Buforin Cu Activitate Anticancer-1
Buforin Cu Activitate Anticancer-1
Buforin Cu Activitate Anticancer-1
Peptides
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/peptides
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Buforin IIb is a novel cell-penetrating anticancer peptide derived from histone H2A. In this study, we
Received 21 December 2010 enhanced the cancer targeting specificity of buforin IIb using a tumor-associated enzyme-controlled
Received in revised form 12 February 2011 activation strategy. Buforin IIb was fused with an anionic peptide (modified magainin intervening
Accepted 12 February 2011
sequence, MMIS), which neutralizes the positive charge of buforin IIb and thus renders it inactive, via a
Available online 18 February 2011
matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)-cleavable linker. The resulting MMIS:buforin IIb fusion peptide was
completely inactive against MMPs-nonproducing cells. However, when the fusion peptide was admin-
Keywords:
istrated to MMPs-producing cancer cells, it regained the killing activity by releasing free buforin IIb
Buforin IIb
Anticancer peptide
through MMPs-mediated cleavage. Moreover, the activity of the fusion peptide toward MMPs-producing
Antimicrobial peptide cancer cells was significantly decreased when the cells were pretreated with a MMP inhibitor. Taken
Fusion peptide together, these data indicate that the cancer targeting specificity of MMIS:buforin IIb is enhanced com-
Matrix metalloproteinase pared to the parent peptide by reactivation at the specialized areas where MMPs are pathologically
produced.
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
0196-9781/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2011.02.010
896 J.H. Jang et al. / Peptides 32 (2011) 895–899
Fig. 1. Cell viability of the MMPs-nonproducing cancer cells treated with buforin IIb and MMIS:buforin IIb. (A) In vitro cytotoxicity. Buforin IIb (䊉) or MMIS:buforin IIb ()
was added to FSF and HeLa cells. After a 24-h incubation with the peptides, cell viability was measured by the MTT assay. (B) Hemolytic activity. Fresh RBC suspension was
incubated with peptides. The release of hemoglobin into supernatant was monitored to indicate the membrane damage of RBC. Data in (A) and (B) represent the mean ± SD
of 3 independent experiments. Error bars in (B) are smaller than the size of the symbols and are not shown in the figure.
2.6. Gelatin zymography tested against HeLa cells, the free buforin IIb released from the
fusion peptide (IAGQ-buforin IIb) had the same cytotoxic activ-
Cells were grown to about 70% confluence before the growth ity as the parent peptide, which indicated that the four amino
media was exchanged to the serum-free media. After 72 h of incu- acids (IAGQ) added to the N-terminal of buforin IIb as a result of
bation, the conditioned media was collected by centrifugation MMPs-mediated cleavage had no adverse effects on the cytotoxic
and concentrated with Microcon YM-10 filters (Millipore, Biller- activity of buforin IIb (data not shown). These results showed that
ica, MA, USA). 10 g of the total protein was electrophoresed on a free buforin IIb was released from MMIS:buforin IIb by MMP-2 and
10% SDS–polyacrylamide gel containing 1 mg/ml gelatin (Sigma, St. MMP-9, and regained the cytotoxic activity.
