Catalysts 09 00342
Catalysts 09 00342
Catalysts 09 00342
Article
Perovskite-type LaFeO3: Photoelectrochemical
Properties and Photocatalytic Degradation of
Organic Pollutants Under Visible Light Irradiation
Mohammed Ismael and Michael Wark *
Institute of Chemistry, Chemical Technology 1, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg,
Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 9-11, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; mohammed.ismael1980@gmail.com
* Correspondence: michael.wark@uni-oldenburg.de; Tel.: +49-441-798-3675
Received: 15 February 2019; Accepted: 3 April 2019; Published: 8 April 2019
1. Introduction
Semiconductor-based catalysis is a green technology, which gained considerable attention owing
to its potential environmental applications, such as wastewater treatment, air purification and
degradation of different organic contaminants [1–3]. In the past few decades, titanium dioxide
(TiO2 ) as an n-type semiconductor has an attractive extensive interest as photocatalysts because of
its easy availability, inertness, low costs, nontoxicity and chemical stability [4]. However, the large
band gap energy for TiO2 (3.0–3.2 eV), requiring UV light that occupies around 5% of solar energy
for excitation, limits its applications to a great extent [5]. Another difficulty is the high recombination
rate of the photoexcited electron-hole pairs in TiO2 [6]. Many attempts have been developed to retard
this electron-hole recombination and to increase the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2 , such as surface
modification using a suitable metal ion and nonmetal dopant to increase the visible light absorbance
and coupling with another semiconductor to enhance the charge separation efficiency [7,8]. Although
in some cases improved photocatalytic activities were reported, very often the doping increased the
number of structural defects acting as unwanted recombination centers. Therefore, the development of
cost-effective, efficient and alternative photocatalysts with intrinsic narrow band gaps to increase the
visible light response has become a research focus [9,10]. Mixed metal oxides and oxynitrides attracted
interest since many of them are visible-light active, cheap, non-toxic and stable [11].
Iron is highly abundant in the earth crust and thus cheap. Many mixed metal oxides containing
iron, i.e., ferrites, offer suitable band gap energy for visible light absorption. Furthermore, the position
of their valence band edges is more positive than the oxidation potential of O2 /H2 O (1.23 V vs.
NHE) rendering them suitable for the photooxidation of water [12]. The high activity of ferrites for
degradation of pollutants has been proven in many studies [13–15]. Ferrites with a perovskite structure,
with a general formula of ABO3 with for example, A = rare-earth metal ion and B = Fe3+ ion, exhibit
a wide range of ferro-, piezo-, and pyro-electrical properties rendering them suitable as magneto-optical
material, electrode materials, structural materials, sensors and refractory materials [16]. The perovskite
LaFeO3 is employed as a catalyst, e.g., in solid oxide fuel cells, but also in devices using its good
dielectric properties and high piezoelectricity.
However, LaFeO3 has also been used as a photocatalyst; several studies focused on the synthesis
and the activity for photodegradation of several organic dyes under visible light irradiation [17–19].
Thirumalairajan et al. synthesized floral-like LaFeO3 by a surfactant-assisted hydrothermal technique
and found that the porous floral nanostructure led to higher photoactivity compared to bulk LaFeO3
for the degradation of different dyes, such as rhodamine B (RhB) and methylene blue (MB) [20]. Su et
al. prepared large surface area nanosized LaFeO3 particles by employing SBA-16 as a hard template
and compared its visible light activity for RhB degradation with that of LaFeO3 prepared by the citric
acid assisted sol-gel route [21]. Yang et al. prepared LaFeO3 by conventional co-precipitation and
enhanced its activity by post-treatment in molten salt [22]. Tijare et al. [23] formed nano-crystalline
LaFeO3 perovskite by the sol-gel route and claimed activity for photocatalytic hydrogen generation
under visible light irradiation.
In the present work, we applied the same synthetic route for LaFeO3 as Tijare et al. but altered
(i) the duration of the thermal treatment and (ii) used a pyrolysis step at 400 ◦ C instead of using
ultra-sonication or drying at 90 ◦ C in an oven. Citric acid assisted sol-gel was chosen as a synthesis route
because, in general, it is a suitable method for the synthesis of nanopowders with a well-developed
high specific surface area obtained at low calcination temperature and short times without employing
expensive sacrificial structure-directing agents or template structures. The visible light activity for
degradation of RhB and 4-chlorophenol (4-CP) as model organic pollutants was investigated. As for
Tijare et al., we also attempted hydrogen generation, however, failed with that and suspected it was
based on the Mott-Schottky plots calculating band positions that the conduction band edge of LaFeO3
was too positive than the reduction potential of H2 /H2 O (0 V vs. NHE) to create electrons which were
reductive enough to react with protons to hydrogen.
grains. The average crystallite sizes of LaFeO3 D have been determined by using the Debye-Scherer
formula [25]:
Kλ
Catalysts 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW D= 3 of 15
Catalysts 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW βcosθ 3 of 15
Figure
Figure2 22shows
shows the
showsthe scanning electron
thescanning
scanning micrographs of
electronmicrographs
micrographs the prepared
prepared LaFeO
LaFeO3 samples
samplesatat different
Figure electron ofofthe
the prepared LaFeO samples
33
atdifferent
different
calcination temperatures.
calcination temperatures. Scanning
temperatures. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to determine the
calcination Scanningelectron
electronmicroscopy (SEM)(SEM)
microscopy was usedwasto used
determine the morphology
to determine the
morphology of
of the perovskite the perovskite LaFeO 3 samples; as seen in Figure 2 both samples show a network
morphology of theLaFeO 3 samples;
perovskite LaFeO as3 samples;
seen in Figure 2 both
as seen samples
in Figure showsamples
2 both a networkshowstructure
a networkwith
structure withmorphology.
semi-spherical semi-spherical
It morphology.
was found that It was
the found
particle sizes that
of the were
S-700 particle sizes of smaller
significantly S-700 were
than
structure with semi-spherical morphology. It was found that the particle sizes of S-700 were
significantly
those of S-900, smaller than
consistent those
with ofof S-900,
theS-900, consistent
trendconsistent with
of the crystallite the
sizestrend of the
determined crystallite
from XRD. sizes determined
significantly smaller than those with the trend of the crystallite sizes determined
from XRD.
from XRD.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. SEM
SEM images
images of
of LaFeO
LaFeO33 calcined
calcined at
at different
different temperatures:
temperatures: (a)
(a) S-700,
S-700, (b)
(b) S-900.
S-900.
Figure 2. SEM images of LaFeO3 calcined at different temperatures: (a) S-700, (b) S-900.
