Anderson 2017 Thinking CAP
Anderson 2017 Thinking CAP
Anderson 2017 Thinking CAP
Thinking CAP
Jason Anderson describes the importance of context in a best practice teaching model.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
I
40%
30%
20%
10%
0% I
Then, in the late 1990s, there was a teacher education courses such as the important part of new language in global
fairly sudden change to the use of Trinity CertTESOL and the Cambridge coursebooks since Headway, Strategies,
extensive texts to provide context (see CELTA: 'new language from a text', and and even before. Analysis of L.G.
Figure 1), a change that passed largely typically involves several stages: Alexander's very popular coursebooks
unnoticed. While Headway had typically from the 1960s (e.g. Practice and
introduced new language at the start 1. Learners discuss the topic of the Progress; Developing Skills, both from
of the unit, and used texts afterwards text to build background schemata, 1967) shows that these too, in almost
to provide receptive skills practice of and possibly learn any important every unit, provide an 'extensive text'
the new language, coursebooks such vocabulary relating to the topic/text. context, after which a 'Key Structures'
as Cutting Edge (1998) and English File section focuses in on potential new
2. Learners read or listen to the text,
(1999), began to provide receptive skills language features in the text. Not only
usually twice for global and detailed
practice before the language analysis, is 'New language from a text' pre-
comprehension.
using texts that included examples of communicative, but context has been
the new language. This may be due to 3. Learners notice the new language in part of the language classroom for over
the influence of Schmidt's (1990: 129) the text. 50 years.
'noticing hypothesis', which posited
4. Learners analyse the new language,
that 'noticing is the necessary and
sufficient condition for converting
typically for meaning, form and CAP (Context, analysis,
input to intake' or the influence of
pronunciation. practice)
Krashen's (e.g. 1982) Input hypothesis 5. Learners practise the new language, Hopefully the above discussion
that emphasised the importance of typically in controlled (first) and demonstrates clearly that context is
'exposure' to the target language before then freer practice activities. a central part of how we typically
production. But wherever the influence introduce new language in
6. Learners receive feedback,
came from, it persisted, and we can see contemporary ELT. Yet where exactly
especially correction, on their
that coursebooks since the turn of the is it in the three-stage models that we
performance during the freer
century have mainly used extensive text often use to help us structure new
practice stage.
contexts to introduce new language. language lessons? Models such as PPP
While my research focused on the most (Presentation, Practice, Production)
A more fundamental
popular mainstream global coursebooks and ESA (Engage, Study, Activate) fail
used in adult classrooms, I also looked
finding of the research to mention Context, either in the names
at more localised coursebooks used in Aside from the noticeable change of the stages or their more detailed
secondary classrooms in Europe, Asia described above, Figure 1 reveals description in the methodology books
and South America, and saw similar something perhaps even more important where they originate (Byrne, 1976;
things happening. than the type of context provided, Harmer, 1998). It is for this reason
and this is simply the prevalence of that I have recently begun to use the
context in all the coursebooks sampled. following simple model, in my writings
New language from a text
Contrary to early criticisms of Headway for teacher education (e.g. Anderson,
The lesson type that this change to from the 1990s, it did provide context, 201 7a; 201 7b) and also on pre-service
'text-first' teaching espoused has even albeit an ostensibly visual one. With just courses. It's a model that emphasises
developed its own name on pre-service a few exceptions, context has been an the importance of context to help us to
plan effectively for its integration in new
The context for the new language is established. This may involve the use language lessons. It consists of three
of a text (e.g. listening, reading, video), a situation (in the classroom, on stages: Context, Analysis, Practice, with
Context the board using pictures, etc.), or the learners (e.g. through a an optional fourth stage, Evaluation, as
conversation). shown in Figure 2.
learners notice the new language in the context and they analyse its
Analysis features (e.g. meaning, form, pronunciation, use, text structure) . This may CAP is intended as a descriptive,
involve teacher-led elicitation, guided discovery, text reconstruction, etc. integrated skills model, with receptive
Learners practise using the new language. This may include controlled (e.g. skills (reading and listening) early on
Practice a drill or a gap-fill) and free practice (e.g. a role play, letter or discussion) of in the lesson, and productive skills
the new language, using e ither speaking or writing activities. (speaking and writing) towards the end.
In my description of the stages, I have
.
;--------------------- --- ~-------- - -T- rhi~- ~~v ·i· ~- :;~-1~~ -t~~;;h·~-~ -i~~cib~-~k -t~- i~~~~~~~ -~~ -th~i~- µ~;.t~-~~~~~~- i~- ~ ------ been careful not to prescribe whether
i I . l speaking activity, or feedback on a text they have produced, including images, texts or situations should be
!: Eva uat1on :! praise,
. suggestions
. an d correction.
- .ve 1y, 1earners can se If-eva 1uate
Al ternat1 used to build context, careful not to
prescribe whether analysis should be
!____________________________________ _!_ _~~-~~~~---~-~-~~~~~~-~~~-~-~~~-~~-~~-~~-~~~~~···----·----------------·-------------------------------·- inductive (e.g. discovery learning) or
Figure 2: The CAP/CAPE model deductive (e.g. teacher explanation)