Louis, MO, USA). The gel was washed twice for 20 min in 2.5% (v/v)
Triton X-100, and then incubated for 20 h at 37 ◦ C in the develop- 3.3. Cytotoxicity of MMIS:buforin IIb against MMPs-producing
ment buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2 , cancer cells
and 5 M ZnCl2 ). The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue
and destained. The white bands in the dark backgrounds indicate Based on the in vitro cleavage data, we assumed that the free
the presence of the gelatinases. buforin IIb can be released from MMIS:buforin IIb and regain the
cytotoxic activity if cancer cells secrete MMP-2 or MMP-9. To test
3. Results this hypothesis, we first checked the production of MMP-2 and
MMP-9 in four cancer cell lines (HeLa; B16-F0; HT1080; U87MG) by
3.1. Design of the MMIS:buforin IIb fusion peptide semi-quantitative RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 3A, HeLa did not express
either MMP-2 or MMP-9, while B16-F0 and HT1080 expressed both
Though buforin IIb displayed selective cytotoxicity against can- MMP-2 and MMP-9. In U87MG, MMP-2 was strongly expressed, but
cer cells, it also affected the viability of normal cells such as human MMP-9 was weakly expressed. The production of MMPs in these
fibroblasts and erythrocytes at higher concentrations. As shown cell lines was further confirmed by gelatin zymography of the cell-
in Fig. 1, buforin IIb killed 35.13 ± 4.66% of FSF at 8 M (A), and conditioned media. To examine whether MMP-2 and MMP-9 were
lysed 14.75 ± 0.14% of RBC at 50 M (B). Therefore, to increase secreted to the media, gelatinolytic activities of MMP-2 and MMP-
the specificity of buforin IIb toward cancer cells, we designed a 9 were analyzed using the conditioned media from the four cell
fusion peptide to generate a pro-form of buforin IIb that is inac- lines (Fig. 3B). No clear band was shown in the HeLa conditioned
tive by itself and becomes active when buforin IIb part is released
from the fusion peptide. We fused an anionic peptide (modified
magainin intervening sequence, MMIS) which can neutralize the
positive charge of buforin IIb and thus render it inactive [18], at
the N-terminal of buforin IIb. A MMP-2/MMP-9-cleavable linker
(GPLGIAGQ) was introduced at the fusion site of buforin IIb and
MMIS (Table 1). Unlike buforin IIb, the MMIS:buforin IIb fusion
peptide was completely inactive against human fibroblasts and ery-
throcytes at tested concentrations (Fig. 1). Moreover, it was also
inactive against HeLa cells, which display very little MMP-2 and
MMP-9 activity (Figs. 1A and 3). These results showed that the
fusion partner MMIS efficiently shielded the cytotoxicity of buforin
IIb, thus rendering the MMIS:buforin IIb fusion peptide inactive
against MMPs-nonproducing cells.
Fig. 5. The influence of MMP-2/MMP-9 inhibitor III pretreatment on the cell viabil-
ity. After treatment with MMP-2/MMP-9 inhibitor III, the viability of B16-F0, HT1080
and U87MG cells exposed to MMIS:buforin IIb was determined by the MTT assay.
Data represent the mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments.
Fig. 4. Cell viability of the MMPs-producing cancer cells treated with buforin IIb and MMIS:buforin IIb. After a 24-h incubation with buforin IIb (䊉) or MMIS:buforin IIb (),
the viability of B16-F0, HT1080 and U87MG cells was measured by the MTT assay. Data represent the mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments.
J.H. Jang et al. / Peptides 32 (2011) 895–899 899
Though buforin IIb showed greater specificity toward cancer by matrix metalloproteinase II and matrix metalloproteinase IX. Bioconjug
cells than other anticancer peptides, it also affected the viabil- Chem 2004;15:931–41.
[5] Chiarug V, Ruggiero M, Magnelli L. Angiogenesis and the unique nature of tumor
ity of normal cells such as human fibroblasts and erythrocytes at matrix. Mol Biotechnol 2002;21:85–90.
higher concentrations (Fig. 1). Therefore, to increase the specificity [6] Cho JH, Sung BH, Kim SC. Buforins:histone H2A-derived antimicrobial peptides
of buforin IIb toward cancer cells, tumor-associated enzyme- from toad stomach. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1788:1564–9.
[7] Davies B, Miles DW, Happerfield LC, Naylor MS, Bobrow LG, Rubens RD, et al.
controlled activation strategy was explored in this study. The Activity of type IV collagenases in benign and malignant breast disease. Br J
MMIS:buforin IIb fusion peptide was constructed by joining an Cancer 1993;67:1126–31.
anionic peptide and buforin IIb with a linker cleavable by the [8] Davies B, Waxman J, Wasan H, Abel P, Williams G, Krausz T, et al. Levels of matrix
metalloproteases in bladder cancer correlate with tumor grade and invasion.
tumor-associated enzymes MMP-2 and MMP-9 (Table 1). Because Cancer Res 1993;53:5365–9.
the positive charge is critical to the cytotoxicity of anticancer pep- [9] D’Errico A, Garbisa S, Liotta LA, Castronovo V, Stetler-Stevenson WG, Grigioni
tides such as buforin IIb [29], we reasoned that fusion with an WF. Augmentation of type IV collagenase, laminin receptor, and Ki67 prolif-
eration antigen associated with human colon, gastric, and breast carcinoma
anionic peptide would suppress the cytotoxic activity of buforin
progression. Mod Pathol 1991;4:239–46.