Energy
Energy dispersive
dispersive X-ray
X-ray spectroscopy
spectroscopy (EDXS)
(EDXS) waswas used
used toto investigate
investigate thethe purity
purity and chemical
and chemical
Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS) was used to investigate the purity and chemical
composition
composition of of synthesized LaFeO3 nanoparticles,
synthesized LaFeO nanoparticles, the the pattern
pattern of
of calcined LaFeO3 samples
calcined LaFeO samples areare shown
shown
composition of synthesized LaFeO 3 nanoparticles, the pattern of calcined LaFeO3 samples are shown
in Figure 3. Besides a carbon signal appearing at 0.277 keV and resulting from the latex of the SEM
in Figure 3. Besides a carbon signal appearing at 0.277 keV and resulting from the latex of the SEM
insample
Figureholder
3. Besides a carbon signal appearing at 0.277 keV and resulting from the latex of the SEM
sample holder due due to
to the
the incomplete
incomplete coverage
coverage of of the
the sample
sample [25],
[25], only
only lanthanum
lanthanum (La),(La), iron
iron (Fe)
(Fe) and
and
sample
oxygenholder due present,
to the incomplete coverage theofcitric
the sample [25], only lanthanum (La), toiron (Fe)purity
and
oxygen (O)
(O) were
were present, confirming
confirming that
that the citric acid
acid assisted
assisted sol-gel
sol-gel route
route leads
leads to high
high purity
oxygen
LaFeO3(O) were present,The confirming that the citric acid4.65
assisted sol-gelrelated
route to
leads to high
the purity
LaFeO 3 photocatalyst.
photocatalyst. The peaks
peaksatataround
around 0.83
0.83andand 4.65 keV
keV were
were related to La
La and
and the ones
ones at
at
LaFeO 3 photocatalyst. The peaks at around 0.83 and 4.65 keV were related to La and the ones at
around
around 6.399
6.399 and
and 0.704
0.704 keV
keV to
toFe;
Fe;they
theyproved
provedthatthatthe
theformation
formationofofthe theLaFeO
LaFeO photocatalyst
3 3 photocatalyst had
hada
around 6.399 and 0.704 keV to Fe; they proved that the formation of the LaFeO3 photocatalyst had a
1:1 molar ratio of metal ions as the atomic percentage obtained from EDXS was 0.35% for Fe and
1:1 molar ratio of metal ions as the atomic percentage obtained from EDXS was 0.35% for Fe and
0.34% for La in sample S-700 and 1.13% for Fe and 1.21% for La in S-900, respectively.
0.34% for La in sample S-700 and 1.13% for Fe and 1.21% for La in S-900, respectively.
Catalysts 2019, 9, 342 4 of 15
a 1:1 molar ratio of metal ions as the atomic percentage obtained from EDXS was 0.35% for Fe and
0.34% for
Catalysts La9,in
2019, sample
x FOR PEERS-700 and 1.13% for Fe and 1.21% for La in S-900, respectively.
REVIEW 4 of 15
Catalysts 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 15
Figure
Figure 3. 3.Energy
Energydispersive
dispersive X-ray
X-ray (EDX)
(EDX) spectra
spectra of
ofLaFeO
LaFeO3 3atatdifferent calcination
different temperatures
calcination temperatures
Figure 3. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra of LaFeO3 at different calcination temperatures
(S-700, S-900). (S-700, S-900).
(S-700, S-900).
Figure 44 presents
Figure presents the
the IR
IR spectra
spectra ofof different
different LaFeO samples prepared
LaFeO33 samples prepared atat different
different calcination
calcination
Figure 4 presents
temperatures in the the IR spectra
wavenumber range of 400–4000
different cmLaFeO−1 in 3 samples
order to prepared
determine at different
the possible calcination
functional
temperatures in the wavenumber range 400–4000 cm-1-1 in order to determine the possible functional
temperatures
groups inin the in the
the sample.wavenumber
sample. The
The FT-IR range
FT-IR spectra 400–4000
spectra were
were quite cm in order
quite featureless, to determine
featureless, confirming the
confirming again possible
again the functional
the purity
purity ofof the
the
groups
groups in thesamples.
synthesized sample. The
Thepeak
FT-IRatspectra
556 cm −were
1 canquite
be featureless,
attributed to confirming
the Fe–O again the
stretching purity of
vibration the
being
synthesized samples. The peak at 556 cm-1 can be attributed to the Fe–O stretching vibration being
-1
synthesized
characteristicsamples.
of the The octahedrons
the FeO peak at 556 cm in can be attributed to the Fe–O stretching vibration being
−1 can
characteristic of FeO66 octahedrons in perovskite-type
perovskite-type LaFeO LaFeO33 [26].
[26]. The
The band
band at at 716
716cm
cm-1-1 can be
be
characteristic
assigned bendingof the FeO 6
bending vibrations octahedrons
vibrations of
of the in perovskite-type LaFeO 3 [26]. The band− 1 at 716 cm can be
assigned the La-O
La-O bonds
bonds [11];
[11]; the
the small
small peak
peak atat2905
2905cm as well
cm-1-1 as well as
as the
the small
small
assigned
peak at bending
around vibrations
1600 cm of the
−1 resulted La-O
from bonds
small [11];
amounts the small
of citricpeak
acid at 2905 cm
residues, they as well
were as the
accountedsmallto
peak at around 1600 cm-1-1 resulted from small amounts of citric acid residues, they were accounted to
peak at around
C-H vibrations 1600
vibrations and cm
and the resulted
the symmetric from small
symmetric stretching
stretching of amounts
of the of
the carboxyl citric
carboxyl groups, acid residues, they were accounted to
C-H groups, respectively.
respectively.
C-H vibrations and the symmetric stretching of the carboxyl groups, respectively.
The
The specific
specific surface
surface areas
areas of
of the
the synthesized LaFeO
LaFeO333 samples
samples were
were determined
determined from
from aaa nitrogen
The specific surface areas of the synthesized LaFeO
synthesized samples were determined from nitrogen
nitrogen
adsorption-desorption isothermusing
using the BET approach. The isotherms of the samples can be
adsorption-desorption isotherm using the BET approach. The isotherms of the samples can be
adsorption-desorption isotherm the BET approach. The isotherms of the samples can be classified
classified into type III behavior (Figure 5), which is attributed to a weak adsorbate-adsorbent
classified
into type IIIinto type III(Figure
behavior behavior (Figure
5), which 5), which to
is attributed is aattributed to a weak adsorbate-adsorbent
weak adsorbate-adsorbent interaction [27].
interaction [27]. The surface areas decreased with increasing calcination temperature.the Although the
interaction
The surface[27]. The
areas surface areas
decreased with decreased
increasingwith increasing
calcination calcination Although
temperature. temperature. Although the
surface areas
surface areas were in general quite small, the area of S-700 exceeded even slightly the highest value
surface areas were in general quite
were in general quite small, the small, the area of S-700 exceeded even slightly the highest value
area of S-700 exceeded even slightly the highest value reported
reported
by Tijare by Tijare et al.
m2of/g9.5 m22In
/g [23]. In general, higher areas
surface areas facilitated adsorption of
reported by Tijare
et al. et al.
of 9.5 of 9.5 m /g general,
[23]. [23]. In general, higher surface
higher surface areas facilitated
facilitated adsorptionadsorption
of organicof
organic pollutants, promoted chargeseparation
carrier separation and enabled more light harvesting, resulting
organic pollutants,
pollutants, promoted promoted charge carrier separation
charge carrier and enabled
and enabled more
more light light harvesting,
harvesting, resultingresulting
in total
in total photocatalytic
higher photocatalytic
activity.activity.
in total higher photocatalytic
higher activity.
Catalysts 2019, 9, 342 5 of 15
Catalysts2019,
Catalysts 2019,9,9,x xFOR
FORPEER
PEERREVIEW
REVIEW 5 5ofof1515
Figure5.
