Assignment
Assignment
Answer:
Cost through Bridge 3 = 140
Cost through Bridge 4 = 20
Total cost = 140+20 = 160
L = 100/160 = 6.25 Mbps.
iv. If any one of the line speeds is increased, in general it would expected that the
maximum possible throughput on the links in the spanning tree would also
increase. This is not always the case though. Show an example for the
network below, where the maximum possible throughput supported between
two given bridges actually goes down, when one of the link speeds is
increased. Assume that the line speeds are inversely proportional to the costs.
Answer:
Q5
The figure below shows a university internal network. All the lines can support
transmissions at 300 Mbps in both directions. The switches are full duplex. Also each
switch can switch as many packets per second as the network can offer on its ports.
i) What is the maximum aggregate throughput that can be supported on this
network (in other words, find a scenario in which the largest amount of data
is being transmitted between pairs of devices at the same time)?
Answer:
The maximum aggregate throughput is the one that can be attained only is there is no
bottleneck situation in the network.
Bottleneck: When many data packets travel through the same switch and that causes
delay in the transmission of data packets through the network. Which reduces the
throughput of the network.
So, the maximum aggregate throughput of this network will be 300 Mbps.
ii) If the line speeds of the connections between servers A and B and the top
switch in the figure were increased to 600 Mbps, would the aggregate
throughput in your answer to i) increase?
Answer:
Increasing line speed doesn't necessarily increase the throughput. It may increase the
traffic in the network and increase the bottleneck.