IIb by counterbalancing the overall positive charge. For an anionic [10] Egeblad M, Werb Z. New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer
fusion partner, a modified magainin intervening sequence (MMIS), progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:161–74.
which has been proven to efficiently shield the toxicity of expressed [11] Guo Z, Wang Q. Recent development in carbohydrate-based cancer vaccines.
Curr Opin Chem Biol 2009;13:608–17.
buforin IIb on the host Escherichia coli cells, was selected [18]. MMIS [12] Hamdy FC, Fadlon EJ, Cottam D, Lawry J, Thurrell W, Silcocks PB, et al. Matrix
and buforin IIb was joined by the octapeptide linker (GPLGIAGQ), metalloproteinase 9 expression in primary human prostatic adenocarcinoma
which is cleaved efficiently at the G–I bond by MMP-2 and MMP-9 and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br J Cancer 1994;69:177–82.
[13] Hanai N, Nakamura K, Shitara K. Recombinant antibodies against ganglioside
[21,24]. The embedded linker provides the targeting function since expressed on tumor cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2000;46 Suppl.:S13–7.
MMP-2 and MMP-9 are specifically overexpressed and secreted at [14] Holle L, Song W, Holle E, Wei Y, Wagner T, Yu X. A matrix metalloproteinase 2
tumor tissues. On contact with MMP-2 or MMP-9 producing cells, cleavable melittin/avidin conjugate specifically targets tumor cells in vitro and
in vivo. Int J Oncol 2003;22:93–8.
the embedded linker should be cleaved, restoring the cytotoxic [15] Hoskin DW, Ramamoorthy A. Studies on anticancer activities of antimicrobial
activity of the fusion peptide by releasing free buforin IIb. peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008;1778:357–75.
In agreement with our hypothesis, the MMIS:buforin IIb fusion [16] Kawasaki Y, Xu ZZ, Wang X, Park JY, Zhuang ZY, Tan PH, et al. Distinct roles of
matrix metalloproteases in the early- and late-phase development of neuro-
peptide exhibited MMPs-related selectivity. Cancer cells that pathic pain. Nat Med 2008;14:331–6.
expressed high amounts of MMPs (B16-F0, HT1080 and U87MG) [17] Lee HS, Park CB, Kim JM, Jang SA, Park IY, Kim MS, et al. Mechanism of
were sensitive to the fusion peptide (Fig. 4), whereas the MMPs- anticancer activity of buforin IIb, a histone H2A-derived peptide. Cancer Lett
2008;271:47–55.
deficient HeLa cells were resistant (Fig. 1A), suggesting that the
[18] Lee JH, Minn I, Park CB, Kim SC. Acidic peptide-mediated expression of the
anticancer activity of the fusion peptide was enzyme dependent. antimicrobial peptide buforin II as tandem repeats in Escherichia coli. Protein
This was supported by the facts that MMP-2/MMP-9 inhibitor III Expr Purif 1998;12:53–60.
was able to protect the MMPs-producing cancer cells from the [19] Lehrer RI, Lichtenstein AK, Ganz T. Defensins: antimicrobial and cytotoxic pep-
tides of mammalian cells. Annu Rev Immunol 1993;11:105–28.
cytotoxicity of the fusion peptide (Fig. 5) and MMP-2/MMP-9 pre- [20] Levy AT, Cioce V, Sobel ME, Garbisa S, Grigioni WF, Liotta LA, et al. Increased
digestion could restore the activity of the fusion peptide against expression of the Mr 72,000 type IV collagenase in human colonic adenocarci-
HeLa (data not shown). Taken together, these data indicate that noma. Cancer Res 1991;51:439–44.