Figure
Figure 5.5.N
NN adsorption-desorptionisotherms
adsorption-desorption
22 2adsorption-desorption isotherms
isothermsforfor LaFeO
LaFeO
for samples
3 samples
LaFeO and
3 3samples and theresulting
the the
and resulting
resulting BETsurface
BET BET surface
surface areas
areas
of theofof
areas thedifferent
different
the different samples.
samples.
samples.
Diffuse reflectance UV-Vis spectroscopy was employed to characterize the optical properties of the
Diffusereflectance
Diffuse reflectanceUV-Vis
UV-Visspectroscopy
spectroscopywas wasemployed
employedtotocharacterize
characterizethe theoptical
opticalproperties
propertiesofof
LaFeO3 nanoparticles, as shown in Figure 6a. In the perovskite-type oxide, the strong absorption edge
theLaFeO
the LaFeO3 3nanoparticles,
nanoparticles,asasshownshownininFigure
Figure6a.6a.InInthetheperovskite-type
perovskite-typeoxide, oxide,the thestrong
strongabsorption
absorption
at 520 nm was ascribed to the electronic transition from the O 2p orbitals forming the valence band
edge at 520 nm was ascribed to the electronic transition from the O 2p
edge at 520 nm was ascribed to the electronic transition from the O 2p orbitals forming the valence orbitals forming the valence
to the Fe 3d orbitals in the conduction band [28]. The data showed that the sol-gel prepared LaFeO3
bandtotothe
band theFe Fe3d 3dorbitals
orbitalsininthetheconduction
conductionband band[28].[28].The
Thedata
datashowed
showedthat thatthethesol-gel
sol-gelprepared
prepared
photocatalyst could serve as a potential visible-light-driven photocatalyst. In addition, the band gap
LaFeO3 3photocatalyst
LaFeO photocatalystcould couldserve
serveasasaapotential
potentialvisible-light-driven
visible-light-drivenphotocatalyst.
photocatalyst.InInaddition,addition,the the
energy of LaFeO3 catalysts can be determined from Kubelka−Munk equation [29] via a Tauc plot:
band gap energy of LaFeO3 catalysts can be determined from Kubelka−Munk equation [29] via aa
band gap energy of LaFeO 3 catalysts can be determined from Kubelka−Munk equation [29] via
Taucplot:
Tauc plot: n
α = B hv − Eg /hv
αα ==BB(ℎ𝑣 (ℎ𝑣−−𝐸𝐸) ) /ℎ𝑣 /ℎ𝑣
with α being the absorption coefficient, ν the irradiation frequency, Eg the band gap, B being a constant
(being with
with ααbeing
usually being the
the
1 for absorptioncoefficient,
absorption
semiconductors), coefficient,
h is theννPlanck
theirradiation
the irradiation frequency,
constantfrequency, Eg gthe
and n is a Econstant theband
band gap,BBbeing
gap,
depending being
on theaa
constant
constant (being
(being usually
usually 11 for
for semiconductors),
semiconductors), h hisis the
the Planck
Planck constant
constant and
and n
type of semiconductor (direct transition: n = 1/2; indirect transition: n = 2). For the direct transition n is
is a a constant
constant depending
depending
ononthe
thetype
typeofofsemiconductor
semiconductor semiconductor
LaFeO (directtransition:
(direct transition:nn==1/2; 1/2;indirect
indirecttransition:
transition:nn==2). 2).For
Forthe
thedirect
direct
3, the band gap energy values were estimated by extrapolation of the linear part
transition
transition
of the curves semiconductor
semiconductor LaFeO3,3,the
LaFeO
of the Kubelka–Munk the bandgap
band
function gap energy
energy
(αhv) valueswere
values
1/2 against were
the estimated
estimated
photon energy byextrapolation
by extrapolation
(hv), ofofthe
as displayed the
in
linear
linear part
part ofof the
the curves
curves of
of the
the Kubelka−Munk
Kubelka−Munk function
function (αhv)
(αhv) 1/2 against the photon energy (hv), as
1/2 against
Figure 6b. The S-700 sample absorbed slightly more light energy than the other ones showing that the photon energy (hv), as
adisplayed
displayed
decreasing ininFigure
Figure6b.
particle 6b.
size The
The S-700
andS-700 sampleabsorbed
sample
an increased absorbed
surface slightly
slightly
area amore
led tomore light
light
slight energy
redenergy
shift. than thanthetheother
otheronesones
showingthat
showing thataadecreasing
decreasingparticle
particlesize
sizeand
andan anincreased
increasedsurface
surfacearea arealedledtotoaaslight
slightredredshift.
shift.
Figure6.
Figure
Figure 6.6.Kubelka-Munk
Kubelka-Munkdiffuse
Kubelka-Munk diffusereflectance
diffuse reflectance
reflectance UV-Vis
UV-Vis
UV-Vis spectra
spectra (a)and
(a)(a)
spectra and and resulting
resulting band
resulting band gaps
gapsgaps
band from
fromfrom Tauc
TaucTauc
plots
plots(b)
(b)
plotsof (b)ofofthe
the thestudied
studiedstudiedLaFeO
LaFeO LaFeO
3 samples.
samples.
3 3samples.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on the most promising LaFeO3 S-700 to
X-rayphotoelectron
X-ray photoelectronspectroscopy
spectroscopy(XPS)
(XPS)was
wasperformed
performedon onthe
themost
mostpromising
promisingLaFeO
LaFeO3 3S-700
S-700toto
determine the elemental composition and the chemical oxidation state of the sample surface. Figure 7
determinethe
determine theelemental
elementalcomposition
compositionand andthe
thechemical
chemicaloxidation
oxidationstate
stateofofthe
thesample
samplesurface.
surface.Figure
Figure
shows the X-ray photoelectron (XP) survey spectrum (Figure 7a) and the detailed spectra of the La
77shows
showsthe
theX-ray
X-rayphotoelectron
photoelectron(XP)(XP)survey
surveyspectrum
spectrum(Figure
(Figure7a)
7a)and
andthe
thedetailed
detailedspectra
spectraofofthe
theLa
La
3d, Fe 2p and O 1s. In addition to different La, Fe and O lines, Figure 7a shows also the C 1s signal,
3d,Fe
3d, Fe2p
2pand
andOO1s.1s.InInaddition
additiontotodifferent
differentLa,
La,Fe
Feand
andOOlines,
lines,Figure
Figure7a7ashows
showsalso
alsothe
theCC1s1ssignal,
signal,
which resulted from adventitious surface carbon and which was also referenced to a binding energy
whichresulted
which resultedfrom
fromadventitious
adventitioussurface
surfacecarbon
carbonand
andwhich
whichwaswasalso
alsoreferenced
referencedtotoaabinding
bindingenergy
energy
(284.8eV)
(284.8 eV)ininorder
ordertotoexclude
excludesurface
surfacecharge
chargeeffects
effectsfor
forall
allthe
theother
othersignals.
signals.TheThebinding
bindingenergies
energies
Catalysts 2019, 9, 342 6 of 15
X-rayphotoelectron
Figure7.7.X-ray
Figure photoelectronspectroscopy
spectroscopy(XPS)
(XPS)for
forthe
theS-700
S-700sample
samplesurvey
survey(a),
(a),and
andcore
corelevel
levelXPS
XPS
of La 3d (b), Fe 2p (c) and O1s (d).
of La 3d (b), Fe 2p (c) and O1s (d).
