Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views4 pages

Manifestation and Motion

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 4

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

THIRD JUDICIAL REGION


Municipal Trial Court
San Ildefonso, Bulacan

LESLIE LEGARDA SO, ROLANDO


DALIDA and LEONARDO M. REAL,
Plaintiffs,

CIVIL CASE NO. 718


-versus- For: Forcible Entry and
Damages

TRANQUILINO REYES, JENNILYN


SALVADOR, DOMINGO YABUT,
ROLANDO DURAN, RENATO D.
CRUZ, DONALD ENRIQUEZ,
CAMAEL B. CRUZ, MARIO
ENRIQUEZ, CATALINA BORJA,
ZENAIDA E. SORIANO, GREGORIO
V. SALVADOR and all persons claiming
rights under them,
Defendants.
x------------------------------------------------x

MANIFESTATION AND MOTION

Plaintiff Rolando Dalida says:

1. On 22 September 2022 herein plaintiff attended the schedule


preliminary conference, sans counsel, considering that right to counsel is a
personal right and the same is waivable.

2. That during the scheduled no defendants appeared including their


counsel. Likewise, defendants did not file their preliminary conference brief
despite the issuance of an order directing them to submit the same as early as
18 February 2022.

3. That both non-appearance at the preliminary conference and failure


to submit preliminary conference brief shall merit the same sanction, “the
plaintiff shall be entitled to judgment in accordance with Section a of the
Rule1 Sections 9, 10, 11, and 12 of sail Rule Provides:

“Section 9. Effect of failure to answer. - Should the defendant fail to


answer the complaint within the period provided, the court, on its own
initiative, or upon manifestation by the plaintiff that the period for
filing an answer has already lapsed. Shall render judgment as may be
warranted by the facts alleged in the complaint and its attachments,
limited to what is prayed for therein.

1
A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC
Section 10. Preliminary Conference; notice. - Within five (5) calendar
days after the last responsive pleading is filed, the Branch Clerk of
Court shall issue a Notice of Preliminary Conference, which shall be
held within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of filing of such last
responsive pleading. The rules on pre-trial under Rule 18 of the 2019
Amendments to the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure shall be applicable
to the Preliminary Conference, unless inconsistent.

The Notice of Preliminary Conference shall include the dates


respectively set for:

a) Preliminary Conference (within 30 calendar days from filing of the


last responsive pleading);
b) Court-Annexed Mediation (within an inextendible period of 30
calendar days from the date of referral for mediation); and
c) Judicial Dispute Resolution, in the court’s discretion (within an
inexptendible period of 15 calendar days from notice of failure of the
Court-Annexed Mediation).

Non-appearance at any of the foregoing setting shall be deemed as


non-appearance at the Preliminary Conference and shall merit the same
sanctions under Section 12 of this Rule.

Section 11. Preliminary Conference Brief. - The parties shall file with
the court and serve on the adverse party in such a way as to ensure
receipt, at least three (3) calendar days before the scheduled
Preliminary Conference, their respective Preliminary Conference
Briefs, which shall contain, among others;

a) A Summary of admitted facts;


b) A summary of disputed facts and proposals for stipulations on the same;
c) A statement of factual and legal issues; and
d) A list of testimonial, object, and other documentary evidence offered in
support of the party’s c;aims or defenses, and their marking, if any.

Failure to submit a Preliminary Conference brief within the period


given shall merit the same sanction as non-appearance at the
Preliminary Conference.

Section 12. Appearance at Preliminary Conference. - It shall be the


duty of the parties and their counsel to appear at the Preliminary
Conference, Court-Annexed Mediation, and Judicial Dispute
Resolution, if the latter is ordered by the court. The non-appearance of a
party and/or counsel may be excused only for acts of God, force
majeure, or duly substantiated physical inability.”

4.

PRAYER
Premises considered, it is respectfully prayed that judgment be rendered in
this case against all the defendants except defendant Domingo Yabut and Camael
B. Cruz who filed their Answer pursuant to Section 6 of the Revised Rule on
Summary Procedure and Section 7 Rule 70 of the Revised Rules of Court.
Likewise, the Answer of non-parties to this case shall be expunged from the
records and an alias summons be issued against defendant Rolando Duran who
was not served by summons issued by the Honorable Court.

Other measures of relief are likewise prayed for.

Antipolo City for San Ildefonso, Bulacan.


March 24, 2022.

LEONARDO M. REAL
Plaintiff/Attorney-In-Fact

NOTICE OF HEARING

THE CLERK OF COURT


Municipal Trial Court
San Ildefonso, Bulacan

TRANQUILINO REYES
JENNILYN SALVADOR
RENATO D. CRUZ
DONALD ENRIQUEZ
MARIO ENRIQUEZ
CATALINA BORJA
ZENAIDA E. SORIANO
GREGORIO V. SALVADOR
Defendants

Sir/Madam:

Please submit the foregoing Motion To Render Judgment With Motion To Issue
Alias Summons for consideration and approval of this Honorable Court on 01 April
2022 at 9:00 AM.

LMR

Copy furnished:

TRANQUILINO REYES
JENNILYN SALVADOR
RENATO D. CRUZ
DONALD ENRIQUEZ
MARIO ENRIQUEZ
CATALINA BORJA
ZENAIDA E. SORIANO
GREGORIO V. SALVADOR
Brgy. Gabihan,
San Ildefonso, Bulacan

EXPLANATION

Copy of the foregoing With Motion To Render Judgment With Motion To Issue
Alias Summons is being served to the opposing parties by registered mail/LBC for lack
of messenger to deliver the same. The Honorable Court’s understanding and
consideration is respectfully requested.

LMR

VERIFICATION

I, LEONARDO M. REAL, of legal age, Filipino after having been duly


sworn in accordance with the law hereby depose and say that I am one of the
plaintiffs and the Attorney-in-fact of the of co-plaintiffs in the above–titled case,
which caused the preparation of the foregoing pleading and that the allegation
therein are true and correct of my personal knowledge and belief based on the
authentic documents in my possession.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ___ day of


March 2022 at Antipolo City.

LEONARDO M. REAL
Affiant
ID No. 0062403
Issued by PRC

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me in the City of Antipolo this ____ day
of March 2022, personally known to me, who is the same person who personally
signed before me the foregoing complaint and acknowledged that he executed the
same.

Doc No. _______


Page No. ______
Book No. _____
Series of 2022.

You might also like