceed one.
proportion (equivalent to doubling) of Cat 4–5 hurricanes. Table 2 compares the different values and base periods
Such a sensitivity of the extremes to relatively small for the North Atlantic observations with the downscaling
changes in the mean and standard deviation is well known by Bender et al. (2010) and Done et al. (2012). No
and has been emphasized by the IPCC (2012, their adjustment downward was made to the observed Atlantic
Fig. SPM3). trend due to analysis issues since North Atlantic intensity
However, there seems to be much more happening than archives are reasonably accurate over the period (Kossin
the straightforward ‘wagging of the tail’ implied by et al. 2007). When the base period is taken into account, the
extreme value analysis. Rather, the characteristics of the differing increases in column four converge to a remark-
global intensity distribution have changed consistently over ably consistent net increase in Cat 4–5 proportion of
the past 30 years (Fig. 8); an initially purely exponential *30–35 %. This suggests that the North Atlantic may
tail has developed bimodal characteristics with a secondary saturate at 30–35 % proportion of Cat 4–5 hurricanes after
peak at Cat 4 growing consistently from 1965 to the which no further increases with global warming will occur.
present. If true, a further maximum increase in North Atlantic Cat
We hypothesize that this bimodal development arises 4–5 proportion of *10 % from the current level of *25 %
from the bounded nature of the hurricane intensity distri- (Fig. 5b) may be expected.
bution. Since the maximum wind intensity is only expected For the globe the saturation limit may be around
to increase by around 5 % or \5 m s-1 per C of global 40–50 % proportion of Cat 4–5 hurricanes. Figure 9a
warming (e.g. Emanuel 1987; Henderson-Sellers et al. shows the variation with annual mean tropical SST of the
123
Recent intense hurricane
4 Conclusions
123
G. Holland, C. L. Bruyère
Acknowledgments The National Center for Atmospheric Research Holland GJ, Webster PJ (2007) Heightened tropical cyclone activity
is sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and support in the North Atlantic: natural variability or climate trend? Phil
for this work was also provided by the Willis Research Network, the Trans R Soc A 365:2695–2716
Research Program to Secure Energy for America and NSF EASM Hoyos CD, Agudelo PA, Webster PJ, Curry JA (2010) Deconvolution
grant S1048841. We thank James Done, Asuka Suzuki-Parker and of the factors contributing to the increase in global hurricane
Tom Galarneau for helpful discussions, Ming Ge for extracting the intensity. Science 312:94–97
land proximity data, Roger Pielke Jr for providing the Weinkle et al. Hurrell JW, Hack JJ, Shea D, Caron JM, Rosinski J (2008) A new sea
(2012) landfall data, Jerry Meehl and Julie Arblaster for providing the surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the
climate simulation data from Meehl et al. (2004, 2007, 2012), and Jim community atmosphere model. J Clim 21:5145–5153
Kossin and Chris Velden for providing the homogenized satellite IPCC (2007) Fourth Assessment Report, www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/
data. ar4-wg1.htm
IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the advance climate change adaptation. http://ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/,
Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, dis- p 582
tribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original Kishtawal CM, Jaiswal N, Singh R, Niyogi D (2012) Tropical cyclone
author(s) and the source are credited. intensification trends during satellite era (1986–2010). Geophys
Res Lett 39:L10810. doi:10.1029/2012GL051700
Klotzbach PJ (2006) Trends in global tropical cyclone activity over
the past twenty years (1986–2005). Geophys Res Lett 33:
L10805. doi:10.1029/2006GL025881
References Knaff JA, Brown DP, Courtney J, Gallina GM, Beven JL II (2010) An
evaluation of Dvorak technique-based tropical cyclone intensity
Bender MA, Knutson TR, Tuleya RE, Sirutis JJ, Vecchi GA, Garner estimates. Weather Forecast 25:1362–1379. doi:10.1175/2010
ST, Held IM (2010) Modeled impact of anthropogenic warming WAF2222375.1
on the frequency of intense Atlantic hurricanes. Science Knapp KR, Kruk MC, Levinson DH, Diamond HJ, Neumann CJ
327:454–458 (2010) The international best track archive for climate steward-
Bengtsson L, Hodges KI, Esch M, Keenlyside N, Kornblueh L, Luo ship (IBTrACS). Bull Am Meteor Soc 91:363–376. www.ncdc.
J-J, Yamagata T (2007) How may tropical cyclones change in a noaa.gov/oa/ibtracs/
warmer climate? Tellus 59A:539–561 Knutson TR, Sirutis JJ, Garner ST, Held IM, Tuleya RE (2007)
Bruyère CL, Holland GJ, Towler E (2012) Investigating the use of a Simulation of the recent multidecadal increase of Atlantic
genesis potential index for tropical cyclones in the North hurricane activity using an 18-km-grid regional model. Bull Am
Atlantic Basin. J Clim 25:8611–8626 Meteorol Soc 88:1549–1565
Done JM, Holland GJ, Bruyère CL, Leung LR, Suzuki-Parker A Knutson TR, McBride JL, Chan J, Emanuel K, Holland GJ, Landsea
(2012) Modeling high-impact weather and climate: lessons CW, Held CI, Kossin JP, Srivastava AK, Sugi M (2010) Tropical
from a tropical cyclone perspective. NCAR/TN-490 ? STR, cyclones and climate change. Nat Geosci 3:157–163
p 28. [Available online at http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/ Kossin JP (2012) Personal communication
collections/TECH-NOTE-000-000-000-854] Kossin JP, Knapp KR, Vimont DJ, Murnane RJ, Harper BA (2007) A
Elsner JB (2006) Evidence in support of the climate change-Atlantic globally consistent reanalysis of hurricane variability and trends.