In order to investigate the energy band structure including the conduction band (CB) and
In order to investigate the energy band structure including the conduction band (CB) and
valence band (VB) position of LaFeO3 S-700 and S-900 photocatalysts, electrochemical flat potential
valence band (VB) position of LaFeO3 S-700 and S-900 photocatalysts, electrochemical flat potential
measurements were performed, and the resulting data are plotted in Figure 8a,b using the
measurements were performed, and the resulting data are plotted in Figure 8a and b using the Mott–
Mott–Schottky (MS) relation in the dark [34]:
Schottky (MS) relation in the dark [34]:
11 22 𝑘𝑇kT
= E − E
𝐸 − 𝐸 f b−−
C𝐶2 𝜀𝜀 eN
εεОo𝑒𝑁 𝑒e
withwith C being
C being the capacitance
the capacitance of space
of space charge,
charge, 𝜀 the dielectric
ε the dielectric constant,constant, 𝜀О the permittivity
ε o the permittivity of
of free space,
free space, N the electron donor density, E the applied potential and E the
N the electron donor density, E the applied potential and Efb the flat band potential. Plotting 1/C2
fb flat band potential.
Plotting
against E1/C 2 against E yields a straight line from which the slope of the donor density can be
yields a straight line from which the slope of the donor density can be calculated and Efb can
calculated and E
be determined as thefb can intercept
be determined as the intercept
of the abscissa of the abscissa
by extrapolation to C = 0.byTheextrapolation
positive slopes to C of = 0.
theThe
MS
positive slopes of the MS plots confirmed LaFeO 3 being an n-type semiconductor
plots confirmed LaFeO3 being an n-type semiconductor with electrons as the majority charge carriers. with electrons as
the
Themajority
flat bandcharge carriers.
potentials The(Figure
of S-700 flat band potentials
8a) and of S-700
S-900 (Figure 8b)(Figure 8a) andofS-900
at frequencies 100 Hz (Figure 8b) Hz
and 1000 at
frequencies of 100 Hz and 1000 Hz were calculated to be –0.3 and –0.25 V ( E
were calculated to be −0.3 and −0.25 V (EAg/AgCl(sat-KCl) ) referenced to the KCl-saturated Ag/AgCl
Ag/AgCl(sat-KCl) ) referenced
toelectrode,
the KCl-saturated
respectively.Ag/AgCl electrode,
Thus, using respectively.
the following Thus, using the following equation:
equation:
𝐸 =𝐸 / ( )+ 𝐸 / ( ) + 0.059 × 𝑝𝐻
ENHE = E0 Ag/AgCl (sat−KCl ) + E Ag/AgCl (sat−KCl ) + 0.059 × pH
with E0Ag/AgCl(sat-KCl) = 0.199. For the pH value of 5.6 of the 0.1 M Na2SO4 electrolyte solution,
potentials were 0.23 and 0.28 V versus the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) result. For n-type
semiconductors the Efb was strongly related to the bottom of the conduction band (CB); typically, it is
assumed that CB is 0.1 V more negative than Efb [35], resulting in CB edges at about 0.13 V and 0.18 V
vs. NHE, respectively. These values are close to the position of the conduction band edge for YFeO3
Catalysts 2019, 9, 342 7 of 15
with E0 Ag/AgCl(sat-KCl) = 0.199. For the pH value of 5.6 of the 0.1 M Na2 SO4 electrolyte solution,
potentials were 0.23 and 0.28 V versus the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) result. For n-type
semiconductors the Efb was strongly related to the bottom of the conduction band (CB); typically, it is
assumed that CB is 0.1 V more negative than Efb [35], resulting in CB edges at about 0.13 V and 0.18 V
Catalysts
vs. NHE, 2019, 9, x FOR PEERThese
respectively. REVIEW
values are close to the position of the conduction band edge for YFeO 7 of 15
3
calculated by Ismael et al. [36]. The slightly positive CB potential explains that the LaFeO3 was not
calculated
able to formbyhydrogen
Ismael etviaal. water
[36]. The slightly
splitting positive
under lightCB potential This
irradiation. explains that the LaFeO
was confirmed 3 was not
by respective
able to form hydrogen via water splitting under light irradiation. This was
experiments attempting photocatalytic H2 formation with our LaFeO3 samples on which platinum confirmed by respective
experiments attempting
nanoparticles (0.5 wt. %, photocatalytic
particle size <2Hnm)2 formation with our LaFeO3 samples on which platinum
were photodeposited as a co-catalyst. Even by the use
nanoparticles (0.5 wt. %, particle size <2 nm)
of light with λ ≥ 320 nm and methanol as a sacrificial were photodeposited as a co-catalyst.
agent, no hydrogen Evenwith
was detected by the
all use
the
of light with λ ≥ 320 nm and methanol as a sacrificial agent, no hydrogen was detected
Pt/LaFeO3 samples. This result stands in contrast to H2 formation reported earlier by Tijare et al. [23], with all the
Pt/LaFeO 3 samples. This result stands in contrast to H2 formation reported earlier by Tijare et al. [23],
Parida et al. [37] and Vaiano et al. [38], who, however, performed no analysis on conduction band
Parida et al.
positions. [37]some
Thus, and Vaiano et al. [38], the
doubts regarding who,H2however,
production performed
reported no analysis
in their on exist.
papers conduction band
positions.
Xu et Thus,
al. [39] some doubts
reported regarding
hydrogen the H2 production
production reported
activity over in their
a LaFeO papers exist.
3 /g-C3 N4 composite in the
Xu et al. [39] reported hydrogen production activity over a LaFeO3/g-C3N4 composite in the
presence of TEOA as a sacrificial reagent and Pt as a co-catalyst. Their results show that LaFeO3 alone
presence
had of TEOA
no activity as the
due to a sacrificial reagent and
positive conduction Pt edge
band as a co-catalyst. Their results
(0.11 V); hydrogen was onlyshow that
found LaFeO
if g-C 3
3 N4
alone had no activity due to the positive conduction band edge (0.11 V); hydrogen was only found if
(conduction band potential at −0.85 V vs. NHE) was added, which is in agreement of our results.
g-C3N4 (conduction
Hydrogen production band
waspotential
observedatfor–0.85
otherV ferrites,
vs. NHE) wasasadded,
such CuFe2 O which is in agreement of our
4 and NiFe2 O4 ; for those the
results. Hydrogen production was observed for other ferrites, such as CuFe2O4 and NiFe2O4; for
conduction band positions were found to be negative enough [40,41].
those the conduction band positions were found to be negative enough [40,41].
By taking into account the band gap energies of our LaFeO3 samples from the Tauc plots
By taking into account the band gap energies of our LaFeO3 samples from the Tauc plots (Figure
(Figure 6b), the valence band (VB) positions for S-700 and S-900 can be calculated according to
6b), the valence band (VB) positions for S-700 and S-900 can be calculated according to the
the equation Evb = Ecb + Eg [42], resulting in about Evb = 2.51 V and 2.68 V respectively.
equation 𝐸 = 𝐸 + 𝐸 [42], resulting in about Evb = 2.51 V and 2.68 V respectively.
