Elson 1976
Elson 1976
Elson 1976
C. M. ELSON*
A.R.C. Unit of Nitrogen Fixation, University of Sussex, Brighton NBl 9QJ, Sussex, U.K.
Received July 17, 1975
* Present address: Department of Chemistry, Saint Mary’s The electrochemical techniques of cyclic voltammetry
University, Halifax B3H 3C3, Nova Scotia, Canada. and chronoamperometry were found to be the most
-t
210 C. M. Elson
r
truns-[Mo(Nz)zdpez]-e- P truns-[Mo(N&
4df (1)
truns-[Mo(N&dpe$ % bans-[MO(S),
dpe$ + 2N (2)
ia
where S is a solvent molecule derived from the electro-
lyte.
From the cyclic voltammograms, it was established
I
zspa
and 3500 cm-’ and at 1080 cm-‘]. When A was dis- The reaction was envisioned as proceeding in two
solved in thf-MeOH-LiC10, and allowed to stand for steps: the first step was rate determining and involved
several hours, a reversible oxidation wave appeared at the dissociation of one of the coordinated Nz groups;
Ep, = -0.71V and Ep, = -0.79V. Hence, the main subsequently, the second Nz ligand was very rapidly
products of the gross-scale oxidation of A in perchlorate replaced. Such a mechanism was supported by cyclic
media were truns-[Mo(S)zdpez]+ (where S is a mole- voltammetry which detected only truns-[Mo(NJz
cule of the electrolyte) and a higher oxidation state dpe$ and truns-[Mo(S)zdpez]+ between + 1.0 and
molybdenum species. -1 .OV. Moreover, a dissociative pathway was predicted
by the large positive entropies of activation and by the
decreased rate in the 52 % methanol electrolyte. Transi-
Discussion tion states which are less polar than the reactants are
implicated when the rate constant decreases as the
The decomposition reaction involved the loss of the dielectric constant of the medium increases13. Since
ligating N2 groups from trans-[Mo(N&dpe$, A+. coordinated dinitrogen has been found to be negatively
The lability of the dinitrogen groups was demonstrated charged when bound to rheniumI and molybdenum4,
by both the electrolytic oxidation of A in perchlorate an activated complex of reduced polarity was expected
media which produced truns-[Mo(S)2dpez]f and by when a molybdenum-dinitrogen bond was cleaved. By
heterogeneous ferric chloride oxidations of A in etha- comparison, attack of a solvent molecule (MeOH or
nol which yielded N, (0.2-1.0 mol/Mo) and truns- thf) in an associative mechanism would have preserved
[MoClzdpez][FeC14]6. George and Siebold have also or enhanced the polarity of the transition state.
reported that tr~ns-[Mo(N~)~dpe~]I~ decomposed in The controlled potential oxidations of A at O.OV
solution with loss of Nz. produced truns-[MoC12dpez] and [runs-[MoClzdpeJc
The electrochemical behaviour eliminated mecha- in chloride media and fruns-[Mo(S)zdpez]+ and a
nisms of decomposition involving disproportionation of higher oxidation state molybdenum complex in the
A+ or reduction of A+ by solvent since both these pro- perchlorate electrolyte. Therefore, it appeared that the
cesses would produce A near the electrode surface and initial product of the decomposition reaction, rrurans-
it was found that diffusion alone brought A to the [Mo(S),dpe2]+, disproportionated relatively slowly:
electrode. Furthermore, since the reaction obeyed
pseudo-first order kinetics and the rate constant was 2 truns-[Mo(S)2dpez]f + truns-[Mo(S)zdpe2]
independent of concentration of A, a dimerisation reac- + truns-[Mo(S)zdpez]2+ (3)
tion was ruled out.