hurricane hypothesis. Geophys Res Lett 33:L16705. doi: Geophys Res Lett 34:L04815. doi:10.1029/2006GL028836
10.1029/2006GL026869 Landsea CW, Harper BA, Hoarau K, Knaff JA (2006) Can we detect
Elsner JB, Kossin JP, Jagger YH (2008) The increasing intensity of trends in extreme tropical cyclones? Science 313:452–454
the strongest tropical cyclones. Nature 455:92–95 Mann M, Emanuel K (2006) Atlantic hurricane trends linked to
Emanuel KA (1987) The dependence of hurricane intensity on climate change. EOS 87:233–241
climate. Nature 326:483–485. doi:10.1038/326483a0 Meehl GA, Washington WM, Ammann CM, Arblaster JM, Wigley
Emanuel KA (2005) Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones TML, Tebaldi C (2004) Combinations of natural and anthropo-
over the past 30 years. Nature 436:686–688 genic forcings in twentieth-century climate. J Clim 17:3721–
Emanuel KA (2007) Environmental factors affecting tropical cyclone 3727
power dissipation. J Clim 20:5497–5509 Meehl GA, Arblaster JM, Tebaldi C (2007) Contributions of natural
Emanuel KA (2008) The Hurricane—climate connection. Bull Am and anthropogenic forcing to changes in temperature extremes
Meteor Soc 89:ES10–ES20 over the United States. Geophys Res Lett 34. doi:10.1029/
Frank WM, Young GS (2007) The interannual variability of tropical 2007GL030948
cyclones. Mon Weather Rev 135:3587–3598. doi:10.1175/MWR Meehl GA, Washington WM, Arblaster JM, Hu A, Teng H, Tebaldi
3435.1 C, Sanderson B, Lamarque JF, Conley A, Strand WG, White JB
Grinsted A, Moore JC, Jevreva S (2012) Homogeneous record of III (2012) Climate system response to external forcings and
Atlantic hurricane surge threat since 1923. Proc Nat Acad Sci. climate change projections in CCSM4. J Clim 25:3661–3683.
Published online before print October 15, 2012. doi:10.1073/ doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00240.1
pnas.1209542109 Oouchi K, Yosimura J, Mizuta R, Kusonoki S, Noda A (2006)
Harper BA, Kepert JD, Ginger JD (2008) Guidelines for converting Tropical cyclone climatology in a global-warming climate as
between various wind averaging periods in tropical cyclone simulated in a 20 km mesh global atmospheric model: frequency
conditions. World Meteorological Organization, TD 1555, p 51. and wind intensity analyses. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 84:259–276.
World Meteorological Organization, Geneva doi:10.2151/jmsj.84.259
Henderson-Sellers A, Zhang H, Berz G, Emanuel K, Gray W, Simpson RH, Rielh H (1981) The hurricane and its impact. Louisiana
Landsea C, Holland G, Lighthill J, Shieh S-L, Webster P, State University Press, Baton Rouge, p 398
McGuffie K (1998) Tropical cyclones and global climate Song J-J, Wang Y, Wu L (2010) Trend discrepancies among three
change: a post-IPCC assessment. Bull Am Meteor Soc 79: best track data sets of western North Pacific tropical cyclones.
19–38 J Geophys Res 115:D12128. doi:10.1029/2009JD013058
123
Recent intense hurricane
Thompson DWJ, Wallace JM, Kennedy JJ, Jones PD (2010) An Webster PJ, Holland GJ, Curry JA, Chang H-R (2005) Changes in
abrupt drop in Northern Hemisphere sea surface temperature tropical cyclone number, duration and intensity in a warming
around 1970. Nature 467:444–447. doi:10.1038/nature09394 environment. Science 309:1844–1846
Vecchi GA, Soden BJ (2007) Effect of remote sea surface temper- Weinkle J, Maue R, Pielke R Jr (2012) Historical global tropical
ature change on tropical cyclone potential intensity. Nature cyclone landfalls. J Clim. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00719.1 (early
450:1066–1070 release)
Velden C, Harper B, Wells F, Beven JL II, Zehr R, Olander T, Wu L, Zhao H (2012) Dynamically derived tropical cyclone intensity
Mayfield M, Guard C, Lander M, Edson R, Avila L, Burton A, changes over the Western North Pacific. J Clim 25:89–98. doi:
Turk M, Kikuchi A, Christian A, Caroff P, McCrone P (2006) 10.1175/2011JCLI4139.1
The Dvorak tropical cyclone intensity estimation technique: a Wu M-C, Yeung K-H, Chang W-L (2006) Trends in western North
satellite-based method that has endured for over 30 years. Bull Pacific tropical cyclone intensity. EOS Trans Am Geophys
Am Meteor Soc 87:1195–1210 Union 87:537–538
123