Figure 8. Mott-Schottky
Figure 8. Mott-Schottkyplots
plotsatat100
100HzHzandand1 kHz of (a)
1 kHz of S-700 and and
(a) S-700 (b) S-900, (c) Nyquist
(b) S-900, plots of
(c) Nyquist S-700
plots of
and S-900 in 0.1 M Na SO (pH = 5.6) at 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl and (d) transient photocurrent
S-700 and S-900 in 0.12 M4 Na2SO4 (pH = 5.6) at 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl and (d) transient photocurrent responses
in 0.1 M Nain2 SO
responses /0.1
0.14M NaM Na2 SOM
2SO4/0.1 3 solution
Na2SO3 (pH = 5.6)
solution under
(pH white
= 5.6) underLED illumination.
white LED illumination.
charge carrier mobility and separation [43,44]. Figure 8d indicates the transient photocurrent responses
of S-700 and S-900. The photocurrent of S-700 sample was much higher than that of S-900 indicating the
greatly improved charge transfer and separation ability [45,46]. The onset potential of the photocurrent
indicates the flat band potential of the electrode [47]. In this case, the sulfate/sulfite electrolyte solution
lowered the kinetic barrier for charge transport by trapping the photogenerated holes. Moreover,
the onset of the photocurrent lies at about 0.2 V vs. NHE for S-700, being in good agreement with the
flat band
Catalysts potential
2019, obtained
9, x FOR PEER from the Mott-Schottky plot.
REVIEW 8 of 15
Figure 9. (a) UV-Vis spectra for the degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) under visible light irradiation
Figure 9. (a) UV-Vis spectra for the degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) under visible light irradiation
(λ ≥ 420 nm) on the LaFeO3 S-700 sample ([RhB] = 10−5 M, catalyst weight = 0.1 g) at 25 ◦ C.
(λ ≥ 420 nm) on the LaFeO3 S-700 sample ([RhB] = 10-5 M, catalyst weight = 0.1 g) at 25 °C. (b)
(b) Degradation of RhB as a function of irradiation time with visible light (λ ≥ 420 nm) in the presence
Degradation of RhB as a function of irradiation time with visible light (λ ≥ 420 nm) in the presence of
of different LaFeO3 catalysts or SnO2 for comparison.
different LaFeO3 catalysts or SnO2 for comparison.
The degradation of RhB obeys a pseudo-first-order kinetics law of the type [50]:
The degradation of RhB obeys a pseudo-first-order kinetics law of the type [50]:
ln c /c = kt
ln 𝑐 0⁄𝑐 t = 𝑘𝑡
withwith c0 being
c0 being the initial
the initial concentration
concentration of RhB,of RhB,
ct the ct the concentration
concentration of RhB at of
anyRhB
timeatt,any
t thetime t, t the
illumination
illumination time (min) and k is the first order rate −constant
1 (min -1). Figure 10 shows the linear
time (min) and k is the first order rate constant (min ). Figure 10 shows the linear relationships
relationships between ln(c0/ct) and t, the rate constant for S-700, S-750, S-850 and S-900 were 0.0062,
0.0032, 0.0026 and 0.0013 min-1, respectively.
In general, it is known that the photocatalytic degradation reaction of organic contaminants
proceeds mainly by the contribution of oxygen-containing reactive species such as superoxide (.O2-)
and hydroxyl radicals (.OH) [51,52]. Thus, in order to explore the reactive species for RhB
degradation different scavengers were tested in the photocatalytic process. The hydroxylation test
Catalysts 2019, 9, 342 9 of 15
between ln(c0 /ct ) and t, the rate constant for S-700, S-750, S-850 and S-900 were 0.0062, 0.0032,
0.0026 and 0.0013 min−1 , respectively.
In general, it is known that the photocatalytic degradation reaction of organic contaminants
proceeds mainly by the contribution of oxygen-containing reactive species such as superoxide (. O2 − )
and hydroxyl radicals (. OH) [51,52]. Thus, in order to explore the reactive species for RhB degradation
different scavengers were tested in the photocatalytic process. The hydroxylation test was done using
terephthalic acid (TA) as a probe molecule, in this test TA reacts with OH to produce highly fluorescent
Catalysts 2019, 9, x FOR PEER
2-hydroxyterepthalic REVIEW
acid (fluorescence maximum at 426 nm [53]). 9 of 15
photocatalytic activities.
Figure
Figure 11.
11. (a) Fluorescence
Fluorescencespectra
spectraofof
thethe 2-hydroxyterepthalic
2-hydroxyterepthalic acidacid solution
solution in theinpresence
the presence of3
of LaFeO
Catalysts
LaFeO3 S-700 and (b) the reactive species in trapping experiments during the degradation of RhB. 10 of 15
2019,
S-700 and9, x(b)
FORthePEER REVIEW
reactive species in trapping experiments during the degradation of RhB.
Figure
Figure 12 12 shows
shows that
that the
the LaFeO
LaFeO33 S-700
S-700 was
was not not only
only able
able to
to degrade
degrade dyesdyes like
like RhB
RhB under
under
visible-light
visible-light irradiation
irradiation at
at λ >> 420
420 nm,
nm, but
but also
also compounds
compounds like like 4-CP
4-CP which
which does
does not
not absorb
absorb lights
lights
themselves in that spectral range. Thus, a light-induced self-degradation can be
themselves in that spectral range. Thus, a light-induced self-degradation can be ruled out. With LaFeO ruled out. With3
LaFeO
S-700 the degradation efficiency on 4-CP was lower than that on RhB, but still more than 60% of60%
3 S-700 the degradation efficiency on 4-CP was lower than that on RhB, but still more than the
of
4-CPthewere
4-CPtransformed
were transformed by destroying
by destroying the aromatic
the aromatic ringwhich
ring system, system, which is responsible
is responsible for the
for the absorption
absorption at 315 nm,
at 315 nm, which was which
recorded wasandrecorded
followed and followed
with time inwith time12.
Figure inInFigure
a HPLC 12. analysis
In a HPLC analysis
performed
performed with mixture
with the reaction the reaction
after 5mixture after 5 hours
h of illumination, of illumination,
no significant amountsno significant amounts
of decomposition of
products
decomposition
were found. Totalproducts were found.
organic content Total organic
(TOC) analysis after fivecontent (TOC) analysis
hours illumination after fivethehours
time confirmed 4-CP
illumination
degradation;time confirmed
a reduction theTOC
of the 4-CPbydegradation;
55% was found. a reduction of the3 TOC
Our LaFeO by 55% was
photocatalyst found.
showed Our
higher
LaFeO
activity3 photocatalyst showedcompared
for 4-CP degradation higher activity
to that for 4-CP degradation
reported by Pirzada etcompared
al. [59] andtoHuthat reported
et al. [60]. by
Pirzada et al. [59] and Hu et al. [60].
Figure
Figure 12.
12. Degradation
Degradation ofof 4-CP
4-CP as
as aa function
function of
of irradiation
irradiation time
time without
without aa photocatalyst
photocatalyst and
and in
in the
the
presence of the LaFeO33 catalyst S-700.
presence of the LaFeO catalyst S-700.