Volumes of activation could not be calculated from In the lithium chloride electrolyte, the molybdenum(I1)
the results of the elevated pressure studies since the dication reacted with chloride ions to generate the
applied pressures were insufficient to produce a linear known complex, truns-[MoClzdpez]. It was unlikely
plot of log(k,/kl) versus pressure. However, since the that chloride reacted directly with truns-[Mo(S)zdpez]+
same results were obtained with nitrogen and argon since chloride was not involved in the decomposition
gases between O-150 atm, it was apparent that A+ step and, since reduction of truns-[MoCl,dpe,] did not
was not stabilised by increased pressure of Nz and that yield a stable MO(~) chloro complex but, instead,
the back reaction (reverse of 2) could be neglected in truns-[Mo(S)2dpez] was produced4. The dichloride
the kinetic treatment. complex was oxidisable at -0.13V and was, therefore,
The similarities in the activation energies and entro- converted under the electrolysis conditions to truns-
pies determined in chloride and perchlorate electrolytes [MoC12dpe2]+. Furthermore, the other disproportiona-
indicated that the same mechanism was operative in tion product, truns-[Mo(S)2dpe,] (Ep, = -0.72V), was
both media. Also, since the rate constants at 25°C in oxidised to regenerate truns-[Mo(S)zdpe2]+. Such a
the two electrolytes differed by only 30%, it was con- reaction sequence accounted for the prolonged electro-
cluded that the rate determining step did not involve lyses and the production of some truns-[MoCl,dpe,]
the attack of anions on A+. Therefore, the N2 ligands [FeC&] when trurzs-[Mo(N&dpeJ was oxidised under
were replaced by solvent molecules. It was not possible homogeneous condition8 by one equivalent of ferric
to distinguish whether thf or MeOH was the entering chloride. In the perchlorate media, truns-[Mo(S)2dpez]+
group since the rate constants determined in the 26% could have been formed either directly from the decom-
and 52% MeOH electrolytes differed by only 25 %. position of A+ or by oxidation of the disproportionation
However, the infrared spectrum of the products of the product, truns-[Mo(S)zdpe2]. However, since a mo-
bulk-scale oxidation of A in perchlorate media was lybdenum complex in an oxidation state greater than
consistent with the formulation, truns-[Mo(MeOH)l one was observed, disproportionation also occurred in
dpez][C104] which suggested that methanol was the the perchlorate electrolyte. The failure to produce
entering group but satisfactory elemental analysis could stable MO(I) species by reduction of truns-[MoC&dpe,]
not be obtained. further supported the disproportionation scheme.
Molybdenum(Z) Dinitrogen Complex 213
References 7 T.A. George and C.D. Siebold, Znorg. Chem., 12, 2548
(1973).
1 a) J. Chatt, G. A. Heath and R.L. Richards, Chem. Comm., 8 R.S. Nicholson and I. Shain, Analyt. Chem., 36, 706
444 (1972). b) ibid., 1010. (1964).
2 J. Chatt, A.J. Pearman and R.L. Richards, Nature, 253 9 P.A. Malachesky, Analyt. Chem., 41, 1493 (1969).
(5486), 39 (1975). 10 W. M. Schwarz and I. Shain, J. Phys. Chem., 69,30 (1965).
3 a) Chem. Eng. News, ~1.5 (Sept. 24, 1973). b) E.E. van 11 S. P. Perone and W. J. Kretlow, Analyt. Chem., 38, 1760
Tamelen, J.A. Gladys2 and C.R. Brulet, J. Am. Chem. (1966).
SOL, 96, 3020 (1974). 12 K. J. Laidler, “Reaction Kinetics”, Vol I, Pergamon Press,
4 J. Chatt, C. M. Elson and G. J. Leigh, unpublished results. 69 (1963).
5 T.A. George and CD. Siebold, J. Am. Chem. Sot., 94, 13 F. Basolo and R.G. Pearson, “Mechanisms of Inorganic
6859 (1972). Reactions”, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1967, ~291.
6 J. Chatt, C.M. Elson and R.L. Richards, Chem. Comm., 14 J. Chatt, C.M. Elson, N.E. Hooper and G.J. Leigh, J.
189 (1974) plus unpublished results. Chem. Sot. Dalton Trans., 2392 (1975).