BSPH413 - Final Year PT1
BSPH413 - Final Year PT1
BSPH413 - Final Year PT1
PART 1
Lesson One.
Introduction.
Many professionals in various disciplines do keep on wondering why bother
ourselves about management. The reason for this feeling is that, it is often assumed
that anybody can perform the role of a manager. In other words, they see no need
for taking courses in management as a discipline. Perhaps this is often because
many senior- administrative officers got to such managerial Positions through the
length of period at work and through promotion. Although these assumptions may
have some basis, yet the perception is totally wrong. Nowadays, it is realized that
prudent management of resources, is the key to successful organizations and so the
knowledge of management is very fundamental as part of the training of every
professional (H.A. Akinsola; Principles of Health Administration and
Management, 2007).
In fact, one most important and vital activity of man is managing. No doubt, man
is a social being and therefore the desire to form groups to accomplish those aims
they could not achieve as individuals. In the process of achieving their aims as a
group, they saw management as being essential to ensure the coordination of their
efforts.
Nowadays, society has come to rely increasingly on group efforts, which has made
the task of managers become large, complex and of course important. Everyone,
including students and other professionals who want to improve their
understanding of the organization in which they work, will benefit from this small
management handout.
It is for people in all kinds of organizations. This is because all Managers undertake
the same basic functions irrespective of the organization to obtain results by
establishing an environment for effective and efficient performance of individuals
working together in groups to achieve the organizational goals.
By the end of this course, you will gain:
In recent time, job descriptions have greatly improved and as a result, they
have become a useful basis for a discussion of this kind. Reaching agreement
requires both parties to express their views. Often at work, talking together and
meeting lace-to-face is really the only way to observe rule l. What is more, it
will be necessary to have regular discussions to check that both parties are in
agreement.
Rule 3: Feedback
Once people know what is expected of them and have the skills and resources
to achieve it, then there is need for them to receive regular feedback on
whether they are on the right track. This will enable them to increase their
effort in one or more areas if necessary. The importance of giving a feedback
cannot be over emphasized, it is receiving feedback, either expressed or
observed, that people improve their skills, develop and grow. We therefore
owe a feedback to the people we are working with, especially those we are
managerially responsible for. A Feedback must be given to them to enable
them to progress.
However, it must be borne in mind that the way a feedback is given, makes
the difference. Criticism may be so wounding that instead of enabling the
recipient to change and grow, it robs him/her off the confidence to attempt any
change and this situation can often exacerbate the problem.
Organizational Management.
Organizational Management is based on the concept of how organizations
function with reference to:
a) Organizational Structure.
b) The process of Leadership.
c) Change Management.
d) Teamwork.
The structure of any organization consists of units and functions. These units
and functions contain positions in which job holders are accountable for
achieving results. In between these positions, relationships exist which require
the exercise of an authority and an exchange of information. There is what is
generally referred to as a “chain of command” which starts from the top defining
a hierarchy of positions, indicating who is accountable to whom and for what.
Today, views are different. Many Technical Schools and Universities now provide
Courses for Planners and Managers. As a result, there are increasing numbers of
Planning Professionals, many of whom are Doctors, Nurses, economist and even
Public Health Specialists. However, although these courses help to develop skills in
the technical aspects, such as Cost Benefit analysis, yet they do not always help
Planners to understand how Professionals and Beneficiaries think and relate to each
other.
The Theory of Management.
It is quite appropriate to know what a theory is, before you can confidently discuss its
processes and other important issues about it. In this respect therefore, I will suggest we
know what a theory is before we go to look at the actual processes involved.
Homans an outstanding scholar of management, defined theory as a systematic
grouping of interdependent concepts and principles that give a framework to or
tie-together a significant area of knowledge. A theory according to Homans is, "A
set of pigeonholes or a filing cabinet, in which facts are accumulated and nothing
is more lost, than a loose fact."
You must realize however, that naturally, theories reflect the thinking and attitudes
of their time but at any rate, they still tend to have a lot of influence on today’s
organizational methods and ideas.
Scientific Approach.
According to Frederick Winslow Taylor, it was proposed that Scientific Approach or
classical management Theory focuses on fundamental principles, which he thought
were the underlying facts that could be appropriately applied to any organization.
The main principle of Taylor's Classical or Scientific Theory was the replacement
of custom and the rule of thumb by the application of scientific methods, which
could yield productivity without the expenditure of more human energy and effort.
Taylor believed that with division of labor, that is dividing a piece of work into its
actual constituent parts, productivity can be increased and there will be a rise in
the pay of the workers as well.
Taylor's aim was to increase the efficiency of production methods, not just to lower
organizational cost and increase production but also to enable the workers to
increase their earning wages, it can conclusively be said that the scientific
approach to management focused more on organizational structure.
focused more on the people doing the work in the organization. Human Relations
was about the social needs of the people, their motivation and behavior, The point
made in this approach was that workers could become highly motivated by being
part of a social working group and by being consulted by management about
changes in work practices.
This approach does not focus only on one aspect of an organization, like the
scientific or human relations approaches. The systems approach is focused on the
organization as one complete entity, that is the people, structure, environment
and technology, The organization is seen as a collection of interrelated and
interacting part, which is viewed as a whole.
The Open Systems theory dictates that all organizational elements, people,
structure, environment and technology have to be considered as a cohesive whole
and not as separate items. It can either be opened or closed. Open system interacts
with its external environments, while a closed system is regarded as a self-
supporting from within.