3. Experimental
3. Experimental
3.1. Materials
3.1. Materials
All the reactants were commercial products. Iron (III) nitrate nonahydrate (Fe(NO3 )3 ·9H2 O, 99%),
citric acidthe
All (C6reactants were
H8 O7 , 99%) andcommercial
lanthanumproducts. Iron
(III) nitrate (III) nitrate
hexahydrate nonahydrate
(La(NO (Fe(NO3)39H2O,
3 )3 ·6H2 O, 99.999%) were
99%), citricfrom
purchased acid Sigma-Aldrich.
(C6H8O7, 99%) and lanthanum (III)
4-chlorophenol nitrate
(4-CP, ClC6hexahydrate
H4 OH, ≥99%) (La(NO 3)36H2O, 99,999%)
and Rhodamine B (RhB,
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 4-chlorophenol (4-CP, ClC 6H4OH, ≥99%) and Rhodamine B
C28 H31 ClN2 O3 ) were bought from Merck. All chemicals were analytically pure and were used as
(RhB, C28without
received H31ClN2O 3) were bought from Merck. All chemicals were analytically pure and were used
further purification. Deionized water (>18 MΩ cm) obtained from a Sartorius water
as received without
purification system was further
usedpurification.
during the Deionized water procedure
whole synthetic (>18 MΩ cm) obtained
to prepare thefrom a Sartorius
required metal
water purification
ion solutions. system was used during the whole synthetic procedure to prepare the required
metal ion solutions.
3.3. Characterization
The crystalline phase and size of the obtained LaFeO3 nanoparticles were checked with
a Empyrean theta-theta X-ray diffraction system (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) operating
with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.540598 nm) at 40 kV and 40 mA in the 2θ range of 20–80◦ .
The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas were calculated from nitrogen adsorption-desorption
isotherms measured on a Tri Star II (Micromeritics GmbH, Aachen, Germany). All the samples were
degassed at 150 ◦ C overnight prior to the adsorption measurements.. The diffuse reflectance spectra
(DRS) and UV-Vis absorption spectra of the dye solutions were measured with a Varian Cary 4000
(Mulgrave, Australia). This spectrometer could also be equipped with an Ulbricht sphere allowing
the recording of UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) in the region 200–800 nm using the white
standard MgO as a reference. The photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded using a Varian Cary
Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer (Mulgrave, Australia) at room temperature, with excitation
by incident light of 380 nm. The Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) were recorded using
a Bruker FT-IR Tensor 27 Spectrometer with a platinum ATR unit. The morphology of the prepared
samples and the content of the elements were studied using scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi,
S-3200N, Krefeld, Germany) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX Oxford INCAx-act,
Abingdon, UK), respectively. Since the photocatalytic properties of the LaFeO3 strongly depend on
the surface chemical state of the samples this was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS) with an ESCALAB 250 Xi (Thermo Fisher, East Grinstead, UK) equipped with a monochromatic
Al Kα X-ray source (hν = 1486.6 eV) as the excitation source under ultrahigh vacuum conditions.
The high-resolution spectra for the C 1s, O 1s, La 3d and Fe 2p photoelectron lines were recorded
with a bandpass energy of 20 eV and a step size of 0.1 eV. The spectra were analyzed using Avantage
software (version 5.951). Binding energies in the high-resolution spectra were calibrated by setting the
C 1s signal to 284.8 eV. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), photocurrent measurement
and Mott Schottky plots were performed on an IM6e potentiostat (Zahner Elektrik, GmbH, Kronach,
Germany) and evaluated with the Thales (version 4.12) software. A standard three-electrode cell
configuration with Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl), coiled Pt-wire and LaFeO3 coated FTO were used as
the reference, counter and working electrodes, respectively. The working electrodes were prepared
on the conductive fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass slides (Pilkington, Weiherhammer, Germany)
of 2 × 6 cm size, which were sonicated before by applying in a sequence 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M NaOH,
acetone and ethanol in an ultrasonic bath, then rinsed with deionized water and dried in an air stream.
Then 0.1 g of the respective LaFeO3 sample was dispersed in 500 µl of ethanol in an ultrasonic bath for
30 min and 200 µl of the obtained suspension were coated on the FTO glass substrate using the doctor
blade method. Finally, the FTO substrate was dried in a furnace for 30 min at 353 K and calcined for 3 h
at 873 K. An electrolyte 0.1 M Na2 SO4 aqueous solution was used for the Mott-Schottky measurements
and a 0.1 M Na2 SO4 /0.1 M Na2 SO3 aqueous solution was used as the supporting electrolyte for
photocurrent and electrochemical impedance measurements, respectively.
Catalysts 2019, 9, 342 12 of 15
4. Conclusions
A perovskite-type LaFeO3 photocatalyst was synthesized using the quite simple citric acid
assisted sol-gel route. The prepared samples were characterized using different methods. The most
photocatalytically active sample for decomposition of RhB and 4-CP under visible light was the one
calcined at the lowest temperature of 700 ◦ C due to the highest surface area and the lowest band
gap energy. At temperatures lower than 700 ◦ C the crystallinity of the LaFeO3 samples was not
sufficient. Mott-Schottky plots revealed a positive potential of the CB at around 0.1 V explaining
the observed inactivity of LaFeO3 for the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution via water splitting and
methanol dehydrogenation. The photocatalytic degradation reaction of the pollutants occurred mainly
via direct reaction of the photogenerated holes, but to some extent especially in the starting period of
the degradation experiments also via superoxide radical formation. To sum up, LaFeO3 is a promising
photocatalytic material for degradation of organic pollutants under visible light irradiation.
Catalysts 2019, 9, 342 13 of 15
Author Contributions: M.I. performed the catalyst preparation, structural and electrochemical characterization
and the photocatalytic test experiments. He also prepared the first draft of the manuscript. This work was carried
out under the supervision of M.W., who also structured the discussion of the data and prepared the final version
of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments: We thank Dereje H. Taffa (University of Oldenburg) for his assistance in recording XP spectra
and fruitful discussions XPS and photoelectrochemical results. Financial support by the Phoenix Scholarship
program (PX14DF0164) for MI, and by the German Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG)
under contracts WA 1116/28-1 and INST 184/154-1 for the X-ray diffractometer are gratefully acknowledged.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Chen, X.; Shen, S.; Guo, L.; Mao, S.S. Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation. Chem. Rev.
2010, 110, 6503–6570. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Hoffmann, R.M.; Martin, T.S.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, W.D. Environmental Applications of Semiconductor
Photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 69–96. [CrossRef]
3. Hu, C.; Hu, X.; Guo, J.; Qu, J. Efficient Destruction of Pathogenic Bacteria with NiO/SrBi2 O4 under Visible
Light Irradiation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5508–5513. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Ng, H.Y.; Lightkap, V.I.; Goodwin, K.; Matsumura, M.; Kamat, V.P. To What Extent Do Graphene Scaffolds
Improve the Photovoltaic and Photocatalytic Response of TiO2 Nanostructured Films? J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
2010, 1, 2222–2227. [CrossRef]
5. Sakthivel, S.; Kisch, H. Daylight Photocatalysis by Carbon-Modified Titanium Dioxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 4908–4911. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Tong, T.; Zhang, J.; Tian, B.; Chen, F.; He, D. Preparation of Fe3+ doped TiO2 catalysts by controlled hydrolysis
of titanium alkoxide and study on their photocatalytic activity for methyl orange degradation. J. Hazard.
