Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Delegated Legislation

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Delegated legislation

Delegated legislation refers to the process by which the legislative


authority of a government is delegated to a subordinate authority or body.
This delegated authority is usually given to administrative agencies, local
government bodies, or other organizations to make rules, regulations, and
by-laws that have the force of law.

Delegated legislation is often used to allow for more efficient and effective
regulation of complex areas, where the legislative process may be too
slow or cumbersome to keep up with changing circumstances. For
example, delegated legislation may be used to regulate technical areas
such as health and safety, environmental protection, or taxation.

The powers and limits of delegated legislation are usually set out in the
constitution or other governing laws. These limits may include restrictions
on the types of rules that can be made, the scope of their application, and
the procedures that must be followed in making and enforcing them.

Delegated legislation is subject to the same legal requirements and


standards as legislation made by the legislative authority. This includes
requirements for procedural fairness, accountability, and the protection of
fundamental rights and freedoms.

Delegated legislation is often reviewed by courts or other bodies to ensure


that it complies with the legal framework within which it is made. If a
court finds that delegated legislation is inconsistent with the constitution
or other laws, it may declare it invalid or unconstitutional.

Delegated legislation is necessary for several reasons:

1. Efficiency: Delegated legislation allows for a more efficient law-making


process, as it allows technical and detailed rules and regulations to be
made quickly by those with expertise in the subject matter. This helps to
ensure that laws are up-to-date and reflect the needs of society.
2. Flexibility: Delegated legislation provides flexibility to the primary law-
making authority, allowing it to delegate responsibility to other bodies to
make laws in areas where there may be frequent changes or where
detailed knowledge is required. This allows for greater adaptability to
changing circumstances and avoids the need for frequent amendments to
primary legislation.
3. Specialization: Delegated legislation allows for specialized bodies to make
rules and regulations in their areas of expertise, such as healthcare or
education. This ensures that laws are made by those with the necessary
knowledge and experience, resulting in better-quality legislation.
4. Public consultation: Delegated legislation often involves a process of
public consultation, providing an opportunity for stakeholders to provide
feedback on proposed rules and regulations. This helps to ensure that the
laws made are in the public interest and reflect the needs of society .

Delegated legislation can be classified in various ways, including:

1. Statutory Instruments: These are the most common type of delegated legislation and are
made by government ministers or other bodies empowered by the primary legislation.
Statutory Instruments are often used to provide details or regulations on how a particular Act
of Parliament should be implemented.

2. Orders in Council: These are made by the Privy Council, which is a group of advisors to the
monarch. Orders in Council are used for matters that are of great importance, such as national
security, and are often made in response to emergencies.

3. Bylaws: These are made by local authorities, such as councils or local boards, to regulate
matters in their local areas. Bylaws are often used for issues such as parking restrictions,
noise levels, and waste management.

4. Rules and Regulations: These are made by government agencies, such as the Financial
Conduct Authority or the Health and Safety Executive. Rules and regulations are used to
implement the primary legislation in a specific sector or area.

5. Codes of Practice: These are issued by government bodies, professional associations, or


other organizations to provide guidance on how to comply with specific legislation. Codes of
practice are often used in areas such as health and safety, employment, and environmental
protection.

Constitutionality of delegated legislation

Delegated legislation refers to laws or regulations made by administrative


agencies, under authority delegated to them by the legislative branch of
government. The question of the constitutionality of delegated legislation
depends on the specific circumstances and the legal framework of the
country in question.

In general, delegated legislation must comply with the constitution of the


country, which sets out the fundamental principles and rules governing
the exercise of governmental power. In many countries, the constitution
provides specific limits on the power of administrative agencies to make
laws or regulations, such as requirements for public notice and comment,
or limitations on the scope of delegated authority.

The constitutionality of delegated legislation may also depend on the


extent of the delegation of legislative power from the legislative branch to
the administrative agency. In some cases, the delegation of power may be
so broad that it violates the separation of powers doctrine, which seeks to
prevent any one branch of government from accumulating too much
power.

Courts may be called upon to decide whether a particular instance of


delegated legislation is constitutional, and may consider factors such as
the nature and scope of the delegated power, the procedural safeguards
in place, and the impact of the delegated legislation on individual rights
and interests. Ultimately, the question of the constitutionality of delegated
legislation depends on the specific circumstances of each case and the
legal framework in which it is considered.

Cases on constitutionality of delegated legislation


There have been numerous cases throughout history in various countries
that have addressed the constitutionality of delegated legislation. Here
are a few examples from different legal systems:

1. United States - Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc. (2001) This


case concerned the constitutionality of an Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) regulation that set new air quality standards for particulate
matter. The Supreme Court held that the regulation was unconstitutional
because it delegated too much legislative power to the EPA without
providing clear guidance to the agency.
2. United Kingdom - R (Anderson) v. Secretary of State for the Home
Department (2002) This case involved a challenge to a regulation made
by the Secretary of State that restricted the right of prisoners to receive
certain publications. The Court of Appeal held that the regulation was
unconstitutional because it was not made within the scope of the powers
delegated to the Secretary of State by Parliament.
3. India - L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) This case concerned the
constitutionality of a law that allowed administrative tribunals to
adjudicate disputes in place of regular courts. The Supreme Court held
that the law was constitutional because it did not completely deprive the
jurisdiction of regular courts and provided sufficient safeguards to ensure
fairness.
4. Australia - Coco v. The Queen (1994) This case involved a challenge to a
regulation made by the Governor-General under the Customs Act 1901
(Cth) that prohibited the importation of a certain substance. The High
Court held that the regulation was unconstitutional because it conferred
too much legislative power on the executive branch without adequate
parliamentary control.

These cases illustrate some of the key issues that arise when considering
the constitutionality of delegated legislation, including the scope of
delegated power, the need for clear guidance and procedural safeguards,
and the balance between executive and legislative authority.

You might also like