Summary - Shareholder Participation and Company Meetings
Summary - Shareholder Participation and Company Meetings
Summary - Shareholder Participation and Company Meetings
DESCRIPTION
This study unit deals with provisions of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (hereinafter
referred to as “the Companies Act”) relating to the types and convening of meetings,
voting rights, and the resolutions of meetings of shareholders. It examines the meaning
of these concepts by looking at their relevance and execution in company law.
Learning outcomes
At the end of this study unit you should be able to do the following:
Key concepts
• Company meetings
• Record date
• Proxy
• Special resolution
• Voting rights
A record date refers to the date established under section 59, on which a company
determines the identity of its shareholders and their shareholdings, for the purposes of
the Companies Act. The board of directors must set a record date for the following
purposes:
(i)
Click on the link to read the case Van Zyl v Nuco Chrome Bophuthatswana
(Pty) Ltd 2013 JRD 0453 (GSJ).
Van Zyl v Nuco Chrome Bophuthatswana (Pty) Ltd 2013 JRD 0453 (GSJ)
Proxies
For a better understanding of proxy appointments and the Richard Du Plessis Barry v
Clearwater Estates NPC case, read the following materials.
Read the article below, Madlela V "The Appointment of a Proxy ′At Any Time′
in Terms of Section 58 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008: Richard Du Plessis
Barry v Clearwater Estates NPC [2017] ZASCA 11" PER / PELJ 2019(22).
Madlela
V_Appointment of a Proxy.pdf
This article discusses the appointment of a proxy at any time and articulates the
difference between an alterable and unalterable provision, by analysing the Richard Du
Plessis Barry v Clearwater Estates NPC [2017] ZASCA 11 case.
Click on this link to read the case of Richard Du Plessis Barry v Clearwater
Page 3 of 4
This case heard the application and interpretation of section 58(1) of the Companies
Act regarding a shareholder appointing a proxy at any time.
In this case, the court reaffirmed the exceptional circumstances in which a shareholder
may confront the court to convene a shareholders’ meeting in terms of section 61(12)
of the Companies Act.
Shareholder resolutions
Activity 2.1
Question 1
The shareholders of Injabulo (Pty) Ltd are scheduled to hold a shareholders’ meeting
at 09:00 at the company’s head office. Injabulo (Pty) Ltd has 20 shareholders. At 10:00,
11 shareholders are present at the meeting. They are able to exercise in aggregate 24
per cent of all the voting rights that are entitled to be exercised in respect of the matters
to be decided at the meeting.
Two of the shareholders of the company have indicated to the chairperson that they will
attend the meeting, but are delayed in traffic due to bad weather. These two
shareholders each hold two per cent of the voting rights in Injabulo (Pty) Ltd.
The chairperson of the board of directors approaches you, as the secretary of the
company, for legal advice on whether the shareholders’ meeting may proceed. With
Page 4 of 4
reference to appropriate authority, advise the chairperson of the board of directors, and
indicate the options available to him in these circumstances.
Reflection activity