Mater. 2008, 155, 572–579. [CrossRef]
7. Xu, J.J.; Ao, H.Y.; Fu, G.D.; Yuan, W.S. Synthesis of Gd-doped TiO2 nanoparticles under mild condition and
their photocatalytic activity. Colloid Surf. A 2009, 334, 107–111. [CrossRef]
8. Dodd, A.; Mckinley, A.; Tsuzuki, T.; Sauners, M. Optical and photocatalytic properties of nanoparticulate
(TiO2 )x (ZnO)1−x powders. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 489, L17–L21. [CrossRef]
9. Dai, K.; Peng, Y.T.; Ke, N.D.; Wei, Q.B. Photocatalytic hydrogen generation using a nanocomposite of
multi-walled carbon nanotubes and TiO2 nanoparticles under visible light irradiation. Nanotechnology 2009,
20, 125603. [CrossRef]
10. Chai, B.; Peng, Y.T.; Zeng, P.; Mao, J. Synthesis of floriated In2 S3 decorated with TiO2 nanoparticles for
efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production under visible light. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 14587–14593.
[CrossRef]
11. Laokiat, L.; Khemthong, P.; Grisdanurak, N.; Sreearunothai, P.; Pattanasiriwisawa, W.; Klysubun, W.
Photocatalytic degradation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) using transition
metal-doped titanium dioxide immobilized on fiberglass cloth. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2012, 29, 377–383.
[CrossRef]
12. Taffa, H.D.; Dillert, R.; Ulpe, C.A.; Bauerfeind, L.C.K.; Bredow, T.; Bahnemann, W.D.; Wark, M.
Photoelectrochemical and theoretical investigations of spinel type ferrites (Mx Fe3-x O4 ) for water splitting:
A mini-review. J. Photon. Energy 2016, 7, 12009. [CrossRef]
13. Su, H.M.; He, C.; Sharma, K.V.; Abou Asi, M.; Xia, D.; Li, Z.X.; Deng, Q.H.; Xiong, Y. Mesoporous zinc
ferrite: Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activity with H2 O2 /visible light. J. Hazard. Mater.
2012, 211–212, 95–103. [CrossRef]
14. Cao, W.S.; Zhu, J.Y.; Cheng, F.G.; Huang, H.Y. ZnFe2 O4 nanoparticles: Microwave-hydrothermal ionic liquid
synthesis and photocatalytic property over phenol. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171, 431–435. [CrossRef]
15. Casbeer, E.; Sharma, K.V.; Li, Z.X. Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of ferrites under visible light.
A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 87, 1–14. [CrossRef]
16. Nakanishi, T.; Masuda, Y.; Koumoto, K. Site-Selective Deposition of Magnetite Particulate Thin Films on
Patterned Self-assembled Monolayers. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 3484–3488. [CrossRef]
17. Juan, X.W.; Yun, H.S.; Yan, H.T.; Hua, Q.Y. Photocatalytic Degradation of Water-Soluble Azo Dyes by LaFeO3
and YFeO3 . Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 465, 37–43.
Catalysts 2019, 9, 342 14 of 15
18. Hou, L.; Sun, G.; Liu, K.; Li, Y.; Gao, F. Preparation, characterization and investigation of catalytic activity of
Li-doped LaFeO3 nanoparticles. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 9–14. [CrossRef]
19. Tang, P.; Fu, M.; Chen, H.; Cao, F. Synthesis of Nanocrystalline LaFeO3 by Precipitation and its Visible-Light
Photocatalytic Activity. Mater. Sci. Forum 2011, 694, 150–154. [CrossRef]
20. Thirumalairajan, S.; Girija, K.; Masteralo, R.V.; Ponpandian, N. Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes
under visible light irradiation by floral-like LaFeO3 nanostructures comprised of nanosheet petals. New J.
Chem. 2014, 38, 5480–5490. [CrossRef]
21. Su, H.; Jing, L.; Shi, K.; Yao, C.; Fu, H. Synthesis of large surface area LaFeO3 nanoparticles by SBA-16
template method as high active visible photocatalysts. J. Nanopart. Res. 2010, 12, 967–974. [CrossRef]
22. Yang, J.; Zhong, H.; Li, M.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y. Markedly enhancing the visible-light photocatalytic activity
of LaFeO3 by post-treatment in molten salt. React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 2009, 97, 269–274. [CrossRef]
23. Tijare, N.S.; Joshi, V.M.; Padole, S.P.; Manguklar, A.P.; Rayalu, S.S.; Labhsetwar, K.N. Photocatalytic hydrogen
generation through water splitting on nano-crystalline LaFeO3 perovskite. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37,
10451–10456. [CrossRef]
24. Wu, H.; Hu, R.; Zhou, T.; Li, C.; Meng, W.; Yang, J. A novel efficient boron-doped LaFeO3 photocatalyst
with large specific surface area for phenol degradation under simulated sunlight. CrystEngComm 2015, 17,
3859–3865. [CrossRef]
25. Ju, L.; Chen, Z.; Fang, L.; Dong, W.; Zheng, F.; Shen, M. Sol-Gel Synthesis and Photo-Fenton-Like Catalytic
Activity of EuFeO3 Nanoparticles. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 94, 3418–3424. [CrossRef]
26. Thirumalairajan, S.; Girija, K.; Ganesh, I.; Mangalaraj, D.; Viswanathan, C.; Balamurugan, A. Controlled
synthesis of perovskite LaFeO3 microsphere composed of nanoparticles via self-assembly process and their
associated photocatalytic activity. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 209, 420–428. [CrossRef]
27. Dong, G.; Zhang, L. Porous structure dependent photoreactivity of graphitic carbon nitride under visible
light. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 1160–1166. [CrossRef]
28. Li, K.; Wang, D.; Wu, F.; Xie, T.; Li, T. Surface electronic states and photovoltage gas-sensitive characters of
nanocrystalline LaFeO3 . Mater. Chem. Phys. 2000, 64, 269–272. [CrossRef]
29. Marschall, R.; Soldat, J.; Wark, M. Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen generation from barium tantalate
composites. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2013, 12, 671–677. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Qi, X.; Zhou, J.; Yue, Z.; Gui, Z.; Li, L. Auto-combustion synthesis of nanocrystalline LaFeO3 . Mater. Chem.
Phys. 2002, 78, 25–29. [CrossRef]
31. Rida, K.; Benabbas, A.; Bouremmad, F.; Pena, A.M.; Sastre, E.; Martinez, A. Effect of calcination temperature
on the structural characteristics and catalytic activity for propene combustion of sol-gel derived lanthanum
chromite perovskite. Appl. Catal. A 2007, 327, 173–179. [CrossRef]
32. Thirumalairajan, S.; Girija, K.; Hebalkar, Y.N.; Mangalaraj, D.; Viswanathan, C.; Ponpandian, N.
Shape evolution of perovskite LaFeO3 nanostructures: A systematic investigation of growth mechanism,
properties and morphology dependent photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 7549–7561. [CrossRef]
33. Zhang, J.; Li, M.; Feng, Z.; Chen, J.; Li, C. UV Raman spectroscopic study on TiO2 . I. Phase transformation at
the surface and in the bulk. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 927–935. [CrossRef]
34. Wu, W.; Liang, S.; Shen, L.; Ding, Z.; Zheng, H.; Su, W.; Wu, L. Preparation, characterization and enhanced
visible light photocatalytic activities of polyaniline/Bi3 NbO7 nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 520,
213–219. [CrossRef]
35. Yu, L.; Zhang, X.; Li, G.; Cao, Y.; Shao, Y.; Li, D. Highly efficient Bi2 O2 CO3 /BiOCl photocatalyst based on
heterojunction with enhanced dye-sensitization under visible light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 187, 301–309.