[21] Mansour AM, Drevs J, Esser N, Hamada FM, Badary OA, Unger C, et al. A new
the cancer targeting specificity of MMIS:buforin IIb was enhanced approach for the treatment of malignant melanoma: enhanced antitumor effi-
compared to the parent peptide by reactivation at the specialized cacy of an albumin-binding doxorubicin prodrug that is cleaved by matrix
areas where MMPs are pathologically produced. Ongoing studies metalloproteinase 2. Cancer Res 2003;63:4062–6.
[22] Mott JD, Werb Z. Regulation of matrix biology by matrix metalloproteinases.
are aimed at evaluating the activity of MMIS:buforin IIb fusion pep- Curr Opin Cell Biol 2004;16:558–64.
tide and its potential as a therapeutic agent in vivo using xenograft [23] Naylor MS, Stamp GW, Davies BD, Balkwill FR. Expression and activity of MMPs
mouse models. Furthermore, the design strategy used in the con- and their regulators in ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 1994;58:50–6.
[24] Netzel-Arnett S, Sang QX, Moore WG, Navre M, Birkedal-Hansen H, Van Wart
struction of MMIS:buforin IIb, which joins an anionic peptide and an HE. Comparative sequence specificities of human 72- and 92-kDa gelati-
anticancer peptide with a linker cleavable by the tumor-associated nases (type IV collagenases) and PUMP (matrilysin). Biochemistry 1993;32:
enzymes MMP-2 and MMP-9, could be applied to increase the can- 6427–32.
[25] Papo N, Shai Y. Host defense peptides as new weapons in cancer treatment.
cer targeting specificity of other cationic anticancer peptides.
Cell Mol Life Sci 2005;62:784–90.
[26] Park CB, Yi KS, Matsuzaki K, Kim MS, Kim SC. Structure–activity analysis of
Acknowledgements buforin II, a histone H2A-derived antimicrobial peptide: the proline hinge is
responsible for the cell-penetrating ability of buforin II. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
2000;97:8245–50.
This work was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare [27] Parks WC, Wilson CL, Lopez-Boado YS. Matrix metalloproteinases as mod-
technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family ulators of inflammation and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4:
Affairs, Republic of Korea (A084115). 617–29.
[28] Perez-Tomas R. Multidrug resistance: retrospect and prospects in anti-cancer
drug treatment. Curr Med Chem 2006;13:1859–76.
References [29] Schweizer F. Cationic amphiphilic peptides with cancer-selective toxicity. Eur
J Pharmacol 2009;625:190–4.
[1] Aboudy Y, Mendelson E, Shalit I, Bessalle R, Fridkin M. Activity of two synthetic [30] Smith LL, Brown K, Carthew P, Lim CK, Martin EA, Styles J, et al. Chemopreven-
amphiphilic peptides and magainin-2 against herpes simplex virus types 1 and tion of breast cancer by tamoxifen: risks and opportunities. Crit Rev Toxicol
2. Int J Pept Protein Res 1994;43:573–82. 2000;30:571–94.
[2] Bitton RJ, Guthmann MD, Gabri MR, Carnero AJ, Alonso DF, Fainboim L, et al. [31] Sonnino S, Mauri L, Chigorno V, Prinetti A. Gangliosides as components of lipid
Cancer vaccines: an update with special focus on ganglioside antigens. Oncol membrane domains. Glycobiology 2007;17:1R–3R.
Rep 2002;9:267–76. [32] Vartak DG, Gemeinhart RA. Matrix metalloproteases: underutilized targets for
[3] Chau Y, Padera RF, Dang NM, Langer R. Antitumor efficacy of a novel drug delivery. J Drug Target 2007;15:1–20.
polymer–peptide–drug conjugate in human tumor xenograft models. Int J Can- [33] Woessner JF, Nagase H. Matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. New York:
cer 2006;118:1519–26. Oxford University Press; 2000.
[4] Chau Y, Tan FE, Langer R. Synthesis and characterization of [34] Yong VW. Metalloproteinases: mediators of pathology and regeneration in the
dextran–peptide–methotrexate conjugates for tumor targeting via mediation CNS. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005;6:931–44.