[CrossRef]
36. Ismael, M.; Elhaddad, E.; Taffa, H.D.; Wark, M. Synthesis of Phase Pure Hexagonal YFeO3 Perovskite as
Efficient Visible Light Active Photocatalyst. Catalysts 2017, 7, 326. [CrossRef]
37. Parida, M.K.; Reddy, H.K.; Martha, S.; Das, P.D.; Biswal, N. Fabrication of nanocrystalline LaFeO3 :
An efficient sol-gel auto-combustion assisted visible light responsive photocatalyst for water decomposition.
Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 12161–12168. [CrossRef]
38. Vaiano, V.; Iervolino, G.; Sannino, D. Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from Glucose on
Rh-Doped LaFeO3 . Chem. Eng. Trans. 2017, 60, 235–240.
39. Xu, K.; Feng, J. Superior photocatalytic performance of LaFeO3 /gC3 N4 heterojunction nanocomposites
under visible light irradiation. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 45369–45376. [CrossRef]
Catalysts 2019, 9, 342 15 of 15
40. Yang, H.; Yan, J.; Lu, Z.; Cheng, X.; Tang, Y. Photocatalytic activity evaluation of tetragonal CuFe2 O4
nanoparticles for the H2 evolution under visible light irradiation. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 476, 715–719.
[CrossRef]
41. Rekhila, G.; Bessekhouad, Y.; Trari, M. Visible light hydrogen production on the novel ferrite NiFe2 O4 . Int. J.
Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 6335–6343. [CrossRef]
42. Chen, X.; Zhou, B.; Yang, S.; Wu, H.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Pan, J.; Xiong, X. In situ construction of a SnO2 /g-C3 N4
heterojunction for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 68953–68963. [CrossRef]
43. He, M.Y.; Cai, J.; Zhang, H.L.; Wang, X.X.; Lin, J.H.; Teng, T.B.; Zhao, H.L.; Weng, Z.W.; Wan, L.H.;
Fan, M. Comparing Two New Composite Photocatalysts, t-LaVO4 /g-C3 N4 and m-LaVO4 /g-C3 N4 , for Their
Structures and Performances. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 5905–5915. [CrossRef]
44. Yu, T.H.; Quan, X.; Chen, S.; Zhao, M.H.; Zhang, B.Y. TiO2 –carbon nanotube heterojunction arrays with
a controllable thickness of TiO2 layer and their first application in photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol.
A Chem. 2008, 200, 301–306. [CrossRef]
45. Lim, J.; Monllor-Satocaa, D.; Jang, S.J.; Lee, S.; Choi, W. Visible light photocatalysis of fullerol-complexed
TiO2 enhanced by Nb doping. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 152–153, 233–240. [CrossRef]
46. Bi, P.Y.; Quyang, X.S.; Cao, Y.J.; Ye, H.J. Facile synthesis of rhombic dodecahedral AgX/Ag3 PO4 (X = Cl, Br, I)
heterocrystals with enhanced photocatalytic properties and stabilities. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13,
10071–10075. [CrossRef]
47. Hong, S.; Lee, S.; Jang, S.J.; Lee, S.J. Heterojunction BiVO4 /WO3 electrodes for enhanced photoactivity of
water oxidation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 1781–1787. [CrossRef]
48. Li, X.; Ye, J. Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B over Pb3 Nb4 O13 /Fumed SiO2 Composite under
Visible Light Irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 13109–13116. [CrossRef]
49. Merka, O.; Yarovyi, V.; Bahnemann, D.W.; Wark, M. pH-Control of the Photocatalytic Degradation
Mechanism of Rhodamine B over Pb3 Nb4 O13 . J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 8014–8023. [CrossRef]
50. Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Lin, H.; Nong, Q.; Wu, Y.; Wu, T.; He, Y. Synthesis and characterization of ZrO2 /g-C3 N4
composite with enhanced visible-light photoactivity for rhodamine degradation. RSC Adv. 2014, 4,
40029–40035. [CrossRef]
51. Ohtani, B. Photocatalysis A to Z- what we know and what we do not know in a scientific sense. J. Photochem.
Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2010, 11, 157–178. [CrossRef]
52. Liu, W.; Wang, M.; Xu, C.; Chen, S. Chem. Facile synthesis of g-C3 N4 /ZnO composite with enhanced visible
light photooxidation and photoreduction properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 209, 386–393. [CrossRef]
53. Yu, J.; Dai, G.; Cheng, B. Effect of Crystallization Methods on Morphology and Photocatalytic Activity of
Anodized TiO2 Nanotube Array Films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 19378–19385. [CrossRef]
54. He, M.Y.; Cai, J.; Li, T.T.; Wu, Y.; Lin, J.H.; Zhao, H.L.; Luo, F.M. Efficient degradation of RhB over
GdVO4 /g-C3 N4 composites under visible-light irradiation. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 215–216, 721–730. [CrossRef]
55. Yang, X.; Cui, H.; Li, Y.; Qin, J.; Zhang, R.; Tang, H. Fabrication of Ag3 PO4 -Graphene Composites with
Highly Efficient and Stable Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 363–369. [CrossRef]
56. Wang, F.D.; Kako, T.; Ye, H.J. Efficient Photocatalytic Decomposition of Acetaldehyde over a Solid-Solution
Perovskite (Ag0.75 Sr0.25 )(Nb0.75 Ti0.25 )O3 under Visible-Light Irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
2724–2725. [CrossRef]
57. Kormali, P.; Triantis, T.; Dimotikali, D.; Hiskia, A.; Papaconstantinou, E. On the photooxidative behavior of
TiO2 and PW12 O40 3− : OH radicals versus holes. Appl. Catal. B 2006, 68, 139–146. [CrossRef]
58. Chen, Y.-L.; Zhang, D.-W. A Simple Strategy for the preparation of g-C3 N4 /SnO2 Nanocomposite
Photocatalysts. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2014, 6, 1091–1098. [CrossRef]
59. Pirzada, M.B.; Kunchala, K.R.P.; Naidu, S.B. Synthesis of LaFeO3 /Ag2 CO3 Nanocomposites for
Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B and p-Chlorophenol under Natural Sunlight. ACS Omega
2019, 4, 2618–2629. [CrossRef]
60. Hu, R.; Li, C.; Wang, X.; Sun, Y.; Jia, H.; Su, H.; Zhang, Y. Photocatalytic activities of LaFeO3 and La2 FeTiO6
in p-chlorophenol degradation under visible light. Catal. Commun. 2012, 29, 35